Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Paper
effectively the silylstannylation reaction to afford 2a and 3a in 3f in moderate yield with an erosion of the regioselectivity
quantitative yield with a high regioselectivity retained (2a : 3a = (entry 6), while alkynyl phosphonate 1g did not bring about
18 : 82) (entry 10). As shown in entry 11, the reaction at 0 °C any products (entry 7). As shown in entries 8–12, it was
did not bring about any significant improvement in regioselec- revealed that 1-substituted 4,4,4-trifluoropropargyl alcohol
tivity. In addition, switching the solvent from THF to Et2O, derivatives as a substrate were not good substrates for the silyl-
toluene, CH2Cl2, and 1,4-dioxane did not cause a substantial stannylation, resulting in a large amount recovery of starting
change in the regioselectivity (entries 12–15). Furthermore, the alkynes 1h–l.
reaction in high dilution conditions or under the influence of
5 mol% of the catalyst did not also lead to a satisfactory result dition B was examined. Thus, reaction of alkyne 1 with
(entries 16 and 17). 1.2 equiv. of Me3SiSnBu3 in the presence of 2.5 mol% of Pd(t-
Subsequently, the silylstannylation reaction under Con-
To extend the scope of the synthetic method, a broad range BuNC)2Cl2 in THF at room temperature for 6 h was performed,
of fluorine-containing alkynes 1 were tested for the present and the results are shown in entries 13–24. Alkynes carrying
silylstannylation by using Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (Condition A) or Pd(t- various types of aromatic groups with a substituent like
BuNC)2Cl2 (Condition B) as a catalyst.‡ The results are sum- p-MeO, m-MeO, o-MeO as well as p-Cl, p-EtO2C 1a–e were sub-
marized in Table 2.
jected well to the silylstannylation reaction to give the corres-
Reaction of fluorine-containing alkynes having an electron- ponding products in 82–90% yield with a high regioselectivity
donating group on the benzene ring, 1a–c with 1.2 equiv. of (2 : 3 up to 16 : 84) (entries 13–17). In the case of alkynes
Me3SiSnBu3 under Condition A took place sufficiently to having an ester or
a phosphonate as R, the reaction
provide the corresponding silylstannylated products in under Condition B was found to be sluggish, a large amount
56–75% yield with an excellent regioselectivity (2 : 3 to 90 : 10) of starting alkyne 1f–g being recovered (entries 18 and 19). In
(entries 1–3). The alkynes having an aromatic group substi- sharp contrast to the reactions under Condition A, 4,4,4-tri-
tuted by an electron-withdrawing group, such as p-ClC6H4 (1d) fluoropropargyl alcohol derivatives 1h–j having an aromatic or
and p-EtO2CC6H4 (1e), also underwent regioselective silylstan- aliphatic substituent at the 1-position could participate nicely
nylation to afford the adducts (63%; 2d : 3d = 83 : 17 for 1d, in silylstannylation to give rise to the corresponding silylstan-
65%; 2e : 3e = 77 : 23 for 1e) in a highly regioselective fashion nylated products in high to excellent yields (65–94%), though
(entries 4 and 5). The fluorine-containing alkynyl ester 1f the regioselectivity was somewhat eroded (entries 20–22).
reacted effectively to form the silylstannylated products 2f and Moreover, the 4,4,4-trifluoropropargyl ether derivative was also
found to be a relevant substrate to the present reaction with
Me3SiSnBu3 as well as Me2PhSiSnBu3,2c leading to the corres-
ponding adducts in 85% (2k : 3k = 58 : 42) and 62% yields
‡Typical procedure for the silylstannylation of 1-(4-chlorophenyl)3,3,3-trifluoro-
propyne (1d) under Condition A: To a solution of 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3,3,3-tri- (2k : 3k = 45 : 55), respectively, with no regioselectivity (entries
fluoropropyne (1d, 0.051 g, 0.25 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.007 g,
23 and 24).
0.00625 mmol, 2.5 mol%) in THF (2.5 mL) was added a THF solution of tri-
A determination of the stereochemistry of the silylstannyl-
ated products 2 and 3 was carried out on the basis of the
methyl(tributylstannyl)silane (0.109 g, 0.30 mmol) at room temperature. The
reaction was stirred for 6 h at 80 °C. The resulting mixture was then quenched
NMR analysis after appropriate stereospecific chemical
with H2O. The reaction mixture was extracted with Et2O three times. The com-
bined organic layers were dried over anhydride Na2SO4 and concentrated transformations.
in vacuo. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (hexane–AcOEt = 30 : 1)
Thus, the mixture of 2a and 3a (2a : 3a = 21 : 79) was treated
with 4.4 equiv. of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) in
THF–DMF (1/1) at room temperature for 48 h to form the
corresponding protodesilylstannylated product 4a in 93% yield
to afford the corresponding silylstannylated product (2d
+ 3d, 0.089 g,
0.16 mmol, 63%). 2d (Major isomer); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.31 (s, 9H), 0.80–1.45
(m, 18H), 0.85 (t, J = 7.39 Hz, 9H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.8 Hz,
2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.3, 13.8, 13.9, 27.6, 29.2, 125.0 (q, J = 283.5 Hz), 125.8
to 126.1 (m, 1C), 128.0, 131.0, 143.9 (q, J = 24.0 Hz), 146.1, 172.5 (q, J = 5.7 Hz); as a sole product (Scheme 3). The 4a, bearing a p-methoxy-
19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −49.70 (s, 3F); IR (neat) ν 2957, 2923, 2873, 1721, 1483, 1252,
1233, 1184, 1142, 1097, 1015, 962 cm−1
phenyl group, is a known compound,7 the characterization
data of which were completely in agreement with the reported
one, i.e. the stereochemistry of 4a was determined as Z con-
figuration. This strongly suggested that the silylstannylation
.
Typical procedure for the silylstannylation of 1d under Condition B: To a solu-
tion of 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3,3,3-trifluoropropyne (1d, 0.051 g, 0.25 mmol) and
Pd(t-BuNC)2Cl2 (0.002 g, 0.00625 mmol, 2.5 mol%) in THF (2.5 mL) was added a
THF solution of trimethyl(tributylstannyl)silane (0.109 g, 0.30 mmol) at room reaction to alkyne 1a took place in a cis-selective manner.
Additionally, selective destannylation8 of the 2a and 3a
(2a : 3a = 22 : 78) by treating with 30 equiv. of pyridinium
temperature. The reaction was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. The resulting
mixture was then quenched with H2O. The reaction mixture was extracted with
Et2O three times. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous
p-toluenesulfonate (PPTS) in MeOH at reflux temperature for
Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was chromatographed on silica
52 h led to the corresponding vinylsilanes 5a and 6a in 19%
gel (hexane–AcOEt = 30 : 1) to afford the corresponding silylstannylated product
(2d + 3d, 0.128 g, 0.23 mmol, 90%). 3d (Major isomer); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.06 and 81% yield, respectively (Scheme 4).
(s, 9H), 0.80–1.60 (m, 18H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.39 Hz, 9H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.23
The comparison with a spin–spin splitting pattern between
(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.1, 14.0 (q, J = 1.7 Hz), 14.3, 28.0, 29.5,
125.01 (q, J = 283.5 Hz), 126.4 (q, J = 2.5 Hz), 128.3, 132.1, 143.9, 147.5 (q, J =
28.6 Hz), 167.8 (q, J = 7.2 Hz); 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ −49.54 (s, 3F); IR (neat) ν 2957,
1
5a and 6a in 19F as well as H NMR enabled us to assign their
stereochemistry. Thus, both spin–spin splitting patterns of CF3
1
in 19F NMR and C(sp2)-H in H NMR of 5a were singlet, while
2855, 1547, 1484, 1465, 1420, 1377, 1232, 1184, 1139, 1095, 1015, 962 cm−1
HRMS (FAB) calcd for (M + Na) C24H40ClF3NaSiSn: 591.1460, found 591.1459.
;
those of 6a were doublet for CF3 and quartet for C(sp2)-H.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 1611–1617 | 1613