ChemComm
Communication
[HLiPrCr]2(NAd) (5), as shown in Fig. 2 (bottom). Only one imido with the a-diimine apparently being in the singly reduced state
group has been added across the Cr–Cr bond. Once again, we (see Table 1). The room temperature effective magnetic moment
suggest that a five-membered [2+3] cycloaddition product may of 7 was found to be 2.9(1) mB, consistent with a Cr(III) metal
be formed first, which rapidly extrudes N2. The bond distances center (S = 3/2) strongly coupled to a ligand radical (S = 1/2).
and angles of 5 are comparable to those of other known
In summary, reactivity studies on a quintuply bonded dichro-
bridging imido complexes of chromium.22–26 Similar to the mium complex supported by a-diimine ligands have been
geometries of the [2+2] cycloaddition products, the elongated extended to a variety of molecules. The products are varied and
Cr–Cr distance of 1.9575(11) Å is consistent with the two- their structures differ from those established for quintuply
electron oxidation of the Cr2 unit (to Cr(II)). 5 is also diamagnetic, bonded complexes supported by other ligands. A pervasive feature
presumably due to metal–metal quadruple bonding.
of 1 seems to be the formation of [2+n] cycloaddition products
Finally, we were interested in studying the reactivity of 1 with nonpolar substrates. Polar, heteroatomic multiple bonds on
toward unsaturated molecules featuring X–Y bonds (X, Y = C, N, O). the other hand effect complete cleavage of the metal–metal bond.
Exposure of a benzene solution of 1 to CO (1 atm) produced the
dark blue carbonyl HLiPrCr(CO)4, as confirmed by 1H NMR spectro-
scopy.21 The reaction of 1 with benzophenone resulted in dinuclear
[HLiPrCr(m-OPh2)]2 (6). The structure of 6 (shown in Fig. S2, ESI†)
reveals a benzophenone-bridged dimer with square planar Cr
centers. The average carbon–oxygen bond length of the benzo-
phenone is 1.355(5) Å, which is much longer than the 1.230(3) Å
in benzophenone,27 suggesting some degree of reduction of the
CQO bonds. The average bond lengths of C–C, C–N bonds of
the backbone of the a-diimine ligand are 1.360(6) and 1.336(6) Å,
consistent with those of a monoanionic diimine ligand.21 These
structural features suggest that 6 is a Cr(II) complex. Like
[HLiPrCr(m-Cl)]2,17 6 exhibited a simple isotropically shifted and
broadened 1H NMR spectrum in C6D6, with chemical shifts at 96,
14.6, 3.2, 1.56, and À13.0 ppm. meff(RT) of this complex was found
to be 5.1(2) mB (3.6(1) mB per chromium), which is consistent with
two antiferromagnetically coupled Cr(II) metal centers (S = 2)
coordinated by ligand radicals (S = 1/2).
This work was supported by the NSF (CHE-0911081).
Notes and references
1 A. Noor, T. Bauer, T. K. Todorova, B. Weber, L. Gagliardi and
R. Kempe, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 9825–9832.
2 E. S. Tamne, A. Noor, S. Qayyum, T. Bauer and R. Kempe,
Inorg. Chem., 2012, 52, 329–336.
3 C. Schwarzmaier, A. Noor, G. Glatz, M. Zabel, A. Y. Timoshkin,
B. M. Cossairt, C. C. Cummins, R. Kempe and M. Scheer,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 7283–7286.
4 A. Noor, E. S. Tamne, S. Qayyum, T. Bauer and R. Kempe, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2011, 17, 6900–6903.
5 A. Noor and R. Kempe, Chem. Rec., 2010, 10, 413–416.
6 F. R. Wagner, A. Noor and R. Kempe, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 529–536.
7 A. Noor, G. Glatz, R. Mu¨ller, M. Kaupp, S. Demeshko and R. Kempe,
Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 322–325.
8 A. Noor, F. R. Wagner and R. Kempe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
47, 7246–7249.
9 P.-F. Wu, S.-C. Liu, Y.-J. Shieh, T.-S. Kuo, G.-H. Lee, Y. Wang and
Y.-C. Tsai, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 4391–4393.
10 H.-G. Chen, H.-W. Hsueh, T.-S. Kuo and Y.-C. Tsai, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 10256–10260.
In contrast to 6, reductive coupling of CQN double bonds
was observed upon exposure of 1 to four equivalents of trans-
benzylideneaniline. The reaction was found to form the coupling
product, HLiPrCr(k2-N2C26H22) (7). The crystal structure is shown
in Fig. 3. 7 adopts tetrahedral coordination about chromium
11 S.-C. Liu, W.-L. Ke, J.-S. K. Yu, T.-S. Kuo and Y.-C. Tsai, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6394–6397.
12 Y. L. Huang, D. Y. Lu, H. C. Yu, J. S. Yu, C. W. Hsu, T. S. Kuo,
G. H. Lee, Y. Wang and Y. C. Tsai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51,
7781–7785.
13 Y.-C. Tsai, H.-Z. Chen, C.-C. Chang, J.-S. K. Yu, G.-H. Lee, Y. Wang
and T.-S. Kuo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 12534–12535.
14 Y. C. Tsai, C. W. Hsu, J. S. Yu, G. H. Lee, Y. Wang and T. S. Kuo,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7250–7253.
15 Y.-C. Tsai, Y.-M. Lin, J.-S. K. Yu and J.-K. Hwang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 13980–13981.
16 C. Ni, B. D. Ellis, G. J. Long and P. P. Power, Chem. Commun., 2009,
2332–2334.
17 K. A. Kreisel, G. P. Yap, O. Dmitrenko, C. R. Landis and
K. H. Theopold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 14162–14163.
18 J. Shen, G. P. Yap, J. P. Werner and K. H. Theopold, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 12191–12193.
19 L. Y. Goh and T. C. W. Mak, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1986,
1474–1475.
20 M. J. Calhorda and R. Hoffmann, Organometallics, 1986, 5, 2181–2187.
21 K. A. Kreisel, G. P. Yap and K. H. Theopold, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47,
5293–5303.
22 W. H. Monillas, G. P. A. Yap and K. H. Theopold, Inorg. Chim. Acta,
2011, 369, 103–119.
23 W. H. Monillas, G. P. Yap, L. A. MacAdams and K. H. Theopold,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 8090–8091.
24 A. A. Danopoulos, D. M. Hankin, G. Wilkinson, S. M. Cafferkey, T. K. N.
Sweet and M. B. Hursthouse, Polyhedron, 1997, 16, 3879–3892.
25 A. A. Danopoulos, G. Wilkinson, T. K. N. Sweet and
M. B. Hursthouse, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1995, 2111–2123.
26 B. Moubaraki, K. S. Murray, P. J. Nichols, S. Thomson and
B. O. West, Polyhedron, 1994, 13, 485–495.
27 E. B. Fleischer, N. Sung and S. Hawkinson, J. Phys. Chem., 1968, 72,
4311–4312.
Fig. 3 The molecular structure of 7 (30% probability level).
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 2579--2581 | 2581