ChemComm
Communication
which is common in both molecules. On the other hand, although
both compounds exhibit a reversible reduction process, the reduction
potentials are quite different (E1/2 = ꢀ0.87 V for 5 and ꢀ0.95 V for 6).
These are assigned to the reduction of pyrazinopyrazine (for 5) and
pyrazine (for 6) moieties. In addition, 5 exhibits another irreversible
reduction process at a slightly higher potential (ca. ꢀ1.1 V), but such a
process is observed at ca. ꢀ1.5 V in 6. This may be due to the further
reduction of the N-heterocyclic bridging units. From these results, it
can be concluded that the lowering of the bandgap in 5 compared to
that in 6 is due to the pyrazinopyrazine bridge.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a new and versatile synthetic
methodology for the synthesis of aromatic polycyclic molecules with
interesting optical and electronic properties. By this approach, mole-
cules with donor–acceptor units bridged by pyrazinopyrazine can be
synthesized easily by the reaction between derivatives of 1b and
various substituted 1,2-diketones. It can also be further extended to
the synthesis of functional polymeric materials.
The work reported in this communication was supported by the
Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region, China (HKU700311P, 700613P and T23-713/11). Partial
financial support from the Hong Kong/Macao Scholar Collaborative
Research Scheme, NSFC China (project no. 51328302) is also
acknowledged. The computational work was conducted in part
using the HKU Information Technology Services computing facilities
that are supported in part by the Hong Kong UGC Special
Equipment Grant (SEG HKU09).
Fig. 2 Spatial plots (isovalue = 0.02) of the HOMO and LUMO of (a) 5 and
(b) 6 in toluene from TDDFT calculations.
Table 2 HOMO and LUMO levels measured by cyclic voltammetry and
estimated from DFT calculations for 5 and 6
a
HOMO
(eV)
LUMO
(eV)
Eg
HOMOcalc
(eV)
LUMOcalc
(eV)
Compound
(eV)
Notes and references
5
6
ꢀ5.13
ꢀ5.08
ꢀ4.03
ꢀ3.47
1.10
1.61
ꢀ5.12
ꢀ5.20
ꢀ3.66
ꢀ3.02
1 C. Kitamura, S. Tanaka and Y. Yamashita, Chem. Mater., 1996, 8, 570.
2 D. D. Kenning, K. A. Mitchell, T. R. Calhoun, M. R. Funfar,
D. J. Sattler and S. C. Rasmussen, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 9073.
3 L. Wen, J. P. Nietfeld, C. M. Amb and S. C. Rasmussen, J. Org. Chem.,
2008, 73, 8529.
a
Bandgap estimated from the HOMO and LUMO levels measured by
cyclic voltammetry using dichloromethane as the solvent.
4 B. C. Thompson and J. M. J. Frechet, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
47, 58.
5 G. J. Richards, J. P. Hill, K. Okamoto, A. Shundo, M. Akada,
M. R. J. Elsegood, T. Mori and K. Ariga, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 8408.
6 G. J. Richards, J. P. Hill, N. K. Subbaiyan, F. D’Souza, P. A. Karr,
M. R. J. Elsegood, S. J. Teat, T. Mori and K. Ariga, J. Org. Chem., 2009,
74, 8914.
7 Y. Miura, H. Kawai, K. Fujiwara and T. Suzuki, Chem. Lett., 2011, 40, 975.
8 Z. He, R. Mao, D. Liu and Q. Miao, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 4190.
9 K. Isoda, M. Nakamura, T. Tatenuma, H. Ogata, T. Sugaya and
M. Tadokoro, Chem. Lett., 2012, 41, 937.
10 Y. Miura, H. Chiba, R. Katoono, H. Kawai, K. Fujiwara, S. Suzuki,
K. Okada and T. Suzuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 2012, 53, 6561.
11 O. Tverskoy, F. Rominger, A. Peters, H. J. Himmel and U. H. F. Bunz,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 3557.
the minor component is the p–p* transition. For the absorption
band observed in 5 at 400 nm, it is also assigned to similar mixed
transitions. Due to the contribution from the p–p* transition, the
solvatochromism exhibited is weaker for both molecules.
Table 2 summarizes the HOMO and LUMO levels of 5 and 6
measured by cyclic voltammetry and estimated from DFT calcula-
tions. The experimental values were calculated using ferrocene as
the internal standard. It can be seen that the HOMO levels for both 5
and 6 are similar, and the bandgaps (Eg) measured are 1.10 and
1.61 eV, respectively. The bandgaps are also consistent with the
optical bandgap estimated from the absorption spectra (1.05 and
1.73 eV for 5 and 6, measured in CH2Cl2, respectively). From DFT
calculations, the HOMO levels obtained agree quite well with the
12 B. D. Lindner, J. U. Engelhart, O. Tverskoy, A. L. Appleton,
F. Rominger, A. Peters, H. J. Himmel and U. H. F. Bunz, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8588.
experimental results, but the LUMO levels are consistently higher. 13 F. S. Miranda, A. M. Signori, J. Vicente, B. Souza, J. P. Priebe,
B. Szpoganicz, N. S. Goncalves and A. Neves, Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 5410.
14 H. W. Roesky and H. Hofmann, Anorg. Chem. Org. Chem. Teil B.,
The inconsistency is due to the fact that the calculated energy levels
were estimated from the neutral species whereas the energy levels
1984, 39b, 1315.
obtained from cyclic voltammetry are related to the radical ions.20
From the cyclic voltammogram (Fig. S3, ESI†), both 5 and 6
exhibit a reversible oxidation process (E1/2 = 0.31 V vs. ferro-
15 D. J. Park, A. G. Stern and R. L. Wilier, Synth. Commun., 1990,
20, 2901.
16 C. S. K. Mak, W. K. Cheung, Q. Y. Leung and W. K. Chan, Macromol.
Rapid Commun., 2010, 31, 875.
cene/ferrocenium couple), and another irreversible anodic peak 17 C. S. K. Mak, Q. Y. Leung, C. H. Li and W. K. Chan, J. Polym. Sci., Part
A: Polym. Chem., 2010, 48, 2311.
18 T. Yanai, D. P. Tew and N. C. Handy, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2004, 393, 51.
19 G. Scalmani and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, 114110.
at ca. 0.77 V. With reference to the TDDFT calculation results that
both HOMOs are dominated by the terthiophene, the anodic
processes are assigned to the oxidation of the terthiophene units, 20 K. K. Onchoke, Comput. Theor. Chem., 2011, 963, 40.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 4245--4247 | 4247