Macromolecules
Article
prove the magnetic field induced drug delivery, PVLPEG-
PVLDOXI-PCL-PHOS-Fe3O4 incubated 4T cells were ana-
lyzed using flow cytometer (Supporting Information, Figures
S17 and S18). It was studied in cell lines of a mouse mammary
gland cancer cell line (4T). 4T cells in suspension with
nanocapsule were taken in MACS magnetic column (Miltenyi
Biotec) and kept in the presence of magnetic field as shown in
(Figure 5a). 4T cells in suspension with nanocapsule without
magnetic field was treated as control. Since the nanocapsule
could give emission in the red spectrum due to DOX motif,
APC (Allophycocyanin; Ex- 640 nm and Em-660 nm) channel
was used to perform the flow cytometry analysis. Propidium
iodide experiment confirmed that only living cell populations
were being studied for the drug internalization under the
magnetic field (Supporting Information, Figure S17). It was
very interesting to note the clear intensity shift over cells while
comparing “with magnet” and “without magnet” in APC
channel. On the basis of the intensity shift, it was very
surprising to observe that the much greater internalization of
the nanocapsule in the presence of magnetic field (Supporting
Information, Figure S18). It is well-known that the internal-
ization concentration of a nanocapsule on a target cell actually
depends on the concentration of nanocapsules in extracellular
circumstance.20 So we hypothesized that due to the magnetic
field guiding transfer efficiency of drug vectors was improved.
The cellular uptake behavior of biodegradable nanocapsule was
analyzed using confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, LSM
710). It was obvious from the CLSM images (Figure 5b and c)
that the amount of internalization of DOXI on 4T cells
increased with increasing time as well as magnetic field in
comparison with the control molecule. The cell growth effect
PVLPEG-PVLDOXI-PCL-PHOS copolymer was determined
using trypan blue exclusion method. The effect of cell viability
(Figure 5d) was tested in 4T cells by incubating the
nanocapsules from the copolymer with different concentration,
(250, 500, and 750 μg). Most interestingly, the DOXI
conjugated nanocapsules showed an enhanced antitumor
activity, which could be due to a prolonged retention of the
nanocarrier in the nucleus.
study. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
G.M.N. thanks UGC for the research fellowship and N.V.K.
thank CSIR for the research fellowship. H.D. thanks the DST.
R.S. thanks the Department of Science and Technology, New
Delhi, India, for a Ramanujan fellowship. R.S. and J.D.S. thank
the IISER-Kolkata for providing the infrastructure and start up
funding. All authors thank Dr. Chiranjib Mitra, Department of
Physical Science, IISER-Kolkata, for the MPMS magnetometry
measurements and Koushik Chatterjee and Tanmoy Dalui for
the confocal studies.
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Duncan, R. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 688. (b) Duncan, R.
Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 347. (c) Duncan, R.; Kopecek. J. Nat.
Rev. 1984, 57, 51.
(2) (a) Duncan, R. Anti-Cancer Drugs 1992, 3, 175. (b) Nowicka, A.
M.; Kowalczyk, A.; Jarzebinska, A.; Donten, M.; Krysinski, P.; Stojek,
Z.; Augustin, E.; Mazerska, Z. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 828.
(c) Wei, H.; Zhuo, R. X.; Zhang, X. Z. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 503.
(d) Ge, Z.; Liu, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7289.
(3) (a) Singla, A. K.; Garg, A.; Aggarwal, D. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 235,
179. (b) Stukel, J. M.; Li, R. C.; Maynard, H. D.; Caplan, M. R.
Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 160. (c) Li, D.; Sun, H.; Ding, J.; Tang,
Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhuang, X.; Chen, X. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9,
8875.
(4) (a) Gillies, E. R.; Frechet, J. M. J. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16,
361. (b) Gillies, E. R.; Frechet, J. M. J. Chem. Commun. 2003, 14, 1640.
(c) Lehn, J.-M.; Eliseev, A. Science 2001, 291, 2331. (d) Gillies, E. R.;
Frechet, J. M. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 1295.
(5) (a) Maeda, H.; Wu, J.; Sawa, T.; Matsumura, Y.; Hori, K. J.
Controlled Release 2000, 65, 271. (b) Satav, S. S.; Bhat, S.;
Thayumanavan, S. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1735.
CONCLUSION
■
(6) Maisie, J.; Samantha, M.; Todd, E. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46,
1377.
In conclusion, we have designed and successfully synthesized a
PVLPEG-PVLDOXI-PCL-PHOS-Fe3O4 copolymer which can
be used as a nanocapsule for intracellular sustained delivery of
the antitumor drug DOXI. Most importantly, both Fe3O4, and
DOXI, are efficiently conjugated to the biodegradable
polymeric backbone. The resulting DOXI conjugated nano-
capsule exhibits controlled and pH-responsive drug-release
profile. The results clearly show the importance of having the
acylhydrazine linker which helps to release the drug at the mild
acidic condition. From the cell viability studies, it is clear that
the nanocapsules are very effective in inhibiting tumor cell
growth at low concentration in vitro. The newly designed
biodegradable nanocapsules provide a powerful magnetic
moment under moderate gradient magnetic fields. We envision
that our unique approach may open up a new avenue for more
effective cancer therapy through well-informed decision-
making.
(7) (a) Grubbs, R. H. Handbook of Metathesis; Wiley-VCH:
NewYork, 2003; Vol. 3. (b) Watson, K. J.; Park, S.-J.; Im, J.-H.;
Nguyen, S. T. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 3507. (c) Mortell, K. H.;
Gingras, M.; Kiessling, L. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 12053.
(8) Gillies, E. R.; Goodwin, A. P.; Frechet, J. M. J. Bioconjugate Chem.
2004, 15, 1254.
(9) (a) Albertsson, A. C.; Varma, I. K. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4,
1466. (b) Greenwald, D.; Shumway, S.; Albear, P.; Gottlieb, L. J. Surg.
Res. 1994, 56, 372. (c) Parrish, B.; Breitenkamp, R. B.; Emrick, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7404.
(10) (a) Padilla De Jesus, O. L.; Ihre, H. R.; Gagne, L.; Frechet, J. M.
J.; Szoka, F. C. Bioconjugate Chem. 2002, 13, 453. (b) Uhrich, K. E.;
Cannizzaro, S. M.; Langer, R. S.; Shakesheff, K. M. Chem. Rev. 1999,
99, 3181.
(11) (a) Mizutani, M.; Arnold, S. C.; Matsuda, T. Biomacromolecules
2002, 3, 668. (b) Nederberg, F.; Bowden, T.; Hilborn, J. Macro-
molecules 2004, 37, 954. (c) Cordova, A.; Iversen, T.; Hult, K. Polymer
1999, 40, 6709.
(12) (a) Rao, V. N.; Kishore, A.; Sarkar, S.; Das Sarma, J.;
Shunmugam, R. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2933. (b) Mane, S. R.;
Rao, V. N.; Chatterjee, K.; Dinda, H.; Nag, S.; Kishore, A.; Das Sarma,
J.; Shunmugam, R. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 19639.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
1
Experimental section, synthesis scheme of all monomers, H
NMR, 13C NMR and IR spectra of monomers, and a dialysis
(13) Herrmann, J. L.; Schlessinger, R. H. Chem. Commun. 1973, 711.
2710
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma500384m | Macromolecules 2014, 47, 2703−2711