44
V.D.V. Bodduri et al. / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 163 (2014) 42–45
no much difference in the structures of two sulfonates. Moreover, it
is worthy to note that these compounds showed superior
surfactant behavior when compared to that of original PFOS
potassium salt (KPFOS, CMC 4304 mg/L at 80 8C) [20].
tensiometer was used according to the manufacturer’s recom-
mendations.
The biodegradation of surfactants was determined according to
the OECD Test guideline 301 F [22]. This test was conducted by an
Oxitop respirometer to follow the consumption of oxygen during
28 days in a closed flask containing 15–50 mg/L of the test
The structures that have degrading points like ether links and
hydrocarbon chain allow biodegradability by enzymatic cleavage
or chemical treatments to degrade and would be safer ones when
compared to PFOS derivatives. In this purpose, both the disodium
alkanesulfonates (2 and 3) were subjected to biodegradability test
in the presence of inoculums coming from a sewage plant. These
compounds showed moderate biodegradation and were remained
below the 60% level at 28 days. The low level of biodegradation
may be due to the non-biodegradability of perfluorocarbon chain.
However, these two compounds (2 and 3) are biodegradable to
some extent because of hydrocarbon part, and can be considered as
less toxic and sustainable alternatives to non-biodegradable PFOS,
due to inferior fluorine content [7,11,21]. Considering the new
structural features along with good surface tension reduction
properties and environmental aspects, these hemifluorinated
disodium alkanesulfonates may be useful in replacing original
PFOS in industrial and chemical applications. In addition, this work
influences the research toward new design and syntheses of less
perfluorinated surfactants in the aspects of sustainable chemistry.
substance and inoculums coming from
a sewage plant.
The percentage of biodegradation is obtained by dividing the
resulting biological oxygen demand (BOD) by the theoretical
oxygen demand (ThOD) of the test substance [23]. Aniline was
used as a reference.
4.2. Procedures
4.2.1. Diethyl 2-(3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyl)malonate (6)
Diethyl malonate (11.5 mL, 75.7 mmol) was added dropwise
to an ice-cold suspension of sodium hydride (60% dispersion in
mineral oil, 2.21 g, 55.4 mmol) in THF (150 mL) at 0 8C during
15 min. The resulting mixture was stirred for 30 min while
allowing the temperature from 0–23 8C. 1H,1H,2H,2H-nonafluor-
ohexyl iodide (9.4 mL, 50.5 mmol) was added slowly to the
reaction and the mixture was heated at reflux for 3 h, and then
was cooled to 23 8C. Water (100 mL) and ethyl ether (100 mL)
were added to it. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl
ether (3 ꢀ 80 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried
over sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated. The residue
was purified by flash column chromatography to afford diethyl 2-
(3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyl)malonate (6) as a colorless
3. Conclusions
New disodium sulfonates 2 and 3 were synthesized and
characterized by NMR, IR and mass spectroscopy. The synthesis
of these hemifluorinated disodium alkanesulfonates started from
1H,1H,2H,2H-nonafluorohexyl iodide and diethyl malonate in
three steps in 67–70% overall yields. The surface tension behavior
of 2 and 3 was characterized using Wilhelmy plate method and
critical micelle concentration values were presented. It is
important to note that the CMC values are better when compared
to that of PFOS and thus can be considered as superior surfactants.
The biodegradability test of these sulfonates showed promising
results than non-biodegradable PFOS and can be considered as
environmentally friendly. This study suggests the scope of less
perfluorinated alkanesulfonates in industrial, medicinal and
chemical applications.
liquid (18.2 g, 89%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
4H), 3.44–3.40 (m, 1H), 2.23–2.13 (m, 4H), 1.30–1.26 (m, 6H).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz):
-81.98 (3F, tt, J1 = 11.2 Hz,
d 4.30–4.17 (m,
d
J2 = 3.7 Hz), ꢁ115.37 (2F, quintet, J = 15.0 Hz), ꢁ125.33 to
ꢁ125.36 (2F, m), ꢁ126.89 to ꢁ126.96 (2F, m). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3):
d 168.61, 61.90, 50.77, 28.46, 19.77, 14.06;
ESI-MS (m/z): 429 [M+Na]+. Anal. Calcd. for C13H15F9O4: C, 38.44;
H, 3.72. Found: C, 38.12; H, 3.87.
4.2.2. Dibenzyl 2-(3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyl)malonate (6a)
By following the same procedure mentioned for compound 6,
except taking dibenzyl malonate (5 g, 17.6 mmol) instead of
diethyl malonate as starting material afforded dibenzyl 2-
(3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyl)malonate (6a) (6.16 g, 66%). 1H
4. Experimental
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
5.03–4.98 (m, 4H), 3.44–3.40 (m, 1H), 2.26–2.18 (m, 4H). 19F NMR
(CDCl3, 376 MHz):
ꢁ81.99 (3F, tt, J1 = 11.2 Hz, J2 = 3.7 Hz),
d 7.47–7.45 (m, 4H), 7.39–7.36 (m, 6H),
4.1. General
d
ꢁ115.37 (2F, quintet, J = 15.0 Hz), ꢁ125.34 to ꢁ125.37 (2F, m),
All non-fluorinated starting materials and solvents were
obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (USA). Perfluoroalkyl iodide,
1H,1H,2H,2H-nonafluorohexyl iodide was purchased from Tokyo
Chemical Industries Co. Ltd. (Japan). All reagents were used
without further purification. Melting points were determined on a
digital SMP10 capillary melting point apparatus (SRUAT, UK). NMR
spectra were measured with BRUKER AVANCE 400 (BRUKER,
Germany) spectrometer, IR spectra were recorded on a FT-IR-6300
(JASCO, Japan) spectrometer and MS spectra were obtained from a
Thermo LCQ fleet MS spectrometer (Thermo, USA).
Surface tension was measured according to the American
Society for Testing and Materials ASTM # D1331-56, using the
Wilhelmy plate method on a KRUSS K100 tensiometer (KRUSS,
Germany) in accordance with instructions with the equipment. A
vertical plate of known perimeter was attached to a balance, and
the force due to wetting was measured. Each example to be tested
was added to deionized water by weight based on solids of the
additive in deionized water. Solutions of different concentrations
were prepared and tested 10 times of each dilution. Results were in
mN/m with a standard deviation of less than 1 mN/m. The
ꢁ126.89 to ꢁ126.95 (2F, m). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
d 169.32,
136.82, 128.90, 127.66, 127.14, 66.26, 50.77, 28.46, 19.77; ESI-MS
(m/z): 553 [M+Na]+. Anal. Calcd. for C23H19F9O4: C, 52.05; H, 3.61.
Found: C, 51.90; H, 3.53.
4.2.3. 2-(3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-Nonafluorohexyl)propane-1,3-diol (7)
To a stirred solution of LiAlH4 (3.74 g, 98.5 mmol) in dry
THF (30 mL) under N2 was added dropwise a solution of 6 (10 g,
24.6 mmol) in THF (15 mL). After 48 h at reflux the reaction was
cooled to 0 8C and quenched by careful addition of approx. 40% aq.
KOH. The precipitated aluminum salts were removed by
filtration. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure,
then the residual oil redissolved in Et2O, washed with H2O, dried
(Na2SO4) and evaporated in vacuo to return the 2-substituted
propanediol 7 (7.21 g, 91%) as a viscous solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3):
d 4.07 (t, J = 5.3 Hz, 2H), 3.74–3.69 (m, 2H), 3.64–3.59 (m,
2H), 2.23–2.10 (m, 2H), 1.74–1.61 (m, 3H). 19F NMR (CDCl3,
376 MHz):
d
ꢁ82.10 to ꢁ82.17 (3F, m), ꢁ114.96 to ꢁ115.08 (2F,
m), ꢁ124.95 to ꢁ124.97 (2F, m), ꢁ126.66 to ꢁ126.73 (2F, m). 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
d 63.58, 41.76, 28.61, 18.45; ESI-MS