Communication
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AFC substrate. Proteasome (0.3 nM final
concentration) was incubated in 96-well plates (200 µL final
Acknowledgements
volume) in the absence (control) or presence of various Financial support from the Ministère de la Recherche et des
concentrations of inhibitors (0.1–100 µM, stock solutions in Technologies (MRT) for MK is acknowledged. Guillaume
DMSO) in the following buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTT, Bernadat and Andrew Pearson (language service of the UFR
0.02% (w/v) SDS, and 10% glycerol, pH 7.4. After 15 min of Pharmacy, UPS) are thanked for helping with kinetics data
incubation at 37 °C, the substrate was added (2 µL of a 5 mM processing automation and for correcting the English text
DMSO solution, 50 µM final concentration) and the rate of respectively.
hydrolysis was monitored with a Fluostar Optima (BMG
Labtech) microtiter plate reader by recording the fluorescence
of the hydrolyzed AFC group (excitation filter: 360 nm; emis-
sion filter: 480 nm). The final DMSO concentration was kept
Notes and references
constant at 2% (v/v) and each inhibitor was tested 3 times in
triplicate. The initial linear portion of the curves (60–300 min)
gave access to Vo and Vi values: the slopes of the reaction pro-
gress curves respectively in the absence or presence of inhibi-
tors (Vo was considered to be 100% of the proteasome activity,
while Vi < 100% were considered as inhibition events). These
data were used to calculate the IC50 values (inhibitor concen-
tration causing 50% decrease in proteasome activity) by fitting
the experimental data to the equation: % inhibition = 100
(1 − Vi/Vo). Dose–response curves were fitted to the data point
by nonlinear regression with a 4-parameter log-logistic model
as implemented in the drc package (v2.3-7)19 within the R soft-
ware environment (v3.0.1).20 IC50 and the corresponding confi-
dence intervals were determined with the same software using
the delta method.
1 D. J. Kuhn, Q. Chen, P. M. Voorhees, J. S. Strader,
K. D. Shenk, C. M. Sun, S. D. Demo, M. K. Bennett,
F. W. B. van Leeuwen, A. A. Chanan-Khan and
R. Z. Orlowski, Blood, 2007, 1103281–1103290.
2 M. Groll, W. Heinemeyer, S. Jâger, T. Ullrich, M. Bochtler,
D. H. Wolf and R. Huber, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
1999, 96, 10976–10983.
3 (a) B. M. Kessler, D. Tortorella, M. Altun, A. F. Kisselev,
E. Fiebiger, B. G. Hekking, H. L. Ploegh and
H. S. Overkleeft, Chem. Biol., 2001, 8, 913–929;
(b) A. F. Kisselev and A. L. Goldberg, Methods Enzymol.,
2005, 398, 364–378.
4 A. Wakata, H.-M. Lee, P. Rommel, A. Toutchkine,
M. Schmidt and D. S. Lawrence, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 1578–1582.
5 A. F. Kisselev, T. N. Akopian, V. Castillo and A. L. Goldberg,
Mol. Cell, 1999, 4, 395–402.
6 P. Sledź, F. Förster and W. Baumeister, J. Mol. Biol., 2013,
425, 1415–1423.
7 J. Myung, K. B. Kim, K. Lindsten, N. P. Dantuma and
C. M. Crews, Mol. Cell, 2001, 7, 411–420.
8 R. Nussinov and C. J. Tsai, Cell, 2013, 153, 293–
305.
9 (a) C. Dalvit, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 2007, 51,
243–271; (b) C. Dalvit, E. Ardini, G. P. Fogliatto,
N. Mongelli and M. Veronesi, Drug Discovery Today, 2004, 9,
595–602.
Proteasome activity assays (IC50 determination by 19F NMR
experiments)
All NMR experiments were performed at 37 °C using a Bruker
Avance 400 MHz NMR spectrometer operating at a 19F Larmor
frequency of 376 MHz with a 5 mm inverse dual probe head
(1H–19F). The 19F-NMR spectra were recorded using a pulse
sequence of proton decoupling with a spectral width of 12 019
Hz, an acquisition time of 1 s and a relaxation delay of 4 s. The
spectra were analyzed with TOPSPIN 2.1 (Bruker). The enzy-
matic assays were performed with 400 µL sample volume in
NMR tubes containing an insert filled with D2O. Proteasome
(20 nM final concentration) was pre-incubated for 15 min at 10 H. Chen, S. Viel, F. Ziarelli and L. Peng, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
37 °C in the absence (control) or presence of various concen- 2013, 42, 7971–7982.
trations of inhibitors (0.1–100 µM, stock solutions in DMSO) 11 C. Dalvit, E. Ardini, M. Flocco, G. P. Fogliatto, N. Mongelli
in the buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.02% (w/v) SDS,
and M. Veronesi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 14620–
and 10% glycerol, pH 7.4) before the addition of the substrate
14625.
(50 µM final concentration, stock solutions in DMSO). The 12 S. Mizukami, R. Takikawa, F. Sugihara, M. Shirakawa and
final DMSO concentration was kept constant at 2% (v/v) and
each inhibitor was tested twice. The rate of substrate hydrolysis
K. Kikushi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3641–
3643.
by the proteasome was monitored in real-time in the NMR 13 M. Ito, A. Shibata, J. Zhang, M. Hiroshima, Y. Sako,
spectrometer at 37 °C by measuring every 22 min for 132 min
(6 spectra) the integration of the 19F-NMR signal of the release
AFC. These curves gave access to Vo (control) and Vi (different
Y. Nakano, K. Kojima-Aikawa, B. Mannervik, S. Shuto,
Y. Ito, R. Morgenstern and H. Abe, ChemBioChem, 2012, 13,
1428–1432.
inhibitor concentration) values, used to calculate the IC50 14 K. Tanaka, N. Kitamura and Y. Chujo, Bioconjugate Chem.,
values (inhibitor concentration causing 50% decrease in pro- 2011, 22, 1484–1490.
teasome activity) by fitting the experimental data to the 15 A. Bordessa, M. Keita, X. Maréchal, L. Formicola,
equation: % inhibition = 100 (1 − Vi/Vo) in the same way as
fluorescence.
N. Lagarde, J. Rodrigo, G. Bernadat, C. Bauvais,
J.-L. Soulier, L. Dufau, T. Milcent, B. Crousse,
4580 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 4576–4581
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014