COMMUNICATIONS
One-Step C-Terminal Deprotection and Activation of Peptides
were visualised by immersion in cerium ammonium molyb-
date (CAM) solution followed by drying with hot air. Puri-
fied fractions (Rf =0.2) were pooled and further analysed on
HPLC for purity. The material was further dried under
vacuum and subjected to NMR analysis. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d=2.96–3.04 (m, 2H, CH2CH), 3.73 (s,
3H, CH3O), 3.72–3.90 (m, 2H, Gly-CH2), 4.81–4.85 (m, 1H,
CH2CH), 5.12 (s, 2H, CH2O), 5.45 (br s, 1H, OH), 6.13 (br
molecular sieves powder (100 mgmLꢀ1). The reaction mix-
ture was shaken at 400 rpm at 608C. Samples were taken
and quenched with DMSO (1:3 v/v ratio). After 6 days, 77%
conversion was achieved. Conversions were estimated by
HPLC using the same procedure as described above and fur-
ther identified by LC/MS.
3
s, 1H, CbzNH), 6.53 (br d, 1H, NHCH), 6.67 (d, J=8.0 Hz,
2H, phenol-H), 6.90 (d, 3J=8.0 Hz, 2H, phenol-H), 7.31–
7.40 (m, 5H, Ph-H).
Acknowledgements
This project is part of Integration of Biosynthesis and Organ-
ic Synthesis program (IBOS-2; program number: 053.63.014)
funded by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Re-
search (NWO) and Advanced Chemical Technologies for
Sustainability (ACTS). The authors thank Dr. J.-M. van der
Laan from DSM Food Specialties for helpful discussions.
Preparation of Z-Gly-Tyr-OCH3 Reference
Compound
A mixture of tyrosine methyl ester hydrochloride (1.0 mmol,
232 mg), Z-Gly (1.0 mmol, 209 mg), HOBt (1.5 mmol,
203 mg) and TEA (3.0 mmol, 418 mL) in DCM (10 mL) was
cooled in an ice-water bath. EDC (1.1 mmol, 211 mg) was
added and the cooling was removed. After 20 h, volatiles
were evaporated and the residue was redissolved in AcOEt
(30 mL). The organic solution was washed with 10% (w/v)
aqueous citric acid solution (3ꢂ20 mL), saturated aqueous
NaHCO3 (2ꢂ20 mL) and brine (20 mL), dried (MgSO4) and
the solvent was evaporated. The products were purified by
flash chromatography (silica gel, 40–63 mm, pentane/AcOEt,
1:1, v/v) to give a white powder; yield: 292 mg (75%); Rf =
0.15 (pentane/AcOEt, 1:1, v/v). 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): d=2.96–3.04 (m, 2H, CH2CH), 3.73 (s, 3H, CH3O),
3.72–3.90 (m, 2H, Gly-CH2), 4.81–4.85 (m, 1H, CH2CH),
5.12 (s, 2H, CH2O), 5.42 (br s, 1H, OH), 5.88 (br s, 1H,
ZNH), 6.48 (br d, 1H, NHCH), 6.67 (d, 3J=8.0 Hz, 2H,
phenol-H), 6.90 (d, 3J=8.0 Hz, 2H, phenol-H), 7.31–7.40
(m, 5H, Ph-H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d=37.1, 44.5,
52.7, 53.6, 67.5, 115.9, 127.0, 128.3, 128.5, 128.8, 130.5, 136.2,
155.8, 157.1, 169.6, 172.3; HR-MS (ESI+): m/z=409.1366,
calcd. for C20H22N2O6Na: 409.1370.
References
[1] a) D. J. Craik, D. P. Fairlie, S. Liras, D. Price, Chem.
Biol. Drug. Des. 2013, 81, 136–147; b) N. Sewald, H. D.
Jakubke, Peptide Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2009; c) K. Lintner, O. Peschard, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci.
2000, 22, 207–218; d) I. Gill, R. L. Fandino, X. Jorba,
E. N. Vulfson, Enzyme. Microb. Technol. 1996, 18, 162–
183; e) F. Guzman, S. Berberis, A. Illanes, Electron. J.
Biotechnol. 2007, 10, 279–314; f) H. Korhonen, A. Pih-
lanto, Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 1297–1308.
[2] a) D. Hans, P. R. Young, D. P. Fairlie, Med. Chem. 2006,
2, 627–646; b) A. M. Thayer, Chem. Eng. News. 2011,
89, 21–25.
[3] a) F. Guzmꢃn, S. Barberis, A. Illanes, Electron. J. Bio-
tech. 2007, 10, 279–314; b) T. Nuijens, C. Cusan,
T. J. G. M. van Dooren, H. M. Moody, R. Merkx,
J. A. W. Kruijtzer, D. T. S. Rijkers, R. M. J. Liskamp,
P. J. L. M. Quaedflieg, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352,
2399–2404; c) T. Nuijens, P. J. L. M. Quaedflieg, H. D.
Jakubke, Enzyme catalysis in organic synthesis, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim 2012, pp 675–748.
[4] a) J. Bongers, E. P. Heimer, Peptides 1994, 15, 183–193;
b) F. Bordusa, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4817–4867; c) R. J.
de Beer, B. Zarzycka, M. Mariman, H. I. Amatdjais-
Groenen, M. J. Mulders, P. J. L. M. Quaedflieg, F. L.
van Delft, S. B. Nabuurs, F. P. Rutjes, ChemBioChem
2012, 13, 1319–1326; d) I. Kira, Y. Asano, K. Yokozeki,
J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 108, 190–193.
Kinetic Coupling of Z-Gly-Tyr-OMe with H-Phe-NH2
using DgSbt Protease
To the amidase reaction mixture containing N-protected
acyl donor Z-Gly-Tyr-OMe (8 mmol) in acetonitrile
(1.5 mL), C-terminally protected Phe-NH2 (10 equiv.,
80 mmol) was directly added, as well as 90 mg IPREP (iso-
propyl alcohol-rinsed enzyme precipitate) containing 4 mg
of DgSbt and activated 3ꢁ crushed molecular sieves
(200 mgmLꢀ1). The reaction mixture was shaken at 400 rpm
at 608C. Samples were taken and quenched with DMSO
(1:3, v/v). After 21 days conversion to product was 76%.
Conversions were estimated using HPLC by integration of
the acyl donor starting material and the product peaks as-
suming identical response factors. Products were identified
by LC/MS.
[5] T. Nuijens, E. Piva, J. A. W. Kruijtzer, D. T. S. Rijkers,
R. M. J. Liskamp, P. J. L. M. Quaedflieg, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2011, 353, 1039–1044.
[6] P. J. L. M. Quaedflieg, T. Sonke, G. K. M. Verzijl, R. W.
Wiertz, Patent Appl. EP 1937826(B1), 2009.
[7] S. Neumann, M. R. Kula, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
2002, 58, 772–780.
Kinetic Coupling of Z-Gly-Tyr-OMe with H-Phe-NH2
[8] a) A. M. Klibanov, Nature 2001, 409, 241–246; b) G.
Carrea, S. Riva, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 2312–2341;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2226–2254; c) E. P.
Hudson, R. K. Eppler, D. S. Clark, Curr. Opin. Biotech-
nol. 2005, 16, 637–643.
using TaqSbt Protease
In a parallel coupling reaction, to the purified N-protected
acyl donor Z-Gly-Tyr-OMe (28 mmol) in acetonitrile
(3 mL), C-terminally protected Phe-NH2 (10 equiv.,
280 mmol) was added, followed by 35 mg IPREP enzyme
preparation (2.2 mg of TaqSbt enzyme) and activated 3ꢁ
[9] A. L. Serdakowski, J. S. Dordick, Trends Biotechnol.
2008, 26, 48–54.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 2197 – 2202
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2201