2
J. Ma et al. / Tetrahedron Letters xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
O
O
O
HO
O
1)
2)
O
1) TFA, DCM
0 °C to rt
DCC, DMAP
0 °C to rt
HO
OH
2) MgSO4
3) TEA
Boc-β-Ala, DCC, DMAP
X
N
O
O
0 °C to rt
O
BocHN
O
(80%, 2 steps)
X = CH2
X = O
3
4
2
O
3 DCM -78 °C;
PPh3
86%
TMSCN
0 °C to rt
NaBH(OAc)3
(51%, 4 steps)
(6%, 4 steps)
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
OCH3
6
NC
NH
O
O
NH
O
O
7
5
Scheme 1. Synthesis aza-[13]-macrodiolides 5 and 7 via macrocyclic imine 2.
Boc carbamate; (ii) 20-fold dilution and dehydration using
MgSO4 and (iii) neutralization by addition of triethylamine. At
2 acts as an electrophile rather than as a p nucleophile as does the
11
alkene in 1. Conversion of 2 to a ꢀ1:1 mixture of diastereomers 7
the outset we had hoped to characterize and potentially isolate
imine 2 because there is literature precedence for the formation
of other macrocyclic imines.8,12 Attempts at isolation of 2 were
unsuccessful, however. We ultimately resorted to trapping the
imine directly with nucleophiles to confirm that it had in fact
formed. Sodium cyanoborohydride reduction in methanol14 did
not result in the expected aza-[13]-macrodiolide product 5;
instead, intramolecular amidation and transesterification led to a
shows that there is an absence of diastereofacial selectivity for reac-
tions of this p-system, however. This result is in contrast to other
compounds where macrocyclic diastereocontrol was operative.2a,13
The dichotomy indicates a further difference in the nature of mac-
rocycles 1 and 2. The lack of stereoselectivity for TMSCN addition to
2 could be explained by at least four different models: (i) Imine 2
could take up a rigid geometry that is different than the configura-
tion of 1 in Fig. 2 that would allow attack of nucleophiles from
either diastereoface. This is unlikely based on the structural
requirements of 1 and 2. Specifically, we have only observed the
formation of E alkenes (e.g., 1) which suggests that the E configura-
ring contracted
c-lactam 6 (Scheme 1, inset). The structure of 6
strongly suggested that 5, and consequently imine 2 itself, were
intermediates in the ring contraction (See Supporting information).
Hydride reduction using NaBH(OAc)3 did provide aza-[13]-macro-
diolide 5, albeit in only 6% yield as a mixture with other unidenti-
fied products.
Addition of cyanotrimethylsilane (TMSCN) after in situ imine
formation, on the other hand, yielded cyano aza-[13]-macrodio-
lides 7 as a ꢀ1:1 mixture of diastereomers, 7a and 7b (Scheme 1
and Fig. 2) in a combined 51% yield. It should be noted that each
diastereomer of product 7 is itself racemic because the 1,3-butane
diol used to start the synthesis was racemic. The yield for the
formation of 7 was calculated based on N-Boc aldehyde 3 as
starting material and formally included four steps.
tion of the
ture of the 13-membered ring macrocycle. (ii) The
products could equilibrate after they are formed and the reaction
is under thermodynamic control. Epimerization of -amino nitriles
p-system is best accommodated based on the architec-
a
-amino nitrile
a
is known but under conditions that are more robust (either acidic or
basic) than those used in the formation of 7a and 7b.14,15 As
reported here, imine 2 arose by TFA deprotection of a Boc group
and then the acid was neutralized by one equivalent of TEA prior
to addition of TMSCN. Moreover, exposure of 7a to di-isopropyleth-
ylamine for 12 h at 70 °C showed no epimerization. (iii) The macro-
cyclic imines could interconvert via an aminal intermediate. Such a
process could interconvert an E imine to Z or it could interconvert
alternate E imines (Fig. 3A). Although we cannot rule it out, the Z
imine is unlikely based on the ring size and the rigidifying units.
The interconversion of E imines, however, is on equal footing as
the proceeding imine rotational model. (iv) The imine unit is freely
rotating within the [13]-macrodiolide. We argue that the lack of
selectivity is due to facile rotation of the imine unit in 2 in contrast
to the stationary alkene unit of 1 (Fig. 3B and C). In this scenario,
rapid rotation of the imine exposes each diastereoface outward
toward solution and therefore makes each available for attack by
nucleophiles. The nearly 1:1 ratio of diasteromeric products is
consistent with the model. Similar bond lengths for both the alkene
and the imine imply that the removal of the hydrogen is sufficient
to allow facile rotation of the planar unit.16 Although somewhat
speculative, the rotational model is consistent with the structures
and reactivity we have observed for this group of macrocycles.
Our next objective was to modify the newly prepared aza-[13]-
macrodiolides using 7a as the example compound. Alkylation of
The syn diastereomer, 7a, was a crystalline solid. Data from
X-ray crystallography revealed the structure depicted in Figure 2.
Compound 7a has features that are reminiscent of the X-ray struc-
ture collected for 1 and provides clues about macrocyclic imine 2.
First, each ester creates a four atom planar unit that reduces the
number of freely rotating bonds in the backbone of the macrocycle.
Second, the stereogenic centers at C2 and C9 both put the groups
attached to them (methyl at C2 and cyano at C9) in pseudo equa-
torial positions. Finally, the cyano moiety at C9 is exocyclic to the
macrocycle; that is, it points outside the ring. Epoxidations on
chiral [13]-macrodiolides akin to 1 were highly diastereoselec-
tive.2a In those examples, the
p-system of the alkene was shown
to react exclusively through its exterior face. The position of the
cyano group on the periphery of the macrocycle in 7a suggests that
the a-cyano amine arose by nucleophilic attack on a planar imine
also from the exterior face.
The structural data from 7a suggest that imine 2 largely resem-
bles [13]-macrodiolide 1 (Fig. 2). The difference is that the imine of