R. Bo et al. / Dyes and Pigments 109 (2014) 155e162
157
7.83 (d, J ¼ 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (dd, J ¼ 8.5, 2.6 Hz, 4H), 7.53 (d,
J ¼ 8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.59 (s, 2H), 2.81 (d, J ¼ 6.2 Hz, 2H), 1.90e1.73 (m,
4H).
122.9, 31.1, 30.9, 30.7, 28.0, 27.2, 25.8. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calcd. for
C
43H37N2 (M þ Hþ) 581.2957, found 581.3107.
8-(4-Bromophenyl)-9,10,11,12,13,14-hexahydrobenzo[f]cycloocta
2.3. Fabrication of the memory device
[c]quinoline (5). Yeild (0.50 g) 20%, white powder. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3)
d
8.82 (d, J ¼ 8.9 Hz, 1H), 8.10e7.84 (m, 3H),
The ITO glass substrates were precleaned in ultrasonic bath for
30 min each in deionized water, acetone, and ethanol. The elec-
troactive organic layer was vacuum-deposited under a pressure of
around 1.0 ꢁ 10ꢂ6 Torr and the thickness was 68 nm. The aluminum
electrodes (0.0314 mm2) were vacuum-deposited at 5.0 ꢁ 10ꢂ6 Torr
through a shadow mask to form top electrodes and the thickness
was 55 nm. Both of the thickness was obtained by the scanning
electronic microscopic (SEM). The schematic diagram of the device
and the SEM image of one storage cell were shown in Fig. 1.
7.71e7.64 (m, 2H), 7.62 (d, J ¼ 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (d, J ¼ 8.3 Hz, 2H),
3.62 (s, 2H), 2.98e2.93 (m, 2H), 2.31e2.22 (m, 2H), 1.73e1.64 (m,
4H), 1.55e1.52 (m, 2H).
40-(1-Methylbenzo[f]quinolin-3-yl)-N,N-diphenyl-[1,10-biphenyl]-
4-amine (6). A mixture of compound 2 (0.40g, 1.15 mmol), com-
pound 3 (0.43g, 1.15 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.04 g, 0.03 mmol), K2CO3
(0.47 g, 3.46 mmol), H2O (5 mL) and dioxane (30 mL) was stirred for
6 h under nitrogen at 80 ꢀC. After completion of the reaction, the
mixture was diluted with H2O and extracted with EtOAc
(3 ꢁ 50 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine
and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and then the organic
solvents were completely removed by rotary evaporation. The
residue was purified by column chromatography using petroleum
ether/ethylacetate (5/1; v/v) to give compound 6 (0.32 g, 50%) as
white powder. mp: 200e201 ꢀC. IR (in KBr), cmꢂ1: 3031, 1932, 1582,
1486, 1451, 1329, 1277, 1208, 1175, 821, 719, 694, 633. 1H NMR
2.4. Measurement
NMR spectra were obtained on Inova FT-NMR spectrometers. IR
spectra were obtained on Nicolet 6700 spectrometer. HRMS (ESI)
was determined by using micro TOF-Q II HRMS/MS instrument
(Bruker). UVeVis absorption spectra were measured at room
temperature by using a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrophotometer.
SEM images were taken on a Hitachi S-4700 scanning electron
microscope. Cyclic voltammetry was performed at room tempera-
ture using an ITO working electrode, a reference electrode Ag/AgCl,
and a counter electrode (Pt wire) at a sweep rate of 100 mV sꢂ1 on a
CorrTest CS Electrochemical Workstation analyzer. A 0.1 M solution
of tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (TBAP) in CH3CN was used.
The surface morphology of films was measured on a MFD-3D-SA
Asylum Research's atomic force microscope (AFM). X-ray diffrac-
tion (XRD) patterns were taken on an X'Pert-Pro MPD X-ray
diffractometer. All electrical measurements of the devices were
characterized under ambient conditions without any encapsulation
using a HP-4145B Semiconductor device Analyzer.
(400 MHz, CDCl3)
d
8.85 (d, J ¼ 8.6 Hz 1H), 8.30 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz 2H),
8.21e8.11 (m, 1H), 8.02e7.96 (m, 2H), 7.89 (s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J ¼ 8.1 Hz
2H), 7.73e7.66 (m, 2H), 7.58 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz 2H), 7.29 (t, J ¼ 7.8 Hz,
3H), 7.18e7.15 (m, 7H), 7.05 (t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.24 (s, 3H). 13C NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 154.9, 149.6, 147.5, 147.4, 145.5, 141.3, 137.3,
134.3, 132.8, 131.1, 130.8, 129.5, 129.3, 129.0, 127.7, 127.4, 126.9,
126.4, 126.3, 124.6, 124.5, 123.7, 123.0, 122.5, 27.0. HRMS (ESI, m/z)
calcd. for C38H29N2 (M þ Hþ) 513.2331, found 513.2405.
Compounds 7 and 8 were synthesized using a similar procedure
for compound 6.
N,N-Diphenyl-40-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[a]phenanthridin-5-yl)-
[1,10-biphenyl]-4-amine (7). Yeild (0.25 g) 50%, white powder. mp:
243e244 ꢀC. IR (in KBr), cmꢂ1: 3031, 2937, 2865, 1589, 1500, 1433,
1316, 1278, 1119, 1003, 827, 715, 696. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
3. Results and discussion
d
8.81 (s, 1H), 7.98 (s, 2H), 7.72e7.61 (m, 6H), 7.55 (d, J ¼ 8.6 Hz, 2H),
7.47 (s, 1H), 7.31e7.27 (m, 5H), 7.17 (s, 3H), 7.16 (s, 2H), 7.05 (t,
J ¼ 7.3 Hz, 2H), 3.67 (s, 2H), 2.96 (s, 2H), 1.91(s, 4H). 13C NMR
3.1. Photophysical and electrochemical properties
(300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 158.7, 147.6, 147.2, 140.3, 134.7, 133.3, 132.1,
Fig. 2(aec) shows the UVevis spectra of compounds 6, 7 and 8 in
DCM solution and in the film state, respectively. The maximum
absorption peaks of the three compounds in DCM are at 363 nm,
340 nm and 337 nm, respectively, which could be assigned to the
132.0, 130.1, 129.2, 129.0, 128.9, 128.5, 128.4, 127.8, 126.6, 126.2,
125.6, 124.8, 124.4, 123.8, 122.9, 33.3, 28.4, 23.1, 22.2. HRMS (ESI, m/
z) calcd. for C41H33N2 (M þ Hþ) 553.2644, found 553.2765.
40-(9,10,11,12,13,14-Hexahydrobenzo[f]cycloocta[c]quinolin-8-yl)-
N,N-diphenyl-[1,10-biphenyl]-4-amine (8). Yeild (0.20 g) 56%, white
powder. mp: 245e246 ꢀC. IR (in KBr), cmꢂ1: 3031, 2919, 2850, 1590,
1498, 1435, 1327, 1279, 1005, 828, 750, 695. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
pep* transition of the benzoquinolines group within the molecular
backbone. The maximum absorption peaks of the three compounds
in the film state are at 373 nm, 347 nm and 340 nm, respectively.
Compared with the absorption spectra in solution, the maximum
absorption peaks of the three compounds in film states show a red-
shift of 10 nm, 7 nm and 3 nm, respectively. These changes indicate
DMSO-d6)
d
8.83 (d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz 1H), 8.09 (d, J ¼ 9.4 Hz 1H), 8.05 (d,
J ¼ 9.3 Hz 1H), 7.85 (t, J ¼ 7.4 Hz 1H), 7.80e7.67 (m, 6H), 7.55 (d,
J ¼ 8.1 Hz 2H), 7.35 (t, J ¼ 7.8 Hz 4H), 7.09 (d, J ¼ 8.1 Hz 8H), 3.69 (s,
2H), 3.00 (s, 2H), 2.19 (s, 2H), 1.64 (s, 4H), 1.49 (s, 2H). 13C NMR
that the three molecules happened regular arrangement or
pep
stacking in the film, which promise a smooth charge carrier
transport between neighboring molecules [49]. The absorption
spectrum of compound 6 has the largest red-shift than that of
(300 MHz, CDCl3)
d 147.6, 147.2, 140.1, 134.7, 133.4, 133.2, 130.6,
130.0, 129.2, 129.0, 127.7, 127.6, 126.4, 126.2, 124.6, 124.4, 123.9,
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the indium-tin oxide/organic film/aluminum device, (b) SEM image of the cross section of a storage cell.