Organic Letters
Letter
(10) Typically, 25 equiv of RNH2 is used for the formation of
cationic diaza[4]- and -[6]helicenes. See refs 3 and 4a,c for details.
(11) We had initially considered using the procedure developed for
the purification of dioxo[4]helicene 2, i.e., the reduction with NaBH4
of all cationic derivatives followed by a separation of the resulting
neutral triarylmethane adducts (see reference 5). However, in our
hands, a satisfactory separation of the reduced products could not be
achieved.
(12) The chemoselectivity can be rationalized by the higher
electrophilicity of cations 3 over 8 (pKR+ 13 vs 14.5, respectively).
This difference may be related to the skeleton deformation that occurs
upon the addition of nucleophiles to the central carbon of the
carbenium ions. This leads to change of hybridization from sp2 to sp3
and the resulting strain seems to be better accommodated by the
helical framework of 3 than the rigid planar geometry of triangulene 8.
(13) The relative configuration of compounds 9 was not determined
in the course of this study but everything indicates that the major
diastereoisomer obtained with NaBH4 remains the same with
NaBH3CN. Its nature and the origin of the stereoselectivity are
discussed in ref 6.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
Experimental procedures and full spectroscopic data for all new
compounds. This material is available free of charge via the
■
S
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank the University of Geneva and the Swiss National
Science Foundation for financial support. We acknowledge the
contributions of the Sciences Mass Spectrometry (SMS)
platform at the Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva.
(14) Nicolas, C.; Herse, C.; Lacour, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
4605−4608.
(15) This procedure was preferred over the I2 oxidation protocol that
REFERENCES
■
−
associates a triodide I3 anion to the cation; this colored anion then
(1) Bosson, J.; Gouin, J.; Lacour, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2824−
2840.
complicated the spectral analysis.
(16) For a related result on a compound of type 5, see: Wada, M.;
Watanabe, T.; Natsume, S.; Mishima, H.; Kirishima, K.; Erabi, T. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995, 68, 3233−3240. The ammonium salts
decompose however upon heating.
(17) Most probably, the strong bifurcated hydrogen bonding
interactions that occur in the solid state between the H−N+ bonds
and the neighboring methoxy groups are also present in solution;
those are the reasons for this stability.
(18) This experiment supports the cationic-driven SNAr mechanism
proposed previously (see ref 4a,b) and invalidates [1,3]-sigmatropic
shifts as alternative hypotheses for the formation of products 3.
(19) (a) Holzwart, G.; Hsu, E. C.; Mosher, H. S.; Faulkner, T. R.;
Moscowit, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 251−252. (b) Nafie, L. A.;
Keiderling, T. A.; Stephens, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2715−
2723. (c) Freedman, T. B.; Cao, X. L.; Dukor, R. K.; Nafie, L. A.
Chirality 2003, 15, 743−758.
(2) For other types of cationic helicenes, see: (a) Arai, S.; Ishikura,
M.; Yamagishi, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1561−1568.
(b) Sato, K.; Okazaki, S.; Yamagishi, T.; Arai, S. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
2004, 41, 443−447. (c) Sato, K.; Katayama, Y.; Yamagishi, T.; Arai, S.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 43, 177−181. (d) Adriaenssens, L.; Severa,
̌
̌
L.; Sal
N. S.; Pospísi
1072−1076. (e) Vav
Sazelova, P.; Kasicka, V.; Teply, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 489−
499. (f) Pospísil, L.; Bednar
Hromadova, M.; Dlouha, H.; Tarab
2014, DOI: 10.1021/ja500220j.
́
ova,
́
T.; Císaro
l, L.; Slavíce
ra, J.; Severa, L.; Svec, P.; Císaro
̌
va,
́
I.; Pohl, R.; Saman, D.; Rocha, S. V.; Finney,
̌
̌
k, P.; Teply, F. Chem.Eur. J. 2009, 15,
́
̌
́
̌ ́
va, I.; Koval, D.;
́
́
̌
̌
́
̌
̌ ́ ̌ ́
anek, P.; Slavícek, P.; Vavra, J.;
̌
́
ova,
́
L.; Step
ek, J.; Teply, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
́
́
́
́
(3) Torricelli, F.; Bosson, J.; Besnard, C.; Chekini, M.; Burgi, T.;
̈
Lacour, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1796−1800.
(4) (a) Laursen, B. W.; Krebs, F. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3432−3434. (b) Laursen, B. W.; Krebs, F. C. Chem.Eur. J. 2001, 7,
(20) Pieters, G.; Gaucher, A.; Marque, S.; Maurel, F.; Lesot, P.; Prim,
D. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2096−2098.
(21) Elm, J.; Lykkebo, J.; Sørensen, T. J.; Laursen, B. W.; Mikkelsen,
K. V. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 12025−33.
1773−1783. (c) Herse, C.; Bas, D.; Krebs, F. C.; Burgi, T.; Weber, J.;
̈
Wesolowski, T.; Laursen, B. W.; Lacour, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 3162−3166. (d) Laleu, B.; Mobian, P.; Herse, C.; Laursen, B. W.;
Hopfgartner, G.; Bernardinelli, G.; Lacour, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 1879−1883. (e) Laleu, B.; Machado, M. S.; Lacour, J. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 2786−2788. (f) Mobian, P.; Banerji, N.; Bernardinelli,
G.; Lacour, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 224−231. (g) Villani, C.;
Laleu, B.; Mobian, P.; Lacour, J. Chirality 2007, 19, 601−606.
(h) Conreaux, D.; Mehanna, N.; Herse, C.; Lacour, J. r. m. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 76, 2716−2722. (i) Guin, J.; Besnard, C.; Pattison, P.;
Lacour, J. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 425−428. (j) Ueda, A.; Wasa, H.; Suzuki,
S.; Okada, K.; Sato, K.; Takui, T.; Morita, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 6691−6695. (k) Hamacek, J.; Besnard, C.; Mehanna, N.;
Lacour, J. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 6777−6782. (l) Elm, J.; Lykkebo, J.;
Sørensen, T. J.; Laursen, B. W.; Mikkelsen, K. V. J. Phys. Chem. A
2012, 116, 8744−8752. (m) Kel, O.; Furstenberg, A.; Mehanna, N.;
̈
Nicolas, C.; Laleu, B.; Hammarson, M.; Albinsson, B.; Lacour, J.;
Vauthey, E. Chem.Eur. J. 2013, 19, 7173−7180.
(5) Guin, J.; Besnard, C.; Lacour, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1748−51.
(6) Sørensen, T. J.; Madsen, A. Ø.; Laursen, B. W. Chem.Eur. J.
2014, 20, 6391−6400.
(7) The azathia analogue was also reported. See: Nicolas, C.;
Bernardinelli, G.; Lacour, J. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2010, 23, 1049−1056.
(8) The final ring closure under acid conditions can be particularly
efficient (yield up to 92%). Together with the first step, combined
yields range from 20 to 50%.
(9) Martin, J. C.; Smith, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2252−
2256.
3803
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol501692r | Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3800−3803