A facile synthesis and ring-opening reactions of novel 2-ferrocenyl-3,4- dihydropyrans

Article abstract of DOI:10.3987/COM-14-12977

A series of novel 2-ferrocenyl-3,4-dihydropyrans were synthesized in good to excellent yields through three-component reaction of vinylferrocene, 1,3-dicarbonyl compound and formaldehyde near room temperature under catalyst-free conditions. The obtained ferrocenyl dihydropyrans can also react readily with indole in the presence of alum, providing a ring-opening product in high yield, and this result opens an effective way to access a new class of complex ferrocenyl derivatives.

Full text of DOI:10.3987/COM-14-12977

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 89, No. 6, 2014, pp. -. © 2014 The Japan Institute of Heterocyclic Chemistry
Received, 11th March, 2014, Accepted, 22nd April, 2014, Published online, 2nd May, 2014
DOI: 10.3987/COM-14-12977
A FACILE SYNTHESIS AND RING-OPENING REACTIONS OF NOVEL
2-FERROCENYL-3,4-DIHYDROPYRANS
Yuying Du, Hui Qiao, Limin Han,* Ning Zhu, and Quanling Suo
Chemical Engineering College, Inner Mongolia University of Technology,
Hohhot 010051, PR China. E-mail: hhhtdyy@163.com
Abstract – A series of novel 2-ferrocenyl-3,4-dihydropyrans were synthesized in
good to excellent yields through three-component reaction of vinylferrocene,
1,3-dicarbonyl compound and formaldehyde near room temperature under
catalyst-free conditions. The obtained ferrocenyl dihydropyrans can also react
readily with indole in the presence of alum, providing a ring-opening product in
high yield, and this result opens an effective way to access a new class of complex
ferrocenyl derivatives.
Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in the synthesis and design of ferrocenyl derivatives
because of their wide-spread applications in material chemistry,1,2 asymmetric catalysis,3 and
bioorganometallic chemistry4 and so on.5 Of course, the design motif and synthesis strategy for
ferrocenyl-based architectures play the most important roles in delivering the required properties.
Although ferrocenyl derivatives are classical aromatic compounds, traditional methods for the
constructing aromatic compounds may not work for ferrocene due to its specific geometric and electronic
properties.6 Furthermore, ferrocenyl fragments are sometimes sensitive to acid and high temperature.7
Therefore, developing efficient methods for their synthesis under mild reaction conditions remains to be a
challenge.
Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) have become a promising tool for synthetic organic chemists, since
they allow complicated molecules to be created using one reaction in a fast, efficient, simple and energy
savings manner.8 Gu and Jérȏme9 reported a simple method for the synthesis of 2-aryl-3,4-dihydropyrans
through multicomponent reaction of formaldehyde, 1,3-dicarbonyl compound and styrene. The key of this
MCR is generation and the following trapping of a 2-methylene-1,3-dicarbonyl intermediate with styrene.
According to a recent report of Cavaleiro,10 β-vinyl-meso-tetraphenylporphyrin can also trap this type

o-quinone methide. Because these reactions were generally performed in the absence of any catalyst
under relative mild conditions, we therefore envisioned that it might be possible to use vinylferrocene,
which is rather susceptible to acid and high temperature, as an alternative substrate to styrene. Herein, we
will report our successful endeavor, in which a new class of ferrocenyl derivatives,
2-ferrocenyl-3,4-dihydropyrans, were synthesized through three-component reaction of vinylferrocene,
1,3-dicarbonyl compound and formaldehyde in acetonitrile near room temperature under catalyst-free
conditions. Furthermore, the obtained ferrocenyl dihydropyrans can also react readily with indole in the
presence of catalytic amount of alum, providing a ring-opening product in high yield (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Three-component reaction of vinylferrocene, acetoacetone and formaldehyde
Initially, a three-component reaction of vinylferrocene (1a), acetoacetone (2a) and formaldehyde was
investigated in acetonitrile. As shown in Table 1, the desired product, 2-ferreenyl-3,4-dihydropran 3a,
o
could be obtained in 61% of yield after 3 hours of reaction at 40 C when the ratio of 1a/2a/HCHO is
1.0/1.0/1.0 (entry 1). Because vinylferrocence is the most expensive reagent among all the substrates used
here, in order to increase the reaction yield, we therefore tried to increase the dosage of β-carbonyl
compound and formaldehyde. As we expected, the reaction yield could be significantly improved by
adding excess amount of acetoacetone and formaldehyde into the system, and finally, a maximum yield,
95%, could be obtained with the ratio of 1a/2a/HCHO is 1.0/4.0/5.0 (entries 2 to 4). Because the model
reaction proceeds according to a tandem Knoevenagel / oxo Diels-Alder reaction pathway, the only side
reaction is Michael addition of the formed Knoevenagel methylene intermediate to acetoacetone,11 the
high yield obtained with large excess amount of 2a and formaldehyde is quite reasonable. The reaction
yield was significantly affected by solvent, and acetonitrile was proved to be the best solvent for the
model reaction among all the solvents examined (entries 4 to 10). It should be noted that although water
has been proved to be a preferable solvent for this type of reaction, only moderate yield was obtained

when it was used in the model reaction (entry 6). Replacing formaldehyde aqueous solution with
paraformaldehyde resulted in a significant decrease of the reaction yield (entry 11). Further investigation
revealed that the model reaction was also affected by temperature and reaction time, and the optimal
conditions should be 40 oC and 3 hours (entries 12 and 13).
Table 1. Three-component reaction of vinylferrocene, acetoacetone and formaldehyde.a
entry
1
2
ratio of 1a/2a/HCHO solvent
temp. (oC)
time (h)
yield (%)
61
68
1.0/1.0/1.0
1.0/1.5/2.0
1.0/2.0/3.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
1.0/4.0/5.0
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
EtOH
H2O
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
74
4
95
5
65
6
43
7
DMSO
THF
trace
38
8
9
DCE
trace
24
10
11b
12
13
1,4-dioxane 40
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
40
20
40
27
21
68
a: 1a: 1.0 mmol, solvent: 1 ml, aqueous formaldehyde (37 wt %) was used as HCHO source;
b: paraformaldehyde was used as HCHO source.
Having the optimized condition in hand, we then examined the substrate scope with respect to
1,3-dicarbonyl compounds. As shown in Table 2, various 1,3-diketones and β-ketoesters could be
successfully used in the title reaction, providing 2-ferrocenyl-3,4-dihydropyrans in good to excellent
yields. When benzoylacetone was used, two regioisomers could be obtained in a ratio in favor of the
cycloadduct with the benzoyl group (entry 8, 3h and 3i). All the obtained compounds were characterized
1
13
by H, and C NMR, IR and elemental analysis. Crystals of compounds 3b and 3d suitable for x-ray
analysis were recrystallized from a solution of hexane and dichloromethane (50:1 v/v). Supplementary
material crystallographic data for the structural analysis have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC Nos. 931129, 931130).

Table 2. Three-component reaction of 1a, formaldehyde and different 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds.
entry
1
1,3-dicarbonyl compound
product
yield (%)
95
2a
3a
2
3
4
5
6
7
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
68
66
89
86
60
67
56
30
2g
3g
3h
3i
8
2h
3b
3d
Figure 1. X-Ray structures of compounds 3b and 3d.
It is well known that 2-aryl-3,4-dihydropyrans could be used as an electrophile to react with some
nucleophiles, such as Grignard reagent,12 indole and thiophenols, 13 in the presence of an appropriate acid
catalyst. With this in mind, we then investigated the possibility of using the obtained
2-ferrocenyl-3,4-dihydropyran as a substrate in this type of Friedel-Crafts type ring-opening reaction. As
shown in Scheme 2, when indole was used as a nucleophile, the desired product, 5a, was obtained only in
5% of yield in the presence of MnCl2 that has been proved to be an efficient catalyst for this type of
ring-opening reaction.14 The reaction yields could be improved, to some extent, by using strong acids,
such as In(OTf)3 and PTSA, as catalysts, however, the yields are still far from satisfactory. Interestingly, a
good yield, 83%, was obtained with alum catalyst under the identical conditions. Because alum is a cheap

and largely available chemical, this result opens thus an effective way to access a new class of ferrocenyl
derivatives.
H
N
O
HN
O
OMe
4a (2.5 equiv)
OMe
O
catalyst (10 mol %)
Fe
O
Fe
MeNO2, 80 oC, 10 h
5a
3b
catalyst
yield (%)
.
MnCl2 4H2O
5
In(OTf)3
21
52
83
.
p-TSA H2O
.
KAl(SO4)2 12H2O
Scheme 2. Friedel-Crafts ring-opening reaction of 3b with indole.
In summary, a three-component reaction of vinylferrocene, 1,3-dicarbonyl compound and formaldehyde
was developed by using acetonitrile as solvent, which offers an effective way to access various novel
2-ferrocenyl-3,4-dihydropyrans. In the presence of alum catalyst, the obtained dihydropyran reacted
readily with indole, providing a hitherto unpresented ferrocenyl derivative in excellent yield.
EXPERIMENTAL
Vinylferrocene was prepared according to a known method.15 Other chemicals were commercially
available. Melting points were recorded on an Electro-thermal digital melting point apparatus and were
uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Nexus 670 FT spectrometer in KBr with absorptions
in cm−1. NMR spectra were measured using a Bruker AV-500 Avance spectrometer at 500.13 MHz (1H)
and 125.75 MHz (13C), respectively. Chemical shifts were reported in ppm relative to TMS in CDCl3.
Mass spectra were obtained using Finnigan Polaris QMS or LCMS-2020 instrument. Elemental analysis
was recorded on an Elementar Vario EL III elemental analyzer. X-ray diffraction data were recorded on a
Bruker-Smart Apex CCD area detector with graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation.
General procedure
Typical experimental procedure for three component reaction of vinylferrocene (1a),
2,4-pentanedione (2a) and formaldehyde: All reactions were conducted in a 10 mL U-type tube
equipped with magnetic stirring. In a typical reaction, vinylferrocene (1a) (106.0 mg, 0.5 mmol) and
2,4-pentanedione (2a) (200.2 mg, 2.0 mmol) were mixed with formalin (202.7 mg, 2.5 mmol, 37 wt %)

o
and MeCN (1.0 mL) under air. The mixture was then heated at 40 C for 3 h. After the reaction, the
mixture was cooled to room temperature, and then extracted with CH2Cl2 (10.0 mL × 3). The obtained
organic phase was then combined together and dried with anhydrous Mg2SO4. After concentration of the
organic phases, the crude compounds were purified by chromatography over silica gel using CH2Cl2 as
eluent. The desired product 3a was obtained in 95% of yield (158.5 mg). Substrate scope for the
three-component reaction was performed according to an analogous procedure.
o
1
Vinylferrocene (1a)15: Orange solid; mp 50-51 C; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 4.10-4.35 (m, 9H),
13
5.01-5.35 (m, 2H), 6.42-6.48, (m, 1H); C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 134.7, 111.1, 83.6, 69.2, 68.7,
66.7; IR (KBr) ν: 3132, 3008, 1626, 1400, 1100, 999, 894, 813 cm-1;. EIMS m/z (M+): 212.05. Anal.
Calcd for C12H12Fe: C 67.96, H 5.70. Found: C 67.64, H 5.68.
o
1
3-Acyl-6-ferrocenyl-2-methyl-5,6-dihydropyran (3a): Yield 95%. Orange solid; mp 105-108 C; H
NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.80-1.87 (m, 1H), 2.17 (s, 1H), 2.23-2.26 (q, 6H), 2.44-2.48 (m, 2H),
4.17-4.25 (m, 9H), 4.67 (dd, Ja = 2.0 Hz, Jb = 10.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 199.0, 164.7,
109.8, 87.6, 74.9, 68.8, 68.2, 68.0, 67.2, 66.3, 29.7, 28.1, 23.2, 21.2; IR (KBr) ν: 3097, 2918, 2852, 1661,
1283, 1241, 1104, 918, 816 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 324.17. Anal. Calcd for C18H20FeO2: C 66.69, H 6.22.
Found: C 66.34, H 6.40.
Methyl 3,4-dihydro-2-ferrocenyl-6-methyl-2H-pyran-5-carboxylate (3b): Yield 68%. Orange solid;
o
1
mp 122-124 C; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.77-1.83 (m, 1H), 2.17-2.22 (m, 1H), 2.28 (s, 3H)
2.32-2.37 (m, 1H), 2.45-2.48 (m, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 4.17-4.25 (t, 9H), 4.66 (dd, Ja = 2.0 Hz, Jb = 10.0 Hz,
13
1H); C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 169.1, 165.2, 100.8, 87.7, 75.0, 68.8, 68.2, 68.0, 67.3, 66.3, 51.0,
27.9, 21.9, 20.4; IR (KBr) ν: 3097, 2949, 2852, 1704, 1268, 1085, 922, 809 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 340.05.
Anal. Calcd for C18H20FeO3: C 63.55, H 5.93. Found: C 63.41, H 5.80.
Ethyl 2-ferrocenyl-6-methyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-5-carboxylate (3c): Yield 66%. Orange solid; mp
o
1
83-85 C; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.28 (t, 3H), 1.77-1.83 (m, 1H), 2.17-2.22 (m, 1H), 2.28 (s,
3H), 2.31-2.38 (m, 1H), 2.46-2.49 (t, 1H), 4.17-4.20 (t, 9H), 4.23 (s, 1H), 4.26 (s, 1H), 4.66 (dd, Ja = 2.0
13
Hz, Jb = 10.0 Hz, 1H); C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 168.7, 164.9, 101.1, 87.8, 74.9, 68.8, 68.1, 67.93,
67.3, 66.3, 59.6, 27.9, 22.0, 20.4, 14.5; IR (KBr) ν: 3097, 2969, 2922, 2856, 1700, 1268, 1077, 929, 816
cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 354.05. Anal. Calcd for C19H22FeO3: C 64.42, H 6.26. Found: C 64.61, H 6.35.
Ethyl 2-ferrocenyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-5-carboxylate (3d): Yield 89%.
o
1
Yellow solid; mp 90-91 C; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.30-1.33 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.83-1.90 (m,
1H), 2.18-2.23 (m, 1H), 2.43-2.49 (m, 1H), 2.56-2.60 (m, 1H), 4.19-4.25 (m, 11H), 4.73 (dd, Ja = 2.0 Hz,
13
Jb = 10.0 Hz, 1H); C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 167.0, 145.9, 145.6, 120.6, 118.4, 109.8, 86.6, 75.8,
68.9, 68.3, 68.0, 66.6, 61.4, 27.6, 23.1, 13.9; IR (KBr) ν: 3097, 2984, 2934, 1723, 1280, 1190, 1093, 929,

824 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 408.05. Anal. Calcd for C19H19F3FeO3: C 55.91, H 4.69. Found: C 55.44, H
4.81.
Methyl 2-ferrocenyl-6-isopropyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-5-carboxylate (3e): Yield 86%. Orange solid;
o
1
mp 61-62 C; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.17-1.25 (m, 6H), 1.67-1.71(m, 1H), 2.07-2.10 (m, 1H),
2.28-2.35 (m, 1H), 2.43-2.47 (m, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.90-3.93 (m, 1H), 4.16-4.22 (m, 9H), 4.61 (dd, Ja =
13
2.0 Hz, Jb = 10.0 Hz, 1H); C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 172.1, 168.9, 99.15, 88.8, 74.5, 68.7, 67.8,
67.6, 66.1, 65.9, 51.0, 30.3, 29.0, 22.1, 20.3, 20.0; IR (KBr) ν: 3089, 2953, 2864, 1704, 1264, 1093, 929,
809 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 368.10. Anal. Calcd for C20H24FeO3: C 65.23, H 6.57. Found: C 65.39, H 6.73.
Ethyl 2-ferrocenyl-6-isopropyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-5-carboxylate (3f): Yield 60%. Orange solid;
o
1
mp 62-63 C; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.17-1.19 (m, 6H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.68-1.71 (m,
1H), 2.06-2.10 (m, 1H), 2.32-2.35 (m, 1H), 2.44-2.48 (m, 1H), 3.88-3.91(m, 1H), 4.15-4.19 (m, 9H),
4.21-4.22 (m, 2H), 4.61 (dd, Ja = 2.5 Hz, Jb = 10.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 171.7, 168.6,
99.5, 74.5, 68.7, 67.7, 67.6, 66.1, 65.9, 59.6, 30.3, 29.1, 22.2, 20.3, 20.0, 14.4; IR (KBr) ν: 3093, 2969,
2914, 2867, 1677, 1287, 1101, 813 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 382.10. Anal. Calcd for C21H26FeO3: C 65.98,
H 6.86. Found: C 66.23, H 7.07.
Ethyl 2-ferrocenyl-6-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-5-carboxylate (3g): Yield 67%. Orange solid; mp
o
1
109-111 C; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 0.91-0.94 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.90-1.94 (m, 1H), 2.28-2.32
(m, 1H), 2.44-2.51 (m, 1H), 2.68-2.73 (m, 1H), 3.92-3.97(q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 4.17-4.30 (t, 9H), 4.86 (d, J
= 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.34-7.41 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 169.0, 163.1, 137.0, 128.9, 128.7,
127.6, 103.6, 87.6, 75.9, 68.8, 68.2, 68.0, 67.2, 66.4, 59.8, 28.3, 23.0, 13.7; IR (KBr) ν: 3082, 2984, 2922,
2844, 1684, 1486, 1443, 1291, 1093, 836 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 416.10. Anal. Calcd for C24H24FeO3: C
69.24, H 5.81. Found: C 68.93, H 5.69.
1-(2-Ferrocenyl-6-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-5-yl)ethanone (3h): Yield 56%. Orange solid; mp
71-72 oC. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.79 (s, 3H), 1.87-1.89 (t, 1H), 2.27-2.30 (m, 1H), 2.41 (s, 1H),
2.61 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.19-4.31 (m, 9H), 4.79 (dd, Ja = 2.0 Hz, Jb = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.41-7.71 (m, 5H);
13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ: 198.5, 161.8, 140.8, 131.5, 128.5, 128.4, 110.2, 87.7, 75.1, 68.8, 68.2,
68.0, 67.4, 66.3, 27.8, 23.4, 20.8; IR (KBr) ν: 3085, 2926, 2852, 1603, 1435, 1291, 1019, 816 cm-1;
EIMS m/z (M+): 386.10. Anal. Calcd for C23H22FeO2: C 71.52, H 5.74. Found: C 71.32, H 5.62.
(2-Ferrocenyl-6-methyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran-5-yl)(phenyl)methanone (3i): Yield 30%. Orange
solid; mp 143-145 oC; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.73 (s, 3H), 1.84-1.91 (m, 1H), 2.29-2.24 (m, 2H),
2.78-2.83 (m, 1H), 4.17-4.30 (m, 9H), 4.84 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.38-7.44 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125
MHz) δ: 198.5, 164.7, 136.7, 131.5, 130.1, 129.5, 128.9, 128.8, 110.2, 87.7, 75.1, 68.8, 68.2, 68.0, 67.4,
67.3, 66.4, 66.3, 28.4, 22.8, 20.8; IR (KBr) ν: 3085, 2926, 2848, 1634, 1595, 1482, 1435, 1283, 1077,
824 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+): 386.10. Anal. Calcd for C23H22FeO2: C 71.52, H 5.74. Found: C 71.38, H 5.60.

Procedure for electrophilic ring-opening reaction of dihydropyran 3b with indole: The reactions
were conducted in a 10 mL U-type flask equipped with magnetic stirring. In a typical reaction, MeNO2
(1.0 mL) was mixed with 3b (42.5 mg, 0.125 mmol), indole 4a (36.6 mg, 0.3125 mmol) and
KAl(SO4)2·12H2O (6 mg, 0.0125 mmol, 10 mol %) under air. The mixture was stirred at 80 oC for 10 h.
After the reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and the desired product, 5a, was obtained
by chromatography over silica gel using EtOAc/ hexane (1:6) as eluent.
Methyl 2-acetyl-5-ferrocenyl-5-(1H-indol-3-yl)pentanoate (5a): Yield 83%. Orange solid; mp 34-36
1
oC; H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ: 1.76-2.10 (m, 7H), 3.37-3.44 (m, 1H), 3.65-3.69 (m, 3H), 3.86-4.04
(m, 9H), 4.22-4.27 (m, 1H), 6.94 (s, 1H), 7.05-7.58 (m, 4H), 8.02 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ:
203.4, 170.4, 170.3, 136.4, 126.7, 121.9, 121.8, 121.6, 119.5, 119.4, 119.2, 111.3, 68.7, 68.6, 68.0, 67.9,
67.5, 67.3, 66.9, 66.7, 59.9, 59.4, 52.9, 52.5, 52.4, 38.2, 37.2, 36.7, 36.1, 34.1, 33.7, 29.5, 28.9, 28.6, 27.3,
26.9; IR (KBr) ν: 3405, 3085, 2945, 2864, 1735, 1712, 1451, 1222, 1100, 813 cm-1; EIMS m/z (M+):
457.20. Anal. Calcd for C26H27FeNO3: C 68.28, H 5.95. Found: C 68.01, H 5. 82.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are thankful to the Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21062011)
for the financial support. Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation (No. 2010MS0211) is highly
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. A. Togni and T. Hayashi, Ferrocenes, VCH, New York, 1995.
2. S. Barlow and S. R. Marderin, in Functional Organic Materials, ed. by T. J. J. Muller and U. H. F.
Bunz, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007, 393.
3. R. G. Arrayas, J. Adrido, and J. C. Carretero, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 7674.
4. D. Hamels, P. M. Dansette, E. A. Hillard, S. Top, A. Vessières, P. Herson, G. Jaouen, and D.
Mansuy, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9124.
5. R. C. J. Atkinson, V. C. Gibson, and N. J. Long, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004, 33, 313.
6. V. H. Purecha, N. S. Nandurkar, B. M. Bhanage, and J. M. Nagarkar, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008, 49,
1384.
7. S. Chen, B. Wang, Q. Yan, J. Shi, H. Zhao, and B. Li, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 1758.
8. J. Zhu and H. Bienaymé, Multicomponent Reactions; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2005, 944.
9. Y. Gu, R. De Sousa, G. Frapper, C. Bachmann, J. Barrault, and F. Jerome, Green Chem., 2009, 11,
1968.

10. J. C. J. M. D. S. Menezes, A. T. P. C. Gomes, A. M. S. Silva, M. A. F. Faustino, M. G. P. M. S.
Neves, A. C. Tomé, F. de C. da Silva, V. F. Ferreira, and J. A. S. Cavaleiro, Synlett, 2011, 1841.
11. J. N. Tan, H. Li, and Y. Gu, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1772.
12. P. T. Franke, B. Richter, and K. A. Jørgensen, Chem. Eur. J., 2008, 14, 6317.
13. M. Li, C. Tang, J. Yang, and Y. Gu, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 4529; M. Li, H. Li, T. Li, and Y. Gu,
Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 1064.
14. M. Li, J. Yang, and Y. Gu, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2011, 353, 1551.
15. M. Rausch, M. Vogel, and H. Rosenberg, J. Org. Chem., 1957, 22, 903; K. R. Berger, E. R. Biehl,
and P. C. Reeves. J. Org. Chem., 1974, 39, 477.