Vol. 26, No. 3 (2014)
Synthesis and Structures of Mononuclear Co(III) and Cu(II) Complexes 735
complexes18,19. The structure shows distortion from perfect
octahedral geometry with respect to bond angles. The trans
base angles [N1-Co1-O3 = 178.30 (14)°, N4-Co1-O8 = 176.68
(15)°] are all significantly less than the ideal value of 180°.
The axial angle O1-Co1-O9 [171.95(13)°] deviates significantly
from the ideal 180°. This angle of distortion can be attributed
to the ligand structure.
The present complex 2 of [Cu(HL)2], together with the
molecular structure is displayed in Fig. 2. Selected bond lengths
and angles are given in Table-3. The title complex 2 contains
of two HL– ligand and one Cu(II) ion. The geometry around
the Cu(II) centre can be described as a distorted square-planar
composed of the N2O2 set of atoms, every HL– ligand is chelated
to the Cu atom in an O,N-bidentate manner. The Cu1-O and
Cu1-N distances are similar to the corresponding distances
observed in some similar Cu complexes20-22. There is slightly
deviation of the metal centre from the N2O2 equatorial plane.
The maximum displacements from the least-squares plane
through N2, N4, O4 and O8 are 0.5447 (22) Å and 0.3598
(18) Å for atoms N4 and O8, respectively, Cu1 is 0.1208 (2)
Å below this plane.
angle that is 78.40 (16)°. The angle is similar to complex 2 of
78.13 (9)°.
Conclusion
Reactions of a multidentate N-[2-(2-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-
benzylideneamino)cyclohexyl]-2-hydroxy-benzamide (H2L)
with CoCl2·6H2O and Cu(NO3)2·3H2O in methanol solvent
results in the formation of two mononuclear complexes,
[Co(HL)2(C8H7O3)]·(CH3OH)2 (1) and [Cu(HL)2] (2). Both
complexes are characterized by elemental analysis and crystal
structure analysis. The metal centers of complexes 1 and 2
have exhibit a distorted octahedral geometry and square-
planar geometry, respectively. The multidentate HL– ligand is
chelated to the metal ions only in an O,N-bidentate manner,
which from the o-vanillin group, thus it is a pity that no
synthetic polynuclear metal complexes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the project supported by the Develop-
ment and Reform Commission of Jilin Province, the Science
and Technology Burrau of Changchun City, the Science and
Technology Department of Jilin Province, China (2011174)
and Changchun University of Science and Technology for their
financial support.
REFERENCES
1. S.H. Li, S.K. Gao, S.X. Liu andY.N. Guo, Cryst. Growth Des., 10, 495
(2010).
2. H. Yin and S.X. Liu, J. Mol. Struct., 918, 165 (2009).
3. L.F. Zou., L. Zhao,Y.N. Guo, J.K. Tang, Q.L. Wang andY.H. Li, Inorg.
Chim. Acta, 382, 65 (2012).
4. J.P. Costes, F. Dahan and F. Nicodeme, Inorg. Chem., 40, 5285 (2001).
5. J. Tang, I. Hewitt, N.T. Madhu, G. Chastanet, W. Wernsdorfer, C.E.
Anson, C. Benelli, R. Sessoli and A.K. Powell, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
45, 1729 (2006).
6. Y. Elerman, A. Elmali and I. Svoboda, Z Naturforsch B, 57, 519 (2002).
7. C.D. Papadopoulos, A.G. Hatzidimitriou, G.P. Voutsas and M. Lalia-
Kantouri, Polyhedron, 26, 1077 (2007).
8. T. Hamamatsu, K.Yabe, M. Towatari, N. Matsumoto, N. Re,A. Pochaba
and J. Mrozinski, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 80, 523 (2007).
9. G.M. Yu, L. Zhao, L.F. Zou, Y.N. Guo, G.F. Xu, Y.H. Li and J.K. Tang,
J. Chem. Crystallogr., 46, 606 (2011).
10. E.A. Velcheva, B.A. Stamboliyska and P.J. Boyadjieva, J. Mol. Struct.,
963, 57 (2010).
Fig. 2. A view of the complex 2, showing the atomic numbering scheme
11. L.K. Thompson, C.J. Matthews, L. Zhao, Z.Q. Xu, D.O. Miller, C.
Wilson, M.A. Leech, J.A.K. Howard, S.L. Heath, A.G. Whittaker and
R.E.P. Winpenny, J. Solid State Chem., 159, 308 (2001).
12. M. Koikawa, H. Yamashita and T. Tokii, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 357, 2635
(2004).
13. R. Mitsuhashi, T. Suzuki, Y. Sunatsuki and M. Kojima, Chem. Lett.,
40, 696698 (2011).
14. Y. Qiao, X.P. Ju, Z.Q. Gao and L.Q. Kong, Acta Cryst. E, 66, O95
(2009).
15. O. Pouralimardan, A.-C. Chamayou, C. Janiak and H. Hosseini-
Monfared, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 1599 (2007).
16. G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-97, Program for Crystal Structure Solution,
University of Göttingen, Germany (1997).
TABLE-3
BOND LENGTHS (Å) AND ANGLES (°) FOR COMPLEX 2
Bond lengths
Cu1-O8
Cu1-O4
1.886 (6)
1.891 (5)
Cu1-N2
Cu1-N4
1.969 (7)
1.998 (7)
Bond angles
O8-Cu1-O4
O4-Cu1-N2
O4-Cu1-N4
151.94 (7)
92.3 (3)
91.2 (3)
O8-Cu1-N2
O8-Cu1-N4
N2-Cu1-N4
92.4 (3)
93.2 (3)
91.2 (3)
17. G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement,
University of Göttingen, Germany (1997).
18. M. Fleck, D. Karmakar, M. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, R. Saha and D.
Bandyopadhyay, Polyhedron, 34, 157 (2012).
19. A. Ray, S. Banerjee, G.M. Rosair, V. Gramlich and S. Mitra, Struct.
Chem., 19, 459 (2008).
20. H. Ali, N.A. Khamis, W.J. Basirun and B.M. Yamin, Acta Cryst. E, 60,
m982 (2004).
The ligand H2L is a potential multidentate ligand with
N2O4 donor sites but in this case it acts as a bidentate chelate.
In complex 1 and complex 2, the HL– ligand is chelated to the
metal ions only in an O,N-bidentate manner, which from the
o-vanillin group. 2-Hydroxybenzamide group is not effected
the coordination metal cation, thus the angle of both aromatic
rings in each ligand is similarly. In complex 1, both aromatic
rings in each ligand surrounding the metal ions form a dihedral
21. A. Elmali, Y. Elerman and I. Svoboda, Acta Cryst., C56, 423 (2000).
22. L.F. Zou, X.Y. Yang, Y. Gao, H.B. Yao and Y.H. Li, Acta Cryst. E, 67,
m511 (2011).