conditions,6 which only returned starting material, even
after prolonged reaction times. In contrast, switching to
m-CPBA cleanly resulted in the oxidation to yield the
sulfoxide,7 without any evidence of overoxidation to the
sulfone. We planned to eliminate the sulfoxide immedi-
ately following the oxidation, but interestingly, we noticed
that the sulfoxide was partially eliminated even at room
temperature after 2 h, as observed by TLC and 1H NMR.
Heating the sulfoxide at 75 °C for 5 min was enough
to induce the complete elimination to afford 3 in 85%
yield.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Paracaseolide A
The ensuing vicinal difunctionalization8 allowed the
introduction of both alkyl chains in a tandem 1,4-addition/
aldol reaction. The normal addition involves adding 3 to a
solution of the copper and organomagnesium compounds;
however, in our system, a complex mixture resulted. The key
to the success of the reaction was utilizing inverse addition, as
described by other researchers.9 In alignment with inverse
addition, dodecyl magnesium bromide was added to a
solution of 3 and CuBr Me2S at À78 °C, after which the
3
solution was warmed to 0 °C before adding the aldehyde to
produce a 72% yield of alcohol 2 as a single diastereomer.
The dehydration of 2 was unexpectedly problematic
when we attempted a mesylation/elimination reaction
utilizing excess triethylamine (10 equiv) and mesyl chloride
(5 equiv) sequentially added at 0 °C, followed by warming
thereactionmixtureto40°C in dichloromethane over 12 h.
Only 42% of the desired elimination product resulted,
along with a diasteromeric mixture of mesylates and
decomposition byproducts. After a number of trials, we
found that regulating the temperature was critically im-
portant to reduce byproduct formation. Specifically,
triethylamine and mesyl chloride were initially added at
À78 °C, which was followed by bringing the temperature
to 80 °C after DBU10 addition to favor elimination and
increase the yield of trans olefin 7 to 65%. The culmination
of the synthesis involved a second simultaneous oxidation/
elimination step, which converted 7 into parcaseolide A (1)
in 90% isolated yield. The identity of 1 was confirmed by
1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass spectral characterization
data which exactly matched those found in the literature.1,4
In summary, paracaseolide A (1) was expeditiously
accomplished in 8 steps from known compounds, with
6.6% overall yield. Overcoming the initial solubility
challenges and successfully pairing two transformations
in single pot procedures greatly contributed to the
overall efficiency of the total synthesis. Furthermore, the
presented multiple challenges, since the compound was
only soluble in halogenated solvents and highly polar
solvents such as DMF, but not in THF, diethyl ether, or
acetonitrile. In addition to solubility difficulties, deproto-
nation was not straightforward since treating 4 with lithium
diisopropylamide, lithium tetramethylpiperidine, potassium
tert-butoxide, or potassium hydride led to either decomposi-
tion or recovery of starting material. Alternatively, forming
the enol silyl ether with TMSOTf also led to a number of
products, presumably due to fragmentation of the silylated
intermediate. Fortunately, sodium hydride in DMF at 0 °C,
after only 3 h, in the presence of excess diphenyl disulfide,
afforded bis-sulfide 6 in 92% yield.
(8) For additional reading on tandem vicinal difunctionalization, see:
(a) Chapdelaine, M.; Hulce, M.Organic Reactions; Paquette, L. A., Ed.;
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, 1990; Vol. 38, Chapter 2, p 225.
(b) Taylor, R. J. K. Synthesis 1985, 4, 364. (c) Han, Y.-K.; Paquette,
L. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3731. (d) Zoretic, P. A.; Yu, B. C.; Biggers,
M. S.; Caspar, M. L. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3954.
The subsequent oxidation/elimination stepwas designed
based on the symmetric nature of 6. We first tried using
the mild oxidizing agent sodium periodate under standard
(9) (a) Posner, G. H. Organic Reactions; Dauren, W. G., Ed.; John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, 1972; Vol. 19, Chapter 1, p 1.
(b) Nielsen, E. B.; Munch-Petersen, J.; Jorgensen, P. M.; Refn, S. Acta
Chem. Scand. 1959, 13, 1943. (c) Munch-Petersen, J. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.
1966, 471.
(10) For the utilization of DBU for the elimination of mesylates, see:
(a) Mendelsohn, B. A.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.; Teyssier, F.; Aulakh, V. S.;
Ciufolini, M. A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1539. (b) Schmidt, V. A.; Alexanian,
E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11402.
(6) (a) Leonard, N. J.; Johnson, C. R. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 282.
(b) Hiskey, R. G.; Harpold, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 3191.
(7) For additional information on sulfoxide oxidationÀelimination,
see: (a) Trost, B. M. Chem. Rev. 1978, 78, 363. (b) Rousch, W. R.; Walts,
A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 721. (c) Nemoto, H.; Nagai, M.;
Fukumoto, K.; Kametani, T. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 2764. (d) Krafft,
M. E.; Kennedy, R. M.; Holton, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 2087.
614
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 3, 2013