62
I. Kumadaki et al. / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 97 (1999) 61±63
E-N-[4-phenyl-1-(tri¯uoromethyl)-3-butenyl]tosylamide
(8), respectively, while non-terminal ene compounds,
cyclohexene (9) and trans-2-octene (10), hardly reacted
(Scheme 1).2
The ene reaction of tri¯uoroacetaldehyde itself does not
proceed thermally [3]. This means that a tosylimino group is
a better substituent as an enophile than a carbonyl group,
while the two large substituents of 4, a tri¯uoromethyl and a
p-toluenesulfonyl groups, make non-terminal disubstituted
ole®ns unreactive. Thus, 4 was found to be useful as an
enophile in the reaction with terminal ole®ns. However,
synthesis of 4 needs multistep and it is highly sensitive to
moisture and dif®cult to do with. This could be the reason
why the yields of the reaction were not satisfactory.
If our previous ®nding that 1 reacted with ene compounds
in the presence of Lewis acids [4] could be applied here, the
above dif®culties would be removed (Scheme 2).
Namely, if 1 reacts with 3 in the presence of a Lewis acid
to give ꢀ-tosylamidoalcohol and this forms the imine 4 (a)
or the amidoalcohol reacts directly with an ene compound in
the presence of the Lewis acid (b), the same product from
the ene reaction will be obtained.
In practice, the best result was obtained when 1, 3 and two
equivalents of 5 were treated in the presence of about two
equivalents of titanium chloride in methylene chloride. By
this reaction the ene product 6 was obtained in 66% yield
with 19% of N-(2,2,2-tri¯uoro-1- ethoxyethyl)tosylamide
(11). This reaction is superior to the former ene reaction of
the imine (4), since this procedure needs not preliminary
formation of tri¯uoroacetaldehyde 2 and its imine 4.
The same reaction of allylbenzene (7) gave the ene
product (8) and N-(2,2,2-tri¯uoro- 1-ethoxyethyl)tosyla-
mide (11) in 34% and 25% yields, respectively.3 These
results showed that the same products from the ene reaction
Scheme 2.
of 4 were obtained from monosubstituted ole®ns by a much
more simple procedure. However, this procedure was not
effective for disubstituted ole®ns. These results are shown in
Scheme 3.
The above results suggest that disubstituted ole®ns are
much less reactive than monosubstituted ones. This may be
due to the larger steric hindrance of the reactive intermedi-
ate of this reaction than those in the reaction of tri¯uor-
omethyl carbonyl compounds.
The above method made the procedure for the ene
products much simpler, but the yields were not satisfactory,
and the reaction hardly proceeded with disubstituted ene
compounds. The byproduct of the above reaction, N-(2,2,2-
tri¯uoro-1-ethoxyethyl)tosylamide (11), seemed to be a
good intermediate for the ene products. We could obtain
11 in a high yield by reaction of 1 and 3 in the presence of
TiCl4, followed by treatment with ethanol.4
Treatment of 5 and 11 with TiCl4 gave 6 in 29% yield
after 20 h. Namely, the reaction proceeded very slowly. We
presumed that the reaction could be accelerated, if an
intermediate like the imine 4 was formed. Thus, 11 was
treated with sodium hydride then TiCl4 followed by addition
of 5 to the mixture. Remarkably, 6 was obtained in 86% by
this procedure.5 Investigation of the mixture by 19F-NMR
showed no signal of 4 but a new peak at 14.1 ppm from
benzotri¯uoride temporarily assigned to the intermediate 12
(Scheme 4).
2A typical procedure for the ene reaction: 1-Decene (5, 1.35 ml,
7.1 mmol) and xylene (10 ml) was added to 4 obtained as above, and the
mixture was refluxed for 16 h. The mixture was worked up the usual way,
and the product was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, hexane±
CH2Cl2, 7:3) to give N-[1-(trifluoromethyl)-3-undecenyl]tosylamide (6,
0.992 g, 34%). 6: Colorless crystals. Mp 46±478C. Mass spectrum (MS)
4Preparation of 11: In a stream of Ar, 1 (1.32 ml, 11 mmol) and TiCl4
(2.18 ml, 20 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of 3 (1.71 g,
10 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 ml), and the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 14 h, followed by treatment with EtOH (3.50 ml,
60 mmol), to give 11 (2.49 g, 84%) after separation by column
chromatography (SiO2, hexane±CH2Cl2±AcOEt, 7:2:1). 11: Colorless
m/z: 391 (M ). HRMS Calcd C19H28F3NO2S: 391.179. Found: 391.179.
1
IR (KBr) cm : 3292 (N±H), 1338, 1180 (SO). 1H-NMR (CDCl3) ꢂ: 0.88
(3H, t, J6.7 Hz), 1.13 (10H, m), 1.91 (2H, dt, J6.7, 6.7 Hz), 2.27 (1H,
ddd, J7.3, 7.3, 14.7 Hz), 2.35 (1H, ddd, J5.2, 7.3, 14.7 Hz), 2.43 (3H,
s), 3.91 (1H, m, ddq on treatment with D2O (J5.2, 7.3, 7.3 Hz)), 5.04
(1H, d, J9.2 Hz, disappeared on treatment with D2O), 5.10 (1H, ddd,
J7.3, 7.3, 15.2 Hz), 5.47 (1H, dtt, J15.2, 6.7, 1.2 Hz), 7.30 (2H, d,
J8.2 Hz), 7.73 (2H, d, J8.2 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3) ppm (from
C6H5CF3): 11.2 (3F, d, J7.3 Hz). All the spectral data of other products
support the assigned structures.
3The typical procedure of the reaction of 1, 3 and an ene compound in
the presence of TiCl4: In a stream of Ar, CF3CH(OH)OEt (1, 132 ꢁl,
1.1 mmol) and TiCl4 (218 ml, 2.0 mmol) was added to a solution of TsNH2
(3, 0.171 g, 1.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 ml) dropwise, then the mixture was
stirred for 4 h. Allylbenzene (7, 300 ꢁl, 2.3 mmol) was added to the
mixture, and the whole was stirred for 6 h in a sealed condition. The
mixture was worked up the usual way, and the product was separated by
column chromatography (SiO2, hexane±AcOEt±Et2O, 8:1:1) to give 8
(124 mg, 34%) and 11 (74 mg, 25%).
crystals. MS m/z: 349 (M ). HRMS Calcd C16H22F3NO2S: 349.132.
1
Found: 349.132. IR (KBr) cm : 3292 (N±H), 1330, 1166 (SO2). 1H-NMR
(CDCl3) ꢂ: 0.88 (3H, t, J7.3 Hz), 1.26 (4H, m), 1.42 (2H, m), 2.42 (3H,
s), 2.52 (1H, m), 3.97 (1H, ddq, J2.8, 12.5, 8.0 Hz), 4.71 (1H, d,
J12.5 Hz), 5.16 (1H, ddd, J0.9, 1.2, 17.1 Hz), 5.27 (1H, dd, J1.2,
10.7 Hz), 5.62 (1H, dddq, J8.2, 10.7, 17.1, 0.9 Hz), 7.29 (2H, d,
J8.2 Hz), 7.74 (2H, d, J8.2 Hz). 19F-NMR (CDCl3) ppm: 8.78 (3F, d,
J8.0 Hz).
5In a stream of Ar, a solution of 11 (0.300 g, 1.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(0.50 ml) and TiCl4 (218 ml, 2.0 mmol) were added in this order to a
suspension of 60% NaH (50 mg) in CH2Cl2 (1.50 ml), and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 1.5 h, then 1-decene (5, 190 ꢁl, 1.0 mmol)
was added. After stirring for 4 h, the mixture was worked up as usual and
the product was separated by column chromatography (SiO2, hexane±
CH2Cl2±AcOEt, 7:2:1) to give 6 (0.339 g, 86%).