Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of (-)-Virginiamycin M2 (1)
Figure 2. Type A streptogramins.
of the synthetic community.5,6 To date, several total syntheses
of the type A streptogramin antibiotics have been completed,5
along with a formal total synthesis.6 While all of the previous
syntheses of the streptogramin class of antibiotics derived
their asymmetry from the chiral pool, enzymatic resolution,
and/or chiral auxiliaries,5 we were interested in a de novo
asymmetric approach that would use asymmetric catalysis
to install the stereocenters of the non-amino acid portion of
type A streptogramins. Herein we describe our successful
efforts to implement this strategy for the de novo formal
total synthesis of virginiamycin M2.
Retrosynthetically, virginiamycin M2 (1) has been derived
from the seco-macrolide 2,5b which in turn could be prepared
from the known oxazole 3, and triene 4. Previously,
Schlessinger had demonstrated the conversion of 4 and 3 to
virginiamycin M2 (1).5a In our strategy (Scheme 1), we
envisioned the triene 4 as being assembled from D-proline,
allylic amine 5, and δ-hydroxy ester 6. Finally, we planned
to install the asymmetry of these two fragments by the
application of a regioselective Sharpless asymmetric dihy-
droxylation of diene fragments 7 and 8.7,8 In particular, we
were interested in using our asymmetric hydration strategy
for the preparation of the syn-γ-substituted δ-hydroxyenoate
6.9
To access useful quantities of dienoate 8, an efficient five-
step approach was developed (Scheme 2). While the route
featured standard Wittig/Horner-Emmons olefination chem-
istry, key to practical nature of this approach was the
recognition that TFA can catalyze the stereoselective isomer-
ization of enal 11 to the more stable E-isomer (98:2), which
when treated with the stabilized Wittig reagent provided good
yields of 8 (72%).10 While we previously had demonstrated
the asymmetric hydration of 8 to the enantiomer of 6, because
of the pseudo-enantiomeric nature of the Sharpless reagents
(4) For conformational studies of the virginiamycin type antibiotics,
see: (a) Dang, J.; Metzger, R. P.; Brownlee, R. T. C.; Chai, A. N.; Separovic,
F. Eur. J. Biophys. 2005, 34, 383-388. (b) Dang, J.; Separovic, F.;
Brownlee, R. T. C.; Metzger, R. P. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 2919-
2924. (c) Dang, J.; Separovic, F.; Brownlee, R. T. C.; Metzger, R. P. Aust.
J. Chem. 2004, 57, 415-418.
Scheme 2. Asymmetric Hydration of Dienoate 8
(5) For the first total synthesis of virginiamycin M2, see: (a) Schlessinger,
R. H.; Li, Y.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3301-3302. For the second,
see: (b) Breuilles, P.; Uguen, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3149-3152.
For the first total synthesis of madumycin II, see: (c) Tavares, F.; Lawson,
J. P.; Meyers A. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3303-3304. For the second,
see: (d) Ghosh, A. K.; Liu, W. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7908-7909.
(6) Brennan, C. J.; Campagne, J.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5195-
5197.
(7) The regioselectivity of the asymmetric dihydroxylation of di- and
trienoates has been studied by Sharpless. See: (a) Berker, H.; Soler, M.
A.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 1345-1376. Our group: (b)
Zhang, Y.; O’Doherty, G. A. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6337-6351.
(8) For the use of this approach in synthesis, see: (a) Smith, A. B.; Walsh,
S. P.; Frohn, M.; Duffey, M. O. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 139-142. (b) Ahmed,
Md. M.; Akhmedov, N.; Cui, H.; Friedrich, D.; O’Doherty, G. A.
Heterocycles 2006, 70, 223-233. (c) Ahmed, Md. M.; Cui, H.; O’Doherty,
G. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6686-6689. (d) Gao, D.; O’Doherty, G. A.
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9932-9939. (e) Ahmed, Md. M.; O’Doherty, G.
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 4151-4155.
(9) (a) Ahmed, Md.; Mortensen, M. M. S.; O’Doherty, G. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 7741-7746. (b) Hunter, T. J.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 1049-1052. For its use in the synthesis of natural products,
see: (c) Li, M.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3987-3990. (d) Li,
M.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 6087-6090.
3106
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 16, 2007