M.A. Raviolo et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 69 (2013) 455e464
461
2
ꢀ
absorbed compounds are identified as those with PSA ꢅ 140 A
were of commercial quality (>97%) from freshly opened containers,
and solvents were of analytical grade.
[38].
The last parameter studied was the molecular rigidity, which
suggests that if NRB is >10 a poor oral bioavailability could occur
[37]. Summing up, when the developed derivatives 2aec and 3aec
were subjected to Lipinski rules, PSA and NRB analyses, it can be
observed in Table 3, that all of them exhibited acceptable
characteristics.
4.2. Equipment
High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) was performed in a
Bruker micrOTOF-Q II, using the electrospray ionization (ESI) pos-
itive mode and atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI). Nu-
clear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) experiments were performed on
Bruker Avance II 400, Ultrashield, Frequency 1H NMR 400.16 MHz
3. Conclusions
13
and C NMR 100.62 Hz, Dual BBI Probe, at 25 ꢃC, using DMSO-d6
(99.8%, Merck) as solvent. The assignment of all exchangeable
protons (OH, NH) was confirmed by the addition of D2O (99.9%,
Sigma), and chemical shift values are reported in parts per million
Different strategies were developed for the synthesis of six Allop
derivatives (2aec and 3aec), which were unequivocally charac-
terized by different spectroscopic methods. Regarding these ana-
(d) relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS). The splitting pattern ab-
lyses, the results showed that all derivatives had
a better
breviations are as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; qua,
quartet; quin, quintet. Ultraviolet spectrophotometric (UV) studies
were carried out using a Shimadzu Model UV-160A spectropho-
tometer, with 1 cm quartz cells. Melting point (mp) and thermal
analysis were carried out using differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) 2920 modulated DSC (TA Instrument); the temperature axis
and the cell constant of the DSC were calibrated with indium, and
thermogravimetric analysis (TG) measurements were performed
with a TA Instrument Hi-res TG 2950 (TA Instrument). Weighed
samples (1.5e3 mg, C-33 Microbalance, Cahan) were scanned in
covered aluminum (Al) pans under a dynamic dry nitrogen atmo-
sphere (50 mL minꢀ1). The pH values were measured with a CRI-
SON GLP-21 pH meter equipped with an Ag/AgCl glass electrode.
physicochemical profile than Allop, as well as that all met Lipinski’s
rules and had suitable characteristics of PSA and NRB.
When the inhibitory effects of the C6-alkyl- and N1-acyl de-
rivatives of Allop against T. cruzi were studied, none of the com-
pounds showed any significant trypanocidal activity in vitro against
TRYP. In contrast, the AMAS resulted susceptible to the 2a, 2b and
3c derivatives of Allop when tested at 1 m
g mLꢀ1. As this hypo-
xantine analog is used by the T. cruzi’s HGPRT as an alternative
substrate during the duplicative process [10], it is certain that the
AMAS forms were involved. On testing different concentrations of
the derivatives, only the 3c compound displayed an inhibitory ef-
fect, probably by being incorporated into the parasite ribonucleic
acid as no physiological nucleotides or blocking of the synthesis of
new purine nucleotide occurred. The 3c derivative exhibited an
IC50 value similar to Allop, which was not toxic for mammalian
cells. The development and maintenance of chronic lesions are due
to persistent intracellular parasites in targeted tissues, which the
immune response is unable to eradicate.
Hence, the possible role of 3c in Chagas disease may become a
practical tool in the improvement of the prognosis of these patients.
It is important to point out that modifications on C-6 (2aec) led to
chemical entities that could not be transformed into Allop in bio-
logical media such as plasma and SIF. Although these compounds
did not have parasiticidal activity per se, they presented better
physicochemical properties than the prototype (Allop).
4.3. Chemistry
4.3.1. Characterization of C6-alkyl series (2aec)
4.3.1.1. 6-Methyl-1,5-dihydro-4H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one
(2a). Light yellow solid (82% yield), Rf ¼ 0.45 (CH2Cl2/EtOH 10:1);
mp: 304 ꢃC; HPLC tr ¼ 3.7 min, MLC tr ¼ 3.0 min. 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6):
d 13.55 (s, 1H, NH-1), 11.92 (s, 1H, NH-5), 8.00 (s, 1H, H-3), 2.33
(s, 3H, H-10). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d
159.3 (CO, C-4), 157.5 (C, C-6),
155.8 (C, C-7a), 134.2 (CH, C-3), 104.1 (C, C-3a), 21.9 (CH3, C-10).
HRMS (APPI) calcd for C6H7N4O (M þ H)þ m/z: 151.0614; found:
151.0622; UV lmax/nm (MeOH, pH 5) 250.
The 3aec series were promising candidates, especially com-
pound 3c, since it demonstrated not only excellent activity against
T. cruzi, but also no cytotoxicity and gave Allop in an adequate time.
These features led to a better lipophilicity and solubility than Allop,
as well as to a lower crystalline lattice, with the possibility of better
pharmacokinetic profiles of the regenerated active compound.
4.3.1.2. 6-Ethyl-1,5-dihydro-4H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one
(2b). Light yellow solid (83% yield): Rf ¼ 0.64 (CH2Cl2/EtOH 10:1);
mp: 325 ꢃC; HPLC tr ¼ 5.3 min, MLC tr ¼ 4.7 min. 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6): d 13.58 (s, 1H, NH-1), 11.92 (s, 1H, NH-5), 7.98 (s, 1H, H-3), 2.63
(qua, 2H, H-10), 1.22 (t, 3H, H-20). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 162.1 (C, C-
6), 158.8 (CO, C-4), 154.7 (C, C-7a), 135.4 (CH, C-3), 104.1 (C, C-3a),
28.0 (CH2, C-10), 11.7 (CH3, C-20). HRMS (APPI) calcd for C7H9N4O
(M þ H)þ m/z: 165.0771; found: 165.0778. UV lmax/nm (MeOH, pH
5) 250.
4. Experimental section
4.1. Chemicals and reagents
4.3.1.3. 6-Propyl-1,5-di hydro-4H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one
(2c). Light yellow solid (81% yield): Rf ¼ 0.72 (CH2Cl2/EtOH 10:1);
mp: 292 ꢃC; HPLC tr ¼ 8.8 min, MLC tr ¼ 7.8 min. 1H NMR (DMSO-
Allopurinol, propionic anhydride, butyric anhydride, acetyl
chloride, propionyl chrolide and butyryl chloride were purchased
from Sigma, and acetic anhydride was purchased from Merck. The
buffer materials of pH 1.2 (hydrochloric acid/sodium chloride), pH
5.5 (acetic acid/sodium acetate) and pH 6.8 (sodium dihydrogen
phosphate/phosphoric acid) were of analytical reagent grade.
The SGF and SIF were prepared according to USP specifications
[40]. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was purchased from Biopack, 1-
propanol (analytical grade) was purchased from Cicarelli and
methanol (MeOH, HPLC grade) was acquired from Sintorgan. The
water used in all studies was of Milli-Q grade (MilliporeÒ), and
solutions and mobile phases were filtered through Millipore filters
d6):
d 13.55 (s, 1H, NH-1), 11.98 (s, 1H, NH-5), 7.99 (s, 1H, H-3), 2.57
(t, 2H, H-10), 1.71 (sex, 2H, H-20), 0.91 (t, 3H, H-30). 13C NMR (DMSO-
d6): d 160.5 (C, C-6), 159.3 (CO, C-4), 155.6 (C, C-7a), 134.2 (CH, C-3),
104.2 (C, C-3a), 36.5 (CH2, C-10), 20.7 (CH2, C-20), 14.0 (CH3, C-30).
HRMS (APPI) calcd for C8H11N4O (M þ H)þ m/z: 179.0927; found:
179.0938. UV lmax/nm (MeOH, pH 5) 250.
4.3.2. Characterization of N1-acyl series (3aec)
4.3.2.1. 1-Acetyl-1,5-dihydro-4H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-one
(3a). White solid, recrystallization from DMF/EtOH (60% yield);
Rf ¼ 0.73 (CH2Cl2/EtOH 8:2); mp: 267 ꢃC; HPLC tr ¼ 3.7 min, MLC
Type FH (4.5 mm) (Millipore) and degassed under vacuum. Reagents