is inversely correlated with enantiselectivity.3a We now report
a method utilizing pH control to override other variables in
the AA reaction of styrenes to selectively provide the B
regioisomer with good enantiomeric ratios (ers).5
The regioselectivity of the AA is known to be influenced
by the nature of the alkaloid ligand used. With this in mind,
the common (DHQ)2AQN, (DHQ)2PHAL, and (DHQ)2PYR
ligands were examined, as well as some less common
alkaloid ligands. These reactions were performed in phos-
phate buffer (pH 7.5-7.7) with p-acetoxystyrene as the
substrate. As summarized in Table 1, the B regioisomer was
We required a convenient method to generate a variety of
1-aryl-2-amino ethanol derivatives for our program in the
synthesis of compounds that influence apoptosis. Investiga-
tion of styrene derivatives as substrates for the AA revealed
that the pH was changing during the course of the reaction.
As it is known that the asymmetric dihydroxylation is facile
at pH >10,6 we conducted our AA studies in the presence
of a phosphate buffer, allowing for precise control of pH.
When the reaction was buffered between pH 7.5 and 8.5,
we found that the B regioisomer was preferentially formed
irrespective of the nature of the styrene substrate, the solvent,
or the ligand.
Table 1. Ligand Effect on the Regiomeric Composition in the
Buffered Aminohydroxylation of p-Acetoxystyrene
solvent/buffer ratio yield er of
entry
ligand
(DHQ)2AQN
(DHQ)2AQN
(DHQ)2AQN
(DHQ)2PHAL
(DHQ)2PHAL
(DHQ)2PYR
(1:1)
A:Ba of Bb Bc (S:R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CH3CN
n-propanol 1:4
THF
CH3CN
1:10 82
87:13
75:25
58:42
85:15
79:21
70:30
26:74
12:88
45:55
45:55
50:50
50:50
47:53
41:59
50:50
11:89
57
53
52
42
38
44
71
56
53
30
45
43
42
60
1:4
1:5
The dependence of chemo- and regioselectivity on pH is
depicted graphically in Figure 1 for styrene. The reactions
n-propanol 1:2
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
1:3
1:1
1:4
1:5
1:5
1:3
1:3
1:3
1:2
1:5
(DHQD)2BcPHAL
8. (DHQD)2PHALPh2
DHQD-MEQ
9
10 DHQD-CLB
11 (DHQD)2PYR(iPr)
12 (DHQD)2PYR
13 (DHQD)2PYR(Naph)
14 (DHQD)2PYR(OMe)3
15 (DHQD)2PYR(Morph) CH3CN
16 (DHQD)2AQN CH3CN
1:10 78
a Determined from 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. b Isolated
yield after chromatography on silica gel. c Ratios determined by chiral SFC.
Stereochemistry assigned from optical rotation and comparison to known
compounds.
preferentially formed for almost all ligand/solvent combina-
tions. Even under (DHQ)2PHAL/n-PrOH conditions (Table
1, entry 5), a combination known to give a strong preference
for regioisomer A,3a,b,e the buffered AA gave B as the
predominant product. In general, the AQN-based ligands with
acetonitrile gave the best yield, regioselectivity, and enan-
tioselectivity in this buffered asymmetric aminohydroxylation
(Table 1, entries 1 and 16).
A range of p-acetoxystyrene substrate concentrations was
evaluated under the buffered AA conditions. Substrate
concentrations greater than 80 mM led to significant diol
formation, up to 30% at 160 mM. Similar effects of
concentration on chemoselectivity have been previously
observed in the AA.7
The effect of temperature on the reaction outcome was
determined to be minimal, as the regio-, chemo-, and
enantioselectivities were essentially the same over a range
of temperatures. However, the reaction proceeded much more
rapidly at higher temperatures. Indeed, at 40 °C the reaction
was complete in 5 to 7 min (Figure 2).
Figure 1. Reaction mixture composition for the aminohydroxy-
lation of styrene in the pH range from 5.5 to 11.3. The ratio of
products was determined by integration of the 1H NMR of the crude
reaction mixture.
were performed in a 2:1 mixture of acetonitrile/0.5 M
phosphate buffer with a variety of pH values. As illustrated
in Figure 1, pH values in the range of 7.5-8.5 are optimal
for obtaining high yields of the B regioisomer; formation of
the A regioisomer and of the diol side product are maximally
suppressed at this pH.
Substitution of the carboxybenzylcarbamate (Cbz) nitrogen
source with tert-butylcarbamate (Boc) or n-butylcarbamate
(5) For recent studies on the pH dependence of the asymmetric
dihyroxylation see: (a) Krief, A.; Castillo-Colaux, C. Synlett 2001, 501-
504. (b) Dupau, P.; Epple, R.; Thomas, A. A.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K.
B. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 421-434.
(6) Dobler, C.; Mehltretter, G.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 3026-3028.
(7) Wuts, P. G. M.; Anderson, A. M.; Goble, M. P.; Mancini, S. E.;
VanderRoest, R. J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2667-2669.
282
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 3, 2003