H. Elokdah et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 1791±1794
1793
structure of 1-(5-chloro-2-methylphenyl)-2-(ethyl sulfanyl)
imidazolidine-4,5-dione (8). 2-Substituted sulfanyl-imid-
azolidine-4,5-dione derivatives are unique and have not
been described in the literature. Initial attempts to prepare
8 via hydride reduction of compound 2a failed to yield
the desired product or yielded an intractable mixture of
products. Compound 8 was successfully prepared from
2a by catalytic hydrogenation (5% Pd/C) in ethanol at
atmospheric pressure (Scheme 2). The reaction pro-
ceeded in good yield and the compound was obtained as
a stable solid.
Saturation of the resonance at 6.23 ppm (Hb) induced
an NOE intensity increase in the aromatic methyl reso-
nance, in the aromatic H6 resonance, and in the S-CH2
resonance. These close interaromatic distances were
con®rmed by saturation of the other half of each dipolar
coupled pair of resonances.
The eect of the synthetic metabolite (8) on the lipid
pro®le of test animals was investigated. Compound 8
did not alter the lipid pro®les of either the cholesterol-fed
rats or the cholesterol-fed hamsters at the test dose of
100 mg/kg/day.
Both the synthetic material and the isolated metabolite
were identical as indicated by their HPLC pro®les, UV,
MS, and 1H NMR spectra (Fig.2). The structure
assignment of 8 was based on elemental analysis, mass
and 1H NMR spectroscopy.12 The chemical shift for the
S-CH2 resonance is at 2.5 ppm, up®eld from the corre-
sponding S-CH2 of compound 1f (3.1 ppm) or that of
compound 2a (3.26 ppm). The resonance at 7.65 ppm
shifted to 7.35 ppm when the temperature was raised
from 25 ꢀC to 40 ꢀC, indicating a resonance corre-
sponding to an exchangeable proton. The most impor-
tant structural evidence was derived from a series of
NOE experiments.
In conclusion, novel 2-substituted sulfanyl-3,5-dihydro-
imidazole-4-one derivatives and 2-substituted sulfanyl-
1H-imidazole-4,5-dione derivatives were described.
Their eects on increasing serum HDL-C over other
lipid fractions were illustrated in animal models. Con-
cerns about the chemical and metabolic stability of
these classes of compounds directed our eorts to a
related series of N-alkyl N0-substituted thiohydantoin
derivatives.13 These compounds were also eective in
raising HDL-C over other lipid fractions and oered
improved stability and metabolic pro®les. This series of
compounds will be the subject of a future publication.
As expected, saturation of the water resonance trans-
ferred saturation to resonance Ha (exchangeable).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mr. Bruce Hofmann and Mr.
James Mattes for performing 1H NMR spectroscopy
experiments, Dr. Mei-Yi Zhang for the mass spectro-
metry, and Ms. Natasha Kagan for isolation of the
metabolite.
References and Notes
1. (a) For a review article see: Barter, P. J.; Rye, K.-A.
Atherosclerosis 1996, 121, 1. (b) Barr, D. P.; Russ, E. M.;
Eder, H. A. Am. J. Med. 1951, 11, 480. (c) Gofman, J. W.;
Young, W.; Tandy, R. Circulation 1966, 34, 679. (d) Miller, G.
J.; Miller, N. E. Lancet 1975, 1, 16. (e) Gordon, D. J.;
Probst®eld, J. L.; Garrison, R. J.; Neaton, J. D.; Castelli, W.
P.; Knoke, J. D.; Jacobs, D. R., Jr.; Bangdiwala, S.; Tyroler,
H. A. Circulation 1989, 79, 8. (f) Stampfer, M. J.; Sacks, F.
M.; Salvini, S.; Willett, W. C.; Hennekens, C. H. N. Engl. J.
Med. 1991, 325, 373. (g) Badimon, J. J.; Badimon, L.; Galuz,
A.; Dische, R.; Fuster, V. Lab. Invest. 1989, 60, 455.
2. Miller, N. E.; Hammett, F.; Saltissi, S.; Rao, S.; Zeller, H.
V.; Coltant, J.; Lewis, B. Br. Med. J. 1981, 282, 1741.
3. Picardo, M.; Massey, J. B.; Kuhn, D. E.; Gotto, A. M., Jr.;
Gianturco, S. H.; Pownall, H. J. Arteriosclerosis 1986, 6, 434.
4. Glomset, J. A. J. Lipid Res. 1968, 9, 155.
Figure 1. Lipoprotein and lipid eects in cynomolgus monkeys dosed
with 10 mg/kg/day orally for 4 weeks. Data represent mean for n=4
monkeys at timepoints 0, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks of dosing. VLDL-
C=Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C=low density
lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C=high density lipoprotein cholesterol,
TC=total cholesterol, and TG=triglycerides. ÃRepresents sig-
ni®cantly dierent from baseline at P<0.05.
5. (a) Glass, C. K.; Pittman, R. C.; Keller, G. A.; Steinberg,
D. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 7161. (b) Mackinnon, M.; Savage,
J.; Wishant, R.; Barter, P. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 2548.
6. (a) Grow, T. E.; Fried, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1978, 253, 8034. (b)
Lagocki, P. A.; Scanu, A. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 3701. (c)
Schaefer, E. J.; Wetzel, M. G.; Bengtsson, G.; Scow, R. O.;
Brewer, H. B., Jr.; Olivecrons, T. J. Lipid Res. 1982, 23, 1259.
7. Screening of the compound ®le in an in vivo based assay
(see ref 10) led to the identi®cation of a series of aryl thiose-
micarbazones as HDL-C enhancers. For more information
see: (a) Commons, T. J.; Musial, C. L.; Christman, S. US
Figure 2. Selected 1H NMR chemical shifts in (CDCl3, 400 MHz) of
metabolite 8.