Reaction of Cyclic Anhydrides with Substituted Phenols
containing the fully hydrolyzed anhydride in the presence of
substituted phenols with one at the same concentration
prepared with phthalic or maleic acid and the corresponding
phenol.
SCHEME 3. Effective Charge Map for the
Phenolysis of Phthalic Anhydride Involving a
Putative Tetrahedral Intermediate
Aqueous solutions were made up from water purified in a
Millipore apparatus. Acetonitrile was dried on silica gel 10%
p/v as described in the literature.29
Kinetic Procedures. Most reactions were carried out in a
stopped-flow apparatus with unequal mixing. The appropriate
anhydride dissolved in dry acetonitrile was placed in the
smaller syringe (0.1 mL). The larger syringe (2.5 mL) was filled
with a water solution containing all the other ingredients.
Considering the possibility of formation of a tetrahe-
dral intermediate with finite lifetime (Scheme 3) and
assuming that leaving group expulsion is the rate-
determining step,24 the value of âNuc determined in the
present work correspond to â1. Taking into account data
from the literature (see d-f in Scheme 2), the effective
charge on the oxygen in the intermediate can be esti-
mated as approximately +0.4 which leads to âEq1 1.4 and
â-1 -0.95. Considering conservation of effective charges4
the value of âEq2 is estimated as 0.3. A small value for
âEq2 is reasonable because the substituent on the aryl
group should not have any significant influence on either
the rate of the leaving group (â2) or the rate for nucleo-
philic attack by the neighboring carboxylate group (â-2).25
The linearity of the Bro¨nsted plots and the value of
their slopes are not enough evidences to either prove or
disprove a concerted mechanism. The best demonstration
of a concerted process is the lack of a Bro¨nsted break at
the pKa expected for a change in rate-determining step
if the reaction were stepwise.8,9 For the phenolysis of
anhydrides the center of the Bro¨nsted curvature (break-
point) for a stepwise reaction should be around pKa 3
(pKa of aryl hydrogen phthalates10). Unfortunately, this
pKa is far lower than the pKa range used in this
investigation. The formation of the tetrahedral interme-
diate is expected to be rate limiting in the phenolysis of
phenyl esters when the nucleophile has a pKa greater
than that of the leaving group.26 It has been suggested27
that the alkaline hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl esters
proceeds toward the anionic tetrahedral intermediate
with a nearly tetrahedral transition-state structure, and
the expulsion of the leaving group from the tetrahedral
intermediate does not create a significant barrier of
activation.28 We do not have any reason to suppose that
the expulsion of carboxylate with pKa ≈ 3 has an
important barrier of activation for substituted phenoxides
with pKa higher than 7. Therefore, we think that a
concerted or enforced concerted mechanism more ad-
equately describes these reactions.
The slow reactions were measured in the cell, with temper-
ature control, of a conventional spectrophotometer by adding
the substrate dissolved in acetonitrile to a solution containing
all of the other ingredients in the required proportions to have
the same amount of the organic solvent as in the stopped-flow
experiments.
The substituted phenols concentration was varied between
1 and 2 × 10-3 M. The total acetonitrile concentration was
4.25% v/v. The solutions of the substrate for the kinetic
determinations were freshly prepared in dry acetonitrile in
the appropriate concentration to get a final concentration of
1.2 × 10-4 M.
All reactions were run at 25.0 ( 0.1 °C and at constant ionic
strength (0.5 M) using NaCl as the compensating electrolyte.
The pH measurements were made with a pH meter at
controlled temperature and calibrated with buffers prepared
according to the literature.30
The observed rate constants were determined by measuring
the change in absorbance at 250, 265, or 300 nm, depending
on the anhydride and substituted phenol, and the wavelength
was chosen so as to have the best signal-to-noise ratio. In some
of the experiments, the pH of the solution was checked after
the reaction by measuring it in the discarded solution, and
the changes observed were always less than 0.03 pH units.
The kinetic traces were fitted to one exponential equation
using the software of the SF apparatus.
The pKa of substituted phenols were taken from the litera-
ture,17 since in previous work we found that there are few
differences in the pKa of the phenols measured at 0.5 and 1 M
ionic strength.10
Acknowledgment. This research was supported in
part by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cien-
t´ıficas y Te´cnicas (CONICET), the Agencia Co´rdoba
Ciencia, Agencia Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa
(FONCYT), Fundacio´n Antorchas, and the Universidad
Nacional de Co´rdoba, Argentina. G.O.A. is a grateful
recipient of a fellowship from CONICET.
Experimental Section
-1
Supporting Information Available: Table S1 with τ2
Materials. Phthalic and maleic anhydrides were sublimed
before use.29 The purity of the products was also checked by
comparing the UV-vis absorption spectrum of a solution
for the reactions of phthalic anhydride with m-cyanophenol,
Table S2 τ2 for the reactions of maleic anhydride with all
-1
the phenols, Tables S3 and S4 with data for phthalic anhydride
with all the other Z-PhOH used, Tables S5 with τ1-1 for maleic
anhydride with phenol at different buffer concentrations, Table
S6 with the data for all the other Z-PhOH, and Table S7 with
the second-order rate constants for the reactions of maleic and
phthalic anhydride with phenol at different buffer concentra-
tions. Figure S1: plot of τ2 vs phenol concentration for the
reaction of phthalic anhydride with phenol. This material is
(24) Leaving group expulsion in the reverse direction in Scheme 3
could be rate determining if bond rupture to regenerate the ester is
faster that expulsion of the phenolate anion. This is a reasonable
possibility since the pKa of the carboxylate group is much lower than
that of the phenol.
(25) Fife, T. H.; Hutchins, J. E. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
4194.
(26) (a) Colthurst, M. J.; Williams, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2 1997, 1493. (b) Ba-Saif, S.; Luthra, A. K.; Williams, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1989, 111, 2647. (c) Williams, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 387.
(27) Shames, S. L.; Byers, L. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6170.
(28) This is defined as an enforced concerted mechanism.7
(29) Perrin, D. D.; Armarego, W. L. G. Purification of Laboratory
Chemicals, 3rd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd: Great Britain, 1994.
JO048183L
(30) See ref 17.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2005 1449