Organic Process Research & Development
ARTICLE
(F. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.). U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. U.S. 2008/108816
A1, 2008.
(25) Other conditions such as SOCl2/pyridine, POCl3/pyridine,
and the Vilsmeier and Burgess reagents provided also good conversions
(5) The HornerꢀWadsworthꢀEmmons route to hydroxymethyl
butenolide 6 is known; see: (a) Gadir, S. A.; Smith, Y.; Taha, A. A.;
Thaller, V. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1986, 222. (b) Harrison, T.; Myers, P. L.;
Pattenden, G. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 5247. (c) Lattmann, E.; Hoffmann,
H. M. R. Synthesis 1996, 155. (d) Balasubramaniam, R. P.; Moss, D. K.;
Wyatt, J. K.; Spence, J. D.; Gee, A.; Nantz, M. H. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 7429.
and yields. MsCl/Et3N, DEAD/PPh3, and SO3 NEt3 led to unsatisfac-
tory conversions and/or yields.
3
(26) More than 250 strains produced the undesired enantiomer (R)-
3, many with 100% conversion and ee values >98%. Screenings were
performed in a 24 deep-well format at 0.1% w/v substrate concentration.
(27) Iridium catalysts in a short screening afforded only low
conversions and enantioselectivities.
(6) Crawforth, J. M.; Fawcett, J.; Rawlings, B. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 1721.
(28) (a) Benincori, T.; Cesarotti, E.; Piccolo, O.; Sannicolꢀo, F. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 2043.(b) Antognazza, P.; Benincori, T.; Brenna, E.;
Cesarotti, E.; Sannicolꢀo, F.; Trimarco, L. (Italfarmaco Sud S.P.A.). PCT
Int. Appl. WO 96/01831 A1, 1996.
(29) A solvent screening in the Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation with 22l
as the ligand showed DCM (92ꢀ93% ee) and trifluoromethylbenzene
(91% ee) to be preferred solvents. Toluene (73% ee) and the group of
methanol, isopropanol, THF and ethyl acetate (e33% ee) turned out to
be vastly inferior. Whether traces of HX (X = halogen) released from the
solvent contributed to the higher ee’s in the halogenated solvents—as
suggested by a reviewer—was not investigated.
(7) See e.g.: (a) Mori, K.; Yamane, K. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 2919.
(b) Mori, K.; Chiba, N. Liebigs Ann. Chem 1989, 957. A sample of (R)-7
prepared in-house by the Evans route suffered from ∼90% racemization
upon standing at ambient temperature for three weeks; Dr. P. Mattei,
personal communication.
(8) (a) Ohta, T.; Miyake, T.; Seido, N.; Kumobayashi, H.; Takaya,
H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 357. (b) Kamlage, S.; Sefkow, M.; Zimmer-
mann, N.; Peter, M. G. Synlett 2002, 77. (c) Bronze-Uhle, E. S.; de Sairre,
M. I.; Donate, P. M.; Frederico, D. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 259, 103.
(9) Hughes, G.; Kimura, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 11253.
(30) Preformed Ru catalysts were prepared as described; cf.:
(a) Heiser, B.; Broger, E. A.; Crameri, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1991, 2, 51.(b) Cereghetti, M.; Foricher, J.; Heiser, B.; Schmid, R. (F.
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.). U.S. Patent 5,488,172, 1996. (c) Chan,
A. S. C.; Laneman, S. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 223, 165. Other Ru
catalysts were made in situ from [Ru(OAc)2(COD)] and the bispho-
sphine ligand in the presence of the starting material 13 and MeOH
(40 °C, 2 h). Only marginal ee differences were observed in cases where
both the preformed and the in situ prepared catalyst were evaluated.
(31) At this point, it may be of interest to note that hydrogenation of
the analogous nonfluorinated compound 3-methyl-2-buten-4-olide with
Ru catalyst 23 provided (S)-3-methyl-γ-butyrolactone with ee values of
only 77% and 59% ee at S/C 100 and 5000, respectively (50 bar H2, 40
°C, 20 h, MeOH). On the other hand, the Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation
(10) Geiger, C.; Kreitmeier, P.; Reiser, O. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005,
347, 249.
(11) See e.g. Takabe, K.; Tanaka, M.; Sugimoto, M.; Yamada, T.;
Yoda, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1992, 3, 1385.
(12) Asymmetric hydrogenation of hydroxymethyl butenolide 6 was
reported to lead to material of very low ee, likely due to the propensity of
the optically active product 7 to racemize (cf. reference 8c).
(13) Commercial material was used, or the ylide was prepared and
isolated from [(ethoxycarbonyl)methyl]triphenylphosphonium bro-
mide in a NaOH/DCM two-phase system.
(14) 1,3-Dihydroxyacetone (12) in substance exists mainly in the
dimeric hemiacetal form unless freshly distilled; see: (a) Fischer,
H. O. L.; Mildbrand, H. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B 1924, 57B, 707.
(b) Davies, L. Bioorg. Chem. 1973, 2, 197. (c) Yoda, H.; Mizutani, M.;
Takabe, K. Synlett 1998, 855. The monomer/dimer ratio had no
influence on the reaction.
of 3-methyl-2-buten-4-olide ([RhCl(COD)]2
50 bar H2, 40 °C, 20 h, DCM) provided 92% ee, equal to the ee
obtained for 13.
þ
22l, S/C 100,
(32) Banfi, L.; Basso, A.; Guanti, G.; Zannetti, M. T. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 4079.
(33) Yoshida, Y.; Sakakura, Y.; Aso, N.; Okada, S.; Tanabe, Y.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 2183.
(15) The formerly used aqueous protocol (10% H2SO4 in MeOH)
was less selective and led to material that was difficult to purify by
distillation or crystallization.
(16) An alternative two-step access to 6 involved reaction of 12 with
Ph3PdCHCO2t-Bu and ester cleavageꢀcyclization with 0.25 M HCl in
methanol. Hydroxymethyl butenolide 6 was obtained in 73% yield over
two steps after chromatography which proved inevitable.
(17) Singh, R. P.; Shreeve, J. M. Synthesis 2002, 2561 and references
cited therein.
(34) For an independent synthesis based on a microbial
BayerꢀVilliger oxidation of 3-benzyloxy-cyclobutanone see: Mazzini,
C.; Lebetron, J.; Alphand, V.; Furstoss., R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5215.
For a synthesis of (R)-27 starting from (R)-paraconic acid ((R)-11) see:
Mori, K. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 3107.
(35) For the preparation of optically active (S)-tert-butyl glycidyl
ether see: (a) Thakur, S. S.; Li, W.-J.; Shin, C.-K.; Kim, G.-J. Chirality
2005 (Volume Date 2006), 18, 37. (b) Kim, M.-J.; Lim, I. T.; Choi, G.-
B.; Whang, S.-Y.; Ku, B.-C.; Choi, J.-Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996,
6, 71. (c) Kotik, M.; Brichac, J.; Kyslik, P. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 120, 364.
(36) Schaus, S. E.; Brandes, B. D.; Larrow, J. F.; Tokunaga, M.;
Hansen, K. B.; Gould, A. E.; Furrow, M. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 1307 and references cited therein.
(18) Yin, J.; Zarkowsky, D. S.; Thomas, D. W.; Zhao, M. M.;
Huffman, M. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1465.
(19) For a review see: Haufe, G. J. Fluorine Chem. 2004, 125, 875.
(20) Van Hijfte, L.; Heydt, V.; Kolb, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 4793.
(21) The primary alcohol rac-16 is slightly less volatile than the
secondary alcohol rac-15. Pure samples of rac-15 and rac-16 were
obtained by chromatography.
(37) The lower boiling (S)-14 was separated from the higher-boiling
(22) Further polar solvents such as DMF, DMA, NMP, DMPU, and
DMSO proved poor in terms of chemoselectivity and yields and/
or rates.
(R)-tert-butyl glyceryl ether by distillation.
(38) When the reaction mixture was warmed up and stirred at
ambient temperature, increasing racemization was observed (1 h: 0.75%;
24 h: 23% (S)-28 formation).
(39) At ambient temperature the stability of the neat triflate (R)-28
could be extended to 1ꢀ2 days by the addition of solid K2CO3 or DIPEA
(5 mol%). As solution in DCM (R)-28 was stable at ambient tempera-
ture for two days without any additive. Although the corresponding
mesylate, tosylate and nosylate derivatives were stable compounds, only
the triflate (R)-28 was sufficiently reactive to effect a selective and
efficient malonate substitution.
(23) Et3N 2HF has been reported to be more nucleophilic than
3
Et3N 3HF, see: (a) Giudicelli, M. B.; Picq, D.; Veyron, B. Tetrahedron
3
Lett. 1990, 31, 6527. (b) Chou, T. S.; Becke, L. M.; O’Toole, J. C.; Carr,
M. A.; Parker, B. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 17.
(24) The use of catalytic amounts of conc. H2SO4 allowed for a
nonaqueous workup (quenching with solid NaOAc followed by filtra-
tion over Na2SO4), hence, avoiding extractive isolation of the rather
water-soluble hydroxy lactone 19. Use of excess of conc. H2SO4
necessitated an aqueous workup and exhaustive extraction of 19 with
ethyl acetate leading to high volume factors.
(40) In order to minimize HF elimination to the cyclopropane side
product (S)-29a, the excess of sodium dimethyl malonate (1.1 equiv)
525
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op200019k |Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 515–526