8058
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8058-8064
Control of the “Superexchange” Interaction through Diphenyl
Sulfide 4,4′-Diyl Magnetic Coupler by Changing the Oxidation
State and Conformation of the Sulfur Atom
Kenji Matsuda, Takehiro Yamagata, Tomoo Seta, Hiizu Iwamura,* and
Kenzi Hori†
Contribution from the Institute for Fundamental Research in Organic Chemistry,
Kyushu UniVersity, Fukuoka 812-81, Japan
ReceiVed December 23, 1996X
Abstract: The exchange interaction between two triplet carbene centers through diphenyl sulfide 4,4′-diyl, its sulfoxide
and sulfone analogs, and thiaxanthene 2,7-diyl coupling units was studied. These dicarbenes were generated by
photolysis of the corresponding bisdiazo precursors in MTHF matrices at cryogenic temperatures. From the temperature
dependence of the ESR signals it was found that the dicarbene jointed through the sulfide group has a quintet ground
state; it serves as a ferromagnetic coupler. On the other hand, as the oxidation state or the geometry of the sulfur
atom was changed to sulfoxide, sulfone, and thiaxanthene groups, antiferromagnetic interaction was observed between
the two diphenylcarbene units. The magnitude of the exchange interaction J/k was determined to be 11, -30, -92,
and -21 K for diphenyl sulfide, sulfoxide, sulfone 4,4′-diyl, and thiaxanthene 2,7-diyl couplers, respectively. In the
ESR spectra of sterically unconstrained sulfide and its analogs the isolated triplet signals were rather strong. In the
thiaxanthene analog, however, this ratio of the isolated triplet signals to those of the other spin multiplicities was
smaller. The isolated triplets were attributed to the conformation where the two phenyl rings were perpendicular to
each other. It was demonstrated that the magnetic interaction could be tailored from ferro- to antiferromagnetic
coupling by changing the oxidation state or geometry of the sulfur atom.
Introduction
through m-phenylene and 1,3,5-benzenetriyl units. Since chains
and networks consisting of carbon atoms only have a number
of limitations from a preparative point of view, the introduction
of heteroatoms such as nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur is considered
to be of help in expanding the scope of the structural variation.
However, the role of heteroatoms in coupling the spins in
polymer 1, for example, is not as clearly understood as in
hydrocarbons. The role of bridging heteroatom ligands in
effecting the magnetic coupling in bi- and polynuclear magnetic
metal complexes is interpreted in terms of “super-
exchange”.5 Our naive question was if we might be able to
interpret the coupling in organic polyradicals containing hetero-
atoms in a similar fashion via the filled π orbital localized on
the sulfur atom.
The design and synthesis of polyradicals having high-spin
ground states are subjects of great importance for deepening
our understanding of chemical bonds and developing potential
organic magnetic materials.1-4 In such systems, the control of
topological symmetry in alternant hydrocarbon polyradicals,
namely, connectivity of the radical centers through π-cross-
conjugated chains and networks, is a guiding principle for
aligning electron spins in parallel. Some of the highlights in
these studies include poly(trityl radicals) (S ) 4)3g and poly-
carbenes (S ) 9)2j,l in which the open shell centers are joined
† Current address: Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Tokiwadai,
Ube 755 Japan.
Diphenyl ether 4,4′-diyl unit in dicarbene 2 is reported by
Itoh et al.6 to couple two carbene centers antiferromagnetically.
This was explained in terms of the superexchange or hyper-
X Abstract published in AdVance ACS Abstracts, August 1, 1997.
(1) For reviews see: (a) Iwamura, H. AdV. Phys. Org. Chem. 1990, 26,
179. (b) Dougherty, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 88. (c) Iwamura, H.;
Koga, N. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 346. (d) Kurreck, H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1409. (e) Miller, J. S.; Epstein A. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 385. (f) Rajca, A. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 871. (g)
Miller, J. S.; Epstein, A. J. Chem. Eng. News 1995, Oct. 2, 30. (h) Kahn,
O. Molecular Magnetism; VCH: New York, 1993.
(3) Polyarylmethyl: (a) Rajca, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5890.
(b) Veciana, J.; Rovira, C.; Crespo, M. I.; Armet, O.; Domingo, V. M.;
Palacio, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2552. (c) Rajca, A.; Utamapanya,
S.; Xu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9235. (d) Rajca, A.; Utamapanya,
S.; Thayumanavan, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1884. (e) Veciana, J.;
Rovira, C.; Ventosa, N.; Crespo, M. I.; Palacio, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 57. (f) Rajca, A.; Utamapanya, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2396.
(g) Rajca, A.; Rajca, S.; Padmakumar, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1994, 33, 2091. (h) Rajca, A.; Rajca, S.; Desai, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 806.
(4) Magnetic interaction through coupler: (a) Murata, S.; Iwamura, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5547. (b) Matsumoto, T.; Ishida, T.; Koga,
N.; Iwamura, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9952. (c) Doi, T.; Ichimura,
A. S.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8928. (d) Jacobs,
S. J.; Shultz, D. A.; Jain, R.; Novak, J.; Dougherty, D. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 1744. (e) Mitsumori, T.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2467.
(2) Polycarbens: (a) Teki, Y.; Takui, T.; Itoh, K.; Iwamura, H.;
Kobayashi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3722. (b) Sugawara, T.;
Bandow, S.; Kimura, K.; Iwamura, H.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984,
106, 6449. (c) Teki, Y.; Takui, T.; Yagi, H.; Itoh, K.; Iwamura, H. J. Chem.
Phys. 1985, 83, 539. (d) Sugawara, T.; Bandow, S.; Kimura, K.; Iwamura,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 368. (e) Teki, Y.; Takui, T.; Itoh, K.;
Iwamura, H.; and Kobayashi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2147. (f)
Fujita, I.; Teki, Y.; Takui, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Itoh, K;. Miko, F.; Sawaki,
Y.; Iwamura, H.; Izuoka, A.; Sugawara, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
4074. (g) Nakamura, N.; Inoue, K.; Iwamura, H.; Fujioka, T.; Sawaki, Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1484. (h) Furukawa, K.; Matsumura, T.; Teki,
Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Takui, T.; Itoh, K. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1993, 232,
251. (i) Matsuda, K.; Nakamura, N.; Takahashi, K.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.;
Iwamura, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5550. (j) Nakamura, N.; Inoue,
K.; Iwamura, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 872. (k) Matsuda,
K.; Nakamura, N.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H. Chem. Eur. J. 1996,
2, 105. (l) Matsuda, K.; Nakamura, N.; Inoue, K.; Koga, N.; Iwamura, H.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 1483.
(5) (a) Kramers, H. A. Physica 1934, 1, 182. (b) Anderson, P. W. Phys.
ReV. 1950, 79, 350. (c) Hay, P. J.; Thibeault, J. C.; Hoffman, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4884. (d) Reference 1h; Chapter 8.
(6) Itoh, K.; Takui, T.; Teki, Y.; Kinoshita, T. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.
1989, 176, 49.
S0002-7863(96)04398-3 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society