1 H), 2.58 (s, 3 H), 2.56 (s, 1 H), 2.06–1.98 (m, 1 H), 1.74–1.68 (m, 1 H),
1.35 (d, J 5.9, 3 H), 1.23 (d, J 6.4, 3 H). For 2: d 7.33 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 7.20
(t, J 7.8, 1 H), 6.93 (t, J 7.8, 1 H), 6.89 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 5.07–5.01 (m, 1 H),
4.98–4.91 (m, 1 H), 2.96 (dd, J 5.9, 16.6, 1 H), 2.67 (dd, J 6.3, 16.6, 1 H),
2.50 (d, J 4.9, 1 H), 2.17 (s, 3 H), 1.45 (d, J 6.3, 3 H), 1.36 (d, J 5.9, 3 H).
For 6: d 7.68 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 7.41 (t, J 7.8, 1 H), 7.01 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 6.95
(t, J 7.8, 1 H), 4.86–4.79 (m, 1 H), 4.12–4.04 (m, 1 H), 2.58 (s, 3 H), 2.04
(d, J 4.4, 1 H), 1.91–1.85 (m, 1 H), 1.79–1.72 (m, 1 H), 1.34 (d, J 6.4, 3 H),
1.23 (d, J 5.9, 3 H). For 7: d 7.32 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 7.20 (t, J 7.8, 1 H) 6.93 (t,
J 7.8, 1 H), 6.89 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 5.07–5.02 (m, 1 H), 4.95–4.90 (m, 1 H), 2.96
(dd, J 6.3, 16.6, 1 H), 2.68 (dd, J 5.9, 16.6, 1 H), 2.17 (s, 3 H), 1.46 (d, J 6.3,
3 H), 1.35 (d, J 5.9, 3 H).
§ The enantiomeric purity of 5 was determined to be over 99% ee by GC
analysis using a CHROMPACK-Chirasil-DEX CB (i.d. 0.25 mm 3 25 m)
column. The column temperature was maintained at 120 °C. The retention
time of the S isomer 5 was 16.9 min and that of the R isomer was 19.0
min.
Al(OPri)2
Me
O
O
OH
OH
O
O
O
O
O
Me
H
Me
1
2
Me
Me
O
O
OH
O
OH
O
O
H
Me
O
O
Al(OPri)2
6
7
Scheme 1
1 For recent review, see C. E. de Graauw, J. A. Peters, H. van Bekkum and
J. Huskens, Synthesis, 1994, 1007.
the intramolecular MPV–Oppenauer reaction (Scheme 1).
Preferential intramolecular coordination to aluminium also
ensures from no formation of 3 generated by intermolecular
MPV reduction is observed. Thus, the intramolecular hydride
transfer proceeds without mixing the equilibrium between 1 and
2 with that between 6 and 7.
In conclusion, a rigorous diastereodifferentiating hydride
transfer has been achieved under a thermodynamic equilibrium,
resulting from both the forward and reverse steps of the
equilibrium proceeding diastereospecifically.
2 K. Nishide, Y. Shigeta, K. Obata and M. Node, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996,
118, 13 103.
3 G. A. Molander and J. A. Mckie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 5821.
4 K. Ishihara, N. Hanaki and H. Yamamoto, Synlett., 1993, 127;
K. Ishihara, N. Hanaki and H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115,
10 695; K. Ishihara, N. Hanaki and H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1991, 113, 7074.
5 W. S. Zhou, X. M. Zhou and Y. Ni, Acta Chim. Sinica, 1984, 42, 706;
W. S. Zhou, Z. Q. Wang, H. Zhang, R. Y. Fei and Z. P. Zhuang, Acta
Chim. Sinica, 1985, 43, 168.
6 T. Sugimura, J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn., 1997, 55, 517.
7 J. B. Pedley, R. D. Naylor and S. P. Kirby, Thermochemical Data of
Organic Compounds, Chapman and Hall, London, 1986.
8 T. Sugimura, H. Yamada, S. Inoue and A. Tai, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
1997, 8, 649.
This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Encouragement of Young Scientists No. 08750961 from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.
9 T. Hayashi, Y. Matsumoto and Y. Ito, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1991, 2,
601; P. V. Ramachandran, B. Gong and H. C. Brown, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1994, 35, 2141.
Footnotes and References
† E-mail: fuji@sci.himeji-tech.ac.jp
‡ The epimers are distinguishable by use of H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
1
spectroscopy. Selected data for 1: d 7.68 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 7.41 (t, J 7.8, 1 H),
7.00 (d, J 7.8, 1 H), 6.95 (t, J 7.8, 1 H), 4.77–4.69 (m, 1 H), 4.03–3.98 (m,
Received in Cambridge, UK, 20th June 1997; 7/04341D
1632
Chem. Commun., 1997