R1O
O
OR1
OR1
Fmoc-HN
CO2R2
AcNH
R1O
O
O
HN
R1O
O
OR1
OR1
(
)
8
i–iv
HN
CO2R2
NH
AcNH
R1O
O
HN
N
O
(
)
8
OR1
OR1
R1O
O
O
O
CO2R2
O
O
NH
AcNH
O
R1O
O
NH
(
)
N
8
HN
HN
NH
OR1
O
N
CO2R2
NH
OR1
R1O
O
O
11, 14
(
)
8
HN
O
AcNH
OR1
O
O
O
OR1
O
N
NH
O
HN
O
CO2R2
OR1
O
O
O
N
N
R1O
O
12, 15
O
(
)
NH
HN
AcNH
N
8
NH
OR1
O
HN
HN
CO2R2
NH
(
)
R1O
8
OR1
AcNH
O
R1O
O
13, 16
O
O
O
11, 12, 13 R1 = Ac, R2 = Me
OR1
O
(
N
O
= Wang resin
NH
CO2R2
R1O
)
OR1
v–vii
8
NH
R1O
O
HN
AcNH
OR1
R1O
14 (Dimer), 15 (Tetramer), 16 (Octamer)
R1 = R2 = H,
= OH
(
)
O
CO2R2
NH
O
8
OR1
O
R1O
AcNH
OR1
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, 20% piperidine–DMF (1 3 5 min, 1 3 15 min); ii, 5, TBTU, Pri2EtN, DMF, 30 min; iii, repeat cycle or 20% piperidine–
DMF; iv, 10, TBTU, Pri2EtN, DMF, 0.5–8 h; v, 95% aq. TFA, 2 h; vi, 1 m NaOMe, MeOH, 2–8 h; vii, 0.05 m NaOH, 2–8 h
g-CH2s), 1.87 (s, 3 H, NAc), 2.07 (m, 1 H, H-3ax), 2.74 (m, 1 H, H-3eq), 3.74
offer suitable carbohydrate accessibility, introduction of a
(s, 3 H, OCH3), 5.35 (dd, 1 H, J6,7 2.2, J7,8 6.1, H-7); dC 23.14 (NAc), 24.58
(g-C), 52.9 (OCH3), 83.3 (C-2); FAB-MS (positive): calc. for
spacer arm between the sialic acid residues and the dendrimer
was carried out using excess ClCO(CH2)8COCl (CH2Cl2,
C30H46N2O15: 674.7. Found: 675.4 (M + 1). For 14: dH(D2O) 1.62 (m, b-,
Pri2EtN, 0 °C) to give unstable monoacid chloride 9 which was
g-CH2s), 1.84 (m, 6 H, b-CH2, H-3ax), 2.08 (s, 6 H, NAc), 2.44 (m, 2 H,
immediately hydrolysed to afford 10 in 53% overall yield.
Attempts to isolate 9 for subsequent attachment to the resin
b-alanyl a-CH2), 2.73 [m, 4 H, succinyl CH2C(O)N, H-3eq], 4.16 (d, 2 H,
J 9.9, H-7); dC 21.5 (NAc), 24.5 (g-C), 26 and 27 (b-Cs), 36.2 (g-Cs, b
were unsuccessful. a-Sialic acid derivative 10 was then ready to
be coupled to the dendritic polyamine core on the solid-phase
using the same TBTU coupling strategy described to scaffold
the dendrimer generations. After coupling, peracetylated sialo-
dendrimers with the valencies of 2, 4 and 8 (11, 12 and 13) were
released from the resin by treatment with 95% TFA. The
sialodendrimers were then deprotected by sequential ester
hydrolysis [(i) de-O-acetylation with 1 m NaOMe in MeOH, (ii)
0.005 m NaOH]. Purification of each independent generation by
size exclusion chromatography over Biogel-P2 (H2O as eluent)
provided pure deprotected glycodendrimers 14, 15 and 16 in
moderate yields (25–56%) (Scheme 3). The purity of each
compound was readily established from the relative integration
alanyl a-C and b-C), 72.4 (C-7), 84.4 (C-2); FAB-MS (positive): calc. for
C55H94N8O24: 1250.64. Found: 1251.5 (M+ + 1, 1%); MALDI-TOF
(negative): Found: 1250.03 (M 2 1)2. For 15: MALDI-TOF (negative):
calc. for C117H200N18O48: 2625.37. Found: 2626 (M 2 1)2. For 16: dH
(D2O) 1.86 (m, 28 H, b-CH2s), 2.11 (s, 24 H, NAc), 4.18 (m, 8 H, H-7); dC
21.57 (NAc), 26.2 (b-Cs), 72.5 (C-7), 85.2 (C-2); MALDI-TOF (negative)
calc. for C241H412N38O96: 5,374.85. Found: 5374 (M 2 1)2.
1 D. Astruc, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1996, 322, 757.
2 D. A. Tomalia and H. D. Durst, Top. Curr. Chem., 1993, 165, 193.
3 C. J. Hawker and J. M. J. Fre´chet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112,
7638.
4 T. Kawaguchi, K. L. Walter, C. L. Wilkins and J. S. Moore, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 2159.
5 S. C. Zimmerman, F. W. Zeng, D. E. G. Reichert and S. V. Kolotuchin,
Science, 1996, 271, 1095.
6 J. P. Tam, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1988, 85, 5409.
7 R. Roy, Polym. News. 1996, 21, 226; R. Roy, Top. Curr. Chem., 1997,
187, 241; K. Aoi, K. Itoh and M. Okada, Macromolecules, 1995, 28,
5391, and references therein.
8 E. J. Toone, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1994, 4, 719.
9 R. Roy, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1996, 6, 692 and references cited
therein.
10 R. Roy, D. Zanini, S. J. Meunier and A. Romanoska, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1993, 1862.
1
of key signals in the H NMR spectrum. MALDI-TOF mass
spectral data (negative mode) further confirmed the integrity of
the dendrimers. Biological properties of these novel N-linked
sialodendrimers will be reported in due course.
We thank Qing Quan Wu and Denis Carrie`re for providing
a-sialic acid azide derivative 8. We are also grateful to Drs P.
Thibault and D. Krajcarski from NRC, Ottawa, for running the
MALDI-TOF experiments on a Perspective Elite-STR instru-
ments.
11 J. C. Paulson, in The Receptors, ed. M. Conn, Academic Press, Orlando,
1985, vol. 2, p. 131.
Footnotes and References
12 D. Zanini and R. Roy, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 7348.
13 D. Zanini and R. Roy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 2088.
14 S.-I. Murahashi, T. Naota and N. Nakajima, Chem. Lett., 1987, 879.
15 E. Kaiser, R. L. Colescott, C. D. Bossinger and P. I. Cook, Anal.
Biochem., 1971, 34, 595.
* E-mail: rroy@science.uottawa.ca
† All compounds showed consistent NMR and mass spectral data. Because
of dendrimers’ repetitive structures, only selected data are reported.
Selected data for 5: dH([2H6]acetone) 1.69 and 1.91 (2 m, 4 H, b-CH2), 2.6
[m, 2 H, succinyl CH2C(O)OH], 4.3 (dd, 4 H, Fmoc-CH2s); dC 28.7 and
30.5 (b-C), 29.8 [succinyl CH2C(O)OH]; FAB-MS (positive): calc. for
16 F. Tropper, F. O. Andersson, S. Braun and R. Roy, Synthesis, 1992,
618.
C40H41N3O7: 675.7. Found: 676.3 (M + 1). For 10 (spacer identification
from anomeric position to acid is a to h): dH(CDCl3) 1.59 (m, 4 H, b-,
Received in Corvallis, OR, USA, 27th May 1997; 7/03679E
2120
Chem. Commun., 1997