358
J.-Y. Lee et al.
many disadvantages such as slow response time and degradative
photorefractive effects, which limit their applications. NLO polymers,
on the other hand, are considered candidate materials, mainly because
they offer many advantages such as light weight and good processabil-
ity to form optical devices [1]. Stabilization of electrically induced
dipole alignment is important considerations in the developments of
NLO polymers. Two approaches have been proposed to minimize the
randomization. One is to use crosslinking method [2] and the other
is to utilize high Tg polymers such as polyimides [3,4]. Polyurethanes
with a NLO chromophore, whose dipole moment is aligned transverse
to the main chain backbone, showed large second-order nonlinearity
with enhanced thermal stability [7,8]. Main-chain NLO polymers [5]
have good thermal stability of dipole alignments, but they often do
not dissolve in organic solvents. Side-chain NLO polymers [6] have
the advantages such as good solubility, homogeneity and high level
of NLO chromophore, but they often suffer from poor stability of dipole
alignments at high temperatures. In this work we have prepared novel
T-type polyurethanes containing the dioxybenzylidenemalononitrile
groups as NLO-chromophores. We selected 2,5-dioxy benzylidenemalo-
nonitrile groups as NLO-chromophores because they have a large
dipole moment and are rather easy to synthesize. Furthermore, the
2,5-dioxybenzylidenemalononitrile groups constitute novel T-type NLO
polyurthanes (see Fig. 1c), in which the pendant NLO-chromophores
are part of the polymer backbones. These mid-type NLO polymers are
expected to have the advantages of both main-chain and side-chain
NLO polymers; stabilization of dipole alignment and good solubility.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Synthetic methods of diol 3 and polymer 4 are summarized in Schemes
ꢀ
1
1 and 2. Compound 3: Mp ¼ 138–140 C. H NMR (acetone-d6) d 3.74–
3.94 (m, 4H, 2 ꢁCH2ꢁOH), 3.94–4.12 (m, 2H, ꢁOH), 4.12–4.22 (m, 4H,
2 ꢁOꢁCH2ꢁ), 7.15–7.32 (m, 2H, aromatic), 7.75 (s, 1H, aromatic), 8.58
=
=
(s, 1H, ꢁPhꢁCH ). IR (KBr) 3516, 3233 (s, OꢁH), 3045 (m, CꢁH),
2941 (m, CꢁH), 2233 (m, CN), 1576 (s, C C) cmꢁ1. Anal. Calcd for
=
C14H14N2O4: C, 61.31; H, 5.14; N, 10.21. Found: C, 61.41; H, 5.22;
N, 10.28. Polymer 4: Inherent viscosity (ginh) ¼ 0.29 dL gꢁ1
(c ¼ 0.5 g dLꢁ1 in m-cresol at 25ꢀC). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 3.88 (s,
6H, 2 ꢁOCH3), 4.17–4.53 (q, 8H, 2 ꢁOꢁCH2ꢁCH2ꢁOꢁ), 7.16–7.39
(d, 6H, aromatic), 7.57–7.76 (d, 2H, aromatic), 8.20 (d, 1H, aromatic),
8.47 (s, 1H, aromatic), 8.59–8.66 (d, 1H, N-H), 9.02 (s, 1H, NꢁH).