Intramolecular Catalysis of Amide Isomerization
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 120, No. 41, 1998 10661
by these novel enzymes has yet to be established, their
importance is supported by the observation that they are
ubiquitous and highly conserved in organisms ranging from E.
coli to humans.11
The detailed mechanisms by which the PPIases catalyze cis-
trans isomerization remain to be completely elucidated. Thor-
ough knowledge of these mechanisms is required to design better
inhibitors for studies of the immunosuppressive and protein
folding roles of the PPIases, and also to examine other postulated
roles of these enzymes in ViVo.13 One important aspect of the
PPIase mechanism that has been proposed based on theoretical
studies is intramolecular catalysis, whereby the prolyl nitrogen
becomes an H-bond acceptor in the rotational transition state
for amide isomerization (Figure 1).6,14 Intramolecular catalysis
is also believed to play a key role in the nonenzymatic folding
of some proteins including dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR,
Figure 1B).15 Substrates bound in the active site of FKBP are
postulated to adopt a type VIa proline turn,6 in which the amide
proton of the residue that follows the proline in primary
sequence sits directly above the ring and can donate an H-bond
to the prolyl Na (Figure 1A, the 5-NH- -Na H-bond); this
stabilizing interaction has been calculated to contribute 1.4 of
the 6.2 kcal/mol decrease in ∆Gq for FKBP-catalyzed proline
isomerization.6b On the other hand, cyclophilin binds its
substrates in a type VIb proline turn, in which the adjacent amide
Figure 1. Intramolecular catalysis in biological systems.
proton is not properly aligned to induce intramolecular catalysis.
However, by analogy to the proposed folding of DHFR,15 there
is an Arg residue close in tertiary structure within the active
site of cyclophilin (but not in the active site of FKBP) that may
act as the hydrogen bond donor during catalysis (Figure 1B).6b
Intramolecular hydrogen bonding between a prolyl Na and
nearby H-bond donors is quite common in structural protein
chemistry, yet its role in the folding and stabilization of proteins
is often ignored.16 Matthews examined H-bonding patterns in
the crystal structures of 42 proteins determined at high resolution
and found that eight have strong H-bond donors (Arg, His, Lys)
within 4 Å of a prolyl nitrogen; 12 more H-bonds were identified
in this same set of proteins if neutral donors were included.15
Additionally, there are a sizable number of cyclic peptidic
natural products which contain a 5-NH- -Na H-bond, as evi-
denced by crystal structures,17 as well as the spirocyclic
peptidomimetics synthesized by Johnson.18 It has yet to be
established conclusively whether H-bonds to prolyl nitrogens
are involved in intramolecular catalysis of protein folding, but
these interactions clearly occur with considerable frequency in
nature.
(9) There have only been a few reports of PPIases acting as folding
catalysts in vivo: (a) For the role of cyclophilin in the maturation of the
collagen triple helix, see: Steinmann, B.; Bruckner, P.; Superti-Furga, A.
J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 1299. (b) For cyclophilin catalyzed folding of
the monomeric protein transferrin, see: Lodish, H. F.; Kong, N. J. Biol.
Chem. 1991, 266, 14835. (c) For the possible role of PPIases in protein
biogenesis in a eukaryotic cytosol, see: Kruse, M.; Brunke, A. E.; Escher,
A.; Szalay, A. A.; Tropschug, M.; Zimmermann, R. J. Biol. Chem. 1995,
270, 2588.
(10) The terminology used in the literature for rotamase enzymes can
be ambiguous. “PPIase” was originally synonymous with cyclophilin, but
the current usage, and the one we adopt here, is to use PPIase as a generic
term encompassing both cyclophilin and FKBP. When we wish to refer to
a specific enzyme, we will clearly differentiate between them.
(11) (a) Fruman, D. A.; Burakoff, S. J.; Bierer, B. E. FASEB J. 1994, 8,
391. (b) Belshaw, P. J.; Meyer, S. D.; Johnson, D. D.; Romo, D.; Ikeda,
Y.; Andrus, M.; Alberg, D. G.; Schultz, L. W.; Clardy, J.; Schreiber, S. L.
Synlett. 1994, 381.
(12) It is known that the catalysis of cis-trans amide isomerization is
not the direct function of the PPIases in immunosupression; rather, a
complex of the immunosupressive drug and the enzyme is believed to bind
to the protein phosphatase calcineurin, and thereby inhibit T-cell activation.
The immunosupressive drugs do, however, bind in the active site of
isomerase activity; see: Schreiber, S. L.; Crabtree, G. R. Immunol. Today
1992, 13, 136. It is interesting to speculate why these enzymes apparently
perform two unrelated tasks by utilizing the same active site.
(13) Other postulated roles of the PPIases in vivo include: (a) Acting
as chaperones, especially for escorting rhodopsin from the ER through the
secretory pathway to its cellular target, see: Baker, E. K.; Colley, N. J.;
Zuker, C. S. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 4886. (b) Effectors of Xaa-Pro bonds which
may act as “molecular switches” to trigger actions such as voltage-gated
ion channel opening; see: Suchyna, T. M.; Xu, L. X.; Gao, F.; Fourtner,
C. R.; Nicholoson, B. J. Nature 1993, 365, 847. (c) Modulation of calcium
release by interaction with calcium release channels; see: Jayaraman, T.;
Brillantes, A.-M.; Timerman, A. P.; Fleischer, S.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.;
Tempst, P.; Marks, A. R. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 9474. (d) Helping with
protein degradation by catalyzing unfolding and prevention of partially
unfolded proteins from precipitation, see: Andres, C. J.; Macdonald, T.
L.; Ocain, T. D.; Longhi, D. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6609. (e) Functioning
as an auxiliary enzyme in HIV-1 protease-mediated reactions, see: Vance,
J. E.; LeBlanc, D. A.; Wingfield, P.; London, R. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1997,
272, 15603.
In a preliminary report, we provided the first experimental
evidence for intramolecular catalysis in model systems (sub-
stituted prolines) attributed to the 5-NH- -Na H-bond depicted
in Figure 1A.7 We now describe a comprehensive experimental
study of this interaction in model systems, and have expanded
its scope to include the following: (1) correlation between the
Hammett σp values of remote substituents and the kinetics of
observed intramolecular catalysis; (2) extensive spectroscopic
characterization of the intramolecular 5-NH- -Na H-bond; (3)
intramolecular catalysis of prolyl carbamates in organic and
aqueous/organic solution; (4) intramolecular catalysis observed
in “polar” chlorocarbon solvents such as CH2Cl2 or CHCl3 is
less than that possible in a very nonpolar, non-hydrogen bonding
solvent such as CCl4; and (5) proof that intramolecular catalysis
is due to an H-bond and not to discrete N-protonation of the
prolyl Na.
(16) For earlier discussions of [NH- -Na] interactions, see: (a) Gieren,
A.; Dederer, B.; Schanda, F. Z. Naturforsch., C: Biosci. 1980, 35c, 741.
(b) Scarsdale, J. N.; Van Alsenoy, C.; Klimkowski, V. J.; Scha¨fer, L.;
Momany, F. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3438.
(17) See for example: (a) Shoham, G.; Lipscomb, W. N.; Wieland, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4791. (b) Kopple, K. D.; Bhandary, K. K.;
Kartha, G.; Yang, Y.-S.; Parameswaran, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 4637. (c) Springer, J. P.; Cole, R. J.; Dorner, J. W.; Cox, R. H.; Richard,
J. L.; Barnes, C. L.; van der Helm, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2388.
(d) Montelione, G. T.; Arnold, E.; Meinwald, Y. C.; Stimson, E. R.; Denton,
J. B.; Huang, S. G.; Clardy, J.; Scheraga, H. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984,
106, 6, 7946. (e) Karle, I. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 181.
(18) Genin, M. J.; Ojala, W. H.; Gleason, W. B.; Johnson, R. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 2334.
(14) In his original reports, Karplus termed this interaction “autocatalysis”
because the hydrogen bond donor was attached to the proline system either
covalently or noncovalently, such as in an enzyme-substrate complex.
However, this terminology may cause confusion because it is commonly
used in the organic synthesis literature to mean catalysis of a reaction by
its product. We therefore term this interaction intramolecular catalysis, as
was proposed by Matthews.15.
(15) Texter, F. L.; Spencer, D. B.; Rosenstein, R.; Matthews, C. R.
Biochemistry 1992, 31, 5687.