of simple alkanols or less reactive benzyl alcohols to their
corresponding azides.
giving the lowest yield of the desired azide 11. In the case
of symmetrical benzylic diol 3, where the same 1.05 equiv
of bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl) chlorophosphate was used, the
major product isolated was the monoazidated product 13
(82%) with the corresponding bisazidated compound as the
minor product (9.2%). This unexpected selectivity suggests
that our one-pot procedure might be used to selectively
convert diols to azido alcohols without going through the
typical protection-deprotection steps.
Mechanistically, we believe the reaction takes place in
three discrete steps as illustrated in Scheme 1. (i) DMAP
Scheme 1
The failure of Thompson’s direct azidation procedure to
convert compounds 1, 2, and 3 to their corresponding azides
and the isolation of phosphate intermediates 4 and 5 suggest
that diphenyl phosphate was not a good enough leaving group
to activate, for SN2 displacement, hydroxyl groups of simple
alkanols or less reactive benzyl alcohols with strong electron-
withdrawing substituents on the phenyl ring. This was also
shown as a limitation of Thompson’s procedure in the
original report.6 We reasoned that introduction of electron-
withdrawing substituents on the phenyl ring would make it
a better leaving group and the resulting phosphate could be
sufficiently reactive for displacement by azide ion. Thus, we
replaced diphenyl chlorophosphate, the common activating
agent used in the indirect methods, with bis(2,4-dichlorophe-
nyl) chlorophosphate. To avoid the isolation of phosphate
intermediates and the preparation of phosphorazidate,7 we
decided to perform the activation and azide displacement
using the following one-pot procedure.8 To a solution of
substrate alcohol (1 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (5 mL) were
added at room temperature with stirring NaN3 (4 equiv) and
DMAP (1.2 equiv) followed by bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl)
chlorophosphate (1.05 equiv). Stirring was continued for 2
h or until the starting material disappeared as monitored by
TLC. The reaction usually works well at room temperature.
If TLC showed incomplete conversion after 2 h, the
temperature could be raised to 45 °C to complete the reaction.
For workup, ethyl ether (100 mL) and brine (30 mL) were
added to the reaction mixture. The organic phase was
separated, washed with aqueous NaOH (20%) and brine, and
dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent
was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by
flash column chromatography (ethyl ether:hexane) to afford
the desired azide product.
reacts with bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl) chlorophosphate in the
presence of sodium azide to form bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-
phosphoryl 4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium azide (19). (ii) The
phosphoryl pyridinium azide (19) then reacts with the
substrate alcohol to form the activated bis(2,4-dichloro-
phenyl) phosphate (20). (iii) The bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-
phosphoryl group in 20 is displaced by azide ion to produce
the desired azide. In this mechanism, the activating reagent
is bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl)phosphoryl 4-(dimethylamino)-
pyridinium azide (19). To confirm this, we performed the
following experiments. First, we mixed an equimolar mixture
of bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl) chlorophosphate and sodium azide
in DMF at room temperature and monitored the reaction
using IR spectroscopy. We observed a complete shift of the
azide signal from 2010 to 2174 cm-1 in about 30 min. When
DMAP was added into the mixture, the azide absorption at
2174 cm-1 disappeared quickly and a new peak appeared at
2133 cm-1. This result suggested that bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl)
chlorophosphate reacted with sodium azide to form the bis-
(2,4-dichlorophenyl) phosphorazidate and the phosphorazi-
date was then converted quickly to bis(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-
phosphoryl 4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium azide (19) upon the
(9) 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) data for the azide products listed in
Table 1: δ ppm 11: 8.14 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.60-7.52 (m, 4H), 7.39-
7.29 (m, 8H), 4.83 (t, J ) 5.8 Hz, 1H), 3.80-3.69 (m, 1H), 3.58-3.50 (m,
1H), 1.94-1.80 (m, 2H), 1.10 (s, 9H); 12: 8.22 (dd, J ) 1.8, 6.8 Hz, 2H),
7.52 (dd, J ) 0.3, 6.9 Hz, 2H), 4.83 (dd, J ) 4.5, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (d, J
) 6.9 Hz, 1H), 0.4.51 (d, J ) 1.2, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 3.51-3.40 (m, 2H), 3.37
(s, 3H), 2.07-2.02 (m, 1H), 1.93-1.89 (m, 1H); 13: 7.40-7.32 (m, 4H),
4.69 (d, J ) 5.9 Hz, 2H), 4.45 (s, 2H), 2.52 (t, J ) 5.9 Hz, 1H); 14: 7.68
(d, J ) 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (t, J ) 7.9 Hz, 2H),
3.53 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2H), 3.10 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2H); 15: 7.69 (d, J ) 7.7 Hz,
4H), 7.50-7.32 (m, 10H), 4.80 (s, 2H), 4.34 (s, 2H), 1.09 (s, 9H); 16:
7.73-7.69 (m, 4H), 7.48-7.42 (m, 6H), 3.79 (t, J ) 5.9 Hz, 2H), 3.49 (t,
J ) 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.85 (p, J ) 6.3 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (s, 9H); 17: 7.78-7.73
(m, 4H), 7.49-7.43 (m, 6H), 3.75 (t, J ) 6.1 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (t, J ) 6.8 Hz,
2H), 1.69-1.55 (m, 6H), 1.14 (s, 9H); 18: 7.75-7.70 (m, 4H), 7.46-7.42
(m, 6H), 3.72 (t, J ) 6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (t, J ) 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.64-1.58 (m,
4H), 1.43-1.37 (m, 6H), 1.11 (s, 9H).
As shown in Table 1, all the alkanols we examined were
converted to their corresponding azides9 in satisfactory yields
between 76 and 92% with the less reactive benzyl alcohol 1
(7) Shioriri, T.; Yamada, S. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1990;
Collect. Vol. VII, pp 206-207.
(8) Caution: Azides especially bisazidated products are potentially
explosive and should be handled with care. The procedure should be
performed in a well-ventilated hood.
1960
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 13, 2000