primary amino groups (2 equiv. CF3CO2Et, THF, 10 min,
25 °C).19–21 This was followed by immediate Boc protection of
the central, secondary amine (Boc2O, THF, 18 h, 25 °C). Conc.
aq. ammonia was added to the solution of tri-protected triamine
until the pH was greater than 11 to remove the trifluoroacetyl
protecting groups (24 h). Mono-Boc protected amine was
isolated and purified by flash column chromatography (15 : 5: 1,
CH2Cl2–MeOH–conc. aq. NH3, v/v/v, Rf 0.13). The cinnamic
acid moieties17,18 were coupled sequentially (first the iso-
feruloyl 9 then the 4-fluoro-3-nitro 11) to the primary amines by
pre-activation with 2-mercaptothiazoline (2-thiazoline-2-thiol,
thiazolidine-2-thione)5 (DCC, 0.01 equiv. DMAP, CH2Cl2, 1 h,
25 °C, followed by filtration to remove the urea). Mono-Boc
protected triamine was added to the yellow CH2Cl2 solution of
the N-acylated 2-mercaptothiazoline and the coupling was
typically complete after 3 h (ca. 50% each acylation). Cyclisa-
tion was brought about by stirring with 5 equiv. CsF in
anhydrous DMF (18 h) to give 23-membered ring polyamine
lactam 12 (79% isolated yield). O-Arylation has occurred by
intramolecular aromatic nucleophilic substitution (SNiAr) reac-
tion of o-nitro-activated fluoride by the remote phenol.
For the 24-membered ring 14, spermidine 1 was reacted with
formalin to give a hexahydropyrimidine adduct (0.95 equiv.
37% w/w aq. formaldehyde, H2O, 1 h, 91%) as developed
independently by Ganem and Hesse and their co-workers.22,23
Isoferulic acid 917,18 was coupled to the primary amine of this
regioselectively protected spermidine through the 2-mercapto-
thiazoline activated intermediate (278 to 25 °C, 55%). After
chromatography, this hexahydropyrimidine was deprotected by
heating with malonic acid and pyridine (EtOH, reflux, 2 h,
79%).22 4-Fluoro-3-nitrocinnamic acid 11 was coupled to the
uncovered primary amine and then the secondary amine was
protected by a Boc group (1.1 equiv. Boc2O, MeOH, 18 h,
25 °C, 89%) to afford a linear precursor of cadabicine analogue
13. Cyclisation was carried out by stirring with 3 equiv. CsF in
anhydrous DMF (18 h, 71% isolated yield), final purification by
RP-HPLC (5 mm C8 inertpak column eluting with 1:4 aq. TFA
(0.1%)–MeOH, v/v, l = 250 nm). TFA catalysed deprotection
(1:1 TFA–CH2Cl2, v/v, 45 min, 0 °C, 90%) of the Boc group in
diaryl ether 15 was followed by O-demethylation with BBr3
(1.2 equiv., CH2Cl2, 3 h, 278 °C) to give 2A-nitrocadabicine 14
in 60% isolated yield.
For the 28-membered ring 15, spermine 2 was protected in a
similar fashion to N-(3-aminopropyl)-1,3-diaminopropane vide
supra. Trifluoroacetyl groups were used to block the two
primary amines then two Boc groups were introduced at the
secondary amines. Conc. aq. ammonia was used to remove the
trifluoroacetyl protecting groups and the N2,N3-diBoc spermine
was then purified by chromatography. The two cinnamic acid
moieties17,18 were introduced in a stepwise fashion using
2-mercaptothiazoline activation to yield the cyclisation pre-
cursor. Cyclisation was carried out in anhydrous DMSO with 3
equiv. K2CO3 and 10 equiv. 18-crown-6, the oxygen nucleophi-
licity was found to be too low without the crown ether. The
cyclisation reaction did not proceed to completion at 25 °C
(starting material still present after 24 h). However, heating the
mixture to 50 °C, in the presence of 18-crown-6, led to complete
reaction after 5 h, yielding the desired macrocycle 15 (66%).
The previously proposed mechanism of cyclisation involved
bringing the two sites of reaction into proximity by p-orbital
stacking interactions between the electron rich guaiacol (2-
methoxyphenol) ring and the electron deficient o-fluoro-
nitrophenyl ring.15 However, macrocycle formations of this
type have recently been demonstrated to proceed in good yield
when the aryl hydroxy group is replaced by an alkyl hydroxy
group, proving that such p–p interactions are not necessary for
successful cyclisation.24 As the isolated yields are high, this
practical approach by aromatic nucleophilic substitution (intra-
molecular SNiAr reaction) should find ready application in the
synthesis of natural products and their analogues with particular
reference to cyclic spermidine and spermine alkaloids of the
codonocarpine 6 and cadabicine 8 classes.
We thank the Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology,
University of Bath, for a studentship (to S. C.). We acknowl-
edge useful discussions with Dr William N. Hunter (University
of Dundee), Professor Manfred Hesse (University of Zürich)
and Dr Ian S. Haworth (University of Southern California).
I. S. B. and I. S. H. are recipients of a NATO grant (CRG
970290). A. H. F. is funded by the Wellcome Trust.
Notes and references
† E-mail: prsisb@bath.ac.uk
1 R. J. Bergeron, Acc. Chem. Res., 1986, 19, 105; I. S. Blagbrough, S.
Carrington and A. J. Geall, Pharm. Sci., 1997, 3, 223 and references
cited therein.
2 T. A. Smith, J. Negrel and C. R. Bird, The cinnamic acid amides of di-
and polyamines, in Advances in Polyamine Research, ed. U. Bachrach,
A. Kaye and R. Chayen, 1983, vol. 4, p. 347; A. Guggisberg and M.
Hesse, The Alkaloids, Academic Press, 1983, vol. 22, p. 85; A.
Guggisberg and M. Hesse, The Alkaloids, Academic Press, 1998, vol.
50, p. 219 and references cited therein.
3 B. Meurer, V. Wray, L. Grotjahn, R. Wiermann and D. Strack,
Phytochemistry, 1986, 25, 433.
4 A. Husson, R. Besselievre and H.-P. Husson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983,
24, 1031.
5 Y. Nagao, K. Seno, K. Kawabata, T. Miyasaka, S. Takao and E. Fujita,
Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1984, 32, 2687.
6 J. McManis and B. Ganem, J. Org. Chem., 1980, 45, 2041; K.
Chantrapromma and B. Ganem, Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22, 23; P.
Page, S. Burrage, L. Baldock and M. Bradley, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
1998, 8, 1751.
7 A. H. Fairlamb and A. Cerami, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 1992, 46, 695;
J. A. Ponasik, C. Strickland, C. Faerman, S. Savvides, P. A. Karplus and
B. Ganem, Biochem. J., 1995, 311, 371.
8 P. Dätwyler, H. Bosshardt, S. Johne and M. Hesse, Helv. Chim. Acta,
1979, 62, 2712; H. H. Wasserman, R. P. Robinson and C. G. Carter,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 1697.
9 R. W. Doskotch, A. B. Ray and J. L. Beal, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1971, 300; R. W. Doskotch, A. B. Ray, W. Kubelka, E. H.
Fairchild, C. D. Hufford and J. L. Beal, Tetrahedron, 1974, 30, 3229.
10 V. U. Ahmad, S. Arif, A. U. R. Amber and K. Fizza, Liebigs Ann.
Chem., 1987, 161.
11 V. U. Ahmad, A. U. R. Amber, S. Arif, M. H. M. Chen and J. Clardy,
Phytochemistry, 1985, 24, 2709; V. U. Ahmad, K. Fizza, A. U. R.
Amber and S. Arif, J. Nat. Prod., 1987, 50, 1186.
12 M. J. Humora, D. E. Seitz and J. Quick, Tetrahedron Lett., 1980, 21,
3971.
13 D. H. Williams, Acc. Chem. Res., 1984, 17, 364.
14 A. V. Rama Rao, M. K. Gurjar, K. L. Reddy and A. S. Rao, Chem. Rev.,
1995, 95, 2135.
15 J. Zhu, Synlett, 1997, 133.
16 D. L. Boger, D. Yohannes, J. Zhou and M. A. Patane, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1993, 115, 3420.
17 F. R. Blase and K. Banerjee, Synth. Commun., 1995, 20, 3187.
18 J. K. Luo, S. L. Castle and R. N. Castle, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1990, 27,
2047.
19 M. C. O’Sullivan and D. M. Dalrymple, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36,
3451.
20 D. Xu, K. Prasad, O. Repic and T. J. Blacklock, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995,
36, 7357.
21 I. S. Blagbrough and A. J. Geall, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 439; A. J.
Geall and I. S. Blagbrough, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 443.
22 B. Ganem, Acc. Chem. Res., 1982, 15, 290.
23 H. Kühne and M. Hesse, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1982, 65, 1470
24 T. Laïb and J. Zhu, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 283.
Communication 8/06688D
2336
Chem Commun., 1998