9908 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 26, 1998
Kirkland et al.
reported. Substrate 4 is commercially available and was
degassed before its use. Argon was purified by passage through
columns of BASF R3-11 catalyst (Chemalog) and 4 Å molec-
ular sieves (Linde). Analytical TLC was performed with silica
gel 60 F254 precoated plates (0.25 mm thickness) with a
fluorescent indicator. Flash column chromatography was
performed with silica gel 60 (230-400 mesh) from EM Sci-
ence.35
Gen er a l RCM P r oced u r e. In a typical reaction, substrate
8 (35 mg, 0.11 mmol) was placed in a vial and dissolved in
CD3OD (0.15 mL). In a separate vial, 2 (5.0 mg, 5.54 µmol)
was placed in a vial and dissolved in CD3OD (0.15 mL). The
catalyst and substrate solutions were combined, placed in an
NMR tube, and the tube was sealed with a rubber septum.
The reaction was heated to 45 °C, and monitored by 1H NMR.
Conversion to product (80%) was determined via integration
of the methylene protons R to the olefin in the cyclized product
(2.95 ppm, s) relative to the methylene protons of the uncyc-
lized substrate (2.68 ppm, dd).
Rea ction of Alk ylid en e 2 w ith Acyclic Olefin s (Gen -
er a l P r oced u r e). A solution of alkylidene 2 (10 mg, 0.11
mmol) in CD3OD (0.5 mL) was placed in a NMR tube that was
sealed with a rubber septum. This solution was heated to 45
°C and purged with propene, resulting in a rapid color change
from deep purple to orange. After 15 min, the reaction was
monitored by 1H NMR. An alkylidene resonance for 2 was
observed at 19.94 ppm, as well as a new alkylidene resonance
at 19.29 ppm. Styrene was also observed in the reaction
mixture. The generation of a new alkylidene species was also
confirmed by 31P NMR (33.3 ppm, s). Evaporation of solvent
yielded an orange powder, but rapid decomposition precluded
isolation.
Ap p lica tion s to Or ga n ic System s. The beneficial
effects of diene substitution are not limited to RCM with
alkylidenes 2 and 3. Even though the methylidene
derived from 1 is quite robust, under certain reaction
conditions its instability can limit conversion. For ex-
ample, RCM of diallylamine hydrochloride with 5 mol %
alkylidene 1 only proceeds to 60% conversion in meth-
ylene chloride (eq 5). RCM of the readily synthesized
phenyl-substituted analogue 14, however, gives pyrroline
hydrochloride (19) quantitatively under the same condi-
tions with minimal decomposition of the catalytic ben-
zylidene. This simple modification of the starting mate-
rial greatly improved the yield of the desired product,
and could be applied generally to increase RCM yields
with 1 in organic solvents.
4,4-Dica r boeth oxy-1-p h en yl-1,7-octa d ien e (10). Diester
10 was synthesized from 1,1-dicarboethoxy-4-pentene and
cinnamyl bromide according to a previously published proce-
dure.36 1,1-Dicarboethoxy-4-pentene was synthesized according
to the same method. Diester 10 was isolated as a clear,
colorless oil (33%, two steps): 1H NMR δ (CDCl3) 7.32-7.17
(m, 5H), 6.44 (d, J ) 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.11-6.00 (m, 1H), 5.84-
5.73 (m, 1H), 5.04 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.96 (d, J ) 5.1 Hz,
1H), 4.19 (q, J ) 5.3 Hz, 4H), 2.06-2.03 (m, 4H), 1.24 (t, J )
4.8 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR δ (CDCl3) 170.8, 137.3, 136.8, 133.5,
128.2, 127.1, 125.9, 123.8, 114.8, 61.0, 57.3, 36.2, 31.6, 28.2,
13.9; HRMS calcd for C20H26O4 (M+) 330.1831, found 330.1825.
4,4-Dica r boet h oxy-1-p h en yl-2-m et h yl-1,6-h ep t a d ien e
(11). Diester 11 was synthesized from diethyl allylmalonate
and 3-bromo-1-phenyl-2-methyl-2-propene in an analogous
manner to substrate 10. 3-Bromo-1-phenyl-2-methyl-2-propene
was synthesized from the commercially available alcohol in
an analogous manner to cis-cinnamyl bromide. Diester 11 was
isolated as a clear, colorless oil (12%, two steps): 1H NMR δ
(CDCl3) 7.32-7.27 (m, 3H), 7.19 (d, J ) 4.0 Hz, 2H), 6.35 (s,
1H), 5.79-5.68 (m, 1H), 5.13 (d, J ) 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.09 (s, 1H),
4.22-4.14 (m, 4H), 2.86 (s, 2H), 2.73 (d, J ) 3.4 Hz, 2H), 1.79
(s, 3H), 1.24 (t, J ) 7.0 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR δ (CDCl3) 171.2,
137.9, 133.7, 132.8, 130.4, 129.0, 128.1, 126.4, 119.1, 61.3, 57.7,
43.4, 37.2, 18.7, 14.2.
Con clu sion s
We have demonstrated the first examples of RCM in
water and methanol. Although alkylidenes 2 and 3 do
not promote the RCM of R,ω-dienes, simple olefin sub-
stitution allows for successful RCM to afford the desired
cyclic product. We have determined several factors that
influence the success of these reactions. In particular, the
choice of olefin substituent is important because it
directly affects the stability and reactivity of the resultant
catalytic alkylidenes. Phenyl substituents have proven
to be the most effective, allowing for quantitative conver-
sions to cyclized product in methanol. Additionally,
dienes containing cis-olefins cyclize considerably faster
than those containing trans-olefins. This methodology
describes an efficient, metal-catalyzed, carbon-carbon
bond-forming process that proceeds to high conversion
in aqueous media. It has also been extended to increase
conversions in RCM catalyzed by 1 in organic solvents.
The incorporation of substituted olefins in complex,
water-soluble dienes may allow for the construction of
biologically interesting architectures in aqueous media.
N-Boc-N-a llyl-tr a n s-cin n a m yla m in e (12). Allylamine
(10.9 g, 0.191 mol) and di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (13.9 g, 63.6
mmol) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (250 mL) at 0 °C and allowed
to stir for 8 h. The solution was then washed with water (100
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l Con sid er a tion s. All manipulations and reactions
involving ruthenium alkylidenes were performed in a nitrogen-
filled dry box or by use of standard Schlenk techniques under
an atmosphere of argon. Distilled deionized water and reagent-
grade methanol were used for these reactions, and were
rigorously degassed by purging with argon and stirring under
high vacuum before use. All other reagents were used without
further purification unless otherwise noted. Alkylidenes 1,4b
2,14 3,14 substrates 7,28 8,29 14,30 and products 5,2b 16,31 17,32
18,3c 19,33 and 2034 have been previously prepared and
(29) Hanessian, S.; Leger, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3115-
3117.
(30) Crozet, M. P.; Kaafaran, M.; Surzur, J . M. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.
1984, 390-398.
(31) Bachman, G. B.; Tanner, H. A. J . Org. Chem. 1939, 4, 493-
501.
(32) Schweizer, E. E.; O’Neill, G. J . J . Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 2082-
2083.
(33) Gajda, T.; Zwierzak, A. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1986, 992-1002.
(34) Tropsha, A. E.; Nizhinni, S. V.; Yaguzhinskii, L. S. Bioorg.
Khim. 1985, 11, 1931-1941.
(35) Still, W. C.; Kahn, M.; Mitra, A. J . Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2923.
(36) Gilman, H.; Blatt, A. H. Org. Synth. 1935, Collect. Vol. 1, 250-
251.
(28) Grigg, R.; Malone, J . F.; Mitchell, T. R. B.; Ramasubbu, A.;
Scott, R. M. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1984, 1745-1754.