Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 287-289
287
On the Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Structure-Property Relationships of Metal
Chromophores
Karel Base,† Mark T. Tierney,† Alain Fort,‡ Jacques Muller,‡ and Mark W. Grinstaff*,†,§
Department of Chemistry, P. M. Gross Chemical Laboratory, Duke University,
Durham, North Carolina 27708, and Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Materiaux de Strasbourg,
CNRS 67037 Strasbourg, France
ReceiVed July 24, 1998
The synthesis and solvent-dependent second-order polarizability, â, responses of three new platinum(II)
chromophores are reported. A strong correlation between the metal chromophore electronic structure and the
second-order polarizability is observed that substantiates the use of the two-state model to design, optimize, and
study new NLO chromophores.
Introduction
synthesizing and characterizing highly solvatochromic metal-
lochromophores and measuring the second-order polarizability,
A current challenge in materials chemistry and engineering
is to afford a specific macromolecular property by tuning a
molecular structure through deliberate chemical changes. Ma-
terials that display nonlinear optical (NLO) activity are of
fundamental interest and technological use for a number of
photonic applications, including optical switching, communica-
tions, and data storage and retrieval.1-8 The rational design of
organic chromophores with specific NLO activity is possible
since the development of structure-property relationships
(SPRs).9-13 In comparison, the relationship between structure
and nonlinear optical activity for inorganic chromophores is not
as well defined or understood.14,15 To date, few metal chro-
mophores approach the NLO responses of current organic
chromophores, and we attribute this to the lack of NLO SPRs
to guide the research and to the limited number of studies
conducted.16 Our approach for developing NLO SPRs relies on
â, in solvents of varying polarity.17 Herein, we report the
solvent-dependent â responses of three new platinum(II) chro-
mophores and insights into the relationship between electronic
structure and second-order polarizability.
NLO SPRs for organic compounds are developed by syn-
thesizing donor-acceptor chromophores with a particular
electronic structure and measuring the molecular polarizabilities.
These data combined with computational studies provide a
clearer picture of the factors that affect NLO responses and the
interrelationships between the molecular structure and first-,
second-, and third-order polarizabilities.9-13,18-21 The relation-
ship between the second-order polarizability, â, and the degree
of charge-separated character (i.e., polarization, or bond-length
alternation, BLA, MIX in polymethines) in the ground-state
structure of an organic chromophore can be understood within
the confines of a two-state model,
† Duke University.
µge2∆µ
‡ Institut de Physique et de Chimie des Materiaux de Strasbourg.
§ http://www.chem.duke.edu/∼mwg.
â
2
Ege
(1) For a recent review on optical nonlinearities, see the special issue of
Chem. ReV. 1994, 94 (January).
(2) Marder, S. R.; Perry, J. W. AdV. Mater. 1993, 5, 804-815.
(3) Materials for Nonlinear Optics: Chemical PerspectiVes; Marder, S.
R., Sohn, J. E., Stucky, G. D., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 455;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1991.
(4) Nonlinear Optical Properties of Organic Molecules and Crystals;
Chemla, D. S., Zyss, J., Eds.; Academic: New York, 1987.
(5) Marder, S. R.; Perry, J. W. Science 1993, 263, 1706-1707.
(6) Prasad, P. N.; Williams, D. J. Introduction to Nonlinear Optical Effects
in Molecules and Polymers; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1991.
(7) Kaino, T.; Tomaru, S. AdV. Mater. 1993, 5, 172-178.
(8) Wagmiere, G. H. Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties of
Molecules; VCH: Weinheim, 1993.
where â is proportional to the square of the transition dipole
moment (µge) and to the dipole difference between the first
excited and ground states (∆µ) and inversely proportional to
the square of the transition energy (Ege) between the ground
(16) For recent reviews on inorganic chromophores for second-order NLO,
see the following three review articles and the references cited therein.
(a) Long, N. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 21-38. (b)
Marder, S. R. In Inorganic Materials; Bruce, D. W., O’Hare, D., Eds.;
John Wiley & Sons Ltd: 1992; pp 115-164. (c) Nalwa, H. S. Appl.
Organomet. Chem. 1991, 5, 349-377.
(9) Marder, S. R.; Beratan, D. N.; Cheng, L. T. Science 1991, 252, 103-
106.
(17) A preliminary account of this NLO study was reported at the 215th
National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Dallas, TX,
March-April 1998.
(10) Marder, S. R.; Gorman, C. B.; Meyers, F.; Perry, J. W.; Bourhill, G.;
Bredas, J. L.; Pierce, B. M. Science 1994, 265, 632-635.
(11) Meyers, F.; Marder, S. R.; Pierce, B. M.; Bredas, J. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 10703-10714.
(18) Albert, I. D. L.; Marks, T. J.; Ratner, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1996,
100, 9714-9725.
(12) Marks, T. J.; Ratner, M. A. Angew. Chem. 1995, 34, 155-173.
(13) Gorman, C. B.; Marder, S. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90,
11297-11301.
(19) Meyers, F.; Marder, S. R.; Pierce, B. M.; Bredas, J. L. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1994, 228, 171-176.
(20) Bourhill, G.; Bredas, J. L.; Cheng, L. T.; Marder, S. R.; Meyers, F.;
Perry, J. W.; Tiemann, B. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2619-
2620.
(14) Bella, S. D.; Fragala, I.; Ledoux, I.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 9481-9485.
(15) Cummings, S. D.; Cheng, L.-T.; Eisenberg, R. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9,
440-450.
(21) Barzoukas, M.; Runser, C.; Fort, A.; Barrzoukas, M. M. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1996, 257, 531.
10.1021/ic980872q CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/05/1999