4920
J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4920-4925
5-En d o-Tr ig Ra d ica l Cycliza tion s of Br om om eth yld im eth ylsilyl
Diisop r op ylp r op a r gylic Eth er s. A High ly Dia ster eoselective Access
to F u n ction a lized Cyclop en ta n es
Ste´phane Bogen, Mihaela Gulea, Louis Fensterbank, and Max Malacria*
Laboratoire de Chimie Organique de Synthe`se associe´ au CNRS, Universite´ Pierre et Marie Curie,
4, place J ussieu - Tour 44-54, Case 229, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
Received March 9, 1999
An efficient radical sequence involving a 5-exo-dig, a diastereoselective 1,5-H transfer, and a rarely
observed in an all-carbon system 5-endo-trig cyclization allows the construction of cyclopentyl
derivatives 2 bearing four controlled stereogenic centers from diisopropyl precursors 1. Olefins 3
were also isolated as minor side products. The effect of the acetylenic substituent Y has been
investigated, and the scope and the limitations of the cascade have been delineated.
Because of its disfavored nature according to Baldwin’s
highly diastereoselective 1,5-H transfer from a vinyl
radical.11 Thus, when submitted to typical radical cy-
clizations,12 bromomethyldimethylsilyl diisopropylprop-
argylic ether of type 1 gave cyclopentanol derivatives of
type 2 in good yields and as single diastereomers, as well
as olefins 3 (Scheme 2). Full mechanistic details, as well
as the scope and limitations of this new process, have
been determined by varying the acetylenic partner and
are given in this paper.
rules1 and of several reported failures,2 the 5-endo-trig
radical cyclization has long been claimed to be a low-
potential synthetic process. This too simplistic a view has
been recently refuted by some very versatile 5-endo-trig
radical processes involving heteroatomic reacting sys-
tems. The groups of Parsons3 and of Ikeda and Ishibashi4
have, for instance, devised an efficient 5-endo-trig radical
cyclization of N-ethenyl-R-haloamides to form pyrrolidi-
nones and substituted pyroglutamates. The 5-endo clo-
sure of the 2-formylbenzoyl radical has also been shown
to be a particularly facile process.5 Moreover, interesting
examples have included the use of heteroatomic radicals
such as silicon centered,6 generated through a 1,5-H
transfer,7 or sulfur centered.8
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
1. P r ep a r a tion of th e Ra d ica l Cycliza tion s P r e-
cu r sor s. The precursors 1 have been prepared from the
corresponding alcohols I (Scheme 3) by silylation with
bromomethyldimethylsilylchlorosilane using three dif-
ferent reaction conditions: triethylamine, DMAP in CH2-
Cl2 or imidazole in DMF, or BuLi in THF (see the
Experimental Section). The alcohols I result from the
addition of a lithium acetylide on diisopropyl ketone.
Precursor Ig was obtained in 55% from the condensation
of the magnesium dianion of the diisopropylpropargylic
alcohol with (S)-menthylsulfinate (see the Supporting
Information).
2. Mech a n ism of th e 5-En d o-Tr ig Cycliza tion . This
new reaction was initially discovered with precursor 1a
and gave a mixture of cyclopentane 2a and olefin 3a in
89% overall yield (Scheme 4). An initial 5-exo-dig cycliza-
tion of the R-silyl radical generates a vinyl radical that
exists under two forms: (E)-4 or (Z)-4. The (E)-vinyl
radical intermediate displays a severe 1,3 allylic interac-
tion. No intermolecular stannane reduction or a 1,5(π-
exo)-H-transfer with the acetal C-H-activated bond13
intervenes so that the equilibrium is shifted toward the
(Z)-4 vinyl radical. Only the staggered (Z)-4st vinyl
radical undergoes a remarkably chemoselective 1,5-H
transfer with a nonactivated C-H bond. Indeed, this
diastereoselective 1,5(π-endo)-H takes place so that it
minimizes the interaction between the methyl and the
In comparison, the all-carbon pentenyl system has not
witnessed such a bloom: the 5-endo-trig radical cycliza-
tion has been rarely observed, and most often in low yield,
as illustrated in Scheme 1.9 Recently, we have evidenced
a highly efficient 5-endo-trig cyclization,10 based on a
(1) (a) Baldwin, J . E. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 734-
736. (b) Baldwin, J . E.; Cutting, J .; Dupont, W.; Kruse, L.; Silberman,
L.; Thomas, R. L. Ibid. 1976, 736-738.
(2) (a) Walling, C.; Pearson, M. S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2262-
2266. (b) Urabe, H.; Kuwajima, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 1355-
1358. (c) Beckwith, A. L. J .; Boate, D. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
1761-1764. (d) Curran, D. P.; Chang, C.-T. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
3140-3157.
(3) Baker, S. R.; Parsons, A. F.; Wilson, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 2815-2818 and references therein.
(4) Ikeda, M.; Ohtani, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Sato, T.; Ishibashi, H. J .
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1998, 1763-1768 and references therein.
(5) Mendenhall, G. D.; Protasiewicz, J . D.; Brown, C. E.; Ingold, K.
U.; Lusztyk, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1718-1724. For related
chemistry, see: Yamamoto, Y.; Ohno, M.; Eguchi, S. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 9653-9661.
(6) Cai, Y.; Roberts, B. P. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 467-
475.
(7) (a) Clive, D. L. J .; Cantin, D. Chem. Commun. 1995, 319-320.
(b) Martinez-Grau, A.; Curran, D. P. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 8332-
8333.
(8) J ournet, M.: Rouillard, A.; Cai, D.; Larsen, R. D. J . Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 8630-8631.
(9) (a) J ulia, M.; Le Goffic, F. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1965, 1550-1555.
(b) Pines, H.; Sih, N. C.; Rosenfield, D. B. J . Org. Chem. 1966, 31,
2255-2257. (c) Wilt, J . A.; Maravetz, L. L.; Zawadzki, J . F. J . Org.
Chem. 1966, 31, 3018-3025. (d) Bradney, M. A.; Forbes, A. D.; Wood,
J . J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1973, 1655-1660. (e) Schmalz, H.-
G.; Siegel, S.; Bats, J . W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2383-
2385.
(11) For a similar approach in a heteroatomic version: Gimisis, T.;
Chatgilialoglu, C. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1908-1909.
(12) For a review on this chemistry: Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M.;
Sieburth, S. M. Synthesis 1997, 813-854.
(13) Fensterbank, L.; Dhimane, A. L.; Wu, S.; Lacoˆte, E.; Bogen, S.;
Malacria, M. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 11405-11420.
(10) Bogen, S.; Malacria, M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3992-
3993.
10.1021/jo9904260 CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/06/1999