tween two dry, rough articular areas preventing second-
ary traumatic osteoarthrosis and bony ankylosis.4,6 There
is ample evidence that the synovial membrane can be
reformed from ordinary connective tissue as in cases of
pseudoarthrosis or its regeneration after synovectomy.4,6
An experimental finding demonstrated that these fascial
grafts, when used for ossiculoplasty, achieve blood circu-
lation through longitudinal vascular network within 48
hours and are preserved forever.7 Initially, the surface
cells of the replaced ossicle imbibes its nourishment from
tissue fluids through its temporal fascia covering; finally,
the entire reconstructed ossicular assembly gets covered
with the middle ear mucosa ensuring its blood supply from
the mucosal plexus.7
In our experience, this method of ossiculoplasty has
granted an essential freedom to an otologist. Formerly,
much time was spent attempting to remove granulations
or cholesteatoma from an intact ossicular chain, often
resulting in recurrence of disease or sensorineural hearing
loss from the manipulations. Our technique minimizes
these problems by removing the incus temporarily to weed
out all disease and the degenerated ligaments with the
knowledge that it can be replaced in its original position
with reconstitution of ligamentous support at the conclu-
sion of the operation. Initially, we were hesitant to per-
form standard repositioning of the incus using this
method after facial nerve decompression because of the
close proximity to the exposed nerve. However, this con-
cern has proved baseless because postoperative recovery
of the facial nerve in these cases was good without any
significant difference in hearing acuity.
In few cases, the revision operation for the minor
graft perforation showed the reposed incus in position
with neatly healed incudomalleolar and incudostapedial
joints and a delicate band of connective tissue running
from the head of the malleus and the incus to the tegmen
tympani resembling the superior malleoincudal fold.
Thus, there is evidence that the suspensory ligaments of
the ossicles can be reformed with this method; the au-
tografted ossicles get biologically adopted with satisfac-
tory joint healing and are able to maintain its size and the
shape as this fascial cover prevents further remodeling
and the new bone formation around it. This has been
clinically confirmed in a number of patients in whom the
incus was well visualized through the thin tympanic mem-
brane after a period of 1 year, and it is obvious from the
improved hearing results that it works effectively.
that many transpositions had failed because the ossicle
was pulled off the capitulum or it slipped and got attached
to the bony walls of the tympanum.5,8 Nikolaou et al.9
performed 40 incus transpositions and achieved closure of
the conductive loss to within 20 dB in 74% of the cases.
The mechanical advantages offered by this approach have
helped us to develop a technique that can be used to repair
a wide variety of intricate ossicular defects using autolo-
gous ossicular or cortical bone grafts.
CONCLUSION
The contemporary techniques used for the reposition-
ing of the dislocated incus do not involve the repair of
ossicular joints, ligaments, and the intratympanic mus-
cles. A new microsurgical concept, “fascial arthroplastic
ossiculoplasty,” is presented, which was successfully per-
formed in 342 patients for the repositioning of a dislocated
incus. The fascial strips used to hold the repositioned
incus in its anatomical position and the fascial dividers
that separate the coupling surfaces of the articulating
ossicles help in maintaining firm, mobile articulations of
the repositioned incus with the malleus, fossa incudis, and
head of the stapes. The procedure is simple, and its post-
operative results are more predictable and reproducible.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank K. C. Gadre and K. B. Bhargava,
Emeritus Professors of Otolaryngology, University of
Bombay (Bombay, India); Vikram Marwah, Emeritus Pro-
fessor of Orthopedics, University of Nagpur (Nagpur, In-
dia); and Dr. Anant K. Chaudhary, Consultant Otologist
at Mumbai (India), for their invaluable suggestions.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Hough JVD. Incudostapedial joint separation: etiology, treat-
ment and significance. Laryngoscope 1959;69:644–664.
2. Calcaterra TC, Gussen R, Harmon E, Schwardz BS. Ossicular
joint healing. Ann Otol 1972;81:690–695.
3. Shuknecht HF, Trupiano S. Some interesting middle ear
problems. Laryngoscope 1957;67:396–401.
4. Murphy JB. Arthroplasty. Ann Surg 1913;57:593–599.
5. Farrior JB. Tympanoplasty (ossicular repositioning in recon-
struction). Arch Otol 1969;89:220–225.
6. Barnett CH, Davies DV, Macconaill MA. Synovial Joints.
London: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd., 1962:1–145.
7. Wullstein HL, Wullstein SR. Tympanoplasty: Osteoplastic
Epitympanotomy, 1st ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag,
1990:39–100.
8. Glasscock ME. Ossicular chain reconstruction. Laryngoscope
1976;86:211–221.
9. Nikolaou A, Bourikas Z, Maltas V, Aidonis A. Ossiculoplasty
with the use of autografts and synthetic materials. J Lar-
yngol Otol 1992;106:692–694.
The hearing results of the present study are encour-
aging compared with those of incus transposition tech-
niques previously used. Farrior5 and Glasscock8 reported
Laryngoscope 112: September 2002
1702
Mundada et al.: Fascial Arthroplastic Ossiculoplasty