2742 Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 15, 1999
Communications
Sch em e 1
Ta ble 1. Ru Cl3‚3H2O-Ca ta lyzed Dim er iza tion of
P h en yla cetylen e (2) To Affor d
1,4-Dip h en yl-1-bu ten -3-yn e (3) (Eq 2)a
amt
amt of
PR3,
PR3/
Rub
amt of amt of
Et2NH, CO2,
of 2, RuCl3‚3H2O,
yield of
entry mmol
mmol
mmol kg/cm2 (Z)-3, %c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
4
2
2
4
0
2
2
2
0
0
50
0
1.2
5.2
4.3d
2.6
PBu3, 2
PBu3, 2
PBu3, 1
PBu3, 2
PBu3, 4
PBu3, 2
PCy3, 2
PCy3, 2
PCy3, 2
PPh3, 2
0
33
50
50
50
50
0
0
50
50
15e
43f
22
53
36
34
48g
37
F igu r e 1. ORTEP structure (50% thermal ellipsoid prob-
ability) of Et2NCO2RuH(CO)(PCy3)2 (4). H atoms are omit-
ted for clarity, except for Ru1-H.
a
Conditions: solvent, toluene 2 mL; reaction temperature, 100
°C; reaction time, 20 h; CO2, initial pressure at room temperature
in a 50 mL stainless steel autoclave. Molar ratio. c Based on 2
b
and determined by GC using bibenzyl as an internal standard.
d
similar to those of the Me2NCO2 ligand of [Me2NCO2-
Ru(PMe2Ph)4]PF6.8
Et2NCO2CHdCHPh (1) ((Z)-1/(E)-1 ) 4.3) was concomitantly
formed in 37% yield. e Conditions: solvent, toluene 4 mL. 1 was
formed in 11% yield. f (Z)-3/(E)-3 ) 3.2. 1 was formed in 2.0% yield.
Interestingly, it was found that addition of 2 to 4 in
toluene at 50 °C evolved CO2 gas in 44 and 50% yields
after 0.5 and 4 h, respectively. The ruthenium bis-
(alkynyl) complex (PhCtC)2Ru(CO)(PCy3)2 (5)9 was
isolated in good yield as prismatic crystals containing
one THF solvent molecule per two ruthenium atoms by
the reaction of 4 with 2 (2/4 ) 6, PCy3/4 ) 2, toluene,
reflux) and subsequent recrystallization from a THF/
hexane solution (Scheme 1). The formation of a PhCt
C-Ru bond by the reaction of a R2NCO2-Ru bond with
2 is unprecedented.
The molecular structure of 5 determined by X-ray
diffraction analysis is shown in Figure 2.10 The geometry
around the ruthenium center is a distorted square
pyramid: the ruthenium atom deviates from the P1-
C37-P2-C45 plane by 0.237(1) Å toward the CO ligand.
Change of the bidentate carbamato ligand of 4 into the
monodentate alkynyl ligand of 5 with concomitant
generation of one vacant coordination site in the pres-
ence of an excess amount of PCy3 is noteworthy in
g
(Z)-3/(E)-3 ) 3.5. 1 was formed in 3.4% yield.
moderate yield as colorless prismatic crystals from an
ethanol-insoluble part of the reaction mixture formed
by the one-pot RuCl3‚3H2O/PCy3/Et2NH/CO2 reaction
without 2. The transition-metal carbamato complexes
represent a class of compounds of considerable interest.5
5a,d-f
Transition-metal amide/CO2
halide/R2NH/CO2
and transition-metal
5g,i
reactions are the two common
preparative methods of transition-metal carbamato
complexes (R2NCO2)nM. Thus, the formation of 4 con-
taining the CO and hydrido ligands generated concomi-
tantly by the one-pot RuCl3‚3H2O/PCy3/Et2NH/CO2
reaction is unique.6
The molecular structure of 4 determined by X-ray
diffraction analysis is shown in Figure 1.7 The ruthe-
nium atom has a distorted-octahedral geometry. The
bond lengths relevant to the bidentate carbamato ligand
along with the small O1-Ru1-O2 bond angle were
(5) (a) Chandra, G.; J enkins, A. D.; Lappert, M. F.; Srivastava, R.
C. J . Chem. Soc. A 1970, 2550. (b) La Monica, G.; Cenini, S.; Porta,
F.; Pizzotti, M. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1976, 1777. (c) Tsuda, T.;
Washita, H.; Watanabe, K.; Miwa, M.; Saegusa, T. J . Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1978, 815. (d) Tsuda, T.; Watanabe, K.; Miyata, K.;
Yamamoto, H.; Saegusa, T. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 2728. (e) Chetcuti,
M. J .; Chisholm, M. H.; Folting, K.; Haitoko, D. A.; Huffman, J . C. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2138. (f) J oslin, F. L.; J ohnson, M. P.;
Mague, J . T.; Roundhill, D. M. Organometallics 1991, 10, 2781. (g)
Bacchi, A.; Dell’Amico, D. B.; Calderazzo, F.; Giurlani, U.; Pelizzi, G.;
Rocchi, L. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1992, 122, 429 and references therein. (h)
Srivastava, R. S.; Singh, G.; Nakano. M.; Osakada, K.; Ozawa, F.;
Yamamoto, A. J . Organomet. Chem. 1993, 451, 221. (i) Dell’Amico, D.
B.; Calderazzo, F.; Gingl, F.; Labella, L.; Strahle, J . Gazz. Chim. Ital.
1994, 124, 375.
(6) Some routes are possible for the ruthenium-mediated conversion
of CO2 into CO; see: Fu, P-f.; Khan, M. A.; Nicholas, K. M. J .
Organomet. Chem. 1996, 506, 49, and references therein. Gas chro-
matographic analysis of the reaction mixture formed by the RuCl3‚
3H2O/PCy3/Et2NH/CO2 reaction indicated the insignificant formation
of OdPCy3, which excludes the deoxygenation of CO2 by PCy3.
(7) Crystal structure data for 4: C42H77NO3P2Ru, colorless, mono-
clinic, P21/c (No. 14), a ) 20.398(6) Å, b ) 9.588(3) Å, c ) 24.566(5) Å,
â ) 113.75(2)°, Z ) 4, R ) 0.041, GOF ) 1.30. One of the N-ethyl
groups, C38 and C39 in Figure 1, is disordered at the two locations
close to each other with an occupancy ratio of 4:6 (the location shown
in Figure 1).
(8) Ashworth, T. V.; Nolte, M.; Singleton, E. J . Organomet. Chem.
1976, 121, C57.
(9) Characteristic spectral data of 5‚0.5THF: IR (cm-1; Nujol) 2074
(CtC), 1920 (CO), 1594 (Ph); 1H NMR (δ, ppm; C6D6) 7.04 (t, J ) 7.4
Hz, 1 H, Ph), 7.27 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 2 H, Ph), 7.76 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz, 2 H,
Ph); 13C NMR (δ, ppm; THF-d8): 122.8, 125.1, 128.6, 129.9, 130.0 (t,
2J (CP) ) 14.1 Hz), 130.2, 130.4, 130.8, 207.1 (t, 2J (CP) ) 12.6 Hz).
Anal. Calcd for C55H80O1.5P2Ru: C, 71.17; H, 8.69. Found: C, 70.90;
H, 8.69.
(10) Crystal structure data for 5‚0.5THF: C55H80O1.5P2Ru, yellow,
monoclinic, P21/n (No. 14), a ) 20.907(3) Å, b ) 22.683(4) Å, c ) 10.522-
(1) Å, â ) 90.32(1)°, Z ) 4, R ) 0.050, GOF ) 1.35. One of the
cyclohexyl rings, C31-C36 in Figure 2, is disordered at the two
locations close to each other with an equal probability.