appended alkyl chains influence the liquid-crystalline proper-
ties, especially melting temperature, and to establish the
structural and thermodynamic factors that assembles the
aromatic cores into columns. Such information, which is critical
for a proper theoretical description of metallomesogens, is not
yet available for any liquid-crystalline material. We are well
aware that the polycatenar ligand L2 is an attractive substrate for
reaction with metal cations that favour octahedral coordination
geometries.
We thank Professor Anthony Harriman for his critical review
of the manuscript and for the energy-mimimised structure and
Dr. Benoît Heinrich (IPCMS) for fruitful and helpful discus-
sions.
Fig. 2 ORTEP view of complex 3 showing 50% probability thermal
ellipsoids. The hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Notes and references
Although non-mesomorphic themselves, ligands L1 and L2
produce thermotropic liquid-crystalline complexes when co-
ordinated to copper(i), as demonstrated by differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) and polarizing optical microscopy (POM).
The DSC thermograms of 2, recorded from 20 to 130 °C,
contain two sharp peaks, each of which indicates a reversible
first-order phase transition. The peak at 49 °C (DH = 149.2 kJ
mol21) corresponds to melting of the crystal into a liquid-
crystalline phase whereas the peak at 117 °C (DH = 3.1 kJ
mol21) can be attributed to clearing of the liquid crystal into an
isotropic melt (values are given for the third cycle). The high
stability of complex 2 was demonstrated by the absence of
significant perturbation of the DSC patterns following several
heating–cooling cycles. The optical textures observed for 2
during slow cooling from the isotropic melt are typical of a
columnar phase (with pseudo focal-conic textures). This
birefringent texture is maintained at room temperature. In
contrast, complex 1 melts into the liquid crystal phase at 48 °C
(DH = 84.6 kJ mol21) and has a clearing point at 75 °C (DH =
10.3 kJ mol21), but only on the first heating stage. It appears,
therefore, that complex 1 is thermally unstable, a feature not
entirely unexpected in view of the lack of substituents at the
6-position.
† Full synthetic details will be given elsewhere. All new compounds were
authenticated by NMR, FTIR, MS and elemental analyses (required values
in parentheses). Selected data: L1: dCNN 8.64 (CDCl3); nCNN 1626 cm21
(KBr pellet, FAB+ m/z 1023.3 [M + H]+, C, 78.59 (78.62), H, 10.62 (10.83),
N, 2.57 (2.74%). L2: dCNN 8.72 (CDCl3), nCNN 1626 cm21 (KBr pellet);
FAB+ m/z 1967.3 [M + H]+, C, 78.43 (78.72), H, 10.53 (11.01), N, 1.99
(2.13%). 1: 92% yield; dCNN 9.18 (CDCl3); nCNN 1589 cm21 (KBr pellet);
FAB+ m/z 2109.2 [M-BF4]+, C, 72.98 (73.24), H, 9.73 (10.09), N, 2.23
(2.55%). 2: 98% yield; dCNN 8.79 (CDCl3); nCNN, 1626, 1588 cm21 (KBr
pellet); FAB+ m/z 3996.8 [M 2BF4]+, C, 75.12 (75.50); H, 10.21 (10.61);
N, 1.53 (2.05%, calculated with one water molecule).
‡ Crystal data for 3: C42H38N6O4Cu•2BF4•H2O•CH2Cl2, M = 1785.26,
¯
triclinic, space group P1, red crystals, a = 12.6180(7), b = 13.075(1), c =
13.783(1) Å, a = 84.437(9), b = 80.643(9), g = 70.631(9), V = 2114.4 Å3,
Z
= 1, m =
0.645 mm21. Data were collected on a Kappa CCD
diffractometer (graphite Mo-Ka radiation, l = 0.71073 Å) at 2100 °C.
15930 reflections collected (2.5 ≤ 2q ≤ 26.36°), 4186 data with I > 3s(I).
The structure was solved using the Nonius OpenMoleN16 package and
refined by full-matrix least squares with anisotropic thermal parameters for
all non-hydrogen atoms except for the solvent molecules (the latter are
disordered). Final results: R(F) = 0.079, wR(F) = 0.105, GOF = 1.189,
542 parameters. CCDC 182/1402.
1 S. Brooker, R. J. Kelly and P. Plieger, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1079.
2 P. K. Bowyer, K. A. Porter, A. D. Rae, A. C. Willis and S. B. Wild,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 1153.
The columnar structure of the liquid crystal phases of 1 and
2 was confirmed by X-ray diffraction studies. It is seen that the
rigid aromatic units that comprise the core of the pseudo-
tetrahedral copper(i) complexes are superposed on top of one
another and embedded in a disordered matrix provided by the
molten alkyl chains. These columns are packed laterally into a
two-dimensional hexagonal unit cell having parameters of 60
and 47 Å for 1 and 2, respectively as measured at 60 °C from the
small-angle reflection. The larger value found for 1 suggests
that a ‘phosmidic-type’ of columnar mesophase is formed
(where several individual molecules aggregate to form a disk),
whereas for 2 the individual molecules stack one on top of the
other to form columns as in conventional discoid liquid
crystalline material.
Liquid crystals obtained from purely organic molecules
comprising a tetrahedral carbon atom substituted with four
semi-rigid subunits bearing flexible terminal alkyl chains have
been reported.12 However, complexes 1 and 2 are, to the best of
our knowledge, the first examples of metallomesogens built
around a single tetrahedral metal cation. Many unsuccessful
attempts to engineer such metallomesogens have been at-
tempted in the past.13,14 As such, these materials differ
markedly from the liquid-crystalline metallohelicate built
around a central binuclear copper(i) helicate.15 It should be
stressed that the 2-iminopyridine moiety is readily amenable for
systematic investigation of how the length and number of
3 M. J. Hannon, C. L. Painting, A. Jackson, J. Hamblin and W. Errington,
Chem. Commun., 1997, 1807.
4 D. M. Haddleton, D. J. Duncalf, D. Kukulj, A. M. Heming, A. J. Shooter
and A. J. Clark, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 1525.
5 G. J. P. Britovsek, V. C. Gibson, B. S. Kimberley, P. J. Maddox, S. J.
Mctavish, G. A. Solan, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 849.
6 R. Ziessel, A. Harriman, J. Suffert, M.-T. Youinou, A. De Cian and J.
Fischer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2509.
7 B. Donnio and D. W. Bruce, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 1993; New J.
Chem., 1999, 275.
8 H.-T. Nguyen, C. Destrade and J. Malthête, Adv. Mater., 1997, 9,
375.
9 A. Juris and R. Ziessel, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1994, 225, 251.
10 R. Ziessel and M.-T. Youinou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32,
877.
11 A. El-ghayoury, A. Harriman, A. De Cian, J. Fischer and R. Ziessel,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 9973.
12 J. Malthête, New J. Chem., 1996, 20, 925.
13 A. Pegenau, T. Hegmann, C. Tschierske and S. Diele, Chem. Eur. J.,
1999, 5, 1643.
14 B. Donnio and D. W. Bruce, Struct. Bonding (Berlin), 1999, 95, 193.
15 A. El-ghayoury, L. Douce, A. Skoulios and R. Ziessel, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2205.
16 OpenMoleN, Interactive Structure Solution, Nonius B. V., Delft, The
Netherlands, 1997.
Communication 9/04245H
2034
Chem. Commun., 1999, 2033–2034