Pd(II) and Pt(II) Complexes with Thiophene Spacers
Organometallics, Vol. 18, No. 25, 1999 5287
1
2c: yield 90%. H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 7.66-7.33 (m, 30
was collected. Removal of the solvent gave a red oil which
contained three inseparable isomers (eg., cis,cis, cis,trans, and
trans,trans). It was dissolved in toluene and heated at reflux
for 2 h. A small amount of iodine was used as catalyst. This
effectively converted the products into the all-trans isomer.
Crystallization from hot hexane gave reddish brown powdery
H, C6H5), 6.83 (d, J H-H ) 16.0 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 5.75 (d, J H-H
)
3.7 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 6.57 (d, J H-H ) 16.0 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 6.48
(d, J H-H ) 3.7 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 6.42 (d, J H-H ) 3.7 Hz, 1 H,
SCCH), 5.87 (d, J H-H ) 3.7 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 4.49 (m, 2 H,
C5H4), 4.27 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.13 (s, 5 H, Cp). 31P NMR (CDCl3,
TMS): δ 23.3. Anal. Calcd for C56H45BrP2S2FePd: C 61.92;
H, 4.18. Found: C, 62.04, H, 3.91.
1
6 (0.76 g, 66%). MS (FAB): m/e 558 (M+). H NMR (CD2Cl2,
TMS): δ 6.85 (d, J ) 3.75 Hz, 2 H, SCCH), 6.59 (d, J ) 16.1
Hz, 2 H, dCH), 6.53 (d, J ) 3.75 Hz, 2H, SCCH), 6.35 (d, J )
16.1 Hz, 2 H, dCH), 4.41 (t, J ) 1.7 Hz, 4 H, C5H4), 4.27 (t, J
) 1.7 Hz, 4 H, C5H4). Anal. Calcd for C22H16Br2S2Fe: C, 47.17;
H, 2.88. Found: C, 47.06; H, 3.02.
2d : yield 93%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 7.57 (m, 12 H,
o-C6H5), 7.31 (m, 18 H, m- and p-C6H5), 6.38 (d, J H-H ) 15.7
Hz, 1 H, dCH), 6.14 (d, J H-H ) 3.5 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 5.90 (d,
J H-H ) 15.7 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 5.77 (d, J H-H ) 3.5 Hz, 1 H,
SCCH), 4.26 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.16 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.05 (s, 5 H,
Syn th esis of Tr in u clea r F eP d 2 Com p lex 7 fr om 6.
Compound 7 was synthesized in 71% yield by the same
procedure as employed for 5, except that 6 was used instead
of 4. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, TMS): δ 7.68-7.23 (m, 60 H, C6H5),
6.35 (d, 8 H, J ) 15.9 Hz, 2 H, dCH), 6.16 (d, J ) 3.36 Hz,
2H, SCCH), 5.95 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.9 Hz, 2 H, dCH), 5.92 (d, J
) 3.36 Hz, 2H, SCCH), 4.13 (br, s, 4 H, C5H4), 4.04 (br, s, 4 H,
Cp). 31P NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 23.3. Anal. Calcd for C52H43
-
IP2SFePd: C, 59.42; H, 4.12. Found: C, 59.08; H, 4.01.
1
2e: yield 90%. H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 7.54-7.19 (m, 30
H, C6H5), 6.50-6.29 (m 6 H, C6H4 and dCH), 4.35 (m, 2 H,
C5H4), 4.20 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.08 (s, 5 H, Cp). 31P NMR (CDCl3,
TMS): δ 23.0. Anal. Calcd for C54H45IP2FePd: C, 62.06; H,
4.34. Found: C, 61.88; H, 4.10.
C5H4). 31P NMR (CD2Cl2, TMS): δ 25.3. Anal. Calcd for C94H76
-
1
3a : yield 42%. H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 7.65-7.30 (m, 30
Br2P4S2FePd2: C, 61.96; H, 4.20. Found: C, 62.12; H, 4.32.
H, C6H5), 6.41 (d, J ) 15.9 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 6.06 (d, J ) 3.4 Hz,
1 H, SCCH), 5.93 (d, J H-H ) 15.9 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 5.75 (d, J H-H
) 3.7 Hz, J H-Pt ) 46 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 4.27 (m, 2 H, C5H4),
4.16 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.06 (s, 5 H, Cp). 31P NMR (CDCl3, TMS):
δ 23.8 (J H-Pt ) 2874 Hz). Anal. Calcd for C52H43BrP2SFePt:
C, 57.16; H, 3.97. Found: C, 56.78; H, 3.79.
Str u ctu r e Deter m in a tion of 3a . Crystals of 3a were
grown by slow diffusion of hexane into a concentrated solution
of 3a in CH2Cl2. Diffraction data were collected with an Enraf-
Nonius CAD4 diffractometer using graphite-monochromated
Mo KR (λ ) 0.7107 Å) radiation with the θ-2θ scan mode at
room temperature. Absorption corrections according to ψ scans
of three reflections were made. All the data processing was
performed using the Shelxl17 package. The Fe and Pt atoms
were located by Patterson techniques; all other atoms were
located by subsequent Fourier maps and cycles of least-squares
refinement. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropi-
cally, and all non-hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized
positions with dC-H ) 0.95 Å. At the end of refinement there
existed four peaks near platinum. Modeling them for a diffused
solvent, either CH2Cl2 or hexane, did not lead to any significant
improvement. The results provided here are for a CH2Cl2
solvate. Relevant experimental details are listed in Table 1.
All other crystal data for 3a are given in the Supporting
Information.
1
3b: yield 48%. H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 7.64-7.29 (m, 30
H, C6H5), 6.78-6.56 (m, 5 H, SCCH and dCH), 6.26 (d, J H-H
) 15.9 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 6.15 (d, J H-H ) 3.5 Hz, 1 H, SCCH),
5.75 (d, J H-H ) 3.4 Hz, J H-Pt ) 45 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 4.43 (m, 2
H, C5H4), 4.28 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.13 (s, 5 H, Cp). 31P NMR
(CDCl3, TMS): δ 23.9 (J H-Pt ) 2858 Hz). Anal. Calcd for C58H47
-
BrP2S2FePt: C, 58.01; H, 3.94. Found: C, 57.79; H, 3.76.
1
3c: yield 52%. H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 7.69-7.34 (m, 30
H, C6H5), 6.83 (d, J H-H ) 15.9 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 6.73 (d, J H-H
)
3.8 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 6.56 (d, J H-H ) 15.9 Hz, 1 H, dCH), 6.46
(d, J H-H ) 3.6 Hz, 1 H, SCCH), 6.32 (d, J H-H ) 3.6 Hz, 1 H,
SCCH), 5.78 (d, J H-H ) 3.6 Hz, J H-Pt ) 46 Hz, 1 H, SCCH),
4.40 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.27 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.12 (s, 5 H, Cp). 31P
NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 23.8 (J H-Pt ) 2842 Hz). Anal. Calcd
for C56H45BrP2S2FePt: C, 57.25; H, 3.86. Found: C, 57.33; H,
3.79.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
1,1′-Bis(p-iod op h en ylvin yl)fer r ocen e (4). Compound 4
was prepared in 59% yield by following a procedure similar to
that described for 1d using 1,1′-ferrocenedicarboxaldehyde and
diethyl (4-iodobenzyl)phosphonate. MS (FAB): m/e 642 (M+).
1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ 7.48 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz, 4 H, C6H4),
6.90 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz, 4 H, C6H4), 6.63 (d, J ) 16.1 Hz, 2H, d
CH), 6.41 (d, J ) 16.1 Hz, 2 H, dCH), 4.41 (m, 4 H, C5H4),
4.26 (m, 4 H, C5H4). Anal. Calcd for C26H20I2Fe: C, 48.64; H,
3.14. Found: C, 48.36; H, 3.03.
Syn th esis of Tr in u clea r F eP d 2 Com p lex 5 fr om 4.
Compound 5 was synthesized in 75% yield by the same
procedure as employed for 2, except that 4 was used instead
of 1. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, TMS): δ 7.68-7.31 (m, 60 H, C6H5),
7.31-7.19 (m, 8 H, C6H4 and dCH), 4.46 (m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.28
(m, 2 H, C5H4), 4.08 (s, 5 H, Cp). 31P NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ
22.9. Anal. Calcd for C98H80I2P4FePd2: C, 61.82; H, 4.23.
Found: C, 61.79; H, 3.91.
1,1′-Bis[2-(5-br om o-2-th ien yl)eth en yl]fer r ocen e (6). So-
dium metal (0.12 g, 5.2 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (50
mL) under nitrogen. (5-Bromo-2-thienylmethyl)triphenylphos-
phonium bromide (2.7 g, 5.0 mmol) was added with vigorous
stirring followed by 1,1′-ferrocenedicarboxaldehyde (0.48 g, 2.0
mmol). The red mixture was refluxed overnight, cooled, and
poured into ice water. The resulting reddish residue was
extracted with CH2Cl2 and the extract dried over anhydrous
MgSO4. Evaporation of the organic extract left a red syrup. It
was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using
CH2Cl2/hexane (1:4) as eluant. A 100 mL portion of the eluant
Syn th esis of F er r ocen yl Der iva tives. The ferro-
cenyl derivatives required for the present study were
easily available from conventional Wittig or Wittig-
Horner reactions (Scheme 1). The Wittig reaction gener-
ally leads to a mixture of E and Z isomers. Careful
recrystallization from hot hexane by exploiting the
higher solubility of the Z isomers led to the separation
of analytically pure E isomers in good yields. Only the
E isomer was subjected to the oxidative-addition reac-
tions. The E isomers are characterized by their AB
quartet with a coupling constant of ca. 16.0 Hz. In the
proton NMR spectra recorded in CDCl3/acetone-d6 all
the three ligands 1a -c exhibited three upfield signals
corresponding to the ferrocene group. Two unresolved
multiplets were observed for the substituted Cp ring,
while the unsubstituted Cp ring resonated at a upfield
position as a sharp singlet. Thiophene protons appear
as two doublets in 1a , and four doublets are seen for
1b and 1c.
Syn th esis of M(P P h 3)2(th )Br Der iva tives. The
utility of zerovalent M(PPh3)4 in the preparation of
trans-M(PPh3)2(R)X complexes (X ) halide and R )
(17) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-Structure Determination Package;
University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany.