Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: AH of 1H-indoles catalyzed by (R,R)-6a.[a]
Although a number of iridium and ruthenium complexes with
different chiral phosphine ligands have been employed in the
AH of trisubstituted 3H-indoles over the past two decades,[9]
only one substrate, 2,3,3-trimethyl 3H-indole, was reported in
all cases (Scheme 1c). So far, there is limited success in the
AH of unprotected indoles, and to the best of our knowledge,
the AH of racemic 3,3-disubstituted 3H-indoles has not been
documented yet.
Most recently, we have found that the cationic ruthenium
complexes of chiral monosufonylated diamines[10] are very
efficient catalysts for the AH of several types of N-containing
heteroaromatic compounds and ketimines with excellent
enantioselectivity.[11] Further mechanism study indicated
that dihydrogen could be activated by the cationic ruthenium
Entry
R1/R2
R3
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12[d]
13[d]
14[d]
15[d]
16[d]
17[e,f]
18[g]
19[g]
Me/H
nPr/H
nBu/H
n-Pentyl/H
C6H5CH2/H
4-FC6H4CH2/H
4-MeC6H4CH2/H
3-MeC6H4CH2/H
Me/H
Me/H
Me/H
-(CH2)3-
-(CH2)4-
-(CH2)4-
-(CH2)4-
-(CH2)5-
Me/Me
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Me
OMe
F
H
H
CH3
F
H
H
Me
H
94 (2a)
88 (2b)
92 (2c)
89 (2d)
93 (2e)
92 (2 f)
90 (2g)
93 (2h)
93 (2i)
93 (2j)
94 (2k)
92 (2l)
91 (2m)
94 (2n)
92 (2o)
73 (2p)
95 (2q)
85 (2r)
53 (2s)
96 (R)
96 (R)
97 (R)
96 (R)
97 (R)
97 (R)
96 (R)
97 (R)
95 (R)
95 (R)
94 (R)
89 (R,R)
95 (R,R)
90 (R,R)
94 (R,R)
99 (R,R)
97 (R,R)
40 (R)
À
complex with the aid of substrate to generate the Ru H active
species and the iminium salt, and the in situ activated
substrate was then reduced by a stepwise H+/HÀ transfer
process.[11b] We thus envisioned that such cationic ruthenium
complex could be used to hydrogenate 1H-indoles and 3H-
indoles, via iminium salts, without the addition of acid
(Scheme 1d,e). Herein, we communicate the highly effective
AH of a wide range of 1H-indoles and 3H-indoles under very
mild reaction conditions. A kinetic resolution was also
observed when racemic 3,3-disubstituted 3H-indoles were
hydrogenated.
H/Me
Ph/H
42 (S)
[a] Reaction conditions: substrates 1a–s (0.2 mmol) and (R,R)-6a in
HFIP, and H2 (1 atm). Stirred at RT for 24 h. [b] Yield of isolated product.
[c] The ee values were determined by HPLC with a chiral-phase column.
[d] cis/trans isomer >20:1. [e] (R,R)-6a (2.0 mol %) and H2 (50 atm).
Stirred at 508C for 24 h. [f] cis/trans isomer=8:1. [g] (R,R)-6a
(5.0 mol%), H2 (50 atm), stirred at 508C for 24 h.
In our initial study, the AH of 2-methyl-indole (1a) with
the catalyst (R,R)-5a (see Scheme 1) was chosen as the model
reaction for the optimization of the reaction conditions (see
Table S1 in the Supporting Information). The solvent influ-
neced the catalytic performance significantly, and full con-
version and high enantioselectivity were observed in hexa-
fluoroisopropanol (HFIP).[12] Upon the screening of a variety
of catalysts, (R,R)-6a was found to be optimal in terms of both
reactivity and enantioselectivity. In addition, the enantiose-
lectivity was insensitive to hydrogen pressure and temper-
ature. Remarkably, even if the reaction was conducted at
ambient temperature and pressure,[13] full conversion and the
same ee value were obtained within 3 hours. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first example for AH of heteroaromatic
compounds at ambient temperature and pressure. Further-
more, when the substrate to catalyst ratio was increased to
1000, only very slight erosion of the ee value was observed
(see entry 27 in Table S1).
Under the optimized reaction conditions, the AH of
a variety of 1H-indoles was examined, and good to excellent
enantioselectivities were obtained (Table 1). 2-Alkyl-substi-
tuted indoles were hydrogenated in very good yields with
excellent enantioselectivities (entries 1–11), regardless of
either the length of side chain or the position of substituents
at the phenyl ring. Notably, excellent results were also
achieved with 2,3-disubstituted fused ring indolines
(entries 12–16). It was found that the enantiomeric excess
increased from 89 to 99% when increasing the ring size from
five- to six- and seven-membered rings. In addition, the
hydrogenation of 2,3-dimethylindole could be carried out
under harsh reaction conditions (entry 17). More difficult
substrates such as 3-methyl and 2-phenyl indoles were also
tested, and moderate ee values were obtained (entries 18 and
19).
Encouraged by the above excellent results, we then
extended this catalytic system to the synthesis of chiral
2,3,3-trisubsituted indolines, which are more commonly found
in alkaloids and other natural products. So far, the AH of 3H-
indoles is still limited to only one substrate.[9] A quick survey
with 3a as the model substrate revealed that (R,R)-7a was the
optimal catalyst (see Table S2). As shown in Table 2, a series
of 2-alkyl-substituted 3H-indole derivatives (3a–f) were
hydrogenated at ambient temperature and pressure in HFIP
with excellent reactivity and enantioselectivity (93–98% ee).
This catalytic system was further applied to the AH of 2-
aryl-substituted 3H-indoles (Table 2), which are much more
difficult substrates for hydrogenation, and transition-metal-
catalyzed AH of this class of substrates has not been reported
yet.[5a] In contrast to 2-alkyl-substituted 3H-indoles, the AH of
3g proceeded smoothly in THF instead of HFIP (see
À
Table S3). Interestingly, (R,R)-7g with a (PhO)2PO2 anion
was found to be optimal catalyst, thus indicating that the
counteranion played an important role on catalytic perform-
ance.[11e–f,14] Under the optimized reaction conditions, high
yields and excellent enantioselectivities (97– > 99% ee) were
obtained for a range of 2-aryl-substituted 3H-indoles (3g–r).
Finally, the AH of a range of racemic 3H-indoles bearing
different substituents at C3 was carried out. Interestingly,
a kinetic resolution of 3H-indoles by AH was observed for the
first time.[15,16] After optimizing the reaction conditions,
several substrates were resolved with high selectivity
(Table 3), thus providing the reduced products with very
2
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!