C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
In conclusion, this study shows that the possibility of expanding
the coordination number renders Zn2+ very effective for the simple
and easy design of (1D) dipolar structures or (3D) octupolar
structures. Moreover, the results illustrate the superiority of
octupoles versus dipoles in terms of nonlinearity without significant
cost of transparency. Their good thermal stability and large first
hyperpolarizability make them attractive candidates for nonlinear
optical materials.
Acknowledgment. We thank the Re´gion Bretagne (PRIR
99CC10) and the CNRS for financial support. K.S. is grateful to
the French Ministry of Education for a fellowship.
References
Figure 1. UV-visible spectra of complexes 1-3.
Table 1. Linear and Nonlinear Optical Data
(1) (a) Verbiest, T.; Houbrechts, S.; Kauranen, M.; Clays, K.; Persoons, J.
Chem. Mater. 1997, 7, 2175. (b) Long, N. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1995, 34, 21. (c) Marks, T. J.; Ratner, M. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1995, 34, 155. (d) Le Bozec, H.; Renouard, T. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
2000, 229.
λmax
ꢀ
ν1/2
(cm-1
â
â0
T
d
10
cmpd
(nm) (mol‚L-1‚cm-1
)
)
f
(10-30esu) (10-30esu) (°C)
(2) Zyss, J.; Ledoux, I. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 77.
a
b
401
397
65000
61000
62000
125000
175000
4280 1.22
4348 1.15
4490 1.22
3825 2.07
4544 3.48
380
368
399
308
330
(3) For recent examples of octupolar structures see: (a) Wolff, J. J.; Siegler,
F.; Matschiner, R.; Wortmann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1436-
1439. (b) Lambert, C.; No¨ll, G.; Schma¨lzlin, E.; Meerholz, K.; Bra¨uchle,
C. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 2129. (c) Lambert, C.; Schma¨lzlin, E.; Meerholz,
K.; Bra¨uchle, C. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 512. (d) Lambert, C.; Gaschler,
W.; Schma¨lzlin, E.; Meerholz, K.; Bra¨uchle, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1999, 577. (e) McDonagh, A. M.; Humphrey, M. G.; Samoc,
M.; Luther-Davies, B.; Houbrechts, S.; Wada, T.; Sasabe, H.; Persoons,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1405. (f) Omenat, A.; Barbera, J.;
Serrano, J. L.; Houbrechts, S.; Persoons, A. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11, 1292.
(g) Cho, B. R.; Lee, S. J.; Lee, S. H.; Son, K. H.; Kim, Y. H.; Doo, I.-Y.;
Lee, G. J.; Kang, T. I.; Lee, Y. K.; Cho, M.; Jeon, S.-J. Chem. Mater.
2001, 13, 1438. (h) Cho, B. R.; Park, S. B.; Lee, S. J.; Son, K. H.; Lee,
S. H.; Lee, M.-J.; Yoo, J.; Lee, Y. K.; Lee, G. J.; Kang, T. I.; Cho, M.;
Jeon, S.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6421. (i) Blanchard-Desce, M.;
Baudin, J.-B.; Jullien, L.; Lorne, R.; Ruel, O.; Brasselet, S.; Zyss, J. Opt.
Mater. 1999, 12, 333. (j) Brunel, J.; Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J.; Blanchard-Desce,
M. Chem. Commun. 2001, 923. (k) Brasselet, S.; Cherioux, F.; Audebert,
P.; Zyss, J. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1915. (l) Thalladi, V. R.; Boese, R.;
Brasselet, S.; Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J.; Jetti, R. K. R.; Desiraju, G. R. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 1639. (m) Lin, W.; Wang, Z.; Ma, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 11249.
aZnCl2 1 459
b2Zn2+ 2 529
a3Zn2+ 3 466
172a
245b
340b
62
157
241
a Measured by EFISH (precision (10%) at 1.34 µm in a 10-3 mol‚L-1
chloroform solution; µ‚â ) 1830 × 10-30 esu5 with µ ) 10.65 D.
b Measured by HRS (precision (15%) in a (1-5)‚10-2 mol‚L-1 dichlo-
romethane solution at 1.91 µm.
to the HLS signal can be considered as negligible. HLS measure-
ments were carried out in concentrated dichloromethane solution
(1-5 × 10-2 mol‚L-1) with a concentrated solution of ethyl-violet
as reference (â1.91 ) 170 × 10-30 esu). Interestingly, the off-
resonant â0 values (Table 1) monotonically increase from 1 to 3
with respect to the number of subchromophores organized around
the Zn(II) center. The â0 value of 2 is about 2-fold larger than that
+
of the recently reported tetrahedral CuI(b)2 complex (â0 ) 78 ×
(4) (a) Dhenaut, C.; Ledoux, I.; Samuel, I. D. W.; Zyss, J.; Bourgault, M.;
Le Bozec, H. Nature 1995, 374, 339. (b) Vance, F. W.; Hupp, J. T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4047. (c) Le Bozec, H.; Le Bouder, T.; Maury,
O.; Bondon, A.; Ledoux, I.; Deveau, S.; Zyss, J. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13,
1677. (d) Le Bouder, T.; Maury, O.; Le Bozec, H.; Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J.
Chem. Commun. 2001, 2430.
10-30 esu).5 This result is consistent with the better acceptor strength
of Zn2+ versus Cu+ and the absence of an antagonist MLCT
transition in 2. An improved transparency/nonlinearity tradeoff is
reached for the octahedral complex 3 as compared to that for the
tetrahedral complex 2. Moreover, these results point out the
efficiency of the octupolar strategy since 3 exhibits a â0 value that
is roughly 4 times larger than that of the corresponding dipolar
derivative 1, without the undesirable bathochromic shift of the ILCT
transition [∆λ(3 vs 1) ) 7 nm]. It is also worth noting that 3 exhibits
a very large â0 value of 241 × 10-30 esu (comparable to that of
the ruthenium analogous complex9), which is to the best of our
knowledge the largest ever reported for octupolar molecules.10 The
enhanced molecular NLO activity of D3 metallo-octupoles as
compared to those of the most efficient D3h organic octupoles can
be related to the ability of Zn2+ to organize three subchromophores
or six intraligand charge transfers, whereas the central benzene ring
in D3h organic octupoles allows the spatial arrangement of only
three charge transfers.
(5) Renouard, T.; Le Bozec, H.; Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J. Chem. Commun. 1999,
871.
(6) Hilton, A.; Renouard, T.; Maury, O.; Le Bozec, H.; Ledoux, I.; Zyss, J.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 2521.
(7) Pallenberg, A. J.; Marschner, T. M.; Barnhart, D. M. Polyhedron 1997,
16, 2711.
(8) The oscillator strength f is estimated by the following relationship: f )
4.319 × 10-9‚ꢀ‚ν1/2 where ν1/2 represents the half-height bandwidth (cm-1).
(9) More recent measurements concerning [a3Ru][PF6]2 give fluorescence-
free â0 of ca. 240 × 10-30esu see ref 4c.
(10) The most efficient D3h organic octupoles featuring extended conjugated
pathway are: 1,3,5-triscyano-2,4,6-tris(dibutylaminobistyryl)benzene
(λmax ) 470 nm, â1.56 ) 219 × 10-30esu, â0 ) 116 × 10-30esu), see ref
3
g-h; 1,3,5-tris(methylsulfonylbistyryl)benzene (λmax ) 377 nm,
â1.34 ) 250 × 10-30esu, â0 ) 157 × 10-30esu), see ref 3j; and 4,9,14-
tris(4′-(di-4-methoxyphenyl)aminophenylethynyl)truxenone (λmax ) 509
nm, â0 ) 169 × 10-30esu, â0 ) 104 × 10-30esu), see ref 3b.
xxx
JA025705A
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 17, 2002 4561