Notes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 10, 2000 3229
3.00 (m, 2H), 1.16 (s, 9H); 13C NMR δ 191.7, 157.1, 154.1, 153.2,
148.8, 140.7, 137.1, 135.5, 127.6, 126.2, 116.1, 112.0, 111.2, 108.8,
80.9, 56.6, 56.5, 56.2, 51.1, 30.3, 28.3; LSIMS m/z 414 ((M +
H)+, 22%), 314 (42%), 296 (100%). Anal. Calcd for C23H27NO6:
C, 66.81; H, 6.58; N, 3.39. Found: C, 66.61; H, 6.60; N, 3.60.
Tor tu osin e (1). Biarylaldehyde 6 (0.807 g; 1.95 mmol) was
dissolved in 5 mL of CHCl3. To this solution was added 16 mL
of a satd solution of anhydrous HCl in ether to give a copious
yellow precipitate. The precipitate was collected by suction
filtration and washed with ether to give 0.675 g of crude solid.
The crude material was separated by column chromatography
(9:1 CH2Cl2-MeOH) to give 0.516 g (80%) of tortuosine chloride,
1: mp 245-248 °C (dec) (lit. mp 242-243 °C); 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6) δ 9.69 (s, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.49 (s,
1H), 5.25 (t, J ) 6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.19 (s, 3H), 4.07 (s, 3H), 4.00 (s,
3H), 3.68 (t, J ) 6.5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 162.4, 157.0,
151.4, 142.3, 138.8, 131.6, 129.5, 124.4, 121.3, 116.7, 110.5, 104.4,
101.9, 57.7, 57.3, 56.6, 27.6; LSIMS m/z 296 (M+, 100%); HR-
sessment of growth inhibitory efficacy against 60 human
tumor cell lines at the National Cancer Institute.12 The
results of this in vitro study are summarized and
contrasted with comparable data provided by the NCI
for ungeremine hydrochloride, 3b, in the Supporting
Information. In consonance with their close structural
similarity, criasbetaine and ungeremine exhibit some-
what similar (although not identical) potencies and
selectivity profiles across the tumor cell-lines in which
they were tested in common. Although clear evidence of
selectivity against the CNS tumor-cell panel was found
for both 2b and 3b, neither betaine proved highly potent
against any of the cell-lines tested. Tortuosine chloride,
1, also exhibited general selectivity for the CNS tumor-
cell panel; however, this compound displayed relatively
high specific potency against the SF-268 glioblastoma
CNS cell-line: Com p ou n d n u m ber (pGI50): 2b (5.4),
3b (6.0), and 1 (7.8). The unusual selectivity and efficacy
of tortuosine chloride against SF-268 cells also compares
favorably with the maximum in vitro growth inhibition
results reported for ellipticinium-type13 and protober-
berine-type14 CNS-selective antitumor agents against this
cell line.
LSIMS m/z Calcd for
296.1291.
C
18H18NO3 (M+): 296.1287. Found:
1-(ter t-Bu toxyca r bon yl)-5-(ben zyloxy)in d olin e (7). To a
solution of 5-(benzyloxy)indole (15.0 g; 67 mmol) in 200 mL of
acetic acid was added sodium cyanoborohydride (12.7 g; 202
mmol), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at 23
°C. The reaction mixture was cooled with an ice bath, made basic
with aqueous NaOH, and extracted with ether to give 14.3 g of
a yellow oil. The crude oil was combined with di-tert-butyl
dicarbonate (18.3 g; 84 mmol) in 200 mL of THF, and the
reaction mixture was allowed to stir overnight at room temper-
ature. The reaction mixture was concentrated with a rotary
evaporator, and the crude product was recrystallized from
ether-pentane to afford 13.1 g (60%) of 7: mp 89.3-90.2 °C;
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.8-7.65 (br m, 1H), 7.45-7.25 (m, 5H), 6.8-
6.7 (m, 2H), 5.02 (s, 2H), 3.96 (br t, J ) 8.6 Hz, 2H), 3.05 (t, J
) 8.6 Hz, 2H), 1.55 (br s, 9H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 154.8, 152.6,
137.6, 136.9 (br), 132.7 (br), 128.6, 127.9, 127.5, 80.6 (br), 71.0,
47.9, 28.6, 27.6. Anal. Calcd for C20H23NO3: C, 73.82; H, 7.12,
N, 4.30. Found: C, 73.93; H, 7.09; N, 4.56.
A convincing mechanistic rationale for tortuosine’s
remarkable in vitro profile remains to be experimentally
determined; however, on the basis of its performance
against SF-268 cancer cells, tortuosine chloride has
recently been selected for preclinical in vivo antitumor
assay at the National Cancer Institute. The results of
these investigations will be reported in due course.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l. Metalation reactions were performed under an
argon atmosphere using oven-dried glassware and freshly puri-
fied solvents. Melting points are uncorrected. 1H NMR (300
MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) were recorded at room tempera-
ture. Column chromatography was performed using 230-400
mesh silica gel.
1-(ter t-Bu toxyca r bon yl)-5-(ter t-bu tyld im eth ylsilyloxy)-
in d olin e (10). BOC-protected indoline 7 (5.77 g; 17.7 mmol) and
10% Pd-C were mixed in 100 mL of absolute ethanol, and the
mixture was stirred under 1 atm of hydrogen overnight. The
reaction mixture was filtered through Celite and concentrated
under vacuum to give 3.75 g (90%) of highly pure 1-(tert-
butoxycarbonyl)-5-hydroxyindoline, 8.15 The BOC-protected hy-
droxyindoline (3.75 g; 15.9 mmol), tert-butyldimethylsilyl chlo-
ride (5.28 g; 35.0 mmol), and imidazole (2.71 g; 39.8 mmol) were
mixed in dry DMF, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 23
°C overnight. After an extractive (ether) workup, column chro-
matography (99:1 hexanes-EtOAc) afforded 5.22 g (94%) of 10:
mp 58.4-59.5 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.75-7.6 (br m, 1H), 6.64
(br d, J ) 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (br d, J ) 0.8 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (br t, J
) 8.7 Hz, 2H), 3.02 (t, J ) 8.7 Hz, 2H), 1.55 (br s, 9H), 0.97 (s,
9H), 0.16 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 152.6; 150.9; 118.4; 116.8;
115.0, 47.7, 28.5, 27.5, 25.7, 18.2, -4.5; EIMS m/z 349 (M+, 13%),
ter t-Bu tyl 5-Meth oxy-7-(2-for m yl-4,5-d im eth oxyp h en yl)-
2,3-d ih yd r oin d ole-1-ca r boxyla te (6). 5-Methoxy-N-BOC-in-
doline, 4,9d (1.62 g; 6.5 mmol) and 2 mL of TMEDA were
dissolved in 40 mL of ether at -45 °C (internal thermometer).
sec-BuLi (10 mL of a 1.3 M solution in cyclohexane) was added
dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at -45 to -50 °C
for 2 h, and CuI-P(EtO)3 complex (4.64 g; 13.0 mmol) was added
in one portion. The resulting orange slurry was stirred at -45
°C for 0.5 h, and a solution of imine 5a (2.43 g; 6.5 mmol) in 5
mL of THF was added in one portion. The reaction mixture was
allowed to warm to room temperature (orange slurry f greenish
black solution) and stirred overnight. The solution was acidified
with dilute aqueous HCl to pH ) 4, and the mixture was refluxed
for 10 min. The mixture was extracted with ether, the combined
ether layers were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated with a rotary
evaporator to give a yellow oil. Chromatography of the crude
product (3:1 hexanes-EtOAc) gave 1.61 g (60%) of 6: mp 142.4-
294 (22%), 293 (100%); HR-EIMS Calcd for
349.2073. Found: 349.2073.
C19H31NO3Si:
1-(ter t-Bu t oxyca r b on yl)-5-(t r iisop r op ylsilyloxy)in d o-
lin e (9). Protection of compound 8 using the general procedure
with TIPSCl gave 73% of 9 as a colorless oil: 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 7.75-7.6 (br m, 1H), 6.7-6.6 (br m, 2H), 3.95 (br t, J ) 8.3
Hz, 2H), 3.05 (t, J ) 8.3 Hz, 2H), 1.55 (br s, 9H), 1.3-1.15 (m,
3H), 1.09 (d, J ) 6.8 Hz, 18 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 152.5, 151.4,
136.5 (br s), 132.2 (br s), 118.0, 116.5, 114.9, 80.4 (br s), 47.7,
28.5, 27.3, 17.9, 12.6. HR-EIMS Calcd for C22H37NO3Si: 391.2543.
Found: 391.2542.
ter t-Bu tyl 5-(ter t-Bu tyld im eth ylsilyloxy)-7-(2-for m yl-4,5-
d im et h oxyp h en yl)-2,3-d ih yd r oin d ole-1-ca r b oxyla t e (12).
Indoline 10 (1.00 g; 2.9 mmol) and 0.86 mL of TMEDA were
dissolved in 15 mL of dry THF. At -40 °C (internal thermom-
eter) sec-Buli (4.4 mL of a 1.3 M solution in cyclohexane) was
added dropwise to the reaction mixture. The mixture was
allowed to stir for 2 h at -40 to -50 °C, and CuI-P(OEt)3
1
143.3 °C; H NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.78 (s, 1H), 7.47 (s, 1H), 6.91 (s,
1H), 6.84 (d, J ) 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J ) 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.13-
4.04 (m, 2H), 3.958 (s, 3H), 3.955 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.07-
(12) Monks, A.; Scudiero, D.; Skehan, P.; Shoemaker, R.; Paull, K.;
Vistica, D.; Hose, C.; Langley, J .; Cronise, P.; Vaigro-Wolff, A.; Gray-
Goodrich, M.; Campbell, H.; Mayo, J .; Boyd, M. R. J . Natl. Cancer Inst.
1991, 83, 757.
(13) (a) J urayj, J .; Haugwitz, R. D.; Varma, R. K.; Paull, K. D.;
Barrett, J . F.; Cushman, M. J . Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 2190. (b) Acton,
E.; Narayanan, V. L.; Risbood, P. A.; Shoemaker, R. H.; Vistica, D. T.;
Boyd, M. R. J . Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 2185. (c) Anderson, W.;
Gopalsamy, A.; Reddy, P. S. J . Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1955.
(14) (a) Sanders, M. M.; Liu, A. A.; Li, T.-K.; Wu, H.-Y.; Desai, S.
D.; Mao, Y.; Rubin, E. H.; LaVoie, E. J .; Makhey, D.; Liu, L. F. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 1998, 56, 1157. (b) For a recent review see Gatto, B.;
Capranico, G.; Palumbo, M. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1999, 5, 195.
(15) Padwa, A.; Dimitroff, M.; Waterson, A. G.; Wu, T. J . Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 3986.