A R T I C L E S
Fu¨rstner et al.
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
in herbarumin.9 The fact, however, that pinolidoxin as well as
the herbarumins all show positive [R]D values together with the
rather poor resolution of the relevant NMR spectra of the Mosher
esters derivatives of 3 raises doubts as to the reliability of this
conclusion. To complicate matters even further, no information
concerning the stereochemistry at C-2 of pinolidoxin is presently
available. Therefore, we reinvestigated this problem by syn-
thesizing several possible candidates and comparing their
analytical and spectroscopic data with those of the natural
product.
For this purpose, it was essential to develop a flexible yet
stereochemically unambiguous approach (Scheme 2). Because
all targets contain a double bond, ring-closing metathesis (RCM)
seemed to be the method of choice for its inherently convergent
character.12,13 RCM allows the nonenolides to be deconvoluted
into two rather simple fragments A and B. Importantly, as shown
in Scheme 3, all possible cyclization precursors can be traced
back to D-ribose as the ultimate source of chirality if required
for structure elucidation purposes.
At the same time, however, one has to keep in mind that the
formation of medium-sized rings by RCM still poses consider-
able challenges. Ring strain predisposes cycloalkenes of 8-11
ring atoms for the reverse process, that is, for ring-opening
metathesis (ROM) or ring-opening metathesis polymerization
(ROMP). Therefore, the number of successful applications of
RCM to this series is still rather limited.14-17
actual structures of 3 and 4,5 however, constitute major
handicaps to a systematic evaluation of the structure/activity
profile of these important leads.4 A full account of our work in
this area comprising the first total syntheses of herbarumin I7
and II as well as a synthesis-driven solution of the puzzle
concerning the stereostructure of pinolidoxin which ensued from
the contradictory evidence in the literature is described below.
Results and Discussion
Structural Considerations and Strategy. A well-docu-
mented study of the herbarumins 1 and 2 leaves no doubt about
the constitution, configuration, and conformation of these
compounds.1 Unfortunately, however, for pinolidoxin the situ-
ation is far from clear. Two preliminary reports suggested a
7/8-anti, 8/9-anti arrangement of the oxygen substituents at these
three contiguous stereocenters as shown in 3a.8 However, one
group later revised its conclusions and suggested a 7,8-anti but
8/9-syn relationship for this domain (3b).9 This analysis was
largely based on degradations of the natural product and
comparison of the samples thus obtained with synthetic material
prepared from either rac-tartaric acid or 2,3-O-isopropylidene-
D-erythrose 5 (Scheme 1). Thereby, the addition of n-propyl-
magnesium chloride to 5 played a key role, which was assumed
to provide alcohol 6 with a syn arrangement between C-8 and
C-9 (pinolidoxin numbering).9 This assignment, however, has
not been rigorously proven and is inconsistent with previous
reports demonstrating that Grignard additions to 5 (and related
hemiacetals) follow the Felkin-Ahn model and uniformly
deliver 8,9-anti configured products 7 with high selectivity.10,11
The same authors also assigned the absolute stereochemistry at
C-7 and C-8 of pinolidoxin as being opposite to the one found
One approach to circumvent this problem is to incorporate
control elements that force the cyclization precursors to adopt
conformations suitable for ring closure.13 An isopropylidene
protecting group spanning O-7 and O-8 should exert this
function by aligning the olefinic side chains in a cyclization-
(11) For examples showing that Grignard additions to isopropylidene protected
lactols of sugars other than erythrose also give anti-relationships, see: (a)
Kinoshita, M.; Arai, M.; Tomooka, K.; Nakata, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
27, 1811. (b) Buchanan, J. G.; MacLean, K. A.; Wightman, R. H.; Paulsen,
H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1463. (c) Buchanan, J. G.; Dunn,
A. D.; Edgar, A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 1191.
(12) For a discussion of strategic advantages related to RCM, see: Fu¨rstner, A.
Synlett 1999, 1523.
(13) Reviews: (a) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18.
(b) Fu¨rstner, A. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3140; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 3012. (c) Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413.
(d) Fu¨rstner, A. Top. Catal. 1997, 4, 285. (e) Schuster, M.; Blechert, S.
Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2124; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,
2037. (f) Schrock, R. R. Top. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 1, 1. (g) Maier, M.
E. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 2153; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2073.
(14) For syntheses of 10-membered rings by RCM, see: (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Mu¨ller,
T. Synlett 1997, 1010. (b) Chang, S.; Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 4757. (c) Gerlach, K.; Quitschalle, M.; Kalesse, M. Synlett 1998, 1108.
(d) Fink, B. E.; Kym, P. R.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 4334. (e) Oishi, T.; Nagumo, Y.; Hirama, M. Chem. Commun.
1998, 1041. (f) Quitschalle, M.; Kalesse, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
7765. (g) Delgado, M.; Martin, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4798. (h)
Bamford, S. J.; Goubitz, K.; van Lingen, H. L.; Luker, T.; Schenk, H.;
Hiemstra, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 345. (i) Nakashima, K.;
Ito, R.; Sono, M.; Tori, M. Heterocycles 2000, 53, 301. (j) Cho, S. C.;
Dussault, P. H.; Lisec, A. D.; Jensen, E. C.; Nickerson, K. W. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 193. (k) Nevalainen, M.; Koskinen, A. M. P.
Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 4184; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4060.
(l) Heinrich, M. R.; Steglich, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3287. (m)
Banwell, M. G.; Bray, A. M.; Edwards, A. J.; Wong, D. J. New J. Chem.
2001, 25, 1347. (n) Telser, J.; Beumer, R.; Bell, A. A.; Ceccarelli, S. M.;
Montio, D.; Gennari, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 9187. (o) For an
indirect approach, see: Me´ndez-Andino, J.; Paquette, L. A. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 1263.
(7) For a preliminary communication on the total synthesis of herbarumin I,
see: Fu¨rstner, A.; Radkowski, K. Chem. Commun. 2001, 671.
(8) (a) De Napoli, L.; Evidente, A.; Lasalvia, M.; Piccialli, G.; Piccialli, V.
Abstract of the 9th Int. Congress of Pesticide Chemistry; London, United
Kingdom, 1998 (http://www.chemsoc.org/chempest/html/3C-0007.html). (b)
Pilli, R. A.; Sabino, A. A. Abstract of the 22nd IUPAC Int. Symp. Chem.
Nat. Prod.; Sa˜o Carlos, SP, Brazil, 2000.
(9) de Napoli, L.; Messere, A.; Palomba, D.; Piccialli, V.; Evidente, A.; Piccialli,
G. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3432.
(10) (a) Mekki, B.; Singh, G.; Wightman, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
5143. (b) Jiang, S.; Singh, G.; Wightman, R. H. Chem. Lett. 1996, 67.
9
7062 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 24, 2002