3503
strategy. Further synthetic and X-ray diffraction studies,13 which should confirm stereochemical assign-
ments, are in progress and will be described in due course.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the EPSRC and Glaxo Wellcome for a CASE studentship, and warmly thank Ron
Galt (ICI Pharmaceuticals) for a valuable discussion and experimental details. We extend our thanks to
Ruth Howard and Steve Simpson (Salford), and to Peter Moore (Glaxo Wellcome) for mass, X-ray and
NMR data, respectively.
References
1. For a review, see: Desimoni, G.; Tacconi, G. Chem. Rev. 1975, 75, 651–692.
2. Boger, D. L.; Weinreb, S. M. Hetero Diels–Alder Methodology in Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: London, 1987; pp.
167–213.
3. Wallace, T. W.; Wardell, I.; Li, K.-D.; Leeming, P.; Redhouse, A. D.; Challand, S. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1995,
2293–2308.
4. Hayes, R.; Li, K.-D.; Leeming, P.; Wallace, T. W.; Williams, R. C. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12 907–12 928.
5. For reviews, see: Juaristi, E.; Quintana, D.; Escalante, J. Aldrichimica Acta 1994, 27, 3–11; Cole, D. C. Tetrahedron 1994,
50, 9517–9582; Cardillo, G.; Tomasini, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 117–128; Enantioselective Synthesis of Beta-Amino
Acids; Juaristi, E., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997. For recent examples, see: Tang, T. P.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 12–13; Evans, D. A.; Wu, L. D.; Wiener, J. J. M.; Johnson, J. S.; Ripin, D. H. B.; Tedrow, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
6411–6417; Roche, D.; Prasad, K.; Repic, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3665–3668; Kawakami, T.; Ohtake, H.; Arakawa,
H.; Okachi, T.; Imada, Y.; Murahashi, S.-I. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 107–110; Miyabe, H.; Fujii, K.; Naito, T. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
569–572.
6. For examples and leading references, see: Tietze, L. F.; Voss, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 6181–6184; Tietze, L. F.;
Hartfiel, U. ibid. 1990, 31, 1697–1700. See also: De Gaudenzi, L.; Apparao, S.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron 1990, 46,
277–290, and references cited therein.
7. Bayles, R.; Flynn, A. P.; Galt, R. H. B.; Kirby, S.; Turner, R. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 6341–6344; idem., ibid. 1988,
29, 6345–6348.
8. Claisen, L. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1897, 297, 1–98.
9. New compounds gave satisfactory analytical data. Typical procedure: A solution of ketene acetal 1 (0.6 mmol) and the
diene 2 (0.6 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was kept at −15°C until analysis by HPLC or TLC indicated that the reaction was
complete. The reaction mixture was then concentrated and the residue analysed by 250 or 300 MHz NMR spectroscopy
(in each case the dr at this stage was estimated to be ca. 4:1). The isolated materials described in Table 1 were obtained
as follows. Entry 1: The residue was taken up in CH2Cl2 (1 mL), filtered through a plug of basic alumina using more
CH2Cl2 and the filtrate concentrated to obtain the isolated product (dr by NMR). Entry 2: The residue was taken up in
CH2Cl2 and filtered through a plug of basic alumina using ethyl acetate:isohexane (1:4). Concentration and crystallisation
from ether:isohexane (1:1) gave the isolated product (dr by NMR). Entry 3: The residue was taken up in CH2Cl2, filtered
through a plug of basic alumina using ether:isohexane (2:1) and the filtrate concentrated to obtain the isolated product (dr
by HPLC). Trituration with isohexane gave material with dr 14:1 by HPLC. Entry 4: The residue was crystallised from
isohexane (dr by HPLC). Selected 1H NMR data (signals tentatively attributed to minor products in square brackets): 3a
[4a] (400 MHz) 1.70 [1.67] (3H, s, ArMe), 1.79 [1.76] (3H, s, ArMe), 1.93 [1.94] (3H, s, MeCON), 2.28 (3H, s, MeCOC),
2.37 (3H, s, 6-Me), 2.42–2.56 (2H, m, 3-H2), 5.27 [5.34] (1H, d, J=9 Hz, 40 or 50-H), 5.36–5.46 (1H, m, 4-H), 5.55 (1H,
d, J=9 Hz, 40 or 50-H), 6.17 [6.06] (1H, d, J=10 Hz, NH), 7.03–7.09 (2H, m, 3,30-ArH), 7.20–7.35 (4H, m, 4,40,5,50-ArH),
7.57 (2H, dd, J=2, 8 Hz, 6,60-ArH); 3b [4b] (250 MHz) 1.68 [1.65] (3H, s, ArMe), 1.78 [1.74] (3H, s, ArMe), 1.89 (3H,
s, MeCON), 2.44 (3H, s, 2-Me), 2.40–2.50 (2H, obscured m, 5-H2), 3.74 (3H, s, CO2Me), 5.28 (1H, d, J=9 Hz, 40-H or
50-H), 5.30–5.40 (1H, m, 4-H), 5.54 (1H, d, J=9 Hz, 40-H or 50-H), 6.00 (1H, d, J=9 Hz, NH), 7.06 (2H, d, J=7.5 Hz,
3,30-ArH), 7.20–7.35 (4H, m, 4,40,5,50-ArH), 7.57 (2H, d, J=8 Hz, 6,60-ArH); 3c [4c] (400 MHz) 1.69 (3H, s, ArMe), 1.77
(3H, s, MeCON), 1.79 (3H, s, ArMe), 2.20 (3H, s, Me), 2.39–2.48 (2H, m, 5-H2), 2.45 (3H, s, 2-Me), 5.06 (1H, d, J=12
Hz, OCHPh), 5.29 (1H, d, J=9 Hz, 50-H), 5.33 (1H, d, J=12 Hz, OCHPh), 5.37–5.45 (1H, m, 4-H), 5.54 [5.55] (1H, d, J=9