Table 1
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: NaH, Et2O, 20 °C, > 95% yield or
BuLi, THF, 278 °C for 1 h then warming to 20 °C, > 90% yield.
diethyl ether at ambient temperature followed by addition of the
oxaziridine 7 again gave an excellent yield of the hydrox-
ylamine 8 as did the use of butyllithium as base. Finally, we
have succeeded in preparing suitable substrates for the 5-endo-
dig cyclisations by a very direct, ‘one-pot’ method (Scheme 4).
Thus, condensation of hex-1-yne 18, after deprotonation using
butyllithium, with phenylacetaldehyde, addition of the oxazir-
idine 7 to the resulting alkoxide and warming to ambient
temperature gave a 55% yield of the desired hydroxylamine 19.
These results suggest that there could well be a number of
(substrate-dependent) modifications which could usefully be
applied to this type of chemistry. Further studies along these
lines are underway, along with work on the 5-endo cyclisations,
which is now viable in the light of the foregoing results.
Scheme 4
We are very grateful for some helpful referees comments and
to the EPSRC mass Spectrometry Centre (University College,
Swansea) for the provision of mass spectral data and to the
EPSRC for financial support.
Notes and references
1 A. D. Jones and D. W. Knight, Chem. Commun., 1996, 915; S. P. Bew
and D. W. Knight, Chem. Commun., 1996, 1007; A. D. Jones, D. W.
Knight, A. L. Redfern and J. Gilmore, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
3267; S. B. Bedford, K. E. Bell, F. Bennett, C. J. Hayes, D. W. Knight
and D. E. Shaw, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 2143.
2 O. Mitsunobu, Synthesis, 1981, 1; O. Mitsunobu, Comp. Org. Synth,
1991, 6, 1; O. Mitsunobu, Comp. Org. Synth, 1991, 6, 65; D. L. Hughes,
Org. React., 1992, 42, 335; D. L. Hughes, Org. Prep. Proced. Int., 1996,
28, 127.
3 E. Breuer, H. G. Aurich and A. Nielsen, Nitrones, Nitronates and
Nitroxides, ed. S. Patai and Z. Rappoport, John Wiley and Sons,
Chichester, 1989.
4 E. Grochowski and J. Jurczak, Synthesis, 1976, 682. We found that ethyl
acetate was a superior solvent for this reaction; see: H. Iwagami, M.
Yatagi, M. Nakazawa, H. Orita, Y. Honda, T. Ohnuki and T. Yukawa,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1991, 64, 175.
reacted slightly less efficiently giving the hydroxylamine
derivative 9 in 80% yield. Two secondary alcohols, cyclohex-
anol and cholesterol, similarly gave the hydroxylamines 10 and
11 in 85 and 70% yields, respectively. Even the tertiary alcohol
group in a-terpineol reacted reasonably efficiently to give the
derivative 12 in 50% yield. This contrasts with the use of 3,3A-
di-tert-butyloxaziridine,11 which delivered only a 10% yield
from a similar tertiary alcohol. However, it should be noted that
this latter method leads directly to O-alkylhydroxylamines as
the free bases, which could be useful in some contexts.
Returning to our original substrates, we were glad to find that
yields were again viable, the allylic alcohol derivative 13 being
isolated in almost quantitative yield while the relatively
sensitive propargylic derivative 14 was isolated in 50% yield,
with the material balance being largely unreacted alcohol.
Hence, it appears that the present method is especially efficient
when applied to benzylic or allylic alcohols. Other oxygen-
based nucleophiles also react successfully. Thus, under the
same conditions, (E)-hex-3-enoic acid was converted into the
O-acylhydroxylamine 15 and 4-methoxyphenol into the O-
arylhydroxylamine 16, both in excellent yields. In general, all of
the foregoing derivatives appeared rather sensitive to chroma-
tography over silica gel; Grade II alumina was more suitable but
its use still often resulted in losses of some 10–20%12
deprotection to give the corresponding O-alkylhydroxylamines
(i.e. 2, 6; R1 = R2 = H) has ample literature precedent,13 which
we have confirmed during the present work, during which we
have also been able to exchange the N-protecting group from
Boc to TS (e.g. 13 ? 2b) in an efficient manner.
5 M. Fujimoto and M. Sakai, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1965, 13, 248.
6 O. F. Foot and D.W. Knight, in preparation.
7 For recent notable contributions, see: S. D. Bull, S. G. Davies, S. Jones,
J. V. A. Ouzman, A. J. Price and D. J. Watkin, Chem. Commun., 1999,
2079; Y.-M. Lin and M. J. Miller, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 7451.
8 J. Vidal, S. Damestoy, L. Guy, J.-C. Hannachi, A. Aubry and A. Collet,
Chem. Eur. J., 1997, 3, 1691; J. Vidal, J.-C. Hannachi, G. Hourdin, J.-C.
Mulatier and A. Collet, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 8845 and
references cited therein.
9 F. A. Davis and A. C. Sheppard, Tetrahedron, 1989, 45, 5703; F. A.
Davis and B.-C Chen, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 912.
10 W. Theilacker and K. Ebke, Angew. Chem., 1956, 68, 303. For a review
of electrophilic amination in general, see: S. Andreae and E. Schmitz,
Synthesis, 1991, 327.
11 I. C. Choong and J. A. Ellman, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 6528.
12 Satisfactory spectroscopic and analytic data have been obtained for all
compounds reported herein.
13 For examples of Boc hydrolysis in such hydroxylamine derivates, see,
for example, L. A. Carpino, C. A. Giza and B. A. Carpino, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1959, 81, 955; T. Sheradsky, G. Salemnick and Z. Nir,
Tetrahedron, 1972, 28, 3833; C. Baloli, P. D. Buttero, E. Licandro and
S. Mairona, Synthesis, 1988, 344.
The ease with which alkoxides in general can be formed led
us to briefly investigate some alternative protocols, using
benzyl alcohol 17 as a test substrate. As outlined in Scheme 3,
generation of the sodium alkoxide using sodium hydride in
976
Chem. Commun., 2000, 975–976