2942 Organometallics, Vol. 19, No. 16, 2000
Communications
(1)
It must be noted that 3 is the first example of a η1-
phosphinine cobalt complex. In both cases, the reduced
complexes were univocally formed and no side product
was detected in the 31P NMR spectra of the crude
mixture. Unfortunately, [Na(acac)] salts could not be
totally removed from the crude mixture by precipitation,
and 3 and 4 could not be recovered as analytically pure
1
substances. NMR experiments (31P, H, and 13C) were
carried out on crude mixtures in both cases. We found
that addition of the (2.2.2) cryptand resulted in nearly
quantitative precipitation of 3 and 4 as a powder
(contaminated by traces of acac salts). To gain more
structural information, X-ray crystallographic studies
were carried out. Suitable crystals were obtained by
heating poorly soluble [Na(2.2.2)] salts of 3 and 4 in
THF or DME overnight.5,8,9 Both complexes adopt a
nearly tetrahedral geometry as reported for other group
9 d10 complexes.5-7 Nevertheless the presence of differ-
ent conformations in the solid points toward a fluxional
behavior for 3 and 4 in solution. Thus, two independent
molecules (θ ) 78° and 83°), differing from each other
by the twist angle between the planes of the ligands,
are contained in the unit cell of the Co complex 38 and
three molecules (θ ) 59°, 63°, 87°) in the case of its Rh
counterpart 4.9 This situation is not maintained in
solution since the 31P NMR spectra of 4 (doublet at δ )
F igu r e 1. ORTEP drawing of one molecule of 4. Selected
bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): Co(1)-P(1) ) 2.1063-
(7), Co(1)-P(3) ) 2.0841(7), Co(1)-P(2) ) 2.0988(6), Co-
(1)-P(4) ) 2.1097(5), P(1)-C(1) ) 1.730(2), C(1)-C(2) )
1.391(2), C(2)-C(3) ) 1.414(2), C(3)-C(4) ) 1.391(2), C(4)-
C(5) ) 1.397(2), C(5)-C(6) ) 1.454(2), C(6)-P(2) ) 1.737-
(2); C(1)-P(1)-C(5) ) 101.91(7), P(1)-Co(1)-P(2) ) 83.82-
(2), P(2)-Co(1)-P(4) ) 122.32(2), P(1)-Co(1)-P(3) )
112.44(2), P(1)-Co(1)-P(4) ) 133.23(2), P(2)-Co(1)-P(3)
) 126.25(2).
is presented in Figure 1. In both cases a significant
electronic transfer from the metal to the π* LUMO of
the ligand is observed. This phenomenon is evidenced
by the shortening of the C-C bridge bond between each
phosphinine unit (average 1.456 vs 1.490(8) Å in cis-1)
and by the lengthening of the internal PdC bond
(average 1.763 vs 1.736(4) Å in cis-1), in good agreement
with the shape of the biphosphinine LUMO.1b Accord-
ingly, the Rh-P bond lengths in 4 appear to be rather
short (from average 2.219 Å) compared to values re-
ported for phosphinine Rh(+1) complexes (average 2.26
Å).10
1
194.1 ppm with J (31P-103Rh) ) 191 Hz) and 3 (broad
singlet at δ ) 209.4 ppm) show only a single resonance
pointing toward magnetic equivalence of the four P
atoms. An ORTEP view of one molecule of 3 (θ ) 78°)
(4) Preparation of 3: Biphosphinine 1 (0.1 g, 0.4 mmol) was reacted,
in a glovebox, at room temperature with excess sodium (0.23 g, 10
mmol) in THF or DME (10 mL). After 3 h, excess sodium was removed
and [Co(acac)3] (71 mg, 0.2 mmol) was added at -78 °C. The resulting
solution was then slowly warmed to room temperature. After 3 h, Na-
(acac) salts were separated by filtration (glovebox), and cryptand (2.2.2)
(75 mg, 0.2 mmol) was added to the filtrate to precipitate complex 3.
After drying, complex 3 was recovered as a very oxygen sensitive dark
red powder. Elemental data could not be obtained due to traces of Na-
(acac) salt. Preparation of 4: Synthesis of 4 was carried out following
the procedure described above for 3 using 1 (0.1 g, 0.4 mmol), Rh-
(acac)3 (70 mg, 0.2 mmol), and cryptand (2.2.2) (75 mg, 0.2 mmol). After
washing with hexanes, complex 4 was recovered as a very oxygen
sensitive black powder. Suitable crystals of 3 and 4 were obtained as
follows. In the glovebox, 15 mg of powder was placed in a glass tube
and was then subsequently covered with THF or DME. The tube was
sealed under vacuum and then heated at 80 °C overnight. The tube
was broken in the glovebox, and crystals were protected with para-
tone oil for handling and then submitted to X-ray diffraction anal-
ysis.
(5) For references on the synthesis of anionic group 9 complexes
incorporating alkene ligands, see: (a) J onas, K.; Mynott, R.; Kru¨ger,
C.; Sekulowski, J . C.; Tsay, Y.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976,
15, 767. (b) J onas, K.; Schieferstein, L.; Kru¨ger, C.; Tsay, Y. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 550. (c) J onas, K.; Kru¨ger, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1980, 19, 520. (d) J onas, K. Pure Appl. Chem.
1984, 56, 63. (e) J onas, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 295.
(6) For pertinent references on the synthesis of anionic group 9
complexes incorporating CO ligands and isonitriles, see: (a) Hieber,
W.; Schulten, H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1937, 232, 17. (b) Devasaga-
yaraj, A.; Achyutha Rao, S.; Periasamy, M. J . Organomet. Chem. 1991,
387-391, 403. (c) Warnock, G. F.; Cooper, N. J . Organometallics 1989,
8, 1826. (d) Leach, P. A.; Geib, S. J .; Corella, J . A.; Warnock, G. F.;
Cooper, N. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8566. (e) Beck, W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 168.
Though a significant part of the charge resides on
ligands, main-group electrophiles react at the metal
(7) For pertinent references on the synthesis of anionic group 9
complexes incorporating phosphine ligands, see: (a) Hieber, W.; Duch-
atsch, H. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 2933. (b) Kruck, Th.; Derner, N.; Lang,
W. Z. Naturforsch. 1966, 21b, 1020. (c) Scho¨nberg, H.; Boulmaaˆz, S.;
Wo¨rle, M.; Liesum, L.; Schweiger, A.; Gru¨tzmacher, H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1423. (d) Boulmaaˆz, S.; Mlakar, M.; Loss, S.;
Scho¨nberg, H.; Deblon, S.; Wo¨rle, M.; Nesper, R.; Gru¨tzmacher, H. J .
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 2623. (e) Collman, J . P.; Vastine,
F. D.; Roper, W. R. J . Am. Soc. 1966, 88, 5035. (f) Collman, J . P.;
Vastine, F. D.; Roper, W. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2282.
(8) Structure of 3: Deep red cubic crystals were grown from a hot
(80 °C) THF solution of the complex. Crystal data: C28H32P4Co‚
C18H36O6N2Na, triclinic, P1h, a ) 12.789(5) Å, b ) 18.760(5) Å, c )
20.143(5) Å, R ) 91.210(5)°, â ) 93.630(5)°, γ ) 93.530(5)°, V ) 4812-
(3) Å3, Z ) 4, Dcalcd ) 1.312 g cm-3, Mo KR radiation, λ ) 0.71069, T
) - 150.0 K, θmax ) 27.50°, 34 137 measured reflections, 21 921
independent reflections, 18 341 reflections used, Rint ) 0.0314 (>2σ),
wR2 ) 0.0788, R1 ) 0.0323, GOF ) 1.026, difference peak/hole )
0.400(0.049)/-0.322(0.049) e Å3.
(9) Structure of 4 : Deep red plates were grown from a hot (80 °C)
DME solution of the complex. Crystal data: C28H32P4Rh‚C18H36O6N2-
Na, triclinic, P1h, a ) 13.159(3) Å, b ) 13.579(3) Å, c ) 41.546(8) Å, R
) 81.428(1)°, â ) 85.187(1)°, γ ) 88.475(1)°, V ) 7314.1(3) Å3, Z ) 6,
Dcalcd ) 1.355 g cm-3, Mo KR radiation, λ ) 0.71069, T ) -150.0 K,
θmax ) 24.11°, 30 133 measured reflections, 22 243 independent reflec-
tions, 15 658 reflections used, Rint ) 0.0603 (>2σ), wR2 ) 0.1403, R1
) 0.0540, GOF ) 1.008, difference peak/hole ) 0.582(0.152)/-0.634-
(0.152) e Å3.