J. Szklarzewicz et al.
Inorganica Chimica Acta xxx (xxxx) xxx
hydrazide used was 4-hydroxybenzhydrazide (226.1 mg, 1.5 mmol).
Yield 0.649 g. MW = 588.29. Anal. Calc. for C26H18Cl2N4O5V: C, 53.08;
H, 3.08; N, 9.52%. Found: C, 52.89; H, 3.15; N, 9.33%. The complex is
paramagnetic µeff = 1.32 µB. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3431 (m), 1608 (s),
1519 (w), 1495 (s), 1424 (s), 1375 (m), 1353 (m), 1301 (w), 1278 (w),
1210 (m), 1183 (m), 1167 (m), 1145 (w), 1104 (w), 1035 (w), 954 (s),
908 (w), 845 (m), 964 (m), 725 (m), 695 (w), 646 (w), 618 (w), 559 (w),
511 (w), 448 (w).
2.6.12. Synthesis of [VO(L8)(EtO)(EtOH)] 11
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 3, but without addition
of phen ligand. The aldehyde used was 3,5-dichlorosalicylaldehyde
(287.2 mg, 1.5 mmol) and the hydrazide used was phenylacetic acid
hydrazide (227.4 mg, 1.5 mmol). Yield 0.305 g. MW = 479.23. Anal.
Calc. for C19H21Cl2N2O5V: C, 47.62; H, 4.42; N, 5.85%. Found: C, 47.27;
H, 4.27; N, 5.82%. The complex is diamagnetic. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3488
(w), 2979 (w), 1608 (s), 1541 (s), 1494 (w), 1442 (s), 1378 (m), 1350
(w), 1294 (m), 1215 (w), 1190 (w), 1088 (m), 1048 (m), 1029 (m), 976
(s), 956 (m), 902 (w), 877 (w), 864 (w), 795 (w), 777 (m), 727 (s), 693
(w), 635 (w), 606 (m), 571 (w), 536 (w), 511 (w), 474 (w), 429 (w).
2.6.8. Synthesis of [VO(L7)(phen)] 7
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 3. The aldehyde used
was 3,5-dichlorosalicylaldehyde (286.9 mg, 1.5 mmol) and the hydra-
zide used was 4-chlorobenzhydrazide (250.9 mg, 1.5 mmol). Yield
0.688 g. MW = 588.72. Anal. Calc. for C26H15Cl3N4O3V: C, 53.04; H,
2.57; N, 9.52%. Found: C, 52.90; H, 2.58; N, 9.39%. The complex is
paramagnetic µeff = 1.39 µB. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3370 (m), 1605 (vs),
1579 (w), 1518 (m), 1504 (s), 1485 (m), 1435 (s), 1425 (s), 1394 (w),
1375 (m), 1358 (s), 1297 (m), 1208 (m), 1177 (s), 1141 (m), 1105 (w),
1087 (m), 1031 (w), 1015 (w), 955 (vs), 903 (w), 867 (w), 840 (s), 762
(m), 745 (w), 721 (s), 703 (w), 678 (w), 644 (w), 618 (w), 581 (m), 526
(w), 509 (w), 490 (w), 431 (w).
2.6.13. Synthesis of [VO(L10)(phen)] 12
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 3. The aldehyde used
was 3,5-dibromo-4-methoxysalicylaldehyde (464.9 mg, 1.5 mmol) and
the hydrazide used was 4-hydroxybenzhydrazide (255.6 mg, 1.5 mmol).
Yield 0.736 g. MW = 689.21. Anal. Calc. for C27H18Br2N4O5V: C, 47.05;
H, 2.63; N, 8.13%. Found: C, 46.95; H, 2.77; N, 7.92%. The complex is
paramagnetic µeff = 1.92 µB. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3456 (m), 1611 (s),
1592 (s), 1575 (w), 1499 (vs), 1455 (w), 1423 (s), 1402 (w), 1377 (w),
1351 (s), 1280 (w), 1239 (w), 1191 (s), 1166 (m), 1107 (w), 1067 (w),
1025 (w), 974 (w), 959 (s), 842 (m), 777 (w), 755 (w), 720 (m), 637 (w),
555 (w), 509 (w), 433 (w).
2.6.9. Synthesis of [VO(L8)(phen)] 8
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 3. The aldehyde used
was 3,5-dichlorosalicylaldehyde (287.5 mg, 1.5 mmol) and the hydra-
zide used was phenylacetic acid hydrazide (226.1 mg, 1.5 mmol). Yield
0.641 g. MW = 568.31. Anal. Calc. for C27H18Cl2N4O3V: C, 57.06; H,
3.19; N, 9.86%. Found: C, 57.05; H, 3.20; N, 9.83%. The complex is
paramagnetic µeff = 1.55 µB. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3443 (w), 3044 (w),
1605 (s), 1529 (vs), 1491 (w), 1436 (m), 1427 (m), 1381 (w), 1354 (w),
1301 (w), 1219 (w), 1179 (m), 1109 (w), 1042 (w), 1012 (w), 964 (s),
884 (w), 861 (w), 841 (m), 795 (w), 753 (m), 722 (s), 701 (w), 648 (w),
612 (w), 541 (w), 526 (w), 500 (w), 432 (w).
2.6.14. Synthesis of [VO(L11)(phen)] 13
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 3. The aldehyde used
was 3,5-dibromo-4-methoxysalicylaldehyde (464.7 mg, 1.5 mmol) and
the hydrazide used was 4-chlorobenzhydrazide (254.6 mg, 1.5 mmol).
Yield 0.860 g. MW = 707.65. Anal. Calc. for C27H17Br2ClN4O4V: C,
45.83; H, 2.42; N, 7.92%. Found: C, 45.91; H, 2.56; N, 7.82%. The
complex is paramagnetic µeff = 1.46 µB. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3453 (m),
1605 (s), 1579 (w), 1504 (s), 1491 (s), 1423 (vs), 1350 (s), 1297 (w),
1238 (m), 1196 (s), 1141 (w), 1086 (w), 1069 (w), 1035 (w), 1012 (w),
981 (w), 956 (s), 869 (w), 842 (m), 772 (w), 745 (w), 726 (m), 713 (m),
644 (w), 623 (w), 579 (m), 528 (w), 494 (w), 427 (w).
2.6.10. Synthesis of [VO(L9)(EtO)] 9
3,5-Dichlorosalicylaldehyde (287.0 mg, 1.5 mmol) and 3-hydroxy-2-
naphthoic acid hydrazide (303.0 mg, 1.5 mmol) were dissolved in EtOH
(90 ml) under Ar flow on a magnetic stirrer. The mixture was refluxed
for 10 min with constant stirring and the temperature was raised to
100 ◦C. Then VOSO4aq (333.0 mg, 1.5 mmol) and 10 ml of ethanol was
added and heterogenic mixture was refluxed for ca 180 min. After that,
the volume of the reaction mixture was concentrated to final volume of
ca 20 ml and cooled to the room temperature. The precipitate was
filtered off, washed with ethanol and dried in air. Yield 0.442 g. MW =
485.19. Anal. Calc. for C20H15Cl2N2O5V: C, 49.51H, 3.12; N, 5.77%.
Found: C, 50.06; H, 2.99; N, 6.14%. The complex is diamagnetic. FT-IR
(KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3047 (m), 1640 (s), 1621 (w), 1561 (m), 1517 (w), 1452
(m), 1393 (w), 1355 (w), 1345 (w), 1291 (w), 1222 (m), 1177 (m), 1150
(w), 1110 (w), 1079 (w), 1052 (w), 972 (m), 906 (w), 875 (m), 849 (w),
792 (w), 761 (w), 740 (m), 666 (w), 601 (m), 471 (w), 447 (w).
2.6.15. Synthesis of [VO(L12)(phen)] 14
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 3. The aldehyde used
was 3,5-dibromo-4-methoxysalicylaldehyde (465.3 mg, 1.5 mmol) and
the hydrazide used was phenylacetic acid hydrazide (227.4 mg, 1.5
mmol). Yield 0.848 g. MW = 687.23. Anal. Calc. for C28H20Br2N4O4V: C,
48.94; H, 2.93; N, 8.15%. Found: C, 48.95; H, 2.94; N, 8.11%. The
complex is paramagnetic µeff = 1.41 µB. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3478 (m),
1601 (s), 1575 (m), 1526 (s), 1491 (m), 1455 (w), 1417 (s), 1358 (m),
1293 (w), 1239 (w), 1196 (s), 1143 (w), 1102 (w), 1067 (w), 1025 (w),
1006 (w), 967 (s), 871 (w), 851 (m), 779 (w), 758 (w), 724 (m), 673 (w),
643 (w), 535 (w), 460 (w), 425 (w).
2.6.16. Synthesis of [VO(L12)(EtO)(EtOH)] 15
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 3, but without addition
of phen ligand. The aldehyde used was 3,5-dibromo-4-methoxysalicylal-
dehyde (465.3 mg, 1.5 mmol) and the hydrazide used was phenylacetic
acid hydrazide (227.1 mg, 1.5 mmol). Yield 0.485 g. MW = 598.16.
Anal. Calc. for C20H23Br2N2O6V: C, 40.16; H, 3.88; N, 4.68%. Found: C,
40.06; H, 3.82; N, 4.61%. The complex is diamagnetic. FT-IR (KBr,
cmꢀ 1): 3487 (m), 2973 (w), 1605 (s), 1579 (w), 1534 (m), 1461 (w),
1419 (m), 1358 (w), 1301 (w), 1239 (m), 1204 (m), 1159 (w), 1095 (m),
1065 (w), 1046 (m), 976 (s), 955 (w), 904 (w), 871 (w), 791 (w), 751
(w), 730 (m), 700 (w), 671 (w), 635 (w), 545 (w), 519 (w), 444 (w).
2.6.11. Synthesis of [VO(L7)(EtO)(EtOH)] 10
3,5-Dichlorosalicylaldehyde (1610.0 mg, 8.009 mmol), 4-chloro-
benzhydrazide (1091.0 mg, 8.013 mmol) and EtOH (200 ml) were
refluxed under Ar for 15 min yielding a transparent yellow solution.
Then solid [V(acac)3] (2791.0 mg, 8.011 mmol in 22 ml of EtOH) was
added and mixture was refluxed for additional 50 min. The solution was
cooled to ꢀ 10 ◦C for 20 min. The product was filtered off, washed with
EtOH and dried in air. Yield 1.694 g. MW = 499.65. Anal. Calc. for
C
18H18Cl3N2O5V: C, 43.27; H, 3.63; N, 5.61%. Found: C, 43.06; H, 3.25;
N, 5.79%. The complex is diamagnetic. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3465 (m),
1609 (s), 1537 (m), 1507 (w), 1490 (m), 1437 (m), 1396 (w), 1279 (m),
1215 (m), 1194 (w), 1141 (w), 1087 (s), 1050 (w), 1026 (m), 976 (m),
942 (vs), 905 (m), 877 (w), 863 (w), 836 (w), 778 (m), 736 (m), 703 (w),
680 (w), 629 (m), 601 (s), 512 (w), 488 (w), 462 (w), 440 (w).
2.6.17. Synthesis of [VO(L13)(EtO)] 16
The synthesis was performed as synthesis of 9. The aldehyde used
was 3,5-dibromo-4-methoxysalicylaldehyde (465.0 mg, 1.5 mmol) and
the hydrazide used was 3-hydroxy-2-naphtoic acid hydrazide (303 mg,
1.5 mmol). Yield 0.686 g. The filtrate was collected and after few days
the crystals of the compound suitable for x-ray analysis appeared in the
4