7243
15. To a solution of 11 (600 mg, 1.53 mMol) and 9 (308 mg, 1.53 mMol) in DMF (13 mL, stored overnight over 3 A
molecular sieves), TMP (371 mg, 0.406 mL, 3.06 mMol) was added and the resulting mixture was cooled with an
ice-water bath. HATU (582 mg, 1.53 mMol) and HOAt (208 mg, 1.53 mMol) were added and the mixture was
stirred for 25 min. A 1 M solution of HCl was added until pH 1±2 was reached, and the reaction mixture was
extracted with ethyl acetate (3Â10 mL). The collected organic layers were washed with a 5% aqueous NaHCO3
solution, and then with brine. After drying over anhydrous Na2SO4, and ®ltration, the solvent was removed in
vacuo, and the residue was puri®ed by ¯ash chromatography (n-hexane:AcOEt, 1:1) to give 12 in 74% yield after
20
D
crystallization from n-hexane:AcOEt, 1:1: m.p. 205±206ꢀC; ꢀ ^52.04 (c 1.0, MeOH); H NMR (acetone-d6) ꢁ
1
7.65 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J=9.9 Hz, 1H), 7.50±7.25 (m, 5H), 6.72 (d, J=9.9 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (br d, J=12.5
Hz, 1H), 5.13 (br d, J=12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (d, J=4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (d, J=5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (ddq, J=9.9, 1.6 and
8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (m, 1H), 4.50 (dq, J=6.6 and 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (m, 1H), 4.45 (ddq, J=9.9, 1.6 and 8.2 Hz, 1H),
3.62 (s, 3H), 2.51 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.49 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.33 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 3H); 19F NMR (acetone-d6) ꢁ
^71.72 (br d, J=8.2 Hz), ^71.41 (br d, J=8.2 Hz); 13C NMR (acetone-d6) ꢁ 173.9, 171.8, 171.7, 157.5, 137.7, 129.3,
128.8, 128.6, 126.1 (q, J=282.3 Hz), 126.0 (q, J=282.6 Hz), 67.6, 66.0, 65.3, 56.6 (q, J=28.7 Hz), 53.8 (q, J=28.7
Hz), 51.8, 50.3, 40.1, 39.1, 18.1. MS (DIS EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 576 [(M+H)+, 7], 575 [M+Á, 9], 557 [(M^H2O)+Á, 11].
16. Bartlett, P. A.; Hanson, J. E.; Giannousis, P. P. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6268±6274.
17. (a) Coupling between 13 and 14. A suspension of 14 (76 mg) in 3.6 ml of dry AcOEt was treated with 1.2 equiv. of
NMM, cooled to ^10ꢀC, then 1.2 equiv. of iso-BuO2CCl were added under stirring. After 5 min a suspension of 13
(1 equiv.) in 2.5 ml of AcOEt was added. The mixture was stirred 4 days at rt, then centrifuged and the solid was
washed several times with AcOEt, MeOH and ®nally n-hexane to provide 100 mg of 15 (65%) as an amorphous
20
solid. (b) Selected data for 1: m.p. 265±270ꢀC (dec.); ꢀ ^32.16 (c 0.36, DMSO); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) ꢁ 8.08 (d,
D
J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (d, J=9.5 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J=9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H),
5.35 (br signal, 2H), 4.65±4.50 (m, 2H), 4.44 (dq, J=7.0 and 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (dd, J=9.0 and 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.35±
4.25 (m, 2H), 4.20 (dd, J=9.0 and 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.31 and 2.28 (m, 2H), 2.25 (dd, J=14.9 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (dd,
J=14.9 and 4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.10±1.85 (m, 5H), 1.24 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.90±0.80 (m, 18H); 19F NMR (DMSO-d6) ꢁ
^71.20 (br d, J=8.3 Hz), ^71.08 (br d, J=8.2 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) ꢁ 173.3, 171.8, 171.62, 171.59, 171.3,
169.5, 124.9 (q, J=284.3 Hz, 2C), 64.2, 63.8, 57.8, 57.7, 52.9 (q, J=26.9 Hz), 52.4 (q, J=27.7 Hz), 48.2, 44.4, 39.5,
38.5, 30.1, 29.9, 25.6, 22.2 (2C), 19.19, 19.17, 18.23, 18.18, 17.7. MS (DIS EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 710 [(M+H)+, 4], 692
1
[(M+H^H2O)+, 6]. (c) Epimerization of the second Val under dierent coupling conditions was assessed by H
and 19F NMR, as witnessed by the fact that splitting of most of the signals of 15 was detected. For example,
the undesired epimer showed the following 19F NMR (DMSO-d6) ꢁ ^71.15 (br d, J=8.3 Hz) and ^70.95 (br d,
J=8.3 Hz).
18. (a) Moog, C.; Wick, A.; Le Ber, P.; Kirn, A.; Aubertin, A. M. Antiviral Res. 1994, 24, 275±288. (b) Compound 1
was tested as a mixture of epimers at the second Val center.
19. Abbreviations: GABOB, g-amino-b-hydroxybutyric acid; EDCI, N-Ethyl-N0-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide
hydrochloride; HOBt, 1-Hydroxybenzotriazole; HATU, N,N,N0,N0-tetramethyl-O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-uronium
hexa¯uorophosphate; HOAt, 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole; TMP, 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine (sym-collidine); NMM,
N-methylmorpholine.