4902 Organometallics, Vol. 19, No. 23, 2000
Sava et al.
Ta ble 3. Su zu k i Cou p lin g of Ar yl Br om id esa
aryl bromide
mol % Pd t/h conversion (%)
TON
4-bromoacetophenone
4-bromoacetophenone
3-bromothiophene
3-bromothiophene
2-bromoanisole
0.0001
0.0001
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.0001
1
20
1
20
1
77
98
80
96
67
96
46
770 000
980 000
16 000
19 200
13 400
19 200
460 000
hemilabile ligand in complex 6. We therefore attempted
to test its catalytic activity on the catalyzed Suzuki
cross-coupling reaction,13 which has been thoroughly
studied with various palladium-phosphines systems.14
As a model reaction, we first investigated the coupling
between phenylboronic acid and 4-bromoacetophenone
in the presence of K2CO3 as base (eq 2).
2-bromoanisole
bromobenzene
20
1
a
Reaction conditions: 1.0 equiv of aryl bromide, 1.5 equiv of
phenylboronic acid, 2.0 equiv of K2CO3. Temperature: 110 °C. TON
are expressed in mol product (mol Pd)-1
.
complex [Pd(4)] involving the axial-coordination of only
one phosphorus atom. Recently, Fu et al. proposed that
the bulkiness of P(t-Bu)315,16 favors the formation of the
12-electron species [PdP(t-Bu)3], which can be consid-
ered as the active species in the Suzuki cross-coupling
reaction of arylboronic acid with aryl and vinyl halides
All our experiments were conducted in toluene, as
usually experimented by other authors. Various experi-
mental conditions were tested, and the best results were
obtained when preparing separately complex 6 and
adding it to the mixture of arenes (see Experimental
Section). Complex 6 was indeed very efficient as cata-
lyst, and a reproducible conversion of 77% to 4′-acetyl-
biphenyl was obtained using 1 × 10-4% of Pd catalyst
at 110 °C for 1 h (TON ) 7.70 × 105, TOF ) 213.9 (mol
product(mol Pd)-1 s-1). Prolonged heating for 20 h led
to a nearly quantitative conversion under the same
conditions. Although less effective than the remarkable
o-(tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl/Pd(OAc)2 system re-
cently developed by Buchwald et al.14a (TON ) 9.1 ×
107 for the same reaction, 24 h heating), our result
approaches the second highest TON reported by Bedford
using the tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl)phosphite (TON )
8.70 × 105 for 1 h reaction).14c As stated by other
authors, the coupling between phenylboronic acid and
4′-bromoacetophenone efficiently proceeds and generally
leads to high turnovers. Consequently, we extended our
study to the coupling of phenylboronic acid to other
substrates such as 3-bromothiophene, 2-bromoanisole,
and bromobenzene (eq 2).
14i
and triflates.
In conclusion, we anticipate that diphosphaferrocene
chelate complexes may display quite an unusual cata-
lytic chemistry due to their unique combination between
electronic properties and geometry. Investigations aimed
at expanding the use of complexes such as 6 in catalyzed
Csp2-Csp2 bond formation processes as well as in other
catalytic transformations of importance are currently
underway in our laboratories.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r es. All reactions were routinely per-
formed under an inert atmosphere of nitrogen by using
Schlenk techniques and dry deoxygenated solvents. Dry hex-
anes was obtained by distillation from Na/benzophenone and
dry CH2Cl2 from P2O5. Dry Celite was used for filtration.
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were recorded on
a
Bruker AC-200 SY spectrometer operating at 200.13 MHz for
1H, 50.32 MHz for 13C, and 81.01 MHz for 31P. Chemical shifts
are expressed in parts per million downfield from external
TMS (1H and 13C) and 85% H3PO4 (31P), and coupling constants
are given in hertz. Mass spectra were obtained at 70 eV with
a HP 5989 B spectrometer coupled a with HP 5890 chromato-
graph by the direct inlet method. The following abbreviations
are used: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiplet.
Elemental analyses were performed by the “Service d’Analyse
du CNRS”, at Gif sur Yvette, France. [Pd(dba)2] was prepared
according to a published procedure.17
Also in these cases, high TONs were recorded (for 1
h reaction), thus demonstrating the versatility of our
system. Results of these catalytic tests are summarized
in Table 3.
Tetr a eth yl-1-ch lor op h osp h ole (2). To a cooled (0 °C)
dichloromethane (50 mL) solution of complex 1 (5.78 g, 15
mmol) was added via a syringe 3.4 mL of phosphorus trichlo-
ride (15 mmol). The solution was allowed to warm, and the
formation of 2 was monitored by 31P NMR. After 20 min the
transformation was completed. After evaporation to dryness,
hexane (30 mL) was added and the resulting solution was
filtered over dried Celite. No further purification was under-
taken, and phosphole 2 was isolated as a highly moisture
sensitive yellow oil. Yield: 3.35 g (96%). 31P NMR (CDCl3): δ
73.4. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.05 (t, 6H, 3J (H-H) ) 7.60, 2 ×
CH3), 1.19 (t, 6H, 3J (H-H) ) 6.50, 2 × CH3), 2.31 (m, 4H, 2 ×
CH2), 2.47 (m, 4H, 2 × CH2). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 15.05 (d,
4J (P-C) ) 4.6, Me), 16.65 (d, 3J (P-C) ) 6.2, Me), 21.05 (d,
2J (P-C) ) 21.4, CH2), 22.25 (s, CH2), 144.55 (d, 1J (P-C) )
The efficiency of complex 6 is difficult to rationalize
without knowing the nature of the active species. Three
intermediates are plausible: 14-electron complexes [Pd-
(4)2] and [Pd(4)], in which the ligand coordinates pal-
ladium either through the lone pair of one P atom (η1)
or in a chelate fashion, respectively, and a 12-electron
(13) (a) Suzuki, A. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions:
Diedrich, F., Stang, P. J ., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998;
Chapter 2. (b) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457. (c)
Stanforth, S. P. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 263. (d) Stu¨rmer, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 3307.
(14) For relevant references, see: (a) Wolfe, J . P.; Singer, R. A.; Yang,
B. H.; Buchwald, S. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9550. (b) Wolfe,
J . P.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2413. (c)
Albisson, D. A.; Bedford, R. B.; Lawrence, S.; Scully, P. N. J . Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 2095. (d) Beller, M.; Fischer, H.; Her-
rmann, W. A.; O¨ fele, K.; Brossmer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995,
34, 1848. (e) Wallow, T. I.; Novak, B. M. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5034.
(f) Bei, X.; Crevier, T.; Guram, A. S.; J andeleit, B.; Powers, T. S.;
Turner, H. W.; Uno, T.; Weinberg, W. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
3855. (g) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3387.
(h) Zapf, A.; Beller, M. Chem. Eur. J . 2000, 6, 1830. (i) Littke, A. F. ;
Dai, C. ; Fu, G. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4020.
(15) The cone angle of P(t-Bu)3 is 182°. For references see: (a)
Tolman, C. A. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 313. (b) Rahman, M. M.; Liu, H.-
Y.; Eriks, K.; Prock, A.; Giering, W. P. Organometallics 1989, 8, 1.
(16) This value does not represent the genuine cone angle but the
“cone” swept out by ligand 4 when it rotates around the P-Pd bond,
which was approximated to 2.25 Å.
(17) Rettig, M. F.; Maitlis, P. M. Inorg. Synth. 1990, 28, 110.