J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12405-12406
12405
Scheme 1
Bis(azafulvene) as a Versatile Building Block for
Giant Cyclopolypyrroles: X-ray Crystal Structure of
[64]Hexadecaphyrin(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0)
Jun-ichiro Setsune* and Satoshi Maeda
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science
and Graduate School of Science and Technology
Kobe UniVersity, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
ReceiVed September 8, 2000
The figure-eight structure of [40]decaphyrin(1.0.1.0.0.1.0.1.0.0)
indicated that fully conjugated porphyrinoids need not be
topographically flat.1 We have recently proceeded one step further
to demonstrate that giant porphyrinoids with 12- and 16-pyrrole
units have a cylindrical cavity.2 The promise of these giant
porphyrinoids for use in molecular recognition and catalysis
accelerates study on the synthetic methodology.3 Acid-catalyzed
MacDonald-type condensation has been one of the most important
methods and afforded [32]octaphyrin(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0) and [40]-
decaphyrin(1.0.1.0.0.1.0.1.0.0).1,4 Very recently [32]octaphyrin
(1.0.0.0.1.0.0.0) has been formed by oxidative ring closure of
linear oligopyrroles with R-free pyrrolic units at both ends.5 On
the other hand, condensation of R-free pyrrole derivatives with
aldehydes analogous to the Rothemund porphyrin synthesis
gave [24]hexaphyrin(1.0.1.0.1.0) known as rosarin,6 [26]hexa-
phyrin(1.1.1.1.1.1),7 [32]octaphyrin(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0),2 [48]-
dodecaphyrin(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0),2 and [64]hexadecaphyrin-
(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0).2 Although the Rothemund-type
reaction of 2,2′-bipyrrole does afford cyclopolypyrroles with
world-record ring sizes, the chromatographic separation of a
mixture of bipyrrole-based homologues is not easy. Thus, this
work is intended to explore a facile synthetic method for even
larger cyclopolypyrroles by using modified MacDonald-type
reactions which would give a mixture of tetrapyrrole-based
homologues.
the reaction was run for 24 h, 6 and 8 were produced in 24 and
20% yield, respectively. The formation of 6 as a major product
indicates that tetrapyrrole-based cyclooligomers should be de-
composed and recyclized to bipyrrole-based cyclooligomers under
the acidic reaction conditions. This reaction was further compli-
cated by the acid-catalyzed decomposition of 2 to benzaldehyde
and 1. 1H NMR monitoring indicated that 2 (0.02 mmol) did not
react with 1 (0.02 mmol) in CDCl3 (0.5 mL) in 3 h when 5%
decomposition of 2 to give benzaldehyde has occurred. Addition
of CD3CO2D (2 µL) not only triggered the condensation reaction
between 1 and 2 but also enhanced decomposition of 2 to give
benzaldehyde in 20% yield in 30 min. Therefore, the MacDonald-
type condensation of 1 and 2 should be accompanied by the
Rothemund-type condensation of 1 and benzaldehyde under the
above reaction conditions. Since water is responsible for acid-
catalyzed redistribution among cyclooligomers of different ring
size before DDQ oxidation, a new bipyrrole building block which
eliminates undesired formation of water should be preferred.
Addition of phenyllithium (5 equiv) to 5,5′-diformyl-3,3′,4,4′-
tetraethyl-2,2′-bipyrrole in THF would generate the tetraanion that
was quenched with water to give 95% yield of 2. When the
tetraanion was quenched with acetic anhydride (5 equiv) instead
of water, a yellow compound 3 was obtained in 55% yield. The
13C NMR signal due to the methine carbon connecting pyrrole
and phenyl group indicates change in hybridization from sp3 in 2
(68.2 ppm) to sp2 in 3 (131.5 ppm). The resonances due to the
pyrrole ring carbons undergo great downfield shifts from 120.4,
122.5, 122.8, and 128.0 ppm in 2 to 168.8, 141.7, 147.6, and
154.8 ppm in 3. These data are consistent with the bis(azafulvene)
structure of 3. The ROESY spectrum of 3 demonstrated trans
stereochemistry of the phenyl groups with respect to the pyrrole-
â-ethyl groups.8 The polar electronic structure characteristic of
fulvene in 3 would induce facile electrophilic addition to 1 without
the undesired equilibria caused by water.
The condensation reaction of 3,3′,4,4′-tetraethyl-2,2′-bipyrrole
(1, 0.2 mmol) and 5,5′-bis(phenylhydroxymethyl)-3,3′,4,4′-tetra-
ethyl-2,2′-bipyrrole (2, 0.2 mmol) was carried out for 1 h in a
solvent mixture of AcOH (2.5 mL) and CH2Cl2 (2.5 mL)
containing 2 equiv of Zn(OAc)2‚2H2O. Oxidative workup with
2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) gave a mixture
of 2,3,6,7,11,12,15,16,20,21,24,25-dodecaethyl-9,18,27-triphenyl-
rosarin (6)2 and 2,3,6,7,11,12,15,16,20,21,24,25,29,30,33,34-
hexadecaethyl-9,18,27,36-tetraphenyl[32]octaphyrin-
(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0) (8)2 in 11 and 14% yield, respectively. When
(1) Sessler, J. L.; Weghorn, S. J.; Lynch, V.; Johnson, M. R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1507-1510.
(2) Setsune, J.; Katakami, Y.; Iizuna, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
8957-8958.
(3) (a) Sessler, J. L. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanins 2000, 4, 331-336. (b)
Lash, T. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 1763-1767. (c) Sessler,
J. L.; Gebauer, A.; Weghorn, S. J. The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M.,
Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 2000; Vol. 2,
p 55. (d) Sessler, J. L.; Weghorn, S. J. Expanded, Contracted & Isomeric
Porphyrins; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1997. (e) Jasat, A.; Dolphin, D. Chem.
ReV. 1997, 97, 2267-2340.
(4) (a) Bro¨ring, M.; Jendrny, J.; Zander, L.; Schmickler, H.; Lex, J.; Wu,
Y. D.; Nendel, M.; Chen, J. G.; Plattner, D. A.; Houk, K. N.; Vogel, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2515-2517. (b) Vogel, E.; Broring, M.; Fink,
J.; Rosen, D.; Schmickler, H.; Lex, J.; Chan, K. W. K.; Wu, Y. D.; Plattner,
D. A.; Nendel, M.; Houk, K. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2511-
2514.
When a mixture of 1 and 3 is reacted in the AcOH- CH2-
Cl2-Zn(OAc)2‚2H2O system for 1 h, 8 was obtained in 20% yield
with no trace of 6. In addition to 8, blue fractions showing UV-
vis maxima at 674, 674, 708, and 728 nm were obtained in 6, 7,
4, and 3% yield, respectively, by chromatographic separation using
silica gel and polydivinylbenzene gel. The ESI-TOF MS data of
these four fractions (m/z 1982.2708, 2643.6856, 3304.1440, and
3965.5523 for monocations) are in good agreement with the theory
for [48]dodecaphyrin(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0) (12, M + 1 )
1982.2603), [64]hexadecaphyrin(1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0.1.0)
(5) Sessler, J. L.; Seidel, D.; Lynch, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
11257-11258.
(6) Sessler, J. L.; Weghorn, S. J.; Morishima, T.; Rosingana, M.; Lynch,
V.; Lee, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8306-8307
(7) Neves, M. G. P. M. S.; Martins, R. M.; Tome, A. C.; Silvestre, A. J.
D.; Silva, A. M. S.; Felix, V.; Drew, M. G. B.; Cavaleiro, J. A. S. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 385-386.
(8) A cross-peak was observed between the methylene protons at 2.65 ppm
and the methine proton at 6.98 ppm in the ROESY spectrum.
10.1021/ja005588o CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/28/2000