Jones oxidation. Compound 1 was obtained in 48% yield over
three steps. The spiro-azido acid 2 was prepared in a similar
way, as shown in Scheme 2, the iodocyclization of 6 affording
stereoselectively R-7 as the major product9 (d.e. 33%). The
iododerivative was reacted with tetrabutylammonium azide in
toluene (60 °C, 24 h) then submitted to acetolysis affording R-
10,10 and finally converted into azido acid R-2. The overall
yields for the transformation of 3 into 1 and of 6 into 2 were
respectively 40% and 35%, S-111 and R-2 being obtained as the
major isomers.
NMR and molecular dynamics indicate that both arabino- and
fructo-derived bicycles adopt rigid, spatially well-defined
conformations. In particular the sugar-amino acids derived from
precursors S-1 and R-1 are rigid turn mimetics, both molecules
can be incorporated in peptide sequences and used to replace i
+ 1 and i + 2 residues of a protein b-turn.
of HBTU, HO-Bt and DIPEA and finally totally deprotected
with TFA–TIS–water (95+2.5+2.5), affording 915 in 63% yield
over the last two steps.
The high efficiency of the synthesis of compounds 1 and 2 is
likely to offer opportunities for the preparation of a wide range
of carbohydrate-derived bicyclic amino acids with improved
conformational rigidity to be used as templates, inducing
precise secondary structure conformations in peptides. Detailed
conformational analysis of these compounds was carried out by
NMR and molecular dynamics and will be reported else-
where.
We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Carola
Cassani to the experimental work.
Notes and references
Moreover, these conformationally constrained sugar-amino
acids may be incorporated as rigid templates into cyclic
peptides in order to lock a bioactive conformation. Several
templates have been included in cyclic peptides containing the
RGD loop with the aim of obtaining new inhibitors of the
adhesive interaction between the avb3 and the aIIbb3-type
integrins and their ligands.12 As example, cyclic peptide 9 was
synthesised on solid phase (Scheme 3) by the well-established
Fmoc protocol. The dipeptide Arg(Pmc)-Gly was assembled
onto Sasrin resin with a loading of 0.47 mmol g21, then
compound S-1 was coupled in the presence of HBTU,13 HO-Bt
and DIPEA. The N-terminal azide reduction to the amine and
the coupling with Fmoc-Asp(tBu) was effected one-pot in the
presence of DIC, Bu3P, HO-Bt in dry DMF–toluene (2+1) at rt
for 24 h.14 This reaction was found to be very efficient and high
yielding (as assessed from the loading value calculated after the
Fmoc deprotection of the aspartate), in sharp contrast with the
inefficiency of other well-established methods we employed to
reduce this azide. The tetrapeptide was then cleaved from the
resin (1% TFA in CH2Cl2 with immediate neutralisation of the
effluents with pyridine) maintaining all protecting groups,
purified by flash chromatography on silica gel, cyclised in a
dilute solution of DMF (peptide conc. 0.5 mM) in the presence
1 K. C. Nicolau, J. M. Salvino, K. Raynor, S. Pietranico, T. Reisine, R. M.
Freidinger and R. Hirschmann, Pept. Chem. Struct. Biol. Proc. Am.
Chem. Symp. 11th, 1990; R. Hirschmann, K. C. Nicolau, S. Pietranico,
J. Salvino, E. M. Leathy, P. A. Sprengler, G. Furst, A. B. Smith III,
C. D. Strader, M. A. Cascieri and M. R. Candelore, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 9217; R. Hischmann, W. Yao, M. A. Cascieri, C. D. Strader,
L. Maechler, M. A. Cichy-Knight, J. Hines Jr., R. D. van Rijn, P.A.
Sprengeler and A. B. Smith III, J. Med. Chem., 1996, 39, 2441; R.
Hischmann, J. Hines Jr., M. A. Cichy-Knight, R. D. van Rijn, P. A.
Sprengeler, P. G. Spoors, W. C. Sheakespeare, S. Pietranico-Cole, J.
Barbosa, J. Liu, W. Yao, S. Rohrer and A. B. Smith III, J. Med. Chem.,
1998, 41, 1382.
2 H. P. Wessel, D. Banner, K. Gubernator, K. Hilpert, K. Müller and T.
Tschopp, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 751.
3 E. G. von Roedern, E. Lohof, G. Hessler, M. Hoffmann and H. Kessler,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 10 165.
4 E. F. Fuchs and J. Lehmann, Chem. Ber., 1975, 108, 2254; E. F. Fuchs
and J. Lehmann, J. Carbohydr. Res., 1975, 45, 135; E. F. Fuchs and J.
Lehmann, J. Carbohydr. Res., 1976, 49, 267; K. C. Nicolau, H. M.
Florke, G. Egan, T. Barth and V. A. Estevez, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995,
36, 1775.
5 M. D. Smith, D. D. Long, D. G. Marquess, T. D. W. Claridge and
G. W. J. Fleet, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2039.
6 M. D. Smith, T. D. W. Claridge, G. E. Tranter, M. S. P. Sansom and
G. W. J. Fleet, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2041.
7 L. Cipolla, L. Lay and F. Nicotra, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 6678.
8 A consistent NOESY crosspeak (400 MHz, CDCl3) was observed
between H-2A and H-3 protons for the diastereoisomer R-5, that was
absent for S-5.
9 A sequential NOESY correlation allowed the unambiguous attribution
of the configuration at C-2A: for diastereoisomer R-5 H-3/H-1Ab and H-
2A/H-1Aa NOESY crosspeaks were observed thus indicating that H-3 and
H-2A point towards different spatial regions. For diastereoisomer S-8, H-
3/H-1Ab and H-2A/H-1Ab NOESY crosspeaks were observed.
10 Selected data for R-9: MALDI-TOF MS: m/z 467.9 (M), 491.3 (M +
Na), 507.1 (M + K); dH (300 MHz, CDCl3) 1.76 (1H, dd, J 12.9, 9.8, H-
1Aa), 2.04 (3H, s, CH3CO), 2.18 (1H, dd, J 12.9, 6.0, H-1Ab), 3.19 (1H,
dd, J 12.9, 4.9, H-3Aa) 3.47 (1H, dd, J 12.9, 4.0, H-3Ab), 3.52–3.64 (1H,
m, H-5), 3.82 (1H, d, J 9.8, H-1a), 3.87–3.92 (1H, m, H-4), 3.94 (1H, d,
J 1.4, H-3), 4.08–4.20 (2H, m, H-6), 4.25 (1H, d, J 9.8, H-1b), 4.28–4.35
(1H, m, H-2A), 4.42–4.60 (4H, m, CH2-Ph) 7.20–7.40 (10H, m,
Harom).
11 Selected data for S-1: MALDI-TOF MS: m/z 319.9 (M + H); 342.4 (M
+ Na), 358.4 (M + K); dH (300 MHz, CDCl3) 2.09 (1H, m, H-1Ab), 2.31
(1H, ddd, J 14.2, 6.1, 8.3, H-1Aa), 3.30 (1H, dd, J 12.8, 3.8, H-3Ab), 3.55
(1H, dd, J 12.8, 7.3, H-3Aa), 4.13 (1H, m, H-2A), 4.35 (1H, bd, J 3.3, H-2),
4.42 (1H, bd, J 1.7, H-3), 4.61 (1H, bd, J 1.8, H-4), 4.66 (2H, AB
system, CH2-Ph), 4.90 (1H, m, H-1), 7.3–7.4 (5H, m, Harom).
12 M. Aumalley, M. Gurrah, G. Müller, J. Calvete, R. Timpl and H.
Kessler, FEBS Lett., 1991, 291, 50; G. Müller, M. Gurrath, H. Kessler
and R. Timpl, Angew. Chem., 1992, 31, 326; R. Haubner, R. Gratias, B.
Diefenbach, S. L. Goodman, A. Jonczyk and H. Kessler, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1996, 118, 7461; A. Giannis and F. Rübsam, Angew. Chem., 1997,
109, 606; A. C. Bach II, J. Espina, S. A. Jackson, P. F. W. Stouten, J. L.
Duke, S. A. Mousa and W. F. De Grado, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
293.
13 Abbreviations: DIC, N,NA-diisopropylcarbodiimide; DIPEA, diisopro-
pylethylamine; HBTU, 2-(1H-benzotriazole-1-yl-)-1,1,3,3-tetramethy-
luronium hexafluorophosphate; HOBt, N-hydroxybenzotriazole; Pmc,
2,2,5,7,8-pentamethylchroman-6-sulfonyl; TIS, triisopropylsilane.
14 Z. Tang and J. C. Pelletier, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 4773.
15 Selected data for 9: MALDI-TOF MS: m/z 603.3 (M), 626.6 (M + Na),
642.1 (M + K).
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, S-1, HBTU, HOBt, DIPEA, DMF, rt,
4 h; ii, Bu3P, DIC, Fmoc-Asp(OtBu), rt, 24 h; iii, piperidine 20% in DMF;
iv, 1% TFA in DCM, neutralisation of the effluent with pyridine; v, 0.5 mM
peptide in DMF, HBTU, HOBt, DIPEA, 12 h, rt; vi, 95% TFA, 2.5% TIS,
2.5% H2O, 10 h, rt.
2304
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2303–2304