for our group initiating a synthetic approach to this com-
pound. Our first retrosynthetic disassembly of the target leads
to the functionalized 3-formyl pyrrolidine 2. Formyl pyrro-
lidines have been accessed in a very efficient manner by
Overman using a tandem cationic aza-Cope rearrangement-
Mannich cyclization strategy.3 Thus, on the basis of elegant
precedents provided by Overman, the formyl pyrrolidine
moiety of 2 can in principle be obtained from the amino
ketone 3 via the tandem reaction, through a bridgehead
iminium ion. This retrosynthetic analysis represents a facile
entry to the synthesis of FR901483 with the potential to set
all the stereochemistry of this target by starting with an amino
aldehyde derived from L-tyrosine.
Scheme 3a
In an effort to quickly establish the feasibility of this route,
we targeted a precursor 4 possessing only the functionality
necessary for the tandem rearrangement-cyclization process
(Scheme 2). The functionally barren precursor, amino
a (a) TMSCHLiCN, THF, 82%; (b) butanediol, PPTS, benzene,
reflux, 92%; (c) LiAlH4, THF, 80%; (d) 1M HCl, acetone, H2O,
95%.
Scheme 2
ketone was then effected (PPTS, butanediol)6 to afford
compound 8 in 92% yield. Reduction of the nitrile using
LAH gives the primary amine 9 (80%).
Initial attempts to effect the monoalkylation of the primary
amine 9 (in excess) with 4-bromo-3-methoxy-1-butene3c gave
poor yields of the desired product 11b. Moreover, a recently
published method for the monoalkylation of primary amines
with alkyl bromides utilizing CsOH‚H2O did not prove to
be successful either.7 Other attempts to improve the amine
alkylation using a reductive amination8 reaction involving
2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-but-3-enal9 did afford a 76%
yield of 11a. However, this compound proved unsuitable for
the subsequent tandem aza-Cope/Mannich reaction. Fortu-
nately, Petasis has developed a three-component coupling
method involving amines, aldehydes and organoboronates.10
On the basis of this precedent, amine 9 was treated with
paraformaldehyde and excess allylboronate 1011 in EtOH and
H2O to give amine 11b in 58% isolated yield. Removal of
the ketal of 11b with 1M HCl in acetone furnished the
tandem cyclization precursor, amino ketone 7 in 95% yield.
We were delighted to find that treatment of compound 7
to p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) in refluxing benzene
afforded the amino aldehyde 4 (dr, 2/1) via the tandem
cationic aza-Cope rearrangement-Mannich cyclization se-
quence (Scheme 4). The diastereomeric ratio was determined
by 1H NMR intregration of the corresponding formyl peaks.
The resulting amino aldehyde was then protected as ketal
aldehyde 4, possesses the core structure of 1 with an aldehyde
handle that provides access to the amino methyl group via a
Curtius rearrangement. Amino aldehyde 4 is the product of
a Mannich cyclization of iminium ion 5, which in turn can
be obtained via an aza-Cope rearrangement of the iminium
ion 6. This bridged bicyclic substructure is particularly
interesting, in that it is in violation of Bredt’s rule as applied
to bridging carbocycles. Bridgehead imines have been
prepared, and in fact, Kibayashi has shown that bridgehead
imines can be alkylated.2e,4 Finally, bridgehead iminium ion
6 arises from the intramolecular condensation reaction of
the secondary amine and ketone moieties of 7.
The synthesis of the key cyclization precursor 7 was
initiated (Scheme 3) by addition of the lithium anion of
trimethylsilylacetonitrile to cyclohexenone to give the pro-
todesilylated 1,4-addition product directly after column
chromatography in good yield (82%).5 Protection of the
(3) For reviews, see: (a) Overman, L. E.; Ricca, D. J. Comp. Org. Synth.
1991, 2, 1007. (b) Overman, L. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 352. (c)
Overman, L. E.; Kakimoto, M.-a.; Okazaki, M. E.; Meier, G. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6622.
(4) Yamazaki, N.; Ito, T.; Kibayashi, C. Synlett 1999, 37. For references
concerning bridgehead imines, see: Braje, W. M.; Wartchow, R.; Hoffman,
M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2540. Wayne, G. S.; Snyder, G. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9860. Radziszewski, J. G.; Downing, J. W.;
Wentrup, C.; Kaszynski, P.; Jawdosiuk, M.; Kovacic, P.; Michl, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 2799. Sheridan, R. S.; Ganzer, G. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 6158. Toda, M.; Hirata, Y. Yamamura, S. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1970, 1597.
(6) The choice of butanediol as the reagent for protection is based on
the facile removal of the resulting dioxepane ketal. Snider, B. B.; Lin, H.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 643 and references therein.
(7) Salvatore, R. N.; Nagle, A. S.; Schmidt, S. E.; Jung, K.-W. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 1893.
(8) Mattson, R. J.; Pham, K. M.; Leuck, D. J.; Cowen, K. A. J. Org.
Chem. 1990, 55, 2552
(9) Hayashi, M.; Yoshiga, T.; Nakatani, K.; Ono, K.; Oguni, N.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2821.
(5) Tomioka, K.; Koga, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1599.
(10) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11798.
1348
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 9, 2001