Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Research Article
aldehyde, whereas the metal has its oxidation state regenerated.
According to a previous report, early transition metal ions with
d0 electronic configuration, such as Mo(VI) or W(VI), usually
favor the peroxometal pathway. Conversely, the oxometal
pathway usually prevails with late and first-row transition metal
ions, such as Cr(VI), Ru(VI) or Ru(VIII), and Os(VIII).26
This work aims at using PS-MS to evaluate on-surface
alcohol oxidation reactions catalyzed by Ru(III) salts. We
selected the tag-charged benzyl alcohol 1 as the prototype
reactant, tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) as the oxidant, and
RuCl3 as the catalyst. The use of the tag-charged benzyl
alcohol allows for easy monitoring of the reactant consumption
and the formation and distribution of intermediates and
products. We also evaluate the influence of some parameters
(time and the application of heat and UV radiation) on the
reaction course.
after 10 and 60 min. Heating tests were performed on two
papers, which were glued with small pieces of adhesive tape on
Petri dishes. The temperature was kept at approximately 80 °C
by exposing the dishes to a hot-air jet from a hairdryer. The
temperature was monitored using a thermometer placed close
to the papers. Hot air was removed after 10 and 60 min of
exposure. For these experiments (influence of UV radiation
and heating), the same amount and order of addition of
reagents were used, as indicated above.
For the experiments employing other metals as catalysts, 5
μL of a 0.15 mol·L−1 solution (prepared in acetonitrile) of each
metal salt (PdCl2, PtCl4K2, and FeCl3) and 5 μL of the TBHP
and alcohol 1 solution were added to triangle papers, as
previously described. Tests using H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide)
were conducted by adding to the papers 5 μL of a 0.15 mol·L−1
RuCl3 solution (prepared in acetonitrile), 5 μL of a 2.25 mol·
L−1 H2O2 solution (prepared in acetonitrile), and 5 μL of a
0.15 mol·L−1 alcohol 1 solution (prepared in acetonitrile/water
1:1 v/v), applied in this order. In both experiments, the PS-MS
essays were performed after reaction times of 0 and 120 min.
Condensed-phase reactions were performed in a 10 mL flask
by dissolving 15.6 mg (0.075 mmol) of RuCl3, 500 μL (0.75
mmol) of a 1.50 mol·L−1 TBHP solution (prepared in
acetonitrile), and 22.0 mg (0.075 mmol) of compound 1 in
a mixture of 300 μL of acetonitrile and 200 μL of water. The
reaction was kept under constant stirring at room temperature
and collected aliquots in 0, 10, 30, and 60 min for the PS-MS
analysis. These aliquots were then submitted to the PS-MS
analysis after different reaction times, as previously described.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Instruments, Materials and Methods. NMR (nuclear
magnetic resonance) analyses were performed on a Bruker
instrument Advance DPX/200 (Billerica, MA). Solutions of all
compounds were prepared in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 as the
solvent. Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained in KBr tablets on
a Spectrum RX I PerkinElmer spectrometer (Waltham, MA) in
a spectral window of 400−4000 cm−1. Melting points (mp)
were measured on a Gehaka PF 1500 instrument (Sao Paulo,
̃
Brazil). TLC (thin layer chromatography) was carried out with
Macherey-Nagelsilica gel 60 F254 on aluminum sheets. After
chromatographic runs, the silica plates were developed using
ultraviolet light or exposure to chemical reagents, i.e., iodine
vapors or spray of a potassium permanganate solution. PS-MS
(paper spray mass spectrometry) experiments were conducted
on a Thermo LCQ-Fleet mass spectrometer (ThermoScien-
tific, San Jose, USA) in positive-ion mode. The instrumental
conditions were as follows: voltage applied to the paper, 5 kV;
capillary temperature, 275 ◦C; capillary voltage, 8 V; tube lens
voltage, 70 V. Full scan mass spectra were acquired over a 50−
1000 m/z range. The triangular paper’s tip was placed in front
of the mass spectrometer inlet at a distance of approximately 5
mm. Then 20 μL of acetonitrile was added, and, through a
metal clip, a high voltage (5 kV) was applied to the paper base.
HPLC grade acetonitrile was purchased from JT Baker
Chemicals. Ruthenium(III) chloride hydrate (RuCl3·xH2O),
tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) (solution in decane at ∼5.5
mol·L−1), hydrogen peroxide (solution at 35% v/v), and
chloride salts of palladium, platinum, and iron were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI). Chromatographic paper
grade 3 MM CHR, purchased from Whatman International
Ltd. (Maidstone, Kent, England), was cut with a scissor to
manufacture triangular papers in the dimensions of 1.0 × 1.5 ×
1.5 cm.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
On-Surface Alcohol Oxidation Catalyzed by RuCl3.
According to previous (unpublished) studies by our research
group, in the presence of ruthenium complexes, benzyl
alcohols are oxidized to aldehydes in solution in good yields.
To verify whether such reaction could occur directly on a
paper surface, the tag-charged benzyl alcohol 1 was chosen as a
prototype and convenient (for MS detection) starting reactant.
Ruthenium trichloride (RuCl3) and TBHP were selected as the
oxidizing agent and catalyst, respectively (Scheme 1). These
experiments were conducted using an identical molar
proportion for alcohol 1, RuCl3, and TBHP.
Scheme 1. On-Surface Oxidation of the Tag-Charged
Alcohol 1 Yielding Aldehyde 2 in the Presence of TBHP and
RuCl3
General Procedure. Oxidation tests were conducted by
dropping 5 μL of a 0.15 mol·L−1 RuCl3 solution (prepared in
acetonitrile), 5 μL of a 1.50 mol·L−1TBHP solution (prepared
in acetonitrile), and 5 μL of a 0.15 mol·L−1 alcohol 1 solution
(prepared in acetonitrile/water 1:1 v/v), applied in this order,
at the same spot of triangular papers (1 × 1.5 × 1.5 cm). The
PS-MS analysis were performed after reaction times of 0, 10,
30, and 60 min.
Tests with UV radiation were conducted by placing two
papers inside a chamber equipped with a UV Lamp (Techlux,
6 W, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). The papers were kept 20 cm
away from the UV lamp and removed from inside the chamber
A picture of the triangle papers with the reagents (RuCl3,
TBHP, and alcohol 1) of the beginning and after a contact
time of 60 min clearly shows a color change (Figure 1),
indicating the occurrence of a reaction.
Figure 2 shows the PS(+)-MS collected at different times (0,
10, 30, and 60 min) of these on-surface reactions. Note that
there are clear changes in the mass spectra profiles, indicating
that the reaction is proceeding on the paper surface rather than
occurring inside the spray microdroplets. If that were the case,
one would expect to obtain identical mass spectra, regardless of
the acquisition time. Under these conditions, the tag-charged
2169
J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32, 2168−2174