Wavelength-controlled orthogonal photolysis of protecting groups

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/jo025837m

The selective control of a chemical process by the use of an electromagnetic wave has been a challenging goal for several decades. In this article, we describe for the first time the use of a monochromatic light beam to differentiate two different reactive centers. A direct application of this concept is found in the chemistry of protecting groups. Two different photolabile protecting groups were tuned to be responsive to a specific wavelength (e.g., 254 or 420 nm). Using derivatives of the 2-nitroveratryl fragment (such as 10, sensitive at 420 nm) and 3′,5′-dimethoxybenzoin fragment (such as 4, sensitive at 254 nm), it was shown that energy transfer phenomena did not erode the selectivity. Both the inter- and the intramolecular cases were studied and showed selectivities within the synthetically useful range. Hence, we could replace the traditional chemical orthogonality by a chromatic orthogonality.

Full text of DOI:10.1021/jo025837m

Wa velen gth -Con tr olled Or th ogon a l P h otolysis of P r otectin g
Gr ou p s
Aure´lien Blanc and Christian G. Bochet*,†
Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Geneva, 30, quai Ernest-Ansermet,
CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Christian.Bochet@unifr.ch
Received April 18, 2002
The selective control of a chemical process by the use of an electromagnetic wave has been a
challenging goal for several decades. In this article, we describe for the first time the use of a
monochromatic light beam to differentiate two different reactive centers. A direct application of
this concept is found in the chemistry of protecting groups. Two different photolabile protecting
groups were tuned to be responsive to a specific wavelength (e.g., 254 or 420 nm). Using derivatives
of the 2-nitroveratryl fragment (such as 10, sensitive at 420 nm) and 3′,5′-dimethoxybenzoin
fragment (such as 4, sensitive at 254 nm), it was shown that energy transfer phenomena did not
erode the selectivity. Both the inter- and the intramolecular cases were studied and showed
selectivities within the synthetically useful range. Hence, we could replace the traditional chemical
orthogonality by a chromatic orthogonality.
In tr od u ction
occurs from the lowest singlet excited state, regardless
of the initial excitation. This is the consequence of a fast
and efficient nonradiative internal conversion (IC).7 One
should, therefore, not expect to be able to carry out
different chemical reactions at different wavelengths; this
is, however, contradicted by multiple counter-examples.5,6
On a polychromophoric molecule, careful control of all
forms of energy transfer (e.g., through dipolar8 or ex-
change9 mechanisms) has to be considered in order to
allow isolation of the sites.
The ability to absorb energy at a specific site, and keep
it localized until the suitable chemical reaction is fin-
ished, is an important goal in chemistry, and this work
aims at addressing this issue. We decided to illustrate
the concept by the design of an orthogonal protecting
group scheme.10 This is, however, only one of the many
aspects of the field.
The selective control of a chemical process by the use
of an electromagnetic wave has been a challenging goal
for several decades.1 Most of the physical properties of a
wave have been exploited in this context. Light pulses
were shown to initiate different types of reactions de-
pending on their duration and sequences, for example
on acetophenone.2 Polarization has been used to induce
asymmetry in organic reactions by using circularly
polarized light (cpl).3 The wavelength has also been used
as a tunable parameter.4 The dissociation of one among
several ligands around chromium complexes was per-
formed by using monochromatic light beams, sometimes
with high selectivity.5 In organic synthesis, it was found
that the photolysis of bicyclo[3.1.0]hexenones gave dif-
ferent products when performed at 313 nm or at 366 nm.6
Despite these significant studies, the scarcity of examples
misrepresents the importance of such control.
Photolabile protecting groups have been known since
the early 1960s.11 They react through different types of
mechanisms, with the excitation of a diverse variety of
chromophores (carbonyl, nitro, aryl groups, etc.).12 This
mechanistic diversity opens the door for an individual
control by the wavelength.
However, serious difficulties have to be overcome to
achieve this goal. Central to organic photochemistry is
the so-called Kasha rule, stating that fluorescence always
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +41 22 328
7396.
(7) Turro, N. J . Modern Molecular Photochemistry; University
Science Books: Sausalito, 1991.
(8) Fo¨rster, T. Ann. Phys. 1948, 2, 55-75.
(9) Dexter, D. L. J . Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 836-850.
(10) (a) Kocienski, P. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd.
ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999. (b) Merrifield, R. B.; Barany, G.; Cosant,
W. L.; Engelhard, M.; Mojsov, Pept. Proc. Am. Pept. Symp. 5th 1977,
488-502.
(11) (a) Anderson, J . C.; Reese, C. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1962, 1, 1-4.
(b) Barltrop, J . A.; Schofield, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1962, 16, 697-699.
(c) Barton, D. H. R.; Chow, Y. L.; Cox, A.; Kirby, G. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1962, 23, 1055-1057.
(12) (a) Bochet, C. G. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 125-
152. (b) Pillai, V. N. R. Org. Photochem. 1987, 9, 225-323. (c) Pillai,
V. N. R. Synthesis 1980, 1-26.
† Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of Fri-
bourg, Chemin du Muse´e 9, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
(1) Zare, R. N. Science 1998, 279, 1875-1879.
(2) (a) Levis, R. J .; Menkis, G. M.; Rabitz, H. Science 2001, 292,
709-713. (b) Assion, A.; Baumert, T.; Bergt, M.; Brixner, T.; Kiefer,
B.; Seyfried, V.; Strehle, M.; Gerber, G. Science 1998, 282, 919-922.
(3) (a) Feringa, B. L.; van Delden, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 3418-3438, and references therein. (b) Inoue, Y. Chem. Rev. 1992,
92, 741-770.
(4) Bochet, C. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2071-2073.
(5) (a) Langford, C. H.; Vuik, C. P. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,
5409-5410. (b) Langford, C. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17, 96-103.
(6) (a) Dauben, W. G.; Hecht, S. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6102-6107.
(b) Inui, H.; Murata, S. Chem. Lett. 2001, 832-833.
10.1021/jo025837m CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/10/2002
J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5567-5577
5567

Blanc
SCHEME 1
SCHEME 2
SCHEME 3
SCHEME 4
The 2-nitroveratryl group was introduced in 1970 by
Patchornik and Woodward as a nitrogen protecting group
(Scheme 1).13
The substituents around the aromatic ring were opti-
mized to show a maximal reactivity at a wavelength of
350 nm. This relatively long wavelength was attractive
because of its harmless energy content for sensitive
amino acids such as tryptophan or tyrosine. To date, it
is still one of the only photolabile protecting groups
working at low energy (up to 420 nm), and we selected it
for this property. At the other end of the UV spectrum,
arylmethyl groups were known to be highly reactive, such
as the 3,5-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol derivatives.14 These
ester derivatives were shown to be inert at 350 nm and
above,15 making them an attractive complement to the
2-nitroveratryl system (Scheme 2).
SCHEME 5
At 254 nm, the lauroyl ester 2 was photolyzed 27 times
faster than the carbamate 1. However, when a 1:1
mixture of 1 and 2 was photolyzed, almost no selectivity
was obtained.15 This observation suggested an intermo-
lecular energy transfer. We reasoned that by shortening
the lifetime of the excited state of an analogue of 2, the
chemical reaction (i.e., the rupture of the benzylic C-O
bond) would favorably compete with the energy transfer.
The substitution of the benzylic methylene group with a
benzoyl moiety, as in benzoin 4, indeed maintained the
high reactivity at 254 nm, while suppressing the energy
transfer. Such esters were shown by Sheehan to be
unaffected in their photochemical reactivity by naphtha-
lene or even neat piperilene.16 The side product is a
substituted benzofuran 5, inert both chemically and
photochemically under the reaction conditions (Scheme
3).
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
P r ep a r a tion of th e Su bstr a tes. The benzoin ester
4 was prepared by acylation of benzoin 8, itself prepared
by the protocol of Chan.17 The condensation of the
lithiated thioacetal 6 with 3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde
proceeded quantitatively and was followed by the oxida-
tive deprotection of the thioacetal 7 with PhI(OCOCF3)2
in variable yields;18 great care in the stoichiometry (1.5
equiv) and following the reaction by TLC had to be taken
to minimize the formation of diketone 8a (Scheme 4).
(13) Patchornik A.; Amit, B.; Woodward, R. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1970, 92, 6333-6335.
(14) (a) Chamberlin, J . W. J . Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 1658-1660. (b)
Pincock, J . A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 43-49.
(15) Bochet, C. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6341-6346.
(16) (a) Givens, R. S.; Matuszewski, B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
6860-6861. (b) Sheehan, J . C.; Wilson, R. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1964,
30, 5277-5281. (c) Sheehan, J . C.; Wilson, R. M.; Oxford, A. W. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 7222-7228. (d) Pirrung, M. C.; Shuey, S. W. J .
Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3890-3897. (e) Shi, Y. J .; Corrie, J . E. T.; Wan,
P. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8278-8279. (f) Cameron, J . F.; Willson, C.
G.; Fre´chet, J . M. J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 923-924.
(g) Pirrung, M. C.; Bradley, J . C. J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1116-1117.
(17) (a) Stowell, M. H. B.; Rock, R. S.; Rees, D. C.; Chan, S. I.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 307-310. (b) Rock, R. S.; Chan, S. I. J .
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1526-1529.
5568 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002

Wavelength-Controlled Orthogonal Photolysis
SCHEME 6
SCHEME 7
SCHEME 8
Despite these measures, we could not avoid its presence,
together with unreacted 7.
The esters 10a ,b were prepared by classical acylation
of the 2-nitroveratryl alcohol with the corresponding acid
chlorides (Scheme 5). The esters 11a -f were synthesized
following different routes, depending on intrinsic reac-
tivity and starting materials availability. Hence, the
monoesters 11a ,b were prepared by acylation of 2-nitro-
veratryl alcohol with oxalyl chloride (1.0 equiv, 61%) or
malonyl chloride (1.0 equiv, 53%) (Scheme 6). The esters
11c,d were prepared by the opening of succinic or glutaric
anhydrides in the presence of pyridine and DMAP (11c:
88%, 11d : 39%). The ester 11e was prepared in a two-
step procedure, in an overall yield of 58%. First acylating
the alcohol 9 with 6-bromohexanoyl chloride in the
presence of triethylamine and DMAP, and then the
primary bromide was converted into a carboxylic acid by
oxidation with sodium nitrite in the presence of DMSO
and acetic acid.19 Finally, the diester 11f was prepared
in modest yield by acid-catalyzed esterification of pimelic
acid (24%). All these monoesters were converted into
diesters 12a -f by a DCC-mediated esterification with the
benzoin 8 (39% to 76%).
(18) (a) Stork, G.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 287-290.
(b) Routledge, A.; Abell, C.; Balasubramanian S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 1227-1230. (c) Lee, H. B.; Balasubramanian S. J . Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 3454-3460. (d) Cano, M.; Ladlow, M.; Balasubramanian, S.
J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 129-135.
(19) Matt, C.; Wagner, A.; Mioskowski, C. J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
234-235.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002 5569

Blanc
SCHEME 9
SCHEME 10
We also prepared 1,2-disubstituted cyclohexane de-
rivatives, to force the proximity between the two chro-
mophores. The cis-diester 15a was prepared by the
opening of the cis anhydride 13a with 2-nitroveratrol in
the presence of triethylamine and DMAP (71%), followed
by a DCC-mediated esterification with benzoin 8 (48%).
Unfortunately, the all equatorial trans-monoester 14b
failed to undergo further esterification.
In ter m olecu la r Discr im in a tion in th e P h otolysis.
To assess the relative reactivity of the esters 4 and 10a ,
we subjected a 1:1 mixture to a 254 nm irradiation during
5 min in acetonitrile.20 1H NMR analysis showed that
formation of acid 3 occurred in a 92% yield, while the
ester 10a was kept virtually intact (83%) as shown below
(Scheme 8). On the other hand, the same experiment at
420 nm reversed the trend, keeping intact the ester 4
(93%) with the release of acid 3 (92%).
higher reactivity of the 2-nitroveratryl ester at long
wavelength.20 This C11/C9 ratio is in fact a measurement
of the combination of nonspecific absorption and energy
transfer.23 The values obtained, although with room for
improvement, enter the synthetically useful range. In
particular, they show that the energy transfer influence
is minimal.
In tr a m olecu la r Discr im in a tion in th e P h otolysis.
The benefits of wavelength-controlled external group
discrimination would be more apparent in the orthogonal
cleavage of protecting groups. The term orthogonality
was introduced a few decades ago to designate groups
that can be cleaved in the presence of each other by
specific reagents and conditions, irrespective of the
sequence.10 In the case we describe here, we would
observe a chromatic orthogonality instead of chemical
orthogonality. Energy transfer is again central to this
issue, since both chromophores would be located on the
same substrate. The energy transfer rate is distance
dependent.7,8,9 The absence of mutual interference, at
least at the ground state, was confirmed by UV spectros-
copy. The spectrum of diester 12c (alternate line) was
almost exactly the sum (full line) of the spectra of 11c
and 18c (dashed and dotted lines) (Scheme 11).
This experiment clearly showed that it was possible
to select individuals from a mixture by an influence that
is external to the reaction mixture, thus achieving control
of a chemical process by means of an electromagnetic
wave. Further illustration is shown in the Scheme 9 with
1
the H NMR spectra of the mixtures before (trace a) and
after both irradiations (traces b and c). It is worth
mentioning the complex multiplicity of the CR-methylene
group in ester 4, due to the presence of a chiral center in
the protecting group. This is potentially a drawback, but
the practical enantioselective preparation of benzoin 8
has been previously published.21
Thus, we first investigated the photolysis of diester 12f
(n ) 5), with both photosensitive groups quite distant
(but with a flexible spacer). Irradiation at 254 nm
followed by esterification with TMSCHN2 gave 70% of
methyl ester 19f (isolated yield), with no ester 18f
We decided to exploit differential chromatic properties
to selectively release one or another compound in solution
by the choice of the wavelength (Scheme 10). Thus, we
prepared a 1:1 mixture of esters 10b and 4. The differ-
ence in the length of the hydrocarbon chain should have
a negligible effect on the reactivity but should allow a
convenient quantification by GC analysis after suitable
derivatization. The crude mixture resulting from the
photolysis at 254 nm for 5 min was esterified by the
addition of TMSCHN2.22 GC analysis showed a 90:10
ratio of C11/C9 esters 16a and 16b, confirming the much
higher reactivity of the benzoin at this wavelength. On
the other hand, the 420 nm irradiation for 16 h yielded
a 15:85 ratio, favoring the C9 ester, again confirming the
1
detected by H NMR analysis of the crude mixture. On
the other hand, irradiation at 420 nm and esterification
yielded 70% of methyl ester 18f, with no ester 19f
detected (Scheme 12).
To investigate the distance dependence, we gradually
shortened the length of the tether from n ) 5 to n ) 0.
The same range of selectivity was observed, regardless
of the tether length. Even the oxalate (n ) 0) gave
satisfactory results. The instability of the oxalic acid
monoester toward TMSCHN2 prevented, however, the
esterification and purification.24 These results are sum-
marized in Table 1. The total orthogonality was further
checked by the photolysis of the methyl ester 18e at 254
(20) By reactivity, we imply the net reaction rate under specific
conditions; it includes the quantum yield, the absorbance at the
wavelength, and all the experimental parameters.
(21) Pirrung, M. C.; Shuey, S. W. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3890-
3897.
(22) (a) Shiori, T.; Aoyama, T.; Mori, S. Org. Synth. 1990, 68, 1-7.
(b) Hashimoto, N.; Aoyama, T.; Shiori, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981,
29, 1475-1478.
(23) The width at half-height of the emission spectrum of a Rayonet
bulb was estimated as 35 nm.
(24) Wragg, R. T. J . Chem. Soc. 1965, 7162-7165.
5570 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002

Wavelength-Controlled Orthogonal Photolysis
SCHEME 11
SCHEME 12
TABLE 1
smoothly underwent the photolysis at 254 nm yielding
90% of monoacid 14a , as well as at 420 nm yielding
monoacid 22a (70%) (Scheme 13).
entry
diester
n
254 nma
420 nmb
1
2
3
4
5
6
12f
12e
12d
12c
12b
12a
5
4
3
2
1
0
92 (70)
78 (69)
96 (79)
94 (81)
94 (85)
86 (27)
70 (70)
87 (68)
85 (81)
85 (72)
83 (70)
67
Con clu sion
Our goal was to determine the outcome of a chemical
reaction by an influence external to the reaction medium.
Despite many pitfalls, the selective absorption of light
at a specific site and the possibility of keeping the energy
localized at this site were possible. An illustration of this
concept in the orthogonal removal of protecting groups
by using monochromatic light was achieved. This is the
first time that such approach was used in a preparatively
useful scheme. We are currently expanding the range of
functional groups to be protected. This article dealt with
only one specific illustration, and we are now exploring
a
Yield of 11a -f determined by 1H NMR; in parentheses, yield
of 19a -f isolated. Yield of 17a -f determined by 1H NMR; in
parentheses, yield of 18a -f isolated.
b
nm, indeed yielding dimethyl adipate 20 (95%), and by
the photolysis at 420 nm of the methyl ester 19e (85%)
(Scheme 12).
Conformationally constrained systems also allowed a
wavelength-based discrimination, and the diester 15a
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002 5571

Blanc
SCHEME 13
(845 mg, 5.1 mmol) in THF was added, and the mixture was
stirred for 30 min at 0 °C, warmed to room temperature over
1 h, and quenched with a satd NH4Cl solution. The organic
phase was washed with brine and dried over MgSO4. After
evaporation, 7 (1.85 g, quant.) was obtained as a thick yellow
oil: TLC Rf 0.34 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3) νmax
3590, 3015, 2960, 2910, 2840, 1730, 1600, 1520, 1465, 1430,
other applications, such as color-sensitive photorespon-
sive materials and solid-phase organic synthesis.
Exp er im en ta l Section
All reactions were carried out under argon, with magnetic
stirring, unless otherwise specified. Purchased chemicals were
used without further purification, unless otherwise specified.
Solvents were dried by distillation from drying agents as
follows: Et2O and THF (Na/benzophenone), toluene and
benzene (Na); MeCN and CH2Cl2 (CaH2); MeOH (Mg(OMe)2).
Flash column chromatography (FC): SiO2. Melting points
uncorrected.
1330, 1200, 1160, 1060 cm-1
1.92 (m, 2 H), 2.70 (m, 4 H), 3.56 (s, 6 H), 4.93 (s, 1 H), 5.99 (s,
2 H), 6.29 (s, 1 H), 7.30 (m, 3 H), 7.73 (d, J ) 8.1 Hz, 2 H); 13
;
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ
C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 24.8, 27.1, 27.3, 55.1, 66.3, 81.0, 100.8,
106.0, 127.5, 128.1, 130.7, 137.5, 139.4, 159.4; MS (EI) m/z (%)
362 (1, M+•), 195 (100), 169 (68), 121 (26), 77 (5); HR-MS
344.0904 (C19H20O2S2 calcd 344.0905).
Dod eca n oic Acid 1-(3,5-Dim et h oxyp h en yl)-2-oxo-2-
p h en yleth yl Ester (4). The dimethoxybenzoin 8 (67 mg, 0.245
mmol), triethylamine (50 mg, 0.49 mmol), and N,N-(dimethy-
lamino)pyridine (3 mg, 0.0245 mmol) were dissolved in anhy-
drous dichloromethane (2 mL). Lauroyl chloride (64 mg, 0.294
mmol) was then added, and the mixture was stirred at 25 °C
for 12 h. Ethyl acetate was added, and the mixture was washed
with 10% HCl and aq bicarbonate. The organic layer was dried
over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was
purified by FC (cyclohexane/AcOEt 10/1) to give 80 mg of 4,
as a colorless oil (72%): TLC Rf 0.53 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 4/1);
IR (CHCl3) νmax 2925, 2853, 1739, 1698, 1597, 1463, 1430, 1351,
1281, 1206, 1159, 1114, 1068 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 0.90 (t, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.3-1.5 (16 H), 1.69 (m, 2 H), 2.50
(m, 2 H), 3.78 (s, 6 H), 6.43 (t, J ) 2.3, 1 H), 6.61 (d, J ) 2.3,
2 H), 6.77 (s, 1 H), 7.42 (t, J ) 7.5, 2 H), 7.54 (t, J ) 7.5, 1 H),
7.95 (d, J ) 7.3, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 14.1, 22.7,
24.8, 29.1, 29.2, 29.24, 29.3, 29.4, 29.6, 31.9, 34.0, 55.4, 101.1,
106.6, 128.6, 128.8, 133.4, 134.7, 135.7, 161.2, 173.2, 193.8;
MS (EI) m/z (%) 454 (7, M+•), 349 (10), 255 (13), 254 (21), 183
(100), 105 (78); HR-MS 454.2792 (C28H38O5 calcd 454.2719).
2-P h en yl-[1,3]-d ith ia n e (6). 1,3-Propanedithiol (10.8 g, 0.1
mol) was added to a solution of benzaldehyde (10.6 g, 0.1 mol)
in dichloromethane (200 mL). A mixture prepared by the slow
addition at 0 °C of acetyl chloride (10 mL) to methanol (20
mL) in dichloromethane (20 mL. Caution: exothermic reac-
tion!) was slowly added, and the mixture was stirred at RT
for 3 h. Sodium hydroxide (1 N) was added, and the phases
were separated. The organic phase was washed with brine and
dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was evaporated. The
resulting solid was recrystallized twice from methanol, to give
the pure expected thioacetal 6 as white crystals (12.1 g, 62%):
mp 74 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3000, 2902, 1496, 1452, 1424, 1277,
3′,5′-Dim et h oxyben zoin (8). The dithiane 7 (3.63 g, 10
mmol) was dissolved in 15 mL of acetonitrile and 2.5 mL of
water. Bis(trifluoroacetoxy)iodobenzene (6.45 g, 15 mmol) in
10 mL of acetonitrile was slowly added at room temperature
to the vigorously stirred solution. After 1 h, AcOEt was added.
The organic phase was washed with a satd NaHCO3 solution
and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The
residue was purified by FC (silica gel). Recrystallization
(cyclohexane/AcOEt) gave 8 (1.53 g, 56%) as a white solid: TLC
Rf 0.19 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); mp 113 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax
3460, 3015, 2940, 2840, 1680, 1600, 1460, 1450, 1330, 1270,
1
1160, 1060 cm-1; H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.73 (s, 6 H),
5.85 (s, 1 H), 6.35 (s, 1 H), 6.47 (s, 2 H), 7.40 (t, J ) 7.5 Hz, 2
H), 7.54 (t, J ) 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.94 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz, 2 H); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 55.4, 76.2, 100.5, 105.8, 128.7, 129.1,
133.5, 134.0, 141.0, 161.3, 198.7; MS (EI) m/z (%) 272 (18, M+•),
167 (100), 139 (59), 124 (12), 105 (62), 77 (47), 51 (12); HR-
MS 272.1039 (C16H16O4 calcd 272.1048). Small amounts of
diketone 8a were also isolated.
(3,5-Dim eth oxyph en yl)ph en yleth an e-1,2-dion e (8a). Yel-
low oil; TLC Rf 0.31 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3) νmax
3015, 2940, 2840, 1675, 1595, 1460, 1445, 1355, 1160, 1065
cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.82 (s, 6 H), 6.73 (s, 1 H),
7.09 (s, 2 H), 7.50 (t, J ) 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.65 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 1
H), 7.95 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 55.7,
107.4, 107.5, 129.0, 129.9, 132.9, 134.7, 134.9, 161.1, 194.3,
194.4; MS (EI) m/z (%) 270 (7, M+•), 165 (100), 137 (26), 122
(17), 105 (29), 84 (12), 77 (28), 51 (10). HR-MS 270.0896
(C16H14O4N calcd 270.0892).
2-Nitr over a tr ol (9). To a solution of 6-nitroveratraldehyde
(10 g, 47.4 mmol) in 200 mL of methanol was slowly added
NaBH4 (0.9 g, 23.8 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 1 h. The solvent was then evaporated, and
the residue was partitioned between AcOEt and water. After
extraction with AcOEt, the combined organic layers were
washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated.
Recrystallization from AcOEt gave 9 (8,3 g, 82%) as a yellow
solid: TLC Rf 0.13 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 7/3); mp 155 °C; IR
1228, 1173, 1073, 911, 698, 470 cm-1 1H NMR (500 MHz,
;
CDCl3) δ 2.0-1.8 (1 H), 2.2-2.1 (1 H), 3.0-2.8 (2 H), 3.1-3.0
(2 H), 5.2 (s, 1 H), 7.4-7.2 (3 H), 7.48 (d, J ) 6 Hz, 2 H); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 25.1, 32.1, 51.5, 127.7, 128.4, 128.7,
139.1.
(3,5-Dim et h oxyp h en yl)(2-p h en yl-[1,3]-d it h ia n -2-yl)-
m eth a n ol (7). The dithiane 6 (1 g, 5.1 mmol) was dissolved
in 20 mL of dry THF and cooled to 0 °C. n-BuLi (1.1 equiv)
was added dropwise under argon, and the mixture was stirred
at 0 °C for 30 min. A solution of 3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde
(CHCl3) νmax 3020, 2940, 2850, 1520, 1330, 1275, 1080 cm-1
;
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 1 drop of DMSO) δ 3.94 (s, 3 H),
3.99 (s, 3 H), 4.96 (s, 2 H), 7.23 (s, 1 H), 7.69 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3, 1 drop of DMSO) 56.3, 56.4, 62.4, 108.0,
5572 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002

Wavelength-Controlled Orthogonal Photolysis
110.6, 132.8, 139.5, 147.7, 153.8; MS (EI) m/z (%) 213 (49, M+•),
196 (18), 180 (17), 168 (23), 151 (15), 136 (100); HR-MS
213.0664 (C9H11O5N calcd 213.0637).
organic phase was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4,
filtered, and evaporated. Recrystallization (cyclohexane/AcOEt)
gave 11b (160 mg, 53%) as a yellow solid: mp 160-161 °C;
IR (CHCl3) νmax 3025, 2940, 1730, 1585, 1525, 1460, 1380, 1330
1280, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 197 (17200), 242 (10600),
345 (6800); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.58 (s, 2 H), 3.96 (s,
Dod eca n oic Acid 4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl Ester
(10a ). The nitroveratrol 9 (54 mg, 0.253 mmol), triethylamine
(51 mg, 0.506 mmol), and N,N-(dimethylamino)pyridine (3 mg,
0.0253 mmol) were dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane
(1 mL). Lauroyl chloride (61 mg, 0.279 mmol) was then added,
and the mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 12 h. Ethyl acetate
was added, and the mixture was washed with 10% HCl and
aq bicarbonate. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4,
filtered, and concentrated. The residue was recrystallized from
cyclohexane/ethyl acetate to give 80 mg of 10a , as yellow
crystals (80%): TLC Rf 0.67 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 2/1); mp 74-
75 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 2929, 2850, 1736, 1587, 1523, 1464,
1334, 1278, 1171, 1068, 792 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 0.88 (t, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.2-1.4 (16 H), 1.69 (m, 2 H), 2.43
(t, J ) 7.3, 2 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 3.99 (s, 3 H), 5.52 (s, 2 H), 7.01
(s, 1 H), 7.73 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 14.1, 22.7,
25.0, 29.2, 29.26, 29.3, 29.4, 29.6, 31.9, 34.3, 56.36, 56.4, 63.0,
108.3, 110.5, 127.2, 140.1, 148.3, 153.5, 173.1; MS (EI) m/z (%)
395 (5, M+•), 200 (4), 197 (11), 196 (46), 181 (10), 180 (41), 168
(17), 167 (100), 152 (14), 151 (70), 137 (11), 136 (100), 95 (13),
85 (17), 83 (12), 73 (34), 71 (29), 69 (24), 67 (10), 60 (33), 57
(74), 55 (60); HR-MS 395.2304 (C21H33O6N calcd 395.2304).
3 H), 3.99 (s, 3 H), 5.64 (s, 2 H), 7.09 (s, 1 H), 7.74 (s, 1 H); 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 41.6, 56.3, 56.7, 63.8, 108.0, 109.6,
127.4, 139.2, 147.9, 153.9, 166.3, 168.4; MS (EI) m/z (%) 299
(4, M+•), 255 (12), 213 (9), 167 (32), 136 (100); HR-MS 299.0628
(C12H13O8N calcd 299.0641).
Su ccin ic Acid Mon o(4,5-d im eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Es-
ter (11c). 2-Nitroveratrol 9 (426 mg, 2 mmol), succinic
anhydride (201 mg, 2 mmol), and N,N-(dimethylamino)-
pyridine (24 mg, 0.2 mmol) were dissolved in 2 mL of pyridine
and 2 mL of chloroform (ethanol-free, stabilized on amylene).
The mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 24 h. Ethyl acetate was
added, and the solution was washed twice with 10% HCl and
extracted with satd NaHCO3 solution. The basic aqueous phase
was washed with ether, acidified with 10% HCl, and extracted
with AcOEt. The combined organic layers were washed with
brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. Recrystal-
lization (cyclohexane/AcOEt) gave 11c (550 mg, 88%) as a
white solid: mp 138 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3020, 2940, 1740,
1720, 1585, 1525, 1465, 1380, 1280, 1170, 1070 cm-1; UV
(MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 200 (17400), 242 (11100), 345 (6400); 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.74 (s, 4 H), 3.95 (s, 3 H), 3.98 (s, 3 H),
5.55 (s, 2 H), 7.00 (s, 1 H), 7.71 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3) 28.6, 28.7, 56.4, 56.4, 63.6, 108.2, 110.2, 126.9, 139.8,
148.2, 153.6, 171.5, 177.6; MS (EI) m/z (%) 313 (9, M+•), 286
(9), 213 (3), 196 (11), 167 (37), 136 (100); HR-MS 313.0803
(C13H15O8N calcd 313.0798).
Decan oic Acid 4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl Ester (10b).
The nitroveratrol 9 (215 mg, 1 mmol), triethylamine (202 mg,
2 mmol), and N,N-(dimethylamino)pyridine (12 mg, 0.1 mmol)
were dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane (10 mL). De-
canoyl chloride (229 mg, 1.2 mmol) was then added, and the
mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 2 h. Ethyl acetate was added,
and the mixture was washed with 10% HCl and aq bicarbon-
ate. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
concentrated. The residue was recrystallized from cyclohexane
to give 258 mg of 10b, as a yellow solid (70%): TLC Rf 0.5
(cyclohexane/AcOEt 4/1); mp 69-70 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 2916,
2849, 1735, 1578, 1526, 1509, 1459, 1437, 1387, 1318, 1273,
Glu ta r ic Acid Mon o(4,5-d im eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Es-
ter (11d ). 2-Nitroveratrol 9 (426 mg, 2 mmol), glutaric
anhydride (228 mg, 2 mmol), and N,N-(dimethylamino)-
pyridine (24 mg, 0.2 mmol) were dissolved in 2 mL of pyridine
and 2 mL of chloroform (ethanol-free, stabilized on amylene).
The mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 24 h. Ethyl acetate was
added, and the solution was washed twice with 10% HCl and
extracted with satd NaHCO3 solution (3 × 50 mL). The basic
aqueous phase was washed with ether, acidified with 10% HCl,
and extracted with AcOEt. The combined organic layers were
washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated.
Recrystallization (cyclohexane/AcOEt) gave 11d (255 mg, 39%)
as an orange solid: mp 110-111 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3020,
1226, 1171, 1066, 978, 870, 796 cm-1 1H NMR (400 MHz,
;
CDCl3) δ 0.88 (t, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.1-1.4 (12 H), 1.69 (q, J
) 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.42 (t, J ) 7.6, 2 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 3.99 (s, 3
H), 5.52 (s, 2 H), 7.01 (s, 1 H), 7.73 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) 14.1, 22.6, 25.0, 29.15, 29.21, 29.24, 29.4, 29.4,
31.8, 34.3, 56.3, 56.4, 63.0, 108.3, 110.4, 127.2, 140.0, 148.2,
153.4, 173.1; MS (EI) m/z (%) 367 (3, M+•), 321 (2), 196 (33),
180 (28), 167 (77), 136 (100); HR-MS 367.1984 (C19H29O6N
calcd 367.1995).
2980, 1740, 1710, 1580, 1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1070 cm-1
;
1
UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 198 (21100), 242 (11200), 345 (6300); H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.00 (m, 2 H), 2.43 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2
H), 2.50 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 3.96 (s, 3 H), 5.48
(s, 2 H), 6.98 (s, 1 H), 7.69 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)
19.8, 32.9, 33.0, 56.4, 63.3, 108.2, 110.5, 126.8, 140.0, 148.3,
153.5, 172.2, 179.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 327 (11, M+•), 286 (3),
196 (21), 167 (53), 151 (38), 136 (100); HR-MS 327.0949
(C14H17O8N calcd 327.0954).
Oxa lic Acid Mon o(4,5-d im eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester
(11a ). To a stirred solution of oxalyl chloride (127 mg, 1 mmol)
at 0 °C in 1 mL of dichloromethane was added dropwise a
solution of 2-nitroveratrol 9 (213 mg, 1 mmol) in 20 mL of CH2-
Cl2 (2 h). After the addition was completed, the mixture was
stirred overnight at room temperature. The mixture was
basified with a satd NaHCO3 solution, and the aqueous layer
was acidified and extracted with AcOEt. The organic phase
was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
evaporated. Recrystallization (cyclohexane/AcOEt) gave 11a
(174 mg, 61%) as a yellow solid: mp 189-190 °C; IR (CHCl3)
6-Br om oh exa n oic Acid 4,5-Dim et h oxy-2-n it r ob en zyl
Ester . 2-Nitroveratrol 9 (213 mg, 1 mmol), triethylamine (278
µL, 2 mmol), and N,N-(dimethylamino)pyridine (24 mg, 0.2
mmol) were mixed in 5 mL of CH3Cl (ethanol-free, stabilized
on amylene) at room temperature. To the mixture was slowly
added 6-bromohexanoyl chloride (153 µL, 1 mmol). The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Ethyl acetate
was added, and the solution was washed with 10% HCl, with
satd NaHCO3 solution, and with brine. The organic phase was
dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated to give the title
compound (390 mg, quant.) as a pure pale yellow solid: TLC
Rf 0.22 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); mp 64-65 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax
3030, 2940, 1740, 1710, 1580, 1525, 1330, 1280, 1180, 1070,
νmax 3020, 2940, 1740, 1585, 1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1170, 1070
cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 197 (20000), 243 (10900), 345 (6500);
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.88 (s, 3 H), 3.91 (s, 3 H), 5.62
(s, 2 H), 7.08 (s, 1 H), 7.67 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
56.2, 56.3, 64.4, 108.0, 109.8, 125.8, 139.3, 148.2, 153.6, 158.3,
158.9; MS (EI) m/z (%) 285 (17, M+•), 213 (26), 181 (34), 136
(100); HR-MS 285.0484 (C11H11O8N calcd 285.0484).
Ma lon ic Acid Mon o(4,5-d im eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Es-
ter (11b). To a stirred solution of malonyl dichloride (141 mg,
1 mmol) at 0 °C in 1 mL of dichloromethane was added
dropwise a solution of 2-nitroveratrol (213 mg, 1 mmol) in 20
mL of CH2Cl2 (2 h). After the addition was completed, the
mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The
mixture was basified with a satd NaHCO3 solution, and the
aqueous layer was acidified and extracted with AcOEt. The
873 cm-1 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.49 (m, 2 H), 1.70
;
(m, 2 H), 1.87 (m, 2 H), 2.43 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.40 (t, J )
6.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.95 (s, 3 H), 3.98 (s, 3 H), 5.49 (s, 2 H), 6.98 (s,
1 H), 7.71 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.0, 27.6, 32.3,
33.9, 56.4, 63.2, 108.2, 110.6, 126.8, 140.0, 148.2, 153.3, 172.7;
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002 5573

Blanc
MS (EI) m/z (%) 391 (3, M+•), 389 (3), 213 (1), 196 (22), 167
(59), 151 (42), 136 (100); HR-MS 389.0468 (C15H20O6NBr calcd
389.0474).
Malon ic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (3′,5′-
Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester (12b). Following the general
procedure, the monoester 11b (66 mg, 220 µmol) and 3′,5′-
dimethoxybenzoin 8 (60 mg, 220 µmol) in the presence of DCC
(68 mg, 330 µmol) gave 12b (76 mg, 62%) as a pale yellow
solid: TLC Rf 0.10 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); mp 159 °C; IR
(CHCl3) νmax 3025, 2940, 2840, 1740, 1700, 1600, 1525, 1465,
1330, 1280, 1160, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 202 (57100),
243 (22400), 287 (7400), 346 (7600); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 3.69 (m, 2 H), 3.74 (s, 6 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.94 (s, 3 H), 5.63
(ab, J ab ) 19.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.40 (s, 1 H), 6.56 (s, 2 H), 6.78 (s, 1
H), 7.13 (s, 1 H), 7.41 (t, J ) 9.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.54 (t, J ) 9.0 Hz,
1 H), 7.72 (s, 1 H), 7.90 (d, J ) 9.1 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) 41.2, 55.3, 56.5, 64.0, 78.7, 101.3, 106.7, 107.9,
109.7, 127.2, 128.7, 128.8, 133.8, 134.2, 134.5, 139.2, 147.9,
153.9, 161.3, 165.3, 166.3, 192.6; MS (EI) m/z (%) 553 (2, M+•),
296 (6), 272 (7), 196 (62), 167 (58), 139 (33), 105 (100); HR-
MS 553.1576 (C28H27O11N calcd 553.1584).
Su ccin ic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester
(3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester (12c). Following the general
procedure, the monoester 11c (69 mg, 220 µmol) and 3′,5′-
dimethoxybenzoin 8 (60 mg, 220 µmol) in the presence of DCC
(68 mg, 330 µmol) gave 12c (74 mg, 59%) as a white solid:
TLC Rf 0.09 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); mp 131 °C; IR (CHCl3)
νmax 3030, 2940, 2840, 1740, 1700, 1600, 1525, 1465, 1330,
1280, 1160, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 202 (57100), 243
(22400), 287 (7400), 346 (7600); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
2.82 (m, 4 H), 3.73 (s, 6 H), 3.83 (s, 3 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 5.54
(ab, J ab ) 15.1 Hz, 2 H), 6.38 (s, 1 H), 6.55 (s, 2 H), 6.71 (s, 1
H), 7.00 (s, 1 H), 7.39 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.52 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz,
1 H), 7.7 (s, 1 H), 7.90 (d, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3) 29.0, 29.1, 55.3, 55.4, 56.4, 63.5, 78.0, 101.2,
106.7, 108.1, 109.6, 127.6, 128.7, 128.7, 133.7, 134.4, 135.1,
139.5, 148.0, 153.8, 161.2, 171.6, 171.9, 193.1; MS (EI) m/z (%)
567 (1, M+•), 316 (9), 270 (4), 255 (4), 196 (76), 165 (63), 137
(11), 105 (100); HR-MS 316.1294 (C18H20O5 calcd 316.1311).
Ad ip ic Acid Mon o(4,5-d im eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester
(11e). A mixture of 6-Bromohexanoic acid 4,5-dimethoxy-2-
nitrobenzyl ester (390 mg, 1 mmol), sodium nitrite (207 mg, 3
mmol), and acetic acid (580 µL, 10 mmol) in DMSO was stirred
at 45 °C for 24 h. Ethyl acetate was added, and the organic
phase was washed several times with water. The solution was
extracted with satd NaHCO3 solution. The basic aqueous phase
was acidified with 10% HCl and extracted with AcOEt. The
combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The recrystallization (cyclo-
hexane/AcOEt) gave 11e (200 mg, 58%) as a yellow solid: mp
113-114 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3030, 2940, 1740, 1710, 1580,
1525, 1460, 1330, 1280, 1180, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ)
197 (16600), 242 (10600), 343 (6100); 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.71 (m, 4 H), 2.45 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.38 (t, J )
7.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.95 (s, 3 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 5.50 (s, 2 H), 6.98 (s,
1 H), 7.70 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.1, 24.3, 33.5,
33.8, 56.4, 63.3, 108.3, 110.6, 126.9, 140.1, 148.3, 153.4, 172.6,
178.7; MS (EI) m/z (%) 341 (6, M+•), 286 (3), 213 (1), 196 (18),
167 (51), 151 (37), 136 (100); HR-MS 341.1113 (C15H19O8N
calcd 341.1110).
P im elic Acid Mon o(4,5-d im eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Es-
ter (11f). Pimelic acid (470 mg, 2.94 mol), 2-nitroveratrol 9
(939 mg, 4.4 mmol), and p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate
(6 mg, 0.029 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (50 mL) and the
mixture was refluxed for 3 h with removal of the water using
a Dean-Stark apparatus. The toluene was distilled, and the
residue was diluted in ethyl acetate. The mixture was ex-
tracted with half-saturated sodium bicarbonate. The basic
aqueous phases were combined, acidified with 10% HCl, and
reextracted with ethyl acetate. A microcrystalline solid was
obtained (254 mg, 24%): mp 113-114 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3030,
2940, 1740, 1715, 1580, 1520, 1460, 1330, 1280, 1180, 1070
cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 198 (24800), 242 (11800), 342 (6800);
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.41 (m, 4 H), 1.69 (m, 4 H),
2.37 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 2.43 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.96 (s, 3
H), 3.98 (s, 3 H), 5.50 (s, 2 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 7.71 (s, 1 H); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.3, 24.6, 28.5, 33.3, 33.9, 56.4, 63.2,
108.3, 110.6, 127.0, 140.1, 148.3, 153.4, 172.8, 177.3; MS (EI)
m/z 355 (7, M+•), 286 (1), 196 (28), 167 (69), 151 (40), 136 (100);
HR-MS 196.0614 (C9H10O4N+ calcd 196.0610).
Glu tar ic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (3′,5′-
Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester (12d ). Following the general
procedure, the monoester 11d (72 mg, 220 µmol) and 3′,5′-
dimethoxybenzoin 8 (60 mg, 220 µmol) in the presence of DCC
(68 mg, 330 µmol) gave 12d (80 mg, 63%) as a yellow oil: TLC
Rf 0.07 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3) νmax 3025, 2940,
2840, 1740, 1700, 1600, 1520, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1160, 1070
cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 203 (56400), 244 (24400), 288 (7800),
1
345 (6500); H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.06 (m, 2 H), 2.57
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e Cou p lin g Rea ction . The
alcohol (220 µmol), the acid (220 µmol), and N,N-(dimethyl-
amino)pyridine (2.7 mg, 22 µmol) were dissolved in 5 mL of
chloroform (ethanol-free, stabilized on amylene). N,N′-Dicy-
clohexylcarbodiimide (DCC, 68 mg, 330 µmol) was then added,
and the mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 24 h. The mixture
was filtered and washed with 10% HCl, with satd NaHCO3
solution, and with brine. The organic phase was dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was purified by
FC (silica gel, cyclohexane/AcOEt).
(m, 4 H), 3.72 (s, 6 H), 3.91 (s, 3 H), 3.92 (s, 3 H), 5.50 (s, 2 H),
6.38 (s, 1 H), 6.55 (s, 2 H), 6.72 (s, 1 H), 7.00 (s, 1 H), 7.38 (t,
J ) 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.49 (t, J ) 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.69 (s, 1 H), 7.90
(d, J ) 7.2 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 20.0, 32.8,
32.9, 55.3, 56.2, 56.3, 63.1, 77.6, 100.9, 106.7, 108.1, 109.9,
127.2, 128.6, 133.5, 134.4, 135.1, 139.7, 148.0, 153.5, 161.1,
172.1, 172.2, 193.4; MS (EI) m/z (%) 581 (1, M+•), 316 (9), 255
(5), 196 (100), 167 (27), 136 (14), 105 (84); HR-MS 581.1874
(C30H31O11N calcd 581.1897).
Ad ip ic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (3′,5′-
Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester (12e). Following the general
procedure, the monoester 11e (76.2 mg, 220 µmol) and 3′,5′-
dimethoxybenzoin 8 (60 mg, 220 µmol) in the presence of DCC
(68 mg, 330 µmol) gave 12e (100 mg, 76%) as a yellow oil: TLC
Rf 0.12 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3) νmax 3025, 2940,
2840, 1740, 1700, 1600, 1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1160, 1070
cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 202 (48900), 243 (21200), 287 (6700),
Oxa lic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (3′,5′-
Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester (12a ). Following the general
procedure, the monoester 11a (63 mg, 220 µmol) and 3′,5′-
dimethoxybenzoin 8 (60 mg, 220 µmol) in the presence of DCC
(68 mg, 330 µmol) gave 12a (43 mg, 36%) as a pale red solid:
TLC Rf 0.09 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); mp 168 °C; IR (CHCl3)
νmax 3030, 2940, 2840, 1775, 1750, 1700, 1600, 1525, 1460,
1330, 1280, 1180, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 198 (24700),
242 (12300), 286 (6500), 344 (7000); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 3.75 (s, 6 H), 3.89 (s, 3 H), 3.96 (s, 3 H), 5.78 (s, 2 H), 6.43
(s, 1 H), 6.60 (s, 2 H), 6.89 (s, 1 H), 7.20 (s, 1 H), 7.42 (t, J )
7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (t, J ) 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.76 (s, 1 H), 7.92 (d, J
) 7.5 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 55.4, 56.4, 65.1,
80.0, 101.4, 107.1, 108.1, 109.3, 125.9, 128.7, 128.8, 133.8,
133.9, 134.1, 139.2, 148.3, 153.9, 156.2, 156.5, 161.4, 191.2;
MS (EI) m/z (%) 539 (1, M+•), 256 (3), 196 (16), 165 (35), 136
(8), 105 (100); HR-MS 539.1405 (C27H25O11N calcd 539.1423).
1
345 (5600); H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.75 (m, 4 H), 2.50
(m, 4 H), 3.74 (s, 6 H), 3.94 (s, 3 H), 3.95 (s, 3 H), 5.50 (s, 2 H),
6.39 (s, 1 H), 6.56 (s, 2 H), 6.73 (s, 1 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 7.39 (t,
J ) 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.50 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.70 (s, 1 H), 7.91
(d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.3, 26.9,
33.5, 33.8, 55.4, 56.4, 56.4, 63.2, 77.6, 101.1, 106.7, 108.2, 110.3,
127.2, 128.6, 128.7, 133.5, 134.6, 135.4, 139.9, 148.2, 153.5,
161.2, 172.6, 172.7, 193.6; MS (EI) m/z (%) 595 (1, M+•), 316
(3), 255 (3), 196 (100), 165 (17), 136 (4), 105 (32); HR-MS
595.2036 (C31H33O11N calcd 595.2054).
5574 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002

Wavelength-Controlled Orthogonal Photolysis
P im elic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (3′,5′-
Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester (12f). Following the general
procedure, the monoester 11f (38 mg, 110 µmol) and 3′,5′-
dimethoxybenzoin 8 (30 mg, 110 µmol) in the presence of DCC
(35 mg, 165 µmol) gave 12f (42 mg, 64%) as a pale yellow
solid: TLC Rf 0.15 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 7/3); mp 101-102 °C;
IR (CHCl3) νmax 3025, 2940, 2840, 1740, 1700, 1600, 1525, 1465,
1330, 1280, 1160, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 202 (50000),
243 (20200), 286 (6200), 340 (5200); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 1.41 (m, 2 H), 1.70 (m, 4 H), 2.45 (m, 4 H), 3.74 (s, 6 H), 3.94
(s, 3 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 5.50 (s, 2 H), 6.39 (s, 1 H), 6.57 (s, 2 H),
6.73 (s, 1 H), 7.00 (s, 1 H), 7.39 (t, J ) 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.50 (t, J
) 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.70 (s, 1 H), 7.92 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz, 2 H); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.4, 24.5, 28.4, 33.7, 33.9, 55.4, 56.4,
63.1, 77.5, 101.0, 106.6, 108.2, 110.4, 127.1, 128.6, 128.7, 133.5,
134.6, 135.5, 139.9, 148.2, 153.4, 161.2, 172.8, 172.9, 193.6;
MS (EI) m/z (%) 609 (1, M+•), 414 (1), 328 (2), 255 (5), 196 (100),
165 (63), 136 (19), 105 (73); HR-MS 609.2241 (C32H35O11N calcd
609.2210).
2940, 2840, 1730, 1700, 1600, 1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1160,
1070, 910 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 202 (62100), 243 (26000),
289 (6900), 343 (6900); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) major
diastereoisomer: δ 1.3-2.3 (m, 8 H), 2.8-3.2 (m, 2 H), 3.70
(s, 6 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 5.38 (ab, J ab ) 19.6 Hz, 2
H), 6.33 (s, 1 H), 6.50 (s, 2 H), 6.67 (s, 1 H), 7.01 (s, 1 H), 7.38
(t, 2 H), 7.50 (t, 1 H), 7.69 (s, 1 H), 7.88 (d, 2 H); minor
diastereoisomer: δ 1.3-2.3 (m, 8 H), 2.8-3.2 (m, 2 H), 3.69
(s, 6 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 5.47 (ab, J ab ) 19.2 Hz, 2
H), 6.29 (s, 1 H), 6.48 (s, 2 H), 6.70 (s, 1 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 7.37
(t, 2 H), 7.50 (t, 1 H), 7.67 (s, 1 H), 7.86 (d, 2 H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3), mixture of both diastereoisomers: 23.0,
23.6, 24.4, 25.4, 26.3, 27.1, 55.2, 56.3, 63.2, 77.4, 100.7, 106.5,
107.9, 109.8, 127.9, 128.6, 128.7, 133.5, 134.4, 135.2, 139.2,
147.8, 153.6, 161.0, 172.9, 173.0, 193.3; MS (EI) m/z (%) 621
(1, M+•), 316 (10), 255 (6), 196 (96), 180 (18), 165 (80), 137 (15),
122 (12), 105 (100), 82 (25), 77 (43); HR-MS 621.2233
(C33H35O11N calcd 621.2210).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e Selective Clea va ge of
P h otola bile P r otectin g Gr ou p s. In a quartz vessel, the
diester (20 µmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of acetonitrile. The
mixture was degassed by bubbling argon and stirred under
irradiation at 254 nm for 10 min or 419 nm for 24 h. The
solvent was evaporated, and the yield was determined by
NMR. The crude product was methylated with (trimethylsilyl)-
diazomethane (200 µmol) in 2 mL of a benzene/ethanol mixture
(1/1) for 1 h. The solvent was evaporated, and the residue was
purified by FC (silica gel, cyclohexane/AcOEt).
Oxalic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester Meth -
yl Ester (19a ). The diester 12a (10.8 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 254 nm for 10 min (NMR yield of 11a :
86%). The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100
µL, 2 M in hexane), and the purification gave 19a (1.7 mg,
28%) as a yellow solid: TLC Rf 0.10 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1);
mp 112-113 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3020, 2940, 2855, 1775, 1750,
1585, 1525, 1465, 1335, 1280, 1170, 1070 cm-1; 1H NMR (500
MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.95 (s, 3 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 4.00 (s, 3 H), 5.73
(s, 2 H), 7.12 (s, 1 H), 7.76 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)
53.8, 56.4, 56.5, 65.3, 108.3, 110.3, 125.3, 139.8, 148.6, 153.7,
156.9, 157.8; MS (EI) m/z (%) 299 (44, M+•), 196 (100), 165
(18), 151 (22), 136 (47); HR-MS 299.0639 (C12H13O8N calcd
299.0641).
cis-Cycloh exa n e-1,2-d ica r b oxylic Acid Mon o(4,5-d i-
m eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (14a ). 2-Nitroveratrol 9 (426
mg, 2 mmol), cis-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhydride (308
mg, 2 mmol), and N,N-(dimethylamino)pyridine (24.4 mg, 0.2
mmol) were dissolved in 2 mL of pyridine and 2 mL of
chloroform (ethanol-free, stabilized on amylene). The mixture
was stirred at 50 °C for 24 h. Ethyl acetate was added, and
the solution was washed with 10% HCl and extracted with
satd NaHCO3 solution. The basic aqueous phase was washed
with ether, acidified with 10% HCl, and extracted with AcOEt.
The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried
over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. Recrystallization (tolu-
ene) gave 14a (520 mg, 71%) as a yellow solid: mp 162 °C; IR
(CHCl3) νmax 3030, 2940, 2860, 1735, 1710, 1580, 1525, 1460,
1330, 1280, 1180, 1070, 910 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 197
1
(20000), 243 (10900), 344 (6500); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 1.50 (m, 4 H), 1.83 (m, 2 H), 2.05 (m, 2 H), 2.85 (m, 1 H),
2.98(m, 1 H), 3.94 (s, 3 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 5.51 (ab, J ab ) 15.1
Hz, 2 H), 7.00 (s, 1 H), 7.69 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) 23.5, 23.8, 25.8, 26.5, 42.4, 56.3, 56.4, 63.3, 108.1, 110.2,
127.3, 139.8, 148.1, 153.5, 172.9, 179.3; MS (EI) m/z (%) 367
(11, M+•), 213 (5), 196 (23), 180 (17), 167 (62), 151 (69), 136
(100); HR-MS 213.0653 (C9H11O5N calcd 213.0637).
Oxa lic Acid (3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester Meth yl
Ester (18a ). The diester 12a (10.8 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 419 nm for 24 h (NMR yield of 17a : 67%).
The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2
M in hexane). The 1H NMR spectrum of the crude product
showed only decomposition products.
Ma lon ic Acid (4,5-Dim et h oxy-2-n it r ob en zyl) E st er
Meth yl Ester (19b). The diester 12b (11.1 mg, 20 µmol) was
stirred under irradiation at 254 nm for 10 min (NMR yield of
11b: 94%). The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2
(100 µL, 2M in hexane), and the purification gave 19b (5.3
mg, 85%) as a yellow solid: TLC Rf 0.18 (cyclohexane/AcOEt
7/3); mp 103 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3025, 2930, 2855, 1740, 1585,
1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1150, 1070 cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 3.54 (s, 2 H), 3.77 (s, 3 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 4.04 (s, 3 H),
5.64 (s, 2 H), 7.16 (s, 1 H), 7.75 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3) 41.3, 52.6, 56.4, 56.7, 64.1, 108.1, 110.0, 126.9, 139.5,
148.2, 153.8, 165.8, 167.0; MS (EI) m/z (%) 313 (17, M+•), 224
(9), 196 (30), 167 (33), 151 (35), 136 (92), 57 (100); HR-MS
313.0776 (C13H15O8N calcd 313.0798).
tr a n s-Cycloh exa n e-1,2-d ica r boxylic Acid Mon o(4,5-
d im eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (14b). 2-Nitroveratrol 9
(426 mg, 2 mmol), trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic anhy-
dride (308 mg, 2 mmol), and N,N-(dimethylamino)pyridine (24
mg, 0.2 mmol) were dissolved in 2 mL of pyridine and 2 mL of
chloroform (ethanol-free, stabilized on amylene). The mixture
was stirred at 50 °C for 24 h. Ethyl acetate was added, and
the solution was washed with 10% HCl and extracted with
satd NaHCO3 solution. The basic aqueous phase was washed
with ether, acidified with 10% HCl, and extracted with AcOEt.
The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried
over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. Recrystallization (tolu-
ene) gave 14b (460 mg, 63%) as a yellow solid: mp 152 °C; IR
(CHCl3) νmax 3020, 2940, 2860, 1735, 1710, 1580, 1525, 1465,
1330, 1280, 1220, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 197 (20000),
243 (10900), 344 (6500); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.34
(m, 4 H), 1.83 (m, 2 H), 2.15 (m, 2 H), 2.70 (m, 2 H), 3.95 (s, 3
H), 3.98 (s, 3 H), 5.52 (ab, J ab ) 14.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H),
7.71 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 25.1, 28.8, 28.9, 44.2,
44.5, 56.4, 56.5, 63.4, 108.2, 110.1, 127.4, 139.7, 148.1, 153.6,
174.4, 179.7; MS (EI) m/z (%) 367 (5, M+•), 213 (3), 196 (17),
180 (12), 167 (49), 151 (49), 136 (88), 109 (29), 81(100); HR-
MS 367.1302 (C17H21O8N calcd 367.1267).
Ma lon ic Acid (3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester Meth yl
Ester (18b). The diester 12b (11.1 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 419 nm for 24 h (NMR yield of 17b: 83%).
The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2
M in hexane), and the purification gave 18b (5.2 mg, 70%) as
a yellow oil: TLC Rf 0.11 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3)
cis-Cycloh exan e-1,2-dicar boxylic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-
2-n itr oben zyl) Ester (3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester (15a).
Following the general procedure, the monoester 14a (80 mg,
220 µmol) and 3′,5′-dimethoxybenzoin 8 (60 mg, 220 µmol) in
the presence of DCC (68 mg, 330 µmol) gave 15a (66 mg, 48%,
mixture of two diastereoisomers, ratio 55/45) as a yellow oil:
TLC Rf 0.10 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3) νmax 3020,
ν
max 3025, 2930, 2855, 1740, 1600, 1460, 1330, 1280, 1070, 910
1
cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 201 (21300), 243 (6000); H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.56 (s, 2 H), 3.74 (s, 3 H), 3.75 (s, 6 H),
6.41 (s, 1 H), 6.58 (s, 2 H), 6.80 (s, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J ) 7.8 Hz, 2
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002 5575

Blanc
H), 7.52 (t, J ) 7 Hz, 1 H), 7.92 (d, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3) 41.0, 52.6, 55.4, 78.4, 101.3, 106.7, 128.7,
128.8, 133.6, 134.4, 134.9, 161.2, 165.9, 166.5, 192.6; MS (EI)
m/z (%) 372 (4, M+•), 241 (12), 196 (9), 167 (32), 105 (57), 57
(100); HR-MS 372.1187 (C20H20O7 calcd 372.1209).
mp 50-51 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3020, 2935, 2855, 1740, 1585,
1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1160, 1070 cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.70 (m, 4 H), 2.34 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.44 (t, J )
7.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.66 (s, 3 H), 3.96 (s, 3 H), 3.99 (s, 3 H), 5.50 (s,
2 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 7.72 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)
24.4, 26.9, 33.6, 33.9, 51.6, 56.4, 63.2, 108.3, 110.5, 127.0, 140.1,
148.3, 153.4, 172.6, 173.7; MS (EI) m/z (%) 355 (4, M+•), 224
(5), 196 (38), 167 (35), 151 (27), 136 (49), 55 (100); HR-MS
355.1277 (C16H21O8N calcd 355.1267).
Su ccin ic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester
Meth yl Ester (19c). The diester 12c (11.4 mg, 20 µmol) was
stirred under irradiation at 254 nm for 10 min (NMR yield of
11a : 94%). The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2
(100 µL, 2 M in hexane), and the purification gave 19c (5.3
mg, 81%) as a yellow solid: TLC Rf 0.13 (cyclohexane/AcOEt
3/1); mp 67-68 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3020, 2940, 2855, 1740,
1585, 1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1160, 1070 cm-1; 1H NMR (500
MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.72 (m, 4 H), 3.68 (s, 3 H), 3.96 (s, 3 H), 4.03
(s, 3 H), 5.57 (s, 2 H), 7.05 (s, 1 H), 7.73 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3) 28.7, 29.0, 51.9, 56.4, 56.5, 63.5, 108.1,
110.1, 127.3, 139.7, 148.1, 153.7, 171.8, 172.7; MS (EI) m/z (%)
327 (2, M+•), 224 (8), 196 (12), 167 (16), 151 (16), 136 (29), 55
(100); HR-MS 327.0949 (C14H17O8N calcd 327.0954).
Ad ip ic Acid (3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester Meth yl
Ester (18e). The diester 12e (11.9 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 419 nm for 24 h (NMR yield of 17e: 87%).
The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2
M in hexane), and the purification gave 18e (5.6 mg, 68%) as
a yellow oil: TLC Rf 0.25 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 7/3); IR (CHCl3)
νmax 3030, 2960, 2840, 1730, 1700, 1600, 1460, 1350, 1280,
1
1150, 1070, 910 cm-1; H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.70 (m,
4 H), 2.33 (m, 2 H), 2.50 (m, 2 H), 3.66 (s, 3 H), 3.76 (s, 6 H),
6.41 (s, 1 H), 6.58 (s, 2 H), 6.74 (s, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J ) 7.7 Hz, 2
H), 7.52 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.93 (d, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.2, 24.3, 33.5, 33.6, 51.5, 55.4, 77.5,
101.1, 106.6, 128.6, 128.7, 133.5, 134.6, 135.5, 161.2, 172.7,
173.7, 193.6; MS (EI) m/z (%) 414 (5, M+•), 255 (11), 165 (17),
143 (100), 111 (49), 105 (57); HR-MS 414.1668 (C23H26O7 calcd
414.1678).
Su ccin ic Acid (3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester Meth yl
Ester (18c). The diester 12c (11.4 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 419 nm for 24 h (NMR yield of 17c: 85%).
The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2
M in hexane), and the purification gave 18c (5.6 mg, 72%) as
a yellow oil: TLC Rf 0.15 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 7/3); IR (CHCl3)
νmax 3020, 2930, 2840, 1740, 1700, 1600, 1460, 1350, 1280,
1150, 1070, 910 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 201 (33300), 243
P im elic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester Meth -
yl Ester (19f). The diester 12f (11 mg, 18.4 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 254 nm for 10 min (NMR yield of 11f:
90%). The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100
µL, 2 M in hexane), and the purification gave 19f (4.8 mg, 71%)
as a yellow solid: TLC Rf 0.15 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 7/3); mp
79-80 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 2980, 2930, 2870, 1735, 1585, 1525,
1465, 1330, 1280, 1160, 1110, 1070 cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.40 (m, 2 H), 1.70 (m, 4 H), 2.32 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 2
H), 2.43 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.67 (s, 3 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H), 4.00
(s, 3 H), 5.51 (s, 2 H), 7.00 (s, 1 H), 7.73 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.5, 24.6, 28.6, 33.8, 34.0, 51.5, 56.4, 63.2,
108.3, 110.6, 127.0, 140.1, 148.3, 153.4, 172.8, 174.0; MS (EI)
m/z (%) 369 (5, M+•), 196 (72), 180 (18), 167 (67), 151 (50), 136
(100); HR-MS 369.1385 (C17H23O8N calcd 369.1423).
1
(9900); H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.68 (m, 2 H), 2.82 (t, J
) 7 Hz, 2 H), 3.68 (s, 3 H), 3.76 (s, 6 H), 6.41 (s, 1 H), 6.58 (s,
2 H), 6.76 (s, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J ) 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.52 (t, J ) 7.6
Hz, 1 H), 7.93 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)
28.8, 29.0, 51.9, 55.4, 78.8, 101.2, 106.6, 128.6, 128.8, 133.5,
134.5, 135.3, 161.2, 171.8, 172.5, 193.3; MS (EI) m/z (%) 386
(1, M+•), 255 (8), 166 (5), 115 (100), 105 (25); HR-MS 386.1337
(C21H22O7 calcd 386.1366).
Glu t a r ic Acid (4,5-Dim et h oxy-2-n it r ob en zyl) E st er
Meth yl Ester (19d ). The diester 12d (11.6 mg, 20 µmol) was
stirred under irradiation at 254 nm for 10 min (NMR yield of
11d : 96%). The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2
(100 µL, 2 M in hexane), and the purification gave 19d (4.8
mg, 70%) as a yellow solid: TLC Rf 0.07 (cyclohexane/AcOEt
3/1); mp 74 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax 3020, 2940, 2855, 1740, 1585,
1525, 1465, 1330, 1280, 1175, 1070 cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 2.01 (qt, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 2.41 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2 H),
2.50 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.67 (s, 3 H), 3.96 (s, 3 H), 3.99 (s, 3
H), 5.52 (s, 2 H), 7.00 (s, 1 H), 7.72 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3) 20.1, 32.9, 33.2, 51.6, 56.4, 63.5, 108.2, 110.5,
126.9, 140.0, 148.3, 153.5, 172.2, 173.3; MS (EI) m/z (%) 341
(9, M+•), 196 (66), 167 (52), 151 (44), 136 (91), 59 (100); HR-
MS 341.1097 (C15H19O8N calcd 341.1110).
Glu ta r ic Acid (3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester Meth yl
Ester (18d ). The diester 12d (11.6 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 419 nm for 24 h (NMR yield of 17d : 85%).
The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2
M in hexane), and the purification gave 18d (6.5 mg, 81%) as
a yellow oil: TLC Rf 0.09 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3)
νmax 3020, 2955, 2840, 1740, 1700, 1600, 1460, 1350, 1280,
1150, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 205 (44500), 243 (11700);
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.01 (m, 2 H), 2.55 (m, 4 H),
3.67 (s, 3 H), 3.76 (s, 6 H), 6.41 (s, 1 H), 6.58 (s, 2 H), 6.75 (s,
1 H), 7.40 (t, J ) 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.52 (t, J ) 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.93
(d, J ) 7.9 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 20.0, 32.9,
33.0, 51.6, 55.4, 77.6, 101.1, 106.6, 128.6, 128.8, 133.5, 134.5,
135.4, 161.2, 172.4, 173.4, 193.5; MS (EI) m/z (%) 400 (3, M+•),
255 (7), 165 (8), 129 (100), 105 (31); HR-MS 400.1512 (C22H24O7
calcd 400.1522).
P im elic Acid (3′,5′-Dim eth oxyben zoin ) Ester Meth yl
Ester (18f). The diester 12f (11 mg, 18.4 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 419 nm for 24 h (NMR yield of 17f: 70%).
The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2
M in hexane), and the purification gave 18f (5.4 mg, 69%) as
a yellow oil: TLC Rf 0.10 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 4/1); IR (CHCl3)
νmax 2980, 2930, 2870, 1730, 1700, 1600, 1460, 1380, 1350,
1260, 1150, 1070 cm-1; UV (MeCN) λmax (ꢀ) 201 (20900), 243
(5700); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.40 (m, 2 H), 1.68 (m, 4
H), 2.32 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2 H), 2.50 (m, 2 H), 3.67 (s, 3 H), 3.77
(s, 6 H), 6.42 (s, 1 H), 6.59 (s, 2 H), 6.75 (s, 1 H), 7.41 (t, J )
8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.53 (t, J ) 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.94 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 2
H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) 24.4, 24.6, 28.5, 33.7, 33.8,
51.5, 55.4, 77.5, 101.1, 106.6, 128.6, 128.8, 133.5, 134.6, 135.6,
161.2, 172.3, 174.0, 193.6; MS (EI) m/z (%) 428 (3, M+•), 255
(10), 166 (15), 157 (100), 125 (39), 111 (15), 105 (47); HR-MS
428.1854 (C24H28O7 calcd 428.1835).
cis-Cycloh exan e-1,2-dicar boxylic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-
2-n itr oben zyl) Ester Meth yl Ester (21a ). The diester 15a
(12.5 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred under irradiation at 254 nm
for 10 min (NMR yield of 14a : 90%). The residue was then
methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2 M in hexane), and the
purification gave 21a (6.3 mg, 83%) as a yellow solid: TLC Rf
0.24 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); mp 50-51 °C; IR (CHCl3) νmax
3020, 2940, 2860, 1730, 1600, 1520, 1460, 1330, 1280, 1170,
1
1070 cm-1; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.60 (m, 4 H), 1.80
Adipic Acid (4,5-Dim eth oxy-2-n itr oben zyl) Ester Meth -
yl Ester (19e). The diester 12e (11.9 mg, 20 µmol) was stirred
under irradiation at 254 nm for 10 min (NMR yield of 11e:
78%). The residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100
µL, 2 M in hexane), and the purification gave 19e (4.9 mg,
69%) as a yellow solid: TLC Rf 0.13 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 7/3);
(m, 2 H), 2.08 (m, 2 H), 2.91 (m, 2 H), 3.62 (s, 3 H), 3.95 (s, 3
H), 4.04 (s, 3 H), 5.55 (ab, J ab ) 14.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.09 (s, 1 H),
7.72 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 23.7, 26.2, 26.3, 42.6,
42.7, 51.7, 56.4, 56.7, 63.3, 108.1, 110.3, 127.7, 139.7, 148.0,
153.7, 173.2, 174.2; MS (EI) m/z (%) 381 (3, M+•), 196 (25),
5576 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002

Wavelength-Controlled Orthogonal Photolysis
169 (68), 151 (21), 109 (56), 81 (100); HR-MS 381.1388
(C18H23O8N calcd 381.1423).
hexane), and the purification gave 20 (1.5 mg, 66%) as a
colorless oil: TLC Rf 0.47 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 3/1); IR (CHCl3)
νmax 3030, 2955, 2870, 1730, 1585, 1438, 1370, 1230, 1160,
cis-Cycloh exan e-1,2-dicar boxylic Acid (3′,5′-Dim eth oxy-
ben zoin ) Ester Meth yl Ester (23a ). The diester 15a (12.5
mg, 20 µmol) was stirred under irradiation at 419 nm for 24
h (NMR yield of 22a : 70%). The residue was then methylated
with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2 M in hexane), and the purification
gave 23a (6.2 mg, 70%, mixture of two diastereoisomers, ratio
55/45) as a yellow oil: TLC Rf 0.53 (cyclohexane/AcOEt 7/3);
IR (CHCl3) νmax 3030, 2930, 2860, 1730, 1640, 1600, 1460, 1350,
1
1075, 1150 cm-1; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.63 (m, 4 H),
2.31 (m, 4 H), 3.65 (s, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) 24.3,
33.6, 51.4, 173.7; MS (EI) m/z (%) 143 (28), 114 (54), 111 (38),
101 (45), 83 (28), 74 (38), 59 (100), 55 (78).
The diester 19e (4.9 mg, 13.8 µmol) was stirred under
irradiation at 419 nm for 24 h (NMR yield of adipic acid
monomethyl ester: 85%). The residue was then methylated
with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2 M in hexane), and the purification
gave 20 (1.9 mg, 79%).
1280, 1220, 1170 cm-1 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) major
;
diastereoisomer: δ 1.2-2.2 (m, 8 H), 2.82 (m, 1 H), 3.06 (m, 1
H), 3.60 (s, 3 H), 3.75 (s, 6 H), 6.39 (s, 1 H), 6.57 (s, 2 H), 6.75
(s, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.51 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 1 H),
7.93 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz, 2 H); minor diastereoisomer: δ 1.2-2.2
(m, 8 H), 2.80 (m, 1 H), 3.06 (m, 1 H), 3.52 (s, 3 H), 3.76 (s, 6
H), 6.39 (s, 1 H), 6.58 (s, 2 H), 6.77 (s, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J ) 7.6
Hz, 2 H), 7.51 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.93 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz, 2 H);
13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) mixture of both diastereoisomers
23.2, 23.5, 23.9, 24.1, 42.0, 42.6, 51.5, 55.4, 77.3, 101.0, 106.5,
128.6, 128.8, 133.4, 133.7, 135.6, 161.0, 173.1, 174.0, 193.6;
MS (EI) m/z (%) 440 (2, M+•), 288 (43), 254 (38), 245 (16), 169
(100), 139 (16), 109 (35), 97 (13), 81 (67), 57 (25); HR-MS
440.1840 (C25H28O7 calcd 440.1835).
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was supported by the
Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 21-57044.99)
and by the Fonds Fre´de´ric Firmenich et Philippe Chuit.
The authors thank Prof. Alexandre Alexakis for his
generous support. The help of Dr. Caroline Winn in the
preparation of the manuscript is also gratefully ac-
knowledged.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Proton and carbon
NMR spectra for all cited compounds. These materials are
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Ad ip ic Acid Dim eth yl Ester (20). The diester 18e (5.6
mg, 13.5 µmol) was stirred under irradiation at 254 nm for 10
min (NMR yield of adipic acid monomethyl ester: 95%). The
residue was then methylated with TMSCHN2 (100 µL, 2 M in
J O025837M
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 16, 2002 5577