1004
H. Kato et al.
LETTER
Table N-Monomethylamination of Various Azides
(C6H5)3P is the ready solubility of (CH3)3P=O in water,
enabling the easy purification of the products. (CH3)3P is
currently commercially available as a stock solution (1.0
M / toluene).
R-N(H)CH3 4 (Yield/%)
run
1
substrate
method Aa)
method Bb)
76c)
74e)
Method A
N3
3a
Representative procedure for method A is described for
the reaction of the azide 3e: To a solution of 3e (59.3 mg,
0.177 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added a solution of
(CH3)3P in toluene (1.0 M, 0.4 mL) at room temperature.
After stirring for 1.5 h, CH3I (251 mg, 1.77 mmol) in
CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added. After stirring for 3 h at room
temperature, the reaction mixture was concentrated in
vacuo. The residue was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (2.0 mL)
and aqueous NaOH (2 M, 2 mL), and heated at 100 °C for
1 h. After cooling, the products were extracted with
CH2Cl2 (x5). The combined organic extracts were dried
(K2CO3), and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by pre-
parative silica-gel TLC (CHCl3 / MeOH = 94 / 6) gave 4e5
as colorless oil (49.2 mg, 86%).
O
O
O
68c)
73d)
86d)
81
77
2
3
4
O
N3 O
3b
N3
3c
OBn
OBn
BnO
O
81
The left-side column in the Table shows the application of
this protocol to various azides. In all cases listed, the ini-
tial two stages of the process, i.e. the reaction with
(CH3)3P and the methylation with CH3I, were complete
within 4 h at 25 °C, whereas the hydrolysis of the resulting
phosphonium salt was far more difficult than expected,
which was particularly the case for the sterically hindered
substrates. Thus, in the cases of 3a and 3b, the hydrolysis
was possible simply by heating the phosphonium salt in
aqueous THF (runs 1, 2), the hydrolysis for the cases of
3c–3f was only possible by heating under basic conditions
(1 M NaOH aq., 100 °C, 1 h).
N3
BnO
3d
N3
BnO
O
86d)
5
6
83
76
BnO
OCH3
3e
O
N3
BnO
80d)
BnO
OCH3
3f
Method B
a) (CH3)3P (2.0 eq.) / toluene, CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 1.5 h / CH3I (10 eq.),
CH2Cl2, 25 °C; b) (CH3)3P (2.0 eq.) / toluene, CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 1.5 h /
(HCHO)n (5.0 eq.) / NaBH4 (5.0 eq.), MeOH; c) hydrolysis was per-
formed in aq.THF at 80 °C, 12 h; d) hydrolysis was performed in 2
M NaOH, 1,4-dioxane at 100 °C, 1 h; e) the corresponding N,N-di-
methylamine was obtained in 18% yield.
Representative procedure for method B is described also
for the reaction of the azide 3e: To a solution of 3e (56.8
mg, 0.148 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) was added a solu-
tion of (CH3)3P in toluene (1.0 M, 0.3 mL) at room tem-
perature. After stirring for 1.5 h, (HCHO)n (22.6 mg,
0.753 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred
for 6 h at room temperature before treatment with MeOH
(2 mL) and NaBH4 (28 mg, 0.74 mmol) at 0 °C. After stir-
ring for 0.5 h, the reaction was stopped with saturated
aqueous NaHCO3, and extracted with CH2Cl2 (x5). The
combined extracts were dried (K2CO3), and concentrated
in vacuo. Purification by preparative silica-gel TLC
(CHCl3 / MeOH = 94 / 6) gave 4e5 as colorless oil (45.7
mg, 83%).
Although both methods worked well for various sub-
strates, it became apparent that method A is effective for
the less hindered azides, while method B for the hindered
ones. More importantly, method B is particularly suitable
for the application to the multi-functionalized compounds
in terms of the mild reaction conditions, as will be seen in
the following.
Preliminary attempts showed that (CH3)3P, rather than
(C6H5)3P, is the reagent of choice because of the superior
reactivity for generating the key iminophosphorane spe-
cies. The reactivity difference can be roughly grasped by
comparing the time required for the completion of the re-
action with cyclohexyl azide (ca. 0.5 M soln. toluene),
that is, (CH3)3P (1.5 h at 25 °C), (C6H5)3P (12 h at 25 °C
or 5 h at 80 °C). An additional advantage of (CH3)3P over
Gratifyingly, this latter protocol proved applicable to var-
ious substrates as shown in the right column of the Table.
Particularly attractive was that both of the two reaction
stages, i.e. the aza-Wittig reaction and the reduction,
proceeded nicely without respect to, if any, the steric
hindrance of the substrates (cf. method A, vide supra).
Synlett 2001, SI, 1003–1005 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York